
App store age restriction bill passes without objection
Louisiana is looking to join several states in cracking down on access to mobile applications for underage individuals.
Under House Bill 570, teens would need parental permission to download apps like TikTok, Snapchat or Instagram.
The legislation, which passed without objection, aims to give parents greater control over the digital lives of their children by requiring app stores to verify the age of users and confirm parental consent for anyone under 18.
The bill passed the House Commerce Committee without objection.
'Our phones are now the white van,' said Michelle Johnson, a supporter of the bill who warned lawmakers about the link between social media and child exploitation. 'We wouldn't let a strange man lure our kids off the street, but we allow it online every day.'
The bill's supporters, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, argue that placing the responsibility on app stores is both practical and protective of user privacy.
Nicole Lopez, Meta's Director of Global Litigation Strategy for Youth, told lawmakers the company backs HB570 as a 'privacy-protective solution' that streamlines parental control without overburdening app developers.
'Parents already verify age and grant permissions when they buy a phone for their teen,' Lopez said. 'This bill would make that process apply to all app downloads, not just purchases, using the infrastructure Apple and Google already have.'
Lopez noted that Meta has already migrated over 25 million American teens into stricter 'Teen Accounts' with limited messaging and default privacy settings. The company says 80% of U.S. parents support legislation requiring parental consent for app downloads by teens under 16, based on polling data.
The bill would also help ensure compliance with the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which restricts the collection of data from users under 13.
Not everyone is on board. On Monday, critics argued the bill threatens user privacy, shifts liability unfairly to app stores, and may not stand up in court.
'HB570 would compromise the privacy of all users by requiring more data collection just to verify someone's age,' said Aden Hizkias with the Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition. 'This shifts responsibility away from social media companies and undermines First Amendment rights.'
Justin Hill, a policy analyst with NetChoice and a former Missouri lawmaker, warned that similar laws in Utah and Ohio have already been blocked by courts.
'This exact bill has been filed and hasn't passed elsewhere. Courts have said forcing people to upload ID just to access digital content violates constitutional protections.'
In an interview, Carver said that the bill has been tailored so that it does not target specific content, such as social media platforms, thereby avoiding a constitutional challenge.
'This would apply to all 1.5 million apps on the stores, so we're not limiting anyone's access to speech,' Carver said.
Hill pointed out that the practical implications are enormous.
'On Day 1, you'd need to submit ID to the app store just to download or update apps. If you want your son to have access, you'd need to prove you're their parent — how do you do that without a birth certificate?' Hill asked.
John Tamny of the Parkview Institute called the proposal 'a trivialization of parenting,' saying Apple and Google already provide tools for parents to manage screen time and restrict access to apps.
'We're pretending parents are powerless when, in reality, they're already well-armed.'
HB570 would require major app stores like Apple and Google to collect minimal information about a user's age and parental status before allowing teens to download apps. Once verified, parents would receive requests to approve or deny any attempted downloads by their child.
However, the bill does not address what happens if a child uses a parent's already-approved device.
'That's something that will have to be left to the parents,' said Rep. Kim Carver during the hearing. 'We don't want to get into the business of telling parents how to parent.'
Supporters emphasized that the legislation is narrowly tailored to avoid the constitutional pitfalls that have plagued other state efforts. Unlike earlier laws that singled out specific apps or websites, HB570 applies to all app stores equally.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Meta And Microsoft Are Betting Big On AI — So Is The C-Suite
Meta and Microsoft just posted strong earnings, and a common thread is clear: aggressive investment in AI. From infrastructure to ad algorithms, artificial intelligence is becoming a powerful growth engine for both firms. Data from the Forbes Research 2025 CxO Growth Survey shows that C-Suite leaders across sectors are making similar bets. They're fast-tracking AI not as a future play, but as a present-day growth lever. Forbes surveyed 1,001 C-suite executives in December 2024 across several regions globally. All respondents led companies with over $1 billion in annual revenue and included chief financial officers, chief marketing officers and CEOs, among a dozen other CxO titles. What CxOs are doing now in AI: As Meta and Microsoft turn AI into real results, CxOs across the globe are making AI a core part of how they lead, compete and grow. To learn about the possibility of an AI skills gap facing organizations, read more from Forbes Research.


The Verge
4 hours ago
- The Verge
Nvidia and AMD will cut the US government in on revenue from AI chip sales in China.
