logo
U.N. nuclear inspectors depart Tehran after Iran ends cooperation

U.N. nuclear inspectors depart Tehran after Iran ends cooperation

UPIa day ago
July 4 (UPI) -- U.N. nuclear inspectors on Friday departed from Iran two days after the Middle Eastern nation suspended cooperation with the program and weeks after the United States and Israel bombed nuclear sites.
Rafael Grossi, the inspector general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, had aimed to assess the uranium-enrichment facilities and see whether alleged nuclear bomb efforts had been set back.
IAEA hasn't reported the inspectors findings.
They remained in the capital, Tehran, during the conflict between Israel and Iran.
"An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict," the U.N. agency posted Friday on X.
"IAEA Director General rafaelmgrossi reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible."
On Wednesday, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian signed legislation that halts cooperation with the agency, blocking oversight of Iran's nuclear program.
Inspectors will not be allowed to visit nuclear sites without approval from Iran's Supreme National Security Council.
Iranian lawmakers gave two conditions for resuming cooperation, according to state media. The safety of its nuclear program and scientists is secured, and an acknowledgment about its right under international law to enrich uranium.
The spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the Iranian law was "obviously concerning."
"I think the secretary-general has been very consistent in his call for Iran to cooperate with the IAEA, and, frankly, for all countries to work closely with the IAEA on nuclear issues," Stephane Dujarric told reporters.
Iran has been critical of a resolution on June 12 by the IAEA that accused Iran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations.
This was one day before Israel attacked.
Iran and the United States had been engaged in talks for a nuclear deal. The U.S. used B-2 bombers to send missiles deep underground.
"We are for diplomacy," Iran's deputy foreign minister, Majid Takht-Ravanchi, told NBC News on Thursday, adding the U.S. government needs "to convince us that they are not going to use military force while we are negotiating. That is an essential element for our leadership to be in a position to decide about the future round of talks."
President Donald Trump, who doesn't want Iran to be enriching uranium, said that the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites "obliterated" the program.
Grossi earlier said that Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium remains unaccounted for, and the program may have been delayed only a few months, and not years.
"It can be, you know, described in different ways, but it's clear that what happened in particular in Fordo, Natanz, Isfahan, where Iran used to have and still has, to some degree, capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree," Grossi said in a CBS News interview on Saturday. "Some is still standing. So there is, of course, an important setback in terms of those of those capabilities."
Iran has contended its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes but the agency reported in May that Iran stockpiled about 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity, enough to build nine bomb. That's up 50% since February.
In December, the IAEA said Iran was rapidly moving closer to the 90% threshold needed for weapons-grade material.
In 2018, Trump unilaterally exited the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and reimposed harsh sanctions during his first term in office.
In 2015, Iran reached a deal with the United States, Britain, Germany, France, Russia, China and the European Union.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Florida lawmakers denied access to 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility
Florida lawmakers denied access to 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility

UPI

time21 minutes ago

  • UPI

Florida lawmakers denied access to 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility

Activists attend the 'Stop Alligator Alcatraz' protest in front of the entrance of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Fla., on June 28. Photo by Cristobal Herrera-Ulashkevich/EPA July 5 (UPI) -- Five Florida state Democrat lawmakers on Thursday were denied access to the state's newly opened "migrant" detention facility that has been dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz." State Representatives Michele Rayner, Anna Eskamani and Angie Nixon and Senators Carlos Guillermo Smith and Shevrin Jones were turned away while attempting to tour the facility, The Hill reported. State law enforcement officers from several agencies stopped the lawmakers from entering the facility after showing up for an unannounced inspection of the facility that President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis toured on Tuesday and before detainees arrived there. Safety concerns cited Eskamani said they were told they could not tour the facility due to "safety concerns," CNN reported. "If it's unsafe for us, how is it safe for the detainees?" Eskamani said she asked the general counsel for the Florida Division of Emergency Management. The Florida lawmakers said they have the legal authority to inspect the detention facility. "Florida law gives legislators the authority to make unannounced visits to state-run facilities," Jones said in a post on X made on Thursday afternoon. Jones said the group went to the detention facility "to inspect conditions and check on the well-being of the people inside." A group statement issued on Thursday accuses state officials of a "blatant abuse of power and an attempt to conceal human rights violations from the public eye." The facility received its first 500 detainees midweek and eventually will be capable of holding up to 3,000 detainees while undergoing deportation proceedings. Not a federal facility The detention facility is located in the Everglades along U.S. 41, about 70 miles west of Miami. A local airport previously occupied the site, which Florida officials converted into a detention facility in eight days, DeSantis said while touring it with Trump on Tuesday. Although Trump toured it, the facility is not a federal operation. "The Department of Homeland Security has not implemented, authorized, directed or funded Florida's temporary detention center," DHS attorneys said in a court filing made on Thursday, the Miami Herald reported. The filing is in response to a lawsuit challenging the detention facility's purpose, which prompted the Department of Justice to defend its existence. The DOJ "has defended President Trump's immigration agenda in court since day one and we are proud to protect 'Alligator Alcatraz' from baseless, politically motivated legal schemes," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement issued on Thursday. Florida officials are considering adding two more such facilities to help hold and process detainees who are undergoing deportation proceedings. The Department of Defense is deploying 200 Marines to Florida to assist with logistical and administrative support.

