Explainer: What is tokenization and is it crypto's next big thing?
The technology is seen as rapidly increasing in coming years, especially in the U.S., helped by the passage of three new bills. President Donald Trump's administration has eased regulation of the broader crypto industry, paving the way for a boom in the valuation of companies in the sector and the rapid growth of crypto-related securities.
However, the growth of the market for tokenized assets has been far slower than expected in recent years, with many projects still in their infancy or not yet live.
The term "tokenization" is used in a variety of ways. But it generally refers to the process of turning financial assets - such as bank deposits, stocks, bonds, funds and even real estate - into crypto assets.
This means creating a record on digital ledger blockchain that represents the original asset. These blockchain-based assets, or "tokens", can be held in crypto wallets and traded on blockchain, just like cryptocurrencies.
Stablecoins can be seen as an example of tokenization. They are a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value by being pegged to a real-world currency, typically the U.S. dollar. The issuer holds one U.S. dollar in reserve for every dollar-pegged crypto token it creates.
Stablecoins are blockchain-based tokens acting as a proxy for an asset that already exists outside the blockchain.
They allow people to move money across borders without interacting with the banking system. While critics say that this makes them useful for criminals who want to avoid banks' anti-money laundering checks, stablecoin issuers say that they are a lifeline for people in countries without a developed payments system.
Yes and no. Stablecoins have grown in recent years, with the market estimated to be worth about $256 billion, according to crypto data provider CoinMarketCap, and expected to touch $2 trillion by 2028, according to Standard Chartered.
But banks have talked for years about creating tokenized versions of other types of assets, which they say will make trading more efficient, faster and cheaper, and those "tokens" have struggled to gain traction.
While there have been individual issuances, there is not a liquid secondary market for these kinds of assets.
One impediment to trading traditional assets via blockchain is that banks are working on their own private networks, making it difficult to trade across platforms.
Some proponents of the crypto industry have said tokenization can improve liquidity in the financial system. Illiquid assets like real estate could be traded more easily if they are broken up into small digital tokens.
It is also expected to improve access to asset classes that are typically out of reach of smaller investors by creating a cheaper entry point.
Some major global banks, including Bank of America and Citi have said they could explore launching tokenized assets, including stablecoins.
Asset manager BlackRock is also doubling down on the tokenization boom, and has highlighted its ambition of becoming the largest cryptocurrency manager in the world by 2030.
Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange, is seeking permission from the SEC to offer "tokenized equities" to its customers.
Since stablecoins themselves are tokens and seen as one of the biggest drivers of the growth of tokenization, the new stablecoin law will end up boosting the proliferation of tokenization, experts say.
The new market structure bill, known as the Clarity Act, is expected to establish a clear framework that could enable stablecoins and other crypto tokens to become more widely used.
Some analysts say the hype around tokenization might be premature and caution that the rapidly growing crypto ecosystem could experience near-term turbulence due to the potential risks of a big decline in prices.
European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has warned stablecoins pose risks for monetary policy and financial stability.
Some critics of the industry warn the frenzy around the new technology could introduce new systemic risks, especially in the absence of stringent regulation. They also say there is no reason why blockchain should be any more efficient than the electronic ledgers and trading systems already used in financial markets.
Buyers of third-party tokens, which are issued by unaffiliated third parties - such as crypto exchange Kraken - that have custody of securities, could be exposed to counterparty risks, and regulators are sounding notes of caution.
Earlier in July, Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission who has frequently spoken positively about cryptocurrency, said tokenized securities would not be able to circumvent existing securities laws.
