US jobless claims tick up in latest week; productivity improves in second quarter
(Reuters) -The number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits ticked higher last week, suggesting the labor market was largely stable even though job creation is weakening and it is taking laid-off workers longer to find new jobs.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose 7,000 to a seasonally adjusted 226,000 for the week ended August 2, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 221,000 claims for the latest week.
The labor market has slowed, with government data last week showing far fewer jobs were created in July than economists had expected as uncertainty over President Donald Trump's tariffs left businesses wary of adding workers. Moreover, employment gains in the previous two months were revised lower by nearly 260,000, a stunning reversal that prompted Trump to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics - a move that rattled investors and economists already anxious about the eroding quality of official U.S. economic data.
The latest data on new claims indicates employers are not yet turning to large-scale layoffs as the economy loses steam but are managing through attrition. That has helped keep the unemployment rate, at 4.2% in July, relatively low even while job growth has slowed. Declining labor supply amid the White House's immigration crackdown is also helping to stave off a jump in the jobless rate.
Employers' hesitancy to increase hiring means there are fewer jobs for those being laid off. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, rose to a seasonally adjusted 1.974 million during the week ending July 26, the claims report showed.
Meanwhile, the Labor Department also said worker productivity rebounded in the second quarter, easing a surge in labor costs at the start of the year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Trump backers finally reap rewards after years of debanking, black-listing
The business of MAGA is booming. There's crypto, and of course The Donald's signature country clubs and golf courses that people are willing to pay big bucks to get into. There's also a quieter but increasingly lucrative business of consulting corporate America on how best to deal with Trumpers who control the vast administrative state, On The Money has learned. Yes, knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. 3 Knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. Donald Pearsall/NY Post Design In fact, being associated with Trump for many people who served during his first term was for a time the employment version of catching leprosy, former Trump officials tell me. Their comments came following my scoop that JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. You can be like me and not condone the January 6 upheaval and still shudder at the thought that Trump's actions that day means he can't have a private business life, which is what the Biden administrative state working with the nation's two largest banks appeared to have tried to do, people at the banks confirm. But the blackballing apparently didn't stop at the banking business – it spanned across corporate America, sources told On The Money. It included major corporations throwing away the resumes of very capable people, being excommunicated from teaching posts at major universities. It meant being kicked off the speaking circuit, and no book deals, all for working for a time with Trump during his first term, former officials said. Here's how one former top Trump economic aide put it: 'The entire weight of government came out against Trump and people who worked for him including yours truly. It went beyond banking. People couldn't get hired. People couldn't get speaking gigs. It was really, really bad all fueled by the Biden administration.' 3 JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. AFP/Getty Images How it was communicated by the Biden people to big companies to blacklist Trump and his people isn't quite known. Big business, however, is highly regulated. You can see how having a former Trumper in a top role at a major corporation, or Trump's businesses holding accounts at JPMorgan or Bank of America, could bring scrutiny or worse. So why take the risk? Most major companies and banks didn't, my reporting shows. The people from Trump who did land not long after January 6 and Trump's first term ended did so in safe spaces for conservative voices, such as my employer, Fox News (which shares corporate ownership with The Post) and right-of-center think tanks. Of course, many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation, not to mention its embrace of woke culture. 3 Many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation. REUTERS Trump was re-elected president in 2024 and corporate America began to open up to former Trump acolytes, But until recently, when Trump actually got back into the White House for Round 2, their job prospects never matched what those who served in the Obama administration experienced. They immediately snapped up jobs on corporate boards, and landed plum assignments in public policy and public affairs the minute Barack left office. Gary Goldstein, CEO of Whitney Partners, an executive search firm, said part of the problem with being associated with Trump wasn't just his deeds during January 6, or even his election denialism after he lost to Biden in 2020. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Rather, it stems from the fact that businesses hate controversy and before he was president, Trump was a polarizing figure in New York, known more for his brash persona and reality TV show, Goldstein tells Fox Business's Teuta Dedvukaj. 'Anyone who is in business and gets involved in politics is putting themselves in harm's way,' Goldstein said. 'It's better to be agnostic. Once you cross that line, especially with someone like Trump, you can't un-ring that bell.' Well, being elected president a second time has done a lot for un-ringing. JPM and BofA will now gladly take The Donald's money, and the banks are all hiring consultants and flacks to deal with MAGA 2.0. Finally it's getting profitable to be MAGA.
Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
Report: Tariffs could drive up Utah car insurance rates by year's end
Car insurance rates in Utah could rise more by the end of the year thanks to tariffs, a new projection finds. Why it matters: The analysis illustrates just one more way Americans pay for higher tariffs. Driving the news: The nationwide average annual cost of full-coverage car insurance could rise 7% between June and December if tariffs stay in effect, compared to 4% otherwise, per a new report from insurance-comparison platform Insurify. In raw terms, the average cost could hit $2,472 with tariffs, compared to $2,402 without them. For Utahns, rates are expected to climb about 7.6% with tariffs to $2,006 or 4.6% to $1,950 without. Between the lines: That's based on the tariff picture as of Aug. 1, reflecting the Trump administration's recently lowered rates on cars and auto parts from Japan, South Korea and Europe. By the numbers: Utahns typically pay about $1,978 for full coverage auto insurance annually, or nearly $165 a month, which is about 17% lower than the national average. Between the lines: Tariffs affect insurance rates by increasing the costs of imported parts needed for repairs. Inflation, accident frequency, and claims due to extreme weather also impact rates, among other factors. What they're saying: "Initially, car insurance companies looked at 2025 as a year to keep insurance rates stable, or even cut them," per Insurify's report. Claims volume could also fall, and insurance regulators could fight price hikes.
Miami Herald
a minute ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's firing of labor data chief: a terrible gamble with America's future
President Trump's firing of a top U.S. statistics official after she reported bad economic news has sparked fears that he will begin manipulating government data to paint a rosier picture. When I heard the news, my thoughts immediately turned to my native country, Argentina, where a similar event led to economic mayhem. Curious about whether the U.S. economy risks a similar loss of trust and a massive capital flight like the one that hit Argentina more than a decade ago, I called several former top Argentine officials and economists who have inside knowledge of what happened in that country. It turns out there are striking similarities — and some important differences. Trump fired Commissioner of Labor Statistics Erika McEntarfer, a career bureaucrat, on Aug. 1, complaining without showing evidence that she had manipulated disappointing new hiring figures released that day. In essence, he fired the messenger of bad news. Trump said in his social media that 'today's jobs numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' He announced that she would be replaced with 'someone much more competent and qualified.' The news drew alarm bells, especially since it followed months of repeated threats by Trump to Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell for resisting his calls to lower U.S. interest rates. The credibility of U.S. economic data, a bedrock of the U.S. and global economies, was suddenly in question. A headline in The Wall Street Journal read, 'The president's move throws the quality of America's statistical apparatus into question.' The message from economists was clear: If U.S. data are no longer trusted, foreigners and domestic investors will take their money elsewhere. Swiss bankers may already be salivating. Martin Redrado was the president of Argentina's Central Bank at the time when late President Nestor Kirchner intervened in his country's official INDEC economic statistics institute in 2007, and he said it was 'the beginning of Argentina slow-motion financial collapse.' Redrado told me that the Central Bank he presided over even started disregarding the INDEC's official statistics in its published reports, and instead relied on private economic figures. Between 2007 and 2015, Argentina's populist government fired growing numbers of respected INDEC statisticians, a move that further damaged the credibility of official data and drove investors to sell Argentine bonds. 'The United States still has stronger institutions than Argentina had at the time,' Redrado told me. 'But if Trump fired the head of the Federal Reserve, it would put the United States in the same category as Argentina was back then.' Fausto Spotorno, head of the Institute of Economics at Argentina's UADE University, told me that people shouldn't read too much into the fact that the U.S. stock market didn't sink on its first session after McEntarfer's dismissal. 'In Argentina, the loss of confidence in government data was a gradual process,' Spotorno said. 'It took years of growing government intervention in official statistics before the markets panicked.' Typically, after the 2007 intervention of the INDEC, the Kirchner administration would privately press food companies to lower the prices on some of their products, and then order government statisticians to pick those goods to measure inflation, Spotorno said. In effect, the government would tell a company, 'Lower the price of that product, and do whatever you need to do with the prices of your other products.' Then, it would ask government statisticians to measure the lower-priced goods when measuring inflation data. Marcelo Giugale, a former top World Bank official and Georgetown University economist who follows Argentina's economy closely, told me that Trump's firing of the Labor Department's top statistician 'is very bad news for the United States and for the world.' 'It's like if the pilot of the world's biggest aircraft sees that the plane is losing altitude, and instead of checking what's going wrong, and consulting with the co-pilot and experts on the ground, takes a hammer and smashes the dashboard,' he said. 'That's what Trump did by firing McEntarfer.' Giugale added that America still has other government statistics offices that are likely to continue putting out truthful figures, but cautioned that people's distrust may extend to them. 'Distrust is contagious,' he said. 'If people start distrusting labor statistics, they may soon distrust inflation, tax collection and all other government figures,' he said. 'Likewise, if the government puts out good economic news, nobody may believe them.' In Argentina, lack of trust in government data led to capital flight, rampant inflation and a debt crisis. Argentina is still trying to recover investors' confidence, even after President Javier Milei started making draconian free market reforms in 2024. The bottom line is that Trump's firing of the statistician in charge of employment numbers may not by itself be a harbinger of disaster. But if he follows through with his threats to effectively take control of the Federal Reserve, as he has done with the Justice Department and other government agencies, it may be the beginning of the end of America — and the U.S. dollar — as the world's most stable economy. Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog:
