Exclusive: US Democrats, Republicans plan bills to pressure China as Trump pushes trade
The three bills, seen by Reuters ahead of their introduction, have Democratic and Republican sponsors, a departure from the fierce partisanship dividing Washington.
Trump's push to reach economic agreements between the world's two biggest economies has strong support in Congress, especially from his fellow Republicans, but has prompted some China hawks to worry that the U.S. government is de-emphasizing security issues.
"It does appear that President Trump is keen to negotiate some kind of deal with China, and gaps are opening between his approach to China and the approaches of some members of his team, as well as with Congress, which overall has been quite hawkish on China," said Bonnie Glaser, an Asia expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
The desire for a hard line on China is one of the few truly bipartisan sentiments in the perennially divided Congress, even as many lawmakers support Trump's efforts to rebalance the bilateral trade relationship.
"The United States cannot afford to be weak in the face of the People's Republic of China and its aggression around the world," said Democrat Jeff Merkley of Oregon, a lead sponsor of all three bills.
"No matter who is in the White House, America's values of freedom and human rights must remain at the heart of a clear and principled vision that guides our leadership on the global stage," Merkley said in a statement.
White House officials have said that Trump remains fully committed to Asia-Pacific security issues as he pursues his trade agenda and a good personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
One bill, co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn of Texas, would deny entry into the United States of current or former Chinese government officials who were deemed to have engaged in the forced repatriation of members of China's Uyghur minority.
Human rights groups accuse China of widespread abuses of Uyghurs, a mainly Muslim ethnic minority numbering about 10 million in its northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beijing denies any abuses.
Another, co-sponsored by Republican John Curtis of Utah, aims to help Taiwan as the island faces increasing pressure from China. It would support countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that maintain official diplomatic relations with Taiwan and would take other steps to deepen coordination with Taipei.
China claims the democratically governed island as its own and has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. Beijing has stepped up military and political pressure against the island in recent years.
A third bill, co-sponsored by Republican Dan Sullivan of Alaska, seeks to combat "transnational repression" - efforts by any foreign government to reach beyond its own borders to intimidate, harass or harm dissidents, journalists or activists.
Facing Trump's August 12 deadline, top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will meet in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle their longstanding disputes, hoping to extend a truce by three months and keep sharply higher tariffs at bay.
Trump "cares about opening foreign markets to American trade, and that's what he's always cared about. And that is going to run counter to a lot of national security imperatives," said Michael Sobolik, who specializes in U.S.-China relations at the Hudson Institute.
Democrats and some of Trump's fellow Republicans raised concerns about the announcement this month that Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab will resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China, days after its CEO met with Trump. This reversed an AI restriction imposed in April that was designed to keep the most advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
13 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Why the AI Boom Won't End Like the Dotcom Bubble
Twenty-five years ago, the dotcom bubble popped, wiping out trillions in market value and transforming Silicon Valley's swagger into soul-searching. Overnight. It was a cautionary tale of hype outrunning the reality of startups with no viable product or revenue model securing millions in funding, simply for having a '.com' at the end of their name. Fast forward to now, and artificial intelligence is entering its own white-hot phase. Valuations are soaring, and the tech giants are all-in, pouring massive resources into model training, infrastructure, and product integration. At the same time, governments and regulators are scrambling to understand the implications, while the public is still trying to figure out whether this new wave is a friend or a threat. The buzzwords have changed, but the emotional arc feels familiar: euphoria, urgency, and fear of missing out. Many would rightfully assume the AI bubble might pop as well, but this time it's different because AI is different from everything that has happened before. When Decades Happen in Years The first critical difference from the dotcom era concerns the deceptive nature of technological adoption curves. Today's AI explosion might feel like it came out of nowhere. But that's an illusion. Much like the internet, which had been quietly evolving since the 1970s before hitting its stride in the '90s, AI is the product of decades of incremental progress. Machine learning breakthroughs have been in motion for years. What changed was the spark. Models like ChatGPT caught fire, and suddenly the world noticed. In contrast to the dial-up days of the internet, where it took years to gain user traction, AI adoption has moved at breakneck speed. ChatGPT hit 100 million users within two months. That kind of scale was unheard of in the early internet. But fast adoption doesn't mean mature technology. Hype can build far faster than infrastructure or regulation can keep up. The lesson here isn't that rapid adoption is inherently dangerous, but that we must prepare for consequences at an unprecedented scale and speed. The internet's gradual integration allowed for course corrections and adaptive learning. AI's explosive growth demands proactive rather than reactive strategies, as the window for adjustment may close rapidly once certain technological and social tipping points are crossed. Regulators Can No Longer Watch From the Sidelines The second crucial difference involves the delicate dance between innovation and regulation. During the rise of the internet, regulators largely took a hands-off approach. It was a different time. The web was