Soccer Aid star AngryGinge arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage to F1 car at Silverstone at British GP
The TikTokker attended the British Grand Prix over the weekend.
4
4
4
But he got into trouble alongside fellow streamers Chazza and SamHam.
The trio were arrested after being accused of causing £30,000 worth of criminal damage to a BWT Racing Point F1 Team car.
They have each denied the charges, with AngryGinge claiming he only sat in the vehicle.
A Northamptonshire Police spokesperson said: "On Friday, July 4, Northamptonshire Police received a report that a classic Formula 1 car on display at Silverstone Circuit during the British Grand Prix event had sustained several thousands of pounds worth of damage, which was alleged to have been caused by someone accessing the display stand and climbing into the vehicle.
"Officers carried out initial inquiries, and suspects were identified.
"Three men, aged 23, 25 and 27, were arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage to a vehicle and taken into police custody.
"Following a thorough investigation into the circumstances of the incident, all three men were released with no further action."
AngryGinge, 23, claimed he spent 15 hours in a cell and was not even interviewed before being released alongside his friends.
He revealed his ordeal later on stream, wearing an orange jumpsuit and a fake pair of handcuffs.
AngryGinge said: "For sitting in a car, they got us, you don't do that at F1.
"They locked us up for watching somebody else sitting in a car - they locked SamHam up for watching somebody else sit in a car.
"They locked Chazza up for sitting in a car, criminal damage, they tried to say.
"30 grand, they tried to say…"
AngryGinge continued: "Security's then come over, a very funny little moment where I've tried to grass Chaz up.
"Two hours have gone past, you'd have thought I assaulted someone, let me tell you…Chazza has sat in an F1 car.
"I offered to show him the video there and then.
"The words, okay, from the gentleman in the cap, 'there's no point, mate. You can show us at the station.'
"What the f*** is going on here then? We pull up into custody, he said, 'Do you want a solicitor?'
"And I said, 'Sarge, I'm all right, thanks'. He then replied, 'Why don't you want a solicitor?' Done f*** all wrong mate.
He added: "My toilet has got skids in. He's gone, 'would you like any food and drink?' - 'What've you got, mate?'
"He said, 'We've got pot noodles'.
"So, anyway, I've managed to fall asleep, then about 10 seconds go by, and a guy in the cell next to me starts banging for no reason.
"10 o'clock in the morning, I'm thinking it is, and the door opens, I'm thinking it might be interview time.
"Officer opens it, 'you're free to go, there's no further action.'
"I've just spent 15 hours in a concrete block, and I'm now being told, no further action.
"I've not been questioned, interviewed, and that's that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Met police officers who strip-searched black schoolgirl, 15, while she was on her period are guilty of gross misconduct
Two Metropolitan Police officers who strip-searched a 15-year-old black schoolgirl while she was on her period have been found guilty of gross misconduct. The incident, which took place at a school in Hackney, east London, in 2020, saw the girl, known as Child Q, searched by officers who believed she was carrying cannabis. A misconduct panel concluded that the strip search, which involved the exposure of her intimate parts, was 'disproportionate, inappropriate and unnecessary.' No drugs were found on the child. The hearing also heard how the ordeal left the schoolgirl feeling 'humiliated' and 'degraded.' Trainee Detective Constable Kristina Linge and Police Constable Rafal Szmydynski were criticised for their handling of the situation and now could face being sacked from the force. It was concluded that they failed to ensure that an appropriate adult was present during the strip search - as is required when a minor is involved - and for not seeking senior officer authorisation beforehand. They also failed to provide the girl with a copy of the search record, in direct breach of police policy and training. The misconduct panel concluded the officers did not respect the girl's rights as a child and failed to give her the protection she was entitled to under the law. A third officer, PC Victoria Wray, was also found to have committed misconduct for not questioning whether the search was proportionate or checking whether it had been properly authorised. She too breached police standards relating to duties and responsibilities, authority, respect and courtesy, and following orders and instructions. However, the panel did not find that any of the officers had breached standards relating to equality and diversity, or honesty and integrity. Crucially, it concluded there was no evidence that race was a factor in their decisions, nor that the girl had been 'adultified.' The four-week disciplinary hearing was led by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) and chaired by Met Commander Jason Prins. In 2022 the incident sparked protests on the streets where they were heard chanting 'no justice, no peace, abolish the police' and 'racist cops, out of schools'. They also held up signs reading 'no to racist police, justice for Child Q' and 'we say no to police in schools', as well as Black Lives Matter banners. They also chanted 'shame on you' at officers outside the station, footage on social media showed. A protester from Catcalls of London, an Instagram-based awareness group, wrote messages in multi-coloured chalk on the pavement, with one reading: 'Dearest Child Q, the systems designed to protect you failed you. 'We see you. We stand here for you. We are with you.' Commander Kevin Southworth said: 'The experience of Child Q should never have happened and was truly regrettable. 'We have sincerely apologised to Child Q since this incident happened. Again, I am deeply sorry to Child Q and her family for the trauma that we caused her, and the damage this incident caused to the trust and confidence black communities across London have in our officers. 'While the officers involved did not act correctly, we acknowledge there were organisational failings. Training to our officers around strip search and the type of search carried out on Child Q was inadequate, and our oversight of the power was also severely lacking. 