Warning Issued Over Iranians Trying to Enter US: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Federal authorities issued a warning to Border Patrol agents after a leaked memo showed that Iranian nationals may be planning to enter the United States illegally with assistance from Mexican drug cartels.
Newsweek has contacted Customs and Border Protection for comment via email outside office hours.
Why It Matters
A Border Patrol alert issued a week earlier warned that the likelihood of Iranian sleeper cells inside the U.S. was higher than ever. Agents were instructed not to travel alone as a precaution. Iranians have been thrust into the national spotlight in the U.S. following President Donald Trump's recent strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.
The U.S. Border Patrol has encountered more than 2,500 Iranian nationals at the southwest border since the beginning of 2021. It remains unknown how many were released into the country under the Biden administration.
Migrants walking near the U.S.-Mexico border in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on December 19, 2022.
Migrants walking near the U.S.-Mexico border in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on December 19, 2022.
Christian Chavez/AP
What To Know
According to a memo obtained by NewsNation, Border Patrol received intelligence indicating that 35 Iranian nationals planned to cross the border between the Calexico and San Luis ports of entry from July 1 to July 5.
Agents patrolling the Calexico-to-San Luis corridor have been ordered to stay alert and be prepared for possible encounters.
The warning also suggested that the smuggling operation could be facilitated by powerful cartels, including the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) and Los Salazar.
Los Salazar is a relatively small armed wing of the Sinaloa Cartel, founded by Adán "Don Adán" Salazar Zamorano in the early 2000s. Primarily active in Sonora and parts of Chihuahua, the group specializes in trafficking cocaine across the U.S. border and has been linked to migrant smuggling operations. After Don Adán's 2023 extradition to the U.S., leadership passed to his brother Crispín Salazar Zamorano, who continues to maintain the group's close ties to the sons of "El Chapo" and control key smuggling corridors.
The CJNG emerged in 2009 from the Milenio Cartel's splintering and is led by Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, also known as "El Mencho." It controls major drug routes—especially for fentanyl and methamphetamine—throughout Mexico and has established a presence in all 32 federal entities and at least a dozen countries. It is one of Mexico's most powerful and globally networked criminal organizations.
On the first day of his second term, Trump signed an executive order designating Mexican drug cartels and other Latin American criminal groups as terrorist organizations. According to the order, the groups "threaten the safety of the American people, the security of the United States, and the stability of the international order in the Western Hemisphere."
What People Are Saying
The memo obtained by NewsNation said: "On Sunday, June 29, 2025, HSI Tip Line received information concerning 35 illegal Aliens of Iranian descent who may attempt entry into the U.S. between the Calexico and San Luis Port of Entry between July. 1, 2025 (today) until July. 5, 2025. Tipster advised that Los Salazars and CJNG may be involved."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Big Tech looks for some global wins
With help from Aaron Mak Big Tech might have lost its bid to freeze state AI rules, but on the global front, it's finding new opportunities to push back on regulation it doesn't like. Nearly six months after President Donald Trump took office promising to go after 'unfair' overseas digital regulation, the American tech industry has already notched one victory and is pushing for more. Canada folded first: Last week, after Trump threatened to stop trade with Ottawa, Canada agreed to shelve a digital services tax that would have collected billions of dollars from U.S. tech companies. Now, looking to press its case in Europe, half a dozen U.S. tech trade groups signed onto a letter last week urging the White House to take a stand against 'the EU's discriminatory digital regulatory policy.' Europe's Digital Services Act, which aims to curb harmful content online, has already come up as a topic of conversation between American and European negotiators, POLITICO's Ari Hawkins reported. European officials pushed back on reports that the Digital Markets Act, which regulates competition, is on the table, too. No trade deal is set yet, and Trump on Monday announced the tariffs that had been set to snap back this week will once again be postponed as he negotiates deals with U.S. trading partners including Europe. But the environment is giving American tech advocates the sense that the wind is at their backs. 'It's hard for me to see the Europeans just giving it up entirely, but they're going to have to make changes' to their digital rules, said Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the Consumer Technology Association, which counts Amazon, Meta and Apple as members. His group signed last week's letter to the White House, which named the DSA, DMA, digital services taxes, EU AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation among 'discriminatory, unreasonable and burdensome regulations and taxes in the EU.' American companies say they're unfairly targeted by European policies. In the latest example, Apple, which faces fines of €500 million, and Meta, which was fined €200 million, are challenging their penalties for breaching the EU's Digital Markets Act. The trade war that Trump opened seems to have created new avenues to push their case, and now the tech industry has other digital measures in its sights. 