More than half of the world's U.S. dollar stablecoins are issued by a single company, Tether, which says it manages $160 billion in reserves, but has not undergone a financial audit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump aide says India financing Putin's war by buying Russian oil
A top aide to Donald Trump accused India of financing Russia 's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said the US president had made it clear that it was "not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia". "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact," Mr Miller told Fox News, ramping up pressure on New Delhi over its ties with Moscow. Mr Trump, meanwhile, said his special envoy Steve Witkoff could travel to Russia this week as the US readied sanctions on Moscow if president Vladimir Putin did not agree to a ceasefire before Friday. As the war continued, over 100 firefighters rushed to tackle a blaze at an oil depot in Sochi, Russia, after Ukraine launched an overnight drone attack on Sunday.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Asian markets are mixed after Wall St tumbles following poor US jobs report
Shares in Asia are mixed after Wall Street had its worst day since May following the release of weak U.S. jobs data. Markets in Asia had already reacted on Friday to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs on imports from many U.S. trading partners, posting moderate losses. The new import duties are set to take effect on Thursday. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index lost 1.6%, bouncing back from bigger losses, to 40,134.97. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong edged 0.2% higher, to 24,589.21, while the Shanghai Composite index was nearly unchanged at 3,562.18. In South Korea, the Kospi surged 0.7% to 3,140.92. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 shed 0.2% to 8,643.00. Investors' worries about a weakening U.S. economy deepened after the latest report on job growth in the U.S. showed employers added just 73,000 jobs in July. That is sharply lower than economists expected. The Labor Department also reported that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. 'The labor market, once a pillar of resilience, is now looking more like a late-cycle casualty, as soft data begin to replace soft landings in market discourse,' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. U.S. futures edged 0.3% higher, however, early Monday. On Friday, the S&P 500 fell 1.6%, its biggest decline since May 21 and its fourth straight loss. It closed at 6,238.01, posting a 2.4% loss for the week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.2% to 43,588.58, while the Nasdaq composite fell 2.2% to finish at 20,650.13. Internet retail giant Amazon fell 8.3%, despite reporting encouraging profit and sales for its most recent quarter. Technology behemoth Apple fell 2.5% after also beating Wall Street's profit and revenue forecasts. Both companies face tougher operating conditions because of tariffs, with Apple forecasting a $1.1 billion hit from the fees in the current quarter. Trump's decision to order the immediate firing of the head of the government agency that produces the monthly jobs figures raised concern over whether there might be interference in future data. The surprisingly weak hiring numbers led investors to step up their expectations the Federal Reserve may cut interest rates in September. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.21% from 4.39% just before the hiring report was released. That's a big move for the bond market. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for Fed actions, plunged to 3.68% from 3.94% just prior to the report's release. The Fed has held rates steady since December. A cut in rates would give the job market and overall economy a boost, but it could also risk fueling inflation, which is hovering stubbornly above the central bank's 2% target. An update on Thursday for the Fed's preferred measure of inflation showed that prices ticked higher in June, rising to 2.6% from 2.4% in May. The Fed held rates steady again at its most recent meeting this week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been pressured by Trump to cut the benchmark rate, though that decision isn't his to make alone, but belongs to the 12 members of the Federal Open Market Committee. Businesses, investors and the Fed have been operating under a cloud of uncertainty from Trump's tariff policy. Companies have been warning investors that unpredictable policies, with some tariffs already in effect while others change or get extended, make it difficult to plan ahead. Walmart, Procter & Gamble and many others also have warned about import taxes raising costs, eating into profits and raising prices for consumers. In other dealings early Monday, U.S, benchmark crude oil lost 18 cents to $67.15 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, fell 23 cents to $69.44 per barrel. The U.S. dollar rose to 147.80 Japanese yen from 147.26 yen. The euro weakened to $1.1577 from $1.1598.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Restaurant experts reveal the biggest red flags that should send you RUNNING toward the exit?