'This left officers, often young in service or junior in rank, making difficult decisions in complex situations with little information, support or clear resources to help their decision-making. 'What happened to Child Q was a catalyst for change both for the Met and for policing nationally. 'While we should not have needed an incident such as Child Q to check our approach, it has absolutely led us to improving our processes and significantly reducing the number of these types of searches carried out. 'It's crucial we get this right to ensure the impact on young people is minimised as far as possible. 'Sadly, we know there are children in London being exploited to carry drugs and weapons for others as well as involved in criminality, so these types of searches have to remain within police powers. The work we have done since Child Q means we now have the right safeguards in place.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Appeal after £10,000 stolen from man at Paddington train station
British Transport Police (BTP) has released images of suspects after £10,000 in cash was stolen from a man's bag at Paddington railway station in London. The 49-year-old man attended the station at around 9.30am on Friday, 20 June, and went to board a train. Three women are understood to have followed the man, before walking through the carriage and departing at the opposite end. The man noticed that the £10,000 in an envelope had gone missing from his rucksack after taking his seat on the train. BTP has released images of the women who they believe could help their investigation. Anyone who recognises the women is asked to contact BTP by texting 61016 or by calling 0800 40 50 40, quoting reference 170 of 20 th June. According to Transport for London (TfL), theft remains the most common crime on public transport in the capital, with 22,816 theft offences between April 2024 and March 2025. This is an increase of 1,170 offences compared to the previous year and accounts for approximately 48 per cent of the total number of the 47,964 offences that took place.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pregnant mother, 39, who launched a brutal attack on a 'random' pensioner at a FUNERAL walks free from court
A pregnant mother-of-three who launched a brutal attack on a pensioner during a funeral wake, leaving the 65-year-old victim hospitalised and with life-changing injuries, has walked free from court. Danielle Oliver, 39, threw herself at Belinda Stickland without warning inside the Conservative Club in Splott, Cardiff, during a family funeral on June 9 last year. The assault was so severe that it left the pensioner with fractured ribs, breathing difficulties and a lasting diagnosis of emphysema. Cardiff Crown Court heard how Ms Stickland had to be rushed to hospital and kept in for nine days, during which doctors drained fluid from her lungs. She later said the violent and prolonged attack had changed her life 'in every way'. Prosecutor Kirsten Murphy described how the unprovoked attack was caught on CCTV, which showed Oliver looking up from her phone before launching herself at the older woman near the bar. Once on the ground, Stickland was left helpless as Oliver continued to gesture menacingly, prompting bar staff to intervene and drag her out of the venue. In court, Ms Stickland's harrowing victim impact statement revealed the true cost of the assault. 'I was attending the funeral of a close friend on the day I was assaulted. It changed my life in so many ways. It took my sparkle away,' she said. 'I am now a shell of a person, Oliver was a stranger to me, and yet now she is woven into the fabric of my everyday. 'I used to go out and enjoy my life and speak to my neighbours but now I can't leave the house. I feel it is too unsafe.' Addressing her attacker directly, she asked: 'What if you had killed me? What if you had left my children without their mother? What if you had left my grandchildren without their nan? 'I don't just live with the physical injuries, I continue to live with the mental trauma. I am no longer me.' Judge Simon Mills said the footage made clear just how 'heavily' the victim had fallen. He said: 'Any idea that a single blow to the face doesn't do any harm is completely wide of the mark. You could today have been facing prosecution for manslaughter. 'I have heard you are surprised by the seriousness of your victim's injuries. 'Well, I'm afraid in the job that I do, I see all of the time how momentary acts of violence have very serious consequences and sometimes fatal consequences. 'Once you lay your hands on someone else in such a way, then the consequences can be truly catastrophi,c and they arguably have been in this case.' He added: 'I am not going into the background of why you made the decision you did. You were pregnant at the time and I'm aware your medication had to be adjusted. 'An issue was brought to your attention which caused you to make completely the wrong decision.' The court heard Oliver, of Braunton Avenue in Llanrumney, had two prior convictions but none considered aggravating. She was arrested four days after the attack and remained largely uncooperative in the interview, answering 'no comment' to all questions before eventually admitting to assault occasioning grievous bodily harm. Defending Oliver, Dan Jones, said she did not intend to cause such serious harm and cited her responsibilities as a single parent, including care for a child with specific needs. The court also heard that medication changes during her pregnancy may have contributed to her state of mind. Judge Mills handed down a 66-week prison sentence, suspended for two years. Oliver must complete a 10-day rehabilitation programme and was handed a five-year restraining order banning any contact with her victim. The judge opted not to impose compensation, citing Oliver's financial limitations. Outside court, Ms Stickland's daughter, Jinaise, said the family was ready to move forward after two years of waiting. 'My mother is 65 now and shouldn't have had to put up with this. 'The puncture has given her emphysema. My mother is already closer to the coffin than most, and she shouldn't have to have anyone wanting to put her in there any sooner by assaulting her.'