'Canada walking back the DST was an example of how everything is on the table in these trade negotiations,' said Daniel Castro, vice president at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonprofit whose supporters include the CTA, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Meta. To some extent, European tech groups are joining the push to defang the digital rules coming out of Brussels. More than 40 leaders of Europe's biggest corporations, including French AI powerhouse Mistral and the Dutch chipmaking equipment manufacturer ASML, urged Brussels in a letter last week to pause the EU AI Act for two years. They pointed to the challenges pointed out by Mario Draghi, the former European Central Bank chief, whose seminal report last September found Europe lagging in productivity. He blamed Europe's financial markets, costly energy, fragmented R&D and polarized politics. The push against the AI Act, from both sides of the Atlantic, seemed to land with a receptive audience. European Commission tech chief Henna Virkkunen told Politico last month she would not rule out postponing some of the AI Act. Nick Moës, executive director of The Future Society that favors tech regulation, said the push was 'emblematic of significant lobbying going on to try to water down or delete obligations and requirements imposed upon industry players developing AI.' But other tech regulations may be harder to crack. In late June, The Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. Trade Representative's office had compiled a draft trade agreement with the EU that included a list of tentative deals with Brussels, including a dialogue on the Digital Markets Act. According to the report, American companies would be exempt from DMA enforcement while talks went on. A senior member of the European Parliament told POLITICO's Jacob Parry the WSJ report 'is bullshit' and that 'DMA is not up for discussion.' Brzytwa, of the CTA, said he could see policymakers in Brussels struggling to outright repeal tech regulation that had been carefully crafted over years – but the enforcement might be lightened. 'What we're hopeful for is it becomes less burdensome on companies with respect to fines,' he said. Brzytwa said he saw the White House taking an expansive view of what might be possible on the global front. In Trump's first term, he ordered investigations into individual policies that burdened American companies. Now, however, Trump was targeting a wide range of digital policies. 'His aperture in terms of the issue set has broadened,' Brzytwa said. 'We haven't seen anything in writing but all the tea leaves seem to indicate…the issues we're citing are on the table.' Communications systems blamed for flood disaster As deadly floods devastate Texas, alleged failures in emergency communications infrastructure may have been a driving force of the destruction. Over the weekend, flash floods coursed through central Texas, resulting in the deaths of at least 80 people. Dozens of people are also missing. Some local officials have accused the National Weather Service (NWS) of making faulty forecasts, which the agency has disputed. Yet, emergency preparedness experts say that gaps in the technical measures to disseminate warnings are really to blame. 'The crux of this disaster is a failure of the last mile of communication,' Tom Fahy, legislative director for the NWS employee union, told POLITICO. Such alerts were transmitted wirelessly to handheld devices, and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Weather Radio. However, the messages can't reach people who don't have access to a cellphone or reliable service, or who've disabled such notifications on their devices. A summer camp where 11 people are missing notably had a policy against touchscreen devices that could've received weather alerts. In addition, people may miss radio communications if they don't happen to be listening at the right moment. Other counties in Central Texas have tried to solve this problem by installing outdoor weather sirens. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fatal floods in Texas draw howls from Dems over Trump cuts
The weekend's fatal floods in Texas have sparked immediate clashes in Congress over the federal role in preventing, or at least minimizing, the human toll of natural disasters. On one side are Democrats pointing to the Trump administration's cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS) as a potential reason the flood victims were not better forewarned. They're calling for investigations into why the alert systems in place were not more effective. On the other side are Trump's GOP allies, who argue that the president's efforts to slash federal agencies, including the NWS, were a non-factor in what they say was simply a freak natural calamity. They're accusing the Democrats of exploiting a natural disaster for their own political gain. The partisan dispute could hamper what is likely to be the coming debate over Congress's emergency response to the severe flooding in the Hill Country of Central Texas, where at least 90 people — including girls attending a summer camp — were killed as the waters of the Guadalupe River rose violently in the earliest hours of July 4. The massive flooding has put the GOP on the back foot as lawmakers try to defend the federal response and actions by the administration after roughly one-sixth of the weather service's workforce has been culled over the past six months. The cuts were part of Trump's strategy to use the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — an extension of the White House initially led by the billionaire Elon Musk — as a vehicle to shrink the federal government. Trump's allies said the failure occurred within the regional, not the federal, ranks. 'The challenge was at a local level,' Sen. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) told reporters at the Capitol on Monday, noting that 'some sort of wide-ranging notification should have been possible.' 'That didn't happen. That's not anything from the national level, but I think we need to take a look at how to prevent this. It was just a bad situation all around,' said Budd, who has dealt with the recovery of Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene for most of the past year. 'This was a horrible storm. … This was an act of nature.' Some Democrats, for their part, are highlighting the cuts to the NWS as a potential reason that warnings from weather experts and local authorities did not reach the victims in time to compel an evacuation. 'I'm personally praying that Donald Trump finally understands this is not a game — it's real life and there are serious consequences to playing politics with our security and emergency preparedness,' Ken Martin, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said in a statement. 'He was warned this could happen, he was told in clear terms that his weather service cuts could lead to needless deaths, and he didn't care,' Martin continued. 'As Donald Trump continues to ignore experts and gut our critical safety services, he is putting Americans everywhere in danger.' Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), who represents nearby San Antonio, raised similar questions. Responding to reports that several Texas offices of the NWS had vacancies resulting from Trump's DOGE purge, Castro said there needs to be an investigation into whether those cuts were a factor. 'On most days, obviously, you're not going to have a tragedy like this, but when you have flash flooding, there's a risk that you won't have the personnel to … do that analysis, do the predictions in the best way. And it could lead to tragedy,' he said in an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union' program. 'I don't want to sit here and say conclusively that that was the case, but I do think that it should be investigated.' Rep. Becca Balint (D), a Vermont liberal, was more forceful. 'We knew that these cuts would have deadly consequences,' she posted on X. 'The NWS budget isn't just a number that can be slashed because Trump and DOGE feel like it. These are real services that would have saved real people.' Amid the finger pointing, the Weather Service issued a statement on Monday dismissing the idea that understaffing in Texas offices might have contributed to the tragedy. Rather, the agency said it had additional forecasters in those regional offices in anticipation of heavy rains in the area, and that 'all forecasts and warnings were issued in a timely manner.' 'Additionally, these offices were able to provide decision support services to local partners, including those in the emergency management community,' the agency said. That has not prevented some local officials from accusing the NWS of giving what they consider misleading forecasts about the severity of the rain and the subsequent flooding. 'Everybody got the forecast from the National Weather Service,' said Texas Division of Emergency Management Chief Nim Kidd. 'It did not predict the amount of rain that we saw.' What can be done on the congressional side remains an unanswered question, and one that might take some time to become clear. Congress has typically responded to severe natural disasters — hurricanes, wildfires, floods — with emergency funding to help affected communities weather the damage and rebuild. But even that once-routine process has been hamstrung by the partisan polarization that practically defines contemporary politics. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said on Sunday that he feels 'helpless' for now until supplemental requests roll in from lawmakers in the area and a greater assessment of the damage is conducted. 'Every available resource has been deployed. The president, of course, is dialed in and watching this develop moment by moment, as we are,' he told Fox News. 'We will handle supplemental funding requests as they come in, but right now they're still trying to do rescue and recovery, and our hearts go out to all of them.' An outstanding question is whether any new emergency funding would have to be offset with changes elsewhere in the budget, or would be conditioned on separate policy reforms, as some Republicans have demanded of California wildfire aid. Those demands have delayed the delivery of emergency aid — and infuriated Democrats, who have accused Republicans of favoring red states over blue ones. 'Republicans spent months threatening to condition disaster assistance to devastated communities. That behavior was disgraceful,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) posted Monday on X. 'Our job is to help everyone in need.' At this point, lawmakers seem open to a supplemental funding package, though they admit it will take time to figure out a dollar amount. 'We want to take a look at it, but anything we can do to help,' Budd said, noting the December government funding bill included $100 billion for the state's recovery efforts. 'We want to, certainly, be open to that. 'But let's get through the immediate stage right now, take care of lives, save as many lives as possible, assess the damage and then come with an accurate request of what's needed,' he continued. 'There's enough emotion involved on this. Let's wait until we actually know, then let's take care of the people first.' Politics almost always play a role in disaster recovery. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Monday called on the inspector general at the Commerce Department to probe the vacancies at NWS to determine whether they played a role in the rising death toll. But lawmakers also appeared unified in arguing that whatever is to blame, there has to be a remedy to what happened. 'Look, the fact that you have girls asleep in their cabins when the floodwaters are rising — something went wrong there,' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said on Monday. 'We've got to fix that and have a better system of warning to get kids out of harm's way.'
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Shooter who opened fire on Border Patrol agents in South Texas identified by police chief
A shooter who allegedly opened fire on Border Patrol agents outside a federal building in McAllen, Texas, has been identified by authorities as 27-year-old Michigan resident Ryan Louis Mosqueda. An active shooter armed with tactical gear and a rifle opened fire upon Border Patrol agents as they arrived at a Border Patrol annex facility in McAllen, Texas, in the Rio Grande Valley on Monday. Law enforcement believes the attack was a purposeful ambush targeting Border Patrol officials. In a press conference after the shooting, McAllen Police Chief Victor Rodriguez identified the suspected shooter as Mosqueda, saying he allegedly opened fire on the agents, firing "many, many dozens of rounds" at the building. Rodriguez confirmed that the suspect was killed on the scene by agents returning fire. According to the police chief, there is no known motive yet for why Mosqueda allegedly opened fire on Border Patrol agents. He said the suspect is associated with an address in Michigan and that he arrived at the scene driving a vehicle with Michigan plates. He also mentioned that the suspect's car had spray-painting on it with "some language on it," possibly Latin, that he could not decipher. According to Rodriguez, Mosqueda was reported missing from an address in nearby Weslaco and "an hour and a few minutes later he was at this particular location, opening fire on a federal building." In a statement emailed to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for FBI San Antonio said that McAllen police received calls of shots being heard by a local Border Patrol facility near the McAllen International Airport at approximately 5:53 a.m. The spokesperson said the armed suspect, who they did not identify as Mosqueda but rather an "adult male," "engaged the law enforcement officers responding to the scene and officers returned fire." According to the spokesperson, one responding officer was injured in the gunfire and was transported to a local hospital for treatment. The officer is now in stable condition. The FBI representative said there is "currently no threat to public safety that we are aware of" and that the investigation is ongoing. According to a statement by DHS on X, two officers and a Border Patrol employee were injured during the shooting, including one shot in the knee.