With the average cost of dining out in America continuing to rise, getting value for the experience is more important than ever. Currently, a typical person will spend around $166 a month at restaurants, according to the Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts. Between 2019 and 2024, that amount soared by 14 percent, however standards have not always risen in keeping with the trend. At its best, restaurant dining entails thoughtful service, top-notch food, and a welcoming environment. But at its worst, going out to eat means being insulted by staff, forgotten about in a noisy restaurant, and or even finding a hair in your undercooked chicken. Often trying out new restaurants can feel like a shot in the dark. It's hard to tell if your experience will be serene and fulfilling or off-putting and difficult. Fortunately, chefs, restaurant experts, and critics have offered their two cents when it comes to restaurant red flags. Whether you're reading reviews online or simply stumble in the door, these eight signs could help you identify a five-star experience from a total dumpster fire. No visible management Salar Sheik told Fox News Digital, that if a restaurant has no visible management team, it may be a good indicator to turn around. 'Great managers are visible,' said the LA-based restaurant consultant. 'They touch tables, support staff and keep the energy up.' A manager isn't just employed to make sure a restaurant runs smoothly behind the scenes. Part of their job is to ensure guest satisfaction. Often, they greet customers, check on tables, and even assist servers. 'If you can't tell who's in charge, it might be because no one is,' said Sheik. The manager should be visible and accessible. The staff argues with you Another indicator that a restaurant may not be worth your time is rude or argumentative staff. That could be a mean that service standards in the restaurant are too low. Candy Hom, an Atlanta based Food-critic and chef, told All Recipes 'If they mess something up, they should try to make it up to you.' For example, Hom attended a restaurant with a group of friends and the waiter split the check five ways, instead of six as they requested. She said the server 'blamed the fact that he usually has tables of five and not six'. 'Even if the food was good, the experience was ruined,' she explained. It's empty A restaurant that's empty during lunch or dinner rushes should raise some alarms. In some cases new businesses may have trouble bringing in clientele during meal time, but Sheik said that most of the time there should be at least a few other patrons 'Consistently empty restaurants often point to a loss of community trust - whether from poor service, declining quality or mismanagement,' according to Sheik. Slow service can also mean that ingredients sit for longer, making the food less fresh. It's full of influencers On the flip side, a crowded restaurant isn't always a good thing either. Sheik said, 'If it feels more like a photo shoot than a place to break bread, odds are the experience is built more for the 'gram than the guest.' Nowadays many restaurants in major cities host internet personalities in exchange for having their food featured online. Attending a restaurant where that's frequently the case can result in an inauthentic experience. Hom added, 'When every post or review is from a hosted experience, I can't trust that.' Staff are treated poorly If you notice poorly treated staff or low team morale, it may be best to take your business elsewhere. Nadia Chaudhury, the regional editor of Eater for the northeast, told All Recipes: 'If I hear and read about staffers alleging not-great work environments and management issues over and over again from trusted sources … I take those to heart.' Scoping out your restaurant online beforehand could key you in to some of these problems. It's dirty Restaurant cleanliness is an important aspect of the overall experience. If tables, chairs, menus or even the bathroom aren't clean, that could indicate abysmal sanitary standards. 'If those aren't clean, I guarantee you the kitchen's not being held to a higher standard,' said Sheik. 'If the team can't manage that, they're likely failing at much more complex things, too.' Servers don't know the menu Poor training is a great indicator for service value. Sheik said that servers should always be certain of what the restaurant offers. 'If your server has to guess ingredients or check on every question, it signals poor training and a lack of pride in the product,' said Sheik. Menu knowledge can even be life or death. Accurate allergen information is crucial, not only in enhancing the restaurant experience, but also in ensuring the safety of patrons. You're being aggressively upsold Of course, restaurants are supposed to sell you on their offerings. Whether that be the happy hour special or menu item of the day. However, Sheik said if it feels inauthentic or incessant, it may be best to take your business elsewhere 'Suggestive selling is part of the job,' he said Sheik. 'But when it feels like a script or desperation, it often means the restaurant is struggling to hit numbers and pushing sales at the cost of genuine hospitality.' Restaurant dining is supposed to be a fun experience. But lack of knowledge of the restaurant industry and naivete can ruin a perfectly good dinner. Thanks to industry experts, customers are well equipped at avoiding the red flags and finding the perfect place for dinner.