Iran nuclear deal without missile limits is a strategic mistake
Iran nuclear deal without missile limits is a strategic mistake

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Iran nuclear deal without missile limits is a strategic mistake

Did you know that 10,000 ballistic missiles — each carrying one to two tons of explosives — could cause as much, or even more, devastation than a Hiroshima-style atomic bomb? Before Israel's three strikes on Iranian territory — the most consequential in June 2025 — Iran was racing toward mass production of precision-guided ballistic missiles. This wasn't hypothetical. Tehran was preparing to flood Israel's airspace with thousands of advanced rockets designed to overwhelm its multi-layered defense systems: Arrow, David's Sling and Iron Dome. The editor-in-chief of The Times of Israel wrote that it was the sober, unified judgment of Israel's intelligence and military chiefs that led to the preemptive strike. The country wasn't just weeks from a nuclear breakout — it was also on the verge of deploying a missile arsenal with the power to incapacitate Israel's economy, overwhelm its defenses and inflict mass civilian casualties. Former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani once infamously called Israel a 'one-bomb country.' Today, that warning must be updated: Israel is now a '10,000-missile country.' According to veteran Israeli journalist Ron Ben-Yishai, Israeli intelligence concluded that Tehran was preparing to produce 10,000 ballistic missiles with the destructive force equivalent to two nuclear bombs. The hope that Israel's October 2024 strike on Iran's solid-fuel production sites would slow the program proved overly optimistic. Iran responded by accelerating production. Israel's Foreign Ministry later stated that Iran was moving to industrial-scale missile manufacturing. Iran was on track to become the world's leading missile producer, including intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching Europe, with payloads large enough to level city blocks. As one senior Israeli official explained, 'We acted because of two existential threats. One was nuclear …, the other ballistic… That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb.' While much of the world has remained narrowly focused on uranium enrichment, Israeli intelligence had already concluded that Iran's ballistic missile buildup posed an equally urgent and imminent danger. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu explicitly cited Iran's missile expansion as a principal reason for the June 2025 operation. Yet global media coverage of the 12-day Iran-Israel conflict largely overlooked the larger strategic rationale for Israel's strikes. Headlines focused on the limited number of Iranian missiles that penetrated Israeli defenses. What was missed was the far more dangerous trajectory Iran was on: building a missile force capable of saturating and bypassing even the most sophisticated defense systems. That is why recent reports that President Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, may be exploring a nuclear-only agreement with Iran — one that excludes any restrictions on missile development — have deeply alarmed Israel's defense and intelligence establishment. Trump has denied offering sanctions relief or cash incentives, but the concern remains that the United States may be entertaining a deal that fails to address Iran's expanding missile threat. This is not a theoretical oversight. Iran has already adapted its military posture following each major clash — April 2024, October 2024 and June 2025 — improving its ability to evade Israeli and U.S. defenses. Unlike the short-range, low-yield rockets launched by proxy groups like Hezbollah or the Houthis, Iran's homegrown missiles are longer-range, heavier and more destructive — designed to reach deep into Israel's urban centers and critical infrastructure, producing the maximum amount of terror on the citizenry. A nuclear-only deal with sanctions relief that ignores Iran's missile program would not be prudent diplomacy. It would be strategic self-deception. Such an agreement would embolden the regime in Tehran, undercut Israeli deterrence, and almost certainly invite further escalation across the region. Regional instability would follow. As Israel National News recently reported, Iran's missile arsenal is dispersed across hardened bunkers, civilian neighborhoods and remote mountain ranges. These missiles are not going to disappear with a handshake. Rolling back this threat requires sustained diplomatic pressure, rigorous inspections, enforceable limits, and consequences for transgressions, something Iran is loath to agree to. Let's hope reports of a flawed nuclear deal leaving out the equally dangerous missile threat are mistaken. However, if they're accurate, Congress and the American people need to understand what is at stake. An effective agreement must shut down all of Iran's escalatory pathways, not just the nuclear one. Failing to address Iran's missile program in negotiations would be a strategic error for the U.S. and an existential risk for our ally, Israel. Eric R. Mandel is the director of the Middle East Political Information Network and senior security editor for the Jerusalem Post's Jerusalem Report.

BRICS countries set to criticize U.S. tariffs
BRICS countries set to criticize U.S. tariffs

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

BRICS countries set to criticize U.S. tariffs

1 of 2 | The so-called BRICS group of countries is reportedly set to issue a formal statement criticizing the United States current tariff situation, when the group meets for a two-day summit in Brazil, hosted by President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo July 5 (UPI) -- The so-called BRICS group of countries is reportedly set to issue a formal statement criticizing the United States current tariff situation when the group meets for a two-day summit in Brazil. Brazil, India, Russia, China, South Africa and the other five countries that comprise the intergovernmental organization, are expected to adopt a position of "serious concern" regarding U.S. President Donald Trump's enactment of so-called reciprocal tariffs, Bloomberg reports, citing sources familiar with ongoing deliberations. Leaders of the BRICS countries are in Rio de Janeiro for the group's 17th summit which begins Sunday and is being hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Brazil currently holds the BRICS chair position and counts the United States as its second-biggest trading partner after China. Earlier in the week, Trump confirmed U.S. tariffs will begin July 9 when a 90-day pause is scheduled to end. The president has previously been at odds with the organization. After winning the election last year and before taking office, Trump said the group would "wave goodbye to America" if it created its own currency, adding he would also impose a 100% tariff in U.S. domestic markets if that scenario unfolded. In 2023, BRICS formally invited Saudi Arabia and Iran to join the organization. Iran became the group's latest member last year. Last month, BRICS issued a statement on the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, using the same "grave concern" language. The organization continues its recruiting attempts. Last month, Colombia announced it would become a member of the BRICS-backed New Development Bank as the country looks to distance itself from its reliance on Western financial markets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store