experimental, slow-moving, and misunderstood. Lawmakers could afford to 'wait and see.' That luxury doesn't exist with AI. The speed and potential scale of AI, especially with discussions around job automation, misinformation, and existential risk, have thrown governments into reactive mode. There's pressure to regulate quickly, but without clear direction, that regulation risks being either toothless or overly restrictive. The internet era suggests that effective AI regulation must be both swift and strategic, identifying critical intervention points while preserving space for beneficial innovation. This requires unprecedented cooperation between technologists, policymakers, and society at large to navigate competing priorities and unknown risks. The Hype Cycle's Inevitable Correction? Not With AI The 1990s internet boom was driven by the mantra 'the Internet will change everything,' with valuations completely disconnected from financial fundamentals. This belief proved accurate in the long term. The internet did transform virtually every aspect of human society. However, the timeline and mechanisms differed dramatically from initial expectations. When the dotcom bubble burst in 2000, corrections were swift and brutal. Companies valued in billions evaporated overnight, leading many to conclude that internet technologies were merely speculative fads. The market correction was so severe it obscured the underlying technological revolution continuing beneath the financial turbulence. The post-bubble shakeout ultimately strengthened the internet ecosystem by eliminating companies with unsustainable business models while allowing genuinely innovative organizations to consolidate. Google and Amazon survived the correction and emerged stronger, eventually justifying even the bubble era's most optimistic valuations. Today's AI boom exhibits remarkably similar characteristics but here's the main difference. Today's AI boom is rooted in technologies that are already embedded in daily life and scaling rapidly across industries. While investment enthusiasm has inflated some valuations, the core capabilities like natural language processing, generative tools, and autonomous agents are not speculative ideas. Even if the market cools, AI isn't going to vanish or retrench the way many dotcom startups did. Its momentum is structural, not hype-driven. When Giants Control the Future The fifth difference is perhaps the largest one. During the internet's early years, established corporations dismissed the technology's potential. Companies like General Electric and AT&T experimented with online strategies but remained skeptical about broad appeal. This corporate hesitation created extraordinary opportunities for startups to establish themselves as industry leaders. Today's AI world presents a starkly different competitive environment. Rather than dismissing the technology, the world's largest tech companies have committed massive resources to AI development. Unlike the internet's distributed development model, AI advancement increasingly depends on resources that only the largest companies can marshal: vast datasets, specialized computing infrastructure, and teams of highly skilled researchers. This concentration extends beyond competitive concerns to fundamental questions about technological governance. When a handful of companies control the development of potentially transformative AI capabilities, their decisions about safety protocols, ethical guidelines, and deployment strategies effectively shape society's AI future. Unlike previous technological revolutions, where market forces naturally distributed control, AI's resource intensity may naturally consolidate power among existing tech giants. Approaching the Point of No Return AI possesses unique characteristics that could make its trajectory irreversible once certain thresholds are crossed. Take seemingly simple consumer-facing services like AI companions. Candy AI, Replika, Nomi, and Lovescape are just some of the dozens of companies offering increasingly humanlike companionship through large language models, hint at just how quickly emotional and behavioral dependencies on AI systems are forming. Future AI systems may develop capabilities that enable them to improve themselves recursively, creating feedback loops that accelerate development beyond human ability to control or redirect. This potential for technological autonomy distinguishes AI from previous innovations like the internet, which remained fundamentally tools under human direction. While the internet transformed how we communicate, work, and think, humans retained ultimate authority over its development and application. AI systems with sufficient sophistication could potentially assume roles in their own advancement, creating scenarios where human preferences become secondary to algorithmic optimization processes. The internet boom's gradual development allowed for course corrections and adaptive learning throughout the process. If AI development accelerates beyond human oversight capabilities, opportunities for similar adjustments may disappear rapidly. This doesn't suggest AI development should be halted, but decisions made during this critical period will have lasting consequences that extend far beyond typical business cycles. What Happens if AGI Arrives Soon? There's another major difference between the AI gold rush and anything that preceded it. And that's the possibility of AGI's arrival. During the Dotcom era, there was only one internet. There was no possibility that a new, better Internet could make the old one obsolete overnight. With AI however, this is a very realistic scenario. Should Artificial General Intelligence emerge in the next few years, as industry leaders increasingly suggest, we would witness disruption that dwarfs the dotcom revolution in both speed and scope. While the internet bubble taught us about hype cycles and gradual adoption, AGI's arrival would compress decades of transformation into months. The economic shock would make the 2000 market crash seem like a minor correction. The dotcom bubble primarily affected tech stocks and speculative investments, leaving most traditional industries largely intact. AGI would simultaneously threaten every knowledge-based profession, potentially eliminating entire career paths overnight. Unlike the internet, which created new job categories as it destroyed others, AGI could replace human cognitive work entirely, offering no clear pathway for displaced workers to retrain. The concentration risks identified from the dotcom era would become existential threats. During the internet boom, companies like AOL and Yahoo could emerge from nowhere to challenge established players. With AGI, the first organization to achieve breakthrough capabilities could establish permanent dominance. The winner-takes-all dynamics would be absolute. There's no competing with superhuman intelligence using conventional methods. Most critically, AGI eliminates the gradual adoption curve that allowed society to adapt during the internet revolution. The dotcom bubble eventually corrected, but underlying internet technology continued advancing. With AGI, there may be no second chances. The first deployment could fundamentally alter the trajectory of human civilization. Unlike the internet's democratizing potential, AGI could concentrate power so completely that traditional market corrections become impossible. The dotcom bubble showed how quickly hype can outrun substance, and how painful the correction can be. But it also proved that real innovation survives and reshapes the world over time. AI may follow a similar pattern, but the scale is different. The pace is faster, the concentration of power greater, and the risks more profound. The AI truly is a point of no return. And while we can't predict the exact outcome, we can recognize that it's like nothing before. Filed Under: AI, Gadgets News, Technology News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens Canada trade deal over support for Palestinian state
President Donald Trump has warned that Canada 's support for Palestinian statehood would make cutting a trade deal with its northern neighbor 'very hard.' As Trump's self-imposed tariff deadline looms, the president blasted Canadian President Mark Carney 's decision to join the U.K. and France in announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump wrote on Truth Social early Thursday morning. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' Carney announced Wednesday that Canada has 'long been committed to a two-state solution' that would see would see an independent Palestinian state 'living side by side' with the state of Israel. The move would further isolate the U.S. from key allies as international pressure grows over the starvation crisis in Gaza, fueled by Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid. Just hours earlier, the U.S. Senate rejected two resolutions introduced by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders to block arms sales to Israel. While the measures failed, more than half of Senate Democrats supported them, signaling a growing shift in Washington's stance toward the war in Gaza. Before Carney's announcement, both the U.S. and Israel had previously criticized similar declarations by France and Britain, saying that they reward Hamas and do not help efforts to achieve a ceasefire. As Trump threatened to blow up trade talks with Canada, his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to Israel on Wednesday, the White House confirmed to The Independent. Witkoff could also travel to Gaza and visit the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid centers, a U.S. official told Axios. The White House has not publicly confirmed the report. Trump's warning to Canada comes hours before he is set to reinstate his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on Friday for countries that have not struck trade deals with the U.S. The president has often pressured allies to change policies by threatening higher tariffs or stonewalling trade negotiations. Trump set an August 1 deadline for Canada to reach a trade deal with the U.S., with the two nations embroiled in an on-again, off-again trade war for months. Failing to do so would mean Canada could be slapped with a 35 percent tariff for goods that don't comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement. Carney previously hinted last week that the Canadian government is in no rush to finalize a deal by Trump's deadline, noting the objective is 'not to reach a deal, whatever it costs.' Countries including the U.K., South Korea, and Japan, as well as the European Union trading bloc, have recently finalized trade deals, with specific rates to be applied for the goods they sell to the U.S. Meanwhile, the rest of the world stands in limbo, with Trump being clear that those who do not reach deals by the deadline will face higher levies.
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil prices steady as market weighs Trump tariff threats and US stocks build
LONDON, July 31 (Reuters) - Oil prices were little changed on Thursday as investors weigh the supply risks from U.S. President Donald Trump's push for a swift resolution to the war in Ukraine through more tariffs while a surprise build in U.S. crude stocks weighed on prices. Brent crude futures for September , set to expire on Thursday, rose 4 cents, or 0.05%, to $73.28 a barrel by 0812 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for September also rose 4 cents, or 0.06%, to $70.04. Both benchmarks chalked up 1% gains on Wednesday. "We're looking for more clarity on the nature of new tariffs or implementation of sanctions on Russia," said Harry Tchiliguirian at Onyx Capital Group. The U.S. President's history of imposing policies and then changing them a few days later has resulted in traders and analysts hesitating to price them in, Tchiliguirian added. Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, including 100% secondary tariffs on its trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war in Ukraine within 10-12 days, moving up an earlier 50-day deadline. The U.S. has also warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, that it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying. On Wednesday, the U.S. Treasury Department announced fresh sanctions on more than 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and vessels, stepping up the Trump administration's "maximum pressure" campaign after bombing Iranian nuclear sites in June. Meanwhile, U.S. crude oil inventories rose by 7.7 million barrels to 426.7 million barrels in the week ending July 25, driven by lower exports, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday. Analysts had expected a draw of 1.3 million barrels. Gasoline stocks fell by 2.7 million barrels to 228.4 million barrels, far exceeding forecasts for a draw of 600,000 barrels. "U.S. inventory data showed a surprise build in crude stocks, but a bigger than expected gasoline draw supported the view of strong driving season demand, resulting in neutral impact on the oil market," said Fujitomi Securities analyst Toshitaka Tazawa.