Chip race: Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Nvidia battle it out for AI chip supremacy See all Stories Posted Aug 11, 2025 at 1:40 AM UTC Nvidia and AMD will cut the US government in on revenue from AI chip sales in China. The US official said Nvidia agreed to share 15 per cent of the revenues from H20 chip sales in China and AMD will provide the same percentage from MI308 chip revenues. Two people familiar with the arrangement said the Trump administration had not yet determined how to use the money. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Richard Lawler Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AMD Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Nvidia Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech


Motor 1
5 hours ago
- Motor 1
‘Give Me The $12,000 Back:' Expert Reveals the Real Reason You Never Want to Put Money Down on a Lease. It's Not What You Think
Conventional wisdom says putting money down lowers auto payments, but one car sales expert is flipping that logic on its head—and his reasoning might save you thousands if disaster strikes. TikTok influencer Russell ( @russflipswhips ), who has amassed 789,400 followers and 39.5 million likes across more than 230 videos since February 2024, recently demonstrated why putting money down on a lease can be a costly mistake. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . In a one-minute video showing a mock negotiation, he illustrates a scenario that every potential lessee should understand before signing on the dotted line. The Setup The video shows Russell at a hypothetical dealership desk with paperwork showing a $48,997 car lease, a $12,000 trade-in, and a proposed $499 monthly payment. But instead of accepting the standard deal structure, he makes a request that catches the salesman off guard. 'Look, man, I'll lease the car, but I'm not going to put any money down with my trade-in. So can I just get that back in the form of a check?' Russell asks. The confused salesman responds as most would, saying, 'A check? What do you mean? Why don't you just put money down? It's going to make the payment higher.' Russell then delivers the video's key insight, 'Well, here's the reason I don't want to put money down on a lease: it's because what would happen if I total the car?' When the salesman struggles to respond, Russell explains the harsh reality. 'I'll tell you what happens. If I total the car, they're not going to give me any money back.' Russell emphasizes the point, later adding, 'If I put this money down and I were to total this car, I'm going to get absolutely zero back.' A Smart Strategy Trending Now 'A Joke That Had Serious Consequences:' Car Salesman Posts Video on Social Media. Then He Gets Indefinitely Suspended Florida Car Salesman Goes on Test Drive. Then He Gets $160 Ticket Because the Officer Doesn't Understand Magnets Instead of risking his $12,000 trade-in value, Russell proposes a safer approach. 'So I'd like to do zero down on the lease,' the influencer says. 'Give me the 12 grand back in the form of a check.' He then flexes his insider knowledge, saying that the dealership's insurance, 'since it's through Ford, it comes with included gap insurance, so I don't need to put any money down.' He's willing to accept higher monthly payments in exchange for protecting his capital. 'I don't care what the payment is,' he says, adding, 'I'd just like to do zero down on the lease. Give me the $12,000 in the form of a check. I'll do the first payment in plate fees, whatever that is, and I'll just give you that out of pocket.' Why This Works The strategy hinges on understanding how gap insurance functions in leases versus purchases. As Russell explains to the still-hesitant salesman, 'It's not smart to put money down on a lease. I'll put a little bit of money down: Cash for the first payment and plate fees, but I'm not putting twelve grand down on the lease. I'm not taking those chances.' Community Validation The video resonated strongly with viewers who understood the financial wisdom behind the advice. User biglincoln79 commented, 'Never ever put money down on a lease. Smart advice Russ.' Another user, Rob Demmer, provided additional context. 'At the end of the day, the total price of the lease paid over time is the same,' he said. 'Definitely doesn't make sense to put money down if you don't need to!' A user named Chris put forward a more nuanced view, writing, 'Well, there's a money factor in there so you'll pay just a tad more by not putting money down, buuuuutt the protection it provides is WELL worth the minimal difference.' Some viewers shared cautionary tales that proved Russell's point. Sara recounted a nightmare scenario. 'I put 8k down on a brand new car. Parked it at the gym and someone hit it and ran,' she recalled. 'It got totaled. didn't even have it a week, wasn't even registered yet. Never putting money down again.' The Gap Insurance Factor Several commenters highlighted an important detail about manufacturer lease programs. v3982 noted, 'I didn't know that Ford came with free gap insurance if you lease good to know,' while Larry5.0 confirmed, 'That's with just about everyone, haven't seen a brand that doesn't.' However, movingon provided a crucial clarification. 'If the value is less, gap won't cover your down payment,' they noted, reinforcing why avoiding down payments on leases makes financial sense. The strategy becomes even more compelling for business owners. User madeyahlook explained, 'Leasing vehicles is the only real move if you own a business. Depreciating assets are covered by your taxes. And you get to write off licensing fees, interest, mileage, and you always have a new vehicle.' The Bottom Line Russell's approach challenges conventional thinking about lease negotiations. While putting money down reduces monthly payments, it also increases financial risk without providing the protection benefits that come with vehicle ownership. With gap insurance typically included in manufacturer lease programs, the traditional justification for large down payments disappears. The video's caption asks, 'Would you rather lease a car or purchase a car?' but perhaps the better question is: If you're going to lease, why risk your hard-earned money when you don't have to?" Motor1 sent Russell an email at his business address to request comment. We'll update this if he responds. Trending Now duPont Registry Launches New Car Leasing Platform for Luxury & Exotic Vehicles These EV Leases Are Stupid Cheap Right Now Michigan Dealer Caught Allegedly Leasing Used Cars as New Dodge Is Already Pushing Cheap Charger Lease Deals Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )