This Ruf Yellowbird Is Extra Special, and Not Just Because It's the Wrong Color
The Ruf CTR, often known by its nickname 'Yellowbird,' was a Porsche 911 Carrera so heavily customized that it essentially became a new car. A few were made to the same spec, but only one was painted Bordeaux Red and personally driven by Alois Ruf Jr. That's the car we're looking at here, and it's for sale.
This 1989 Ruf CTR1 Lightweight, unofficially dubbed 'Redbird,' is one of six extra-lean CTRs ever made. To earn the Lightweight designation, some steel body panels were swapped for aluminum; there's no center console, no roll cage, no power brakes, no sunroof, no radio, some chassis sound-deadening foam is gone, and the seats are extra-light ones. RM Sotheby's
The twin-turbo flat-six bored to 3.4-liters, Ruf five-speed transmission, and chassis reinforcements are still present, though.
These cars claimed 211 mph in 1987—a ridiculous speed for a vehicle this delicate in any era—letting it win Road & Track's 'World's Fastest Car' shootout that year. But '89 was when the 'Faszination on the Nürburgring' video was released, cementing Ruf's awesomeness in the minds of anybody who had the chance to see it.
This particular car, the ninth CTR built (of 29 total, six of which were Lightweight models), was reportedly stored at Alois Ruf Jr.'s house and used as his personal car to some extent before being delivered to its first real owner. Mr. Ruf himself was, of course, the tuner whose obsession with tinkering on 911s got one of the most elite Porsche customization houses into the annals of history after taking over Ruf from his father (also named Alois).
But even without the fun backstory, the spec on this thing is just incredible. The red-over-dark-brown has a real richness to it. I feel like I can smell the interior through some of these photos. I mean, the whole car is just delightful to look at.
Sadly, for most of us, looking is all we'll be doing with it—R.M. Sotheby's is auctioning it at Monterey this summer, but expects it to fetch between $4.5 and $5 million. RM Sotheby's
Know about any other extra-special special Porsches? Drop me a line at andrew.collins@thedrive.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Continental Auto Unit Margin Climbs Ahead of IPO
Continental's auto-parts unit improved profitability in the second quarter after cutting costs and raising prices ahead of its planned initial public offering in September. CFO Olaf Schick speaks on Bloomberg Television. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Motor Trend
4 hours ago
- Motor Trend
The Fastest! 2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Test
The guy behind the Starbuck's counter on La Cienega noticed my Motor Trend cap: "Hey, you work there? Probably drivin' a cool car tonight, right?" "A Kia minivan. But it's pretty nice. DVD player in back for the kids." He nodded silently and proceeded to make my green tea frappuccino. Worried that this guy's image of the suave, bring-me-another-Ferrari automotive journalist was imploding like Ashley Simpson on "SNL," I absurdly added, "But, um, we'll be testing a Bugatti Veyron in about a week. Ever heard of a Bugatti?"The blender stopped. "Of course I've heard of it. Sixteen-cylinder W-type engine. Four turbos. A thousand horsepower. A million bucks. It'll do, what-- 250 mph?" Now I was nodding silently. He offered a straw. The 2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4, with a 1001-hp W-16 engine and a top speed of 253 mph, sets new standards in speed and luxury. Priced at $1.44 million, it accelerates 0-60 mph in 2.7 seconds and is praised for its engineering, though its design and steering feel are debated. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article. Read Next Exactly when did random baristas start memorizing facts about Bugatti automobiles? The original company's heyday was the late twenties and early thirties--the curtain falling with le Patron's fatal heart attack in 1947. During the ensuing 60 years, the 1750-odd pur sang machines remaining from the 7950 Molsheim produced have become the obscure relics of autodom's closest thing to an extremist cult. The Veyron, on the other hand, is a media queen. Paris Hilton with all-wheel drive. Everybody knows something about it. Larry King will do an interview. And what's behind its universal awareness (besides a VW propaganda machine screaming at redline)? Numbers. Great big memorable numbers. My barista friend already said them. When former VW chief Ferdinand Piech announced the future Veyron's staggering four-digit horsepower and a terminal velocity a third the speed of sound, he destined his Bugatti to be on the lips of the masses. It was P.R. genius. Had he said it would have 751 horsepower and top-out at 187 mph, my frappuccino pal would've said he'd never heard of this Bugatti-whatever, but you ever driven a Z06? There's a finger-burning, pencil-snapping price to pay, however, when the claims come before the car: 1000 horsepower at the crankshaft means roughly 2000 more need to be expelled as waste heat--either exhaled through a watermain of an exhaust pipe or wafted from a dozen radiators. And artificially penciling the top speed at 407 kph (253 mph) tends to anger the aerodynamic demons whose temper, as we know, rises as a square of velocity. You have a sneaky feeling that Piech--who earlier in his career oversaw the creation of the Porsche 917's 1500-horsepower flat-12 turbomotor and Audi's paradigm-shifting quattro all-wheel drive--smiled as he tossed his troops a personal Rubics cube to solve as he went out the door. Go ahead and figure out this one, guys. I'll have fun watching. Three years later, a pair of Veyrons emerge from the transporter ready to rumble on AMCI's 9000-foot-long ex-airbase runway--a two-tone (they're all two-tone) silver-and-white number for photos and a black-and-gray tester we covered with instrumentation (including front and rear ride-height sensors to observe the chassis's hydraulically adjusted suspension). Composed of carbon-fiber (the central monocoque), an aluminum front subframe, a carbon and stainless-steel frame mix at the rear, and aluminum fenders and hood, the Veyron is smaller than you'd imagine--not much bigger than a 911. Its shape is a question of taste, but it's clearly not an automotive beauty in the conventional sense, like a Lamborghini Muira or an early E-Type Jag. It's more akin to Gordon Buehring's Cord 810 or a Hans Ledwinka Tatra (and even many original Bugattis) in being a hyper-complicated piece of sculpture that takes time to consider. Were the Type 57 Electron Coupe or the Atlante "pretty" cars? No. But decades later, they still captivate. The engine itself is a central feature of the exterior design, its top scandalously exposed between two aluminum intake snorkels. The practical reason for this is to dissipate the 8.0-liter engine's crackling heat (a good rain probably helps), making the broad band of bodywork that wraps around it useful for keeping curious young fingers from getting singed. Although capped by twin intercoolers and impressive parallel induction pipes, it's still a bit of a visual letdown if you've ever seen the nuanced artistry of most any original Bugattis. The two banks are essentially twin, narrow-angle Volkswagen VR8 blocks fed by a quartet of turbochargers and direct injection to produce 1001 horsepower (now rumored closer to 1100) at 6000 rpm and 922 pound-feet of torque between 2200 and 5500 rpm. This unimaginable wrenching is delivered forward through a fabulous paddle-shift seven-speed DSG gearbox (0.15 second per shift), then split between the front and rear axles by a Haldex clutch. The basic architecture is reminiscent of a Lamborghini Diablo's. Rotate the key, wait for the systems to self-check, and give the starter button a hard press. A short whirr is eclipsed by a thundering rumble. A check of the gauges finds all the normal ones--except for that power dial on the lower left with numbers ending at a startling 1001. Inside, the motif is Flash Gordon as Howard Hughes would've built it. It's coated in perfectly stitched leather and Alcantara, interrupted by only polished or engine-turned aluminum surfaces. The shapes have a thirties feel--kitschy maybe, but fun. Ahead of you, 1320 feet is about to be eviscerated. Hold the brake, select drive and then first gear. Press the launch-control button, nail the throttle (the pedals are offset to the right), and wait for the revs to stabilize at 3000. Then release--you're doing 60 mph in approximately this much time: 2.7 seconds. There's no wheelspin. The car simply disappears as a V-8-like bellow frantically tries to keep up. At 30 mph, the 4530-pound Veyron is pulling 0.99 g. The quarter mile passes in 10.4 seconds at 139.9 mph, but at 137, our ride height sensors notice the hydraulic suspension adjustment already lowering the chassis and pitching the nose slightly as the rear wing rises and angles itself. The sensation is completely unfamiliar, as the thrust against your back doesn't seem to fade with speed, flummoxing any sensible guess at what the peak velocity might be. 200 mph? 300 mph? Who knows? This thing might never stop. Burt Rutan's spaceship-ride business ought to be concerned about the competition. Were we at Volkswagen's giant Erha Leissen test track, a high-speed key inserted along the doorsill would've allowed the Veyron to run up to its 253-mph low-drag maximum by collapsing the rear wing, closing the front diffusers, and dropping the chassis another 0.8 inch. But Ehra Leissen is probably the only place where this will ever occur, as even a touch of the brake pedal or a 90-degree turn of the steering wheel forfeits the effort and sends you back to handling mode, which is electronically limited to "only" 233. Above 120 mph, any significant brake application causes the elevated rear wing to flip up to a barn-door 55 degrees, but our standard tests from 100 and 60 mph found the drilled and vented carbon-ceramic brakes to be ample-enough anchors: 60 to 0 mph in 103 feet from a 2.3-ton car is hauling it down big-time (decelerating at over 1.1 g--even without the air brake). It's only the car's handling that leaves room for any debate at all. While it pulls a supercar-stout 0.96 g in cornering (aided by the biggest tires ever made for a production car), the steering action is lighter than you'd think and rather hydraulic (Audilike, an editor comments). If you expect the Veyron's helm to be Lotus Elise-sensitive, you'll be disappointed by its vanilla road feel. Nevertheless, the response is lighting-strike quick and, around our figure-eight course, the Bugatti is pleasantly neutral. It's a car of two personalities: a straight-line rocketship and a liquidy GT when the line bends. As the two Veyrons are raised into the transporter, their extra tires rolled away and the tool chests snapped shut, we're left with some shattered test records and a final question: Is this truly the reincarnation of Bugatti? Molsheim's cars have had a few back-from-extinction adventures already: the six disappointing Type 101s (essentially Type 57s) assembled in the 1950s, Virgil Exner's horrifying rebody of the seventh T101 in 1965, and the 31 strangely Veyronlike, Italian-built EB110s spearheaded by Romano Artioli in 1991. (Indeed, the AWD GT version of Artioli's quad-turbocharged V-12 car is rumored to have been closely "examined" by the new regime.) Perhaps in 1956 when Roland Bugatti (Ettore's son) threw up his hands and let the implausible world of Molsheim finally yellow into old photographs, the automotive world should've simply accepted that its king was truly dead. On the other hand, it isn't as bizarre as you might think that blue-collar Volkswagen would be the ultimate sorcerer to conjure back Europe's prince of sports cars. There's a rare photograph of Ettore Bugatti and Ferdinand Porsche speaking to each other at a race. It was likely an awkward encounter, because at about that time, Porsche's Auto Unions were ruthlessly drubbing the Bugatti on the track. It was effectively the beginning of the end, really, for Molsheim. Yet 70 years later, it would be Porsche's grandson, Volkswagen's Dr. Piech, who'd purchase the Bugatti name as well as the historic portion of the old factory's property. And furthermore build there--near the reconstructed barn (that held Rembrandt Bugatti's sculptures), the Orangery (which displayed cars), and even the iconic chateau--a spectacular new assembly shop for the birth of the superb Veyron. A car a certain barista on La Cienega can tell you a great deal about.
Motor Trend
4 hours ago
- Motor Trend
Why Hydrogen-Powered Cars Have Yet to Blow Up
The world's very first internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle wasn't powered by gasoline but rather by hydrogen. Way back in 1807, Francois Isaac de Rivaz used a hydrogen-filled ballon to drive an engine he developed to propel an experimental vehicle—more than 50 years before the first gasoline-powered engine was invented by Nicolaus August Otto. The first electric vehicle didn't appear until 1888 via the Flocken Elektrowagen, and the basis for modern hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) arrived a year later when Ludwig Mond and Carl Langer demonstrated and patented the technology in 1889. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) lag behind gas and electric cars due to limited infrastructure, high costs, and competition. Only three models are in the U.S. market, mostly in California. HFCVs may find more success in heavy-duty vehicles, while challenges persist in the passenger car sector. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article. Read Next So although hydrogen-powered vehicles theoretically came first, forerunners are not always the ultimate frontrunners, and after more than a century of passenger cars proliferating across the globe, HFCVs have lagged to a distant third behind gas and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). HFCVs have been largely regulated to research projects such as GM's 1966 Electrovan, which is widely considered to be the first modern HFCV ever produced. But several automakers persist in trying to make HFCVs viable despite significant barriers, such as a severe lack of fueling infrastructure, higher vehicle and fuel prices, and competition from a recent wave of lower-priced, more plentiful, and more easily fueled electric vehicles. Only Three Passenger HFCVs Available BEVs actually outpaced their gasoline-fueled rivals in popularity and performance during the early horseless carriage days, and in the past decade they've reemerged to challenge the dominance of ICE vehicles, with dozens of models available from traditional car companies and EV-only startups. By comparison, only three passenger HFCVs are currently available in the U.S.—the Toyota Mirai, Hyundai Nexo, and Honda CR-V e:FCEV—and all are sold exclusively in California, the state with the lion's share of public hydrogen fueling stations. Other automakers are also testing HFCVs and producing them in limited numbers. General Motors has been developing HFCVs since 2017, and in 2023 BMW began road testing of a fleet of iX5 Hydrogen vehicles that use Toyota technology. Starting in 2021, Jaguar Land Rover experimented with an HFCV concept based on the Land Rover Defender, while the Ineos Grenadier, with its retro Land Rover Defender exterior, has been outfitted with a HFCV powertrain the company said could be in production within two years. In 2022, Volkswagen partnered with Kraftwerk Tubes to create new hydrogen fuel cell tech it said was cheaper to produce and could theoretically deliver a driving range of more than 1,200 miles but has since been quiet on the HFCV front. Other automakers, including Mercedes-Benz and most recently Stellantis, have pulled the plug on their HFCV development programs. While a handful of automakers keeping pumping money into the technology, HFCVs face an uphill battle for widespread adoption in the U.S. passenger vehicle market, saidChris Liu, senior automotive analyst for new energy vehicles at the tech consulting firm Omdia. 'While the core technology is considered mature, with most components reaching high levels of readiness, critical barriers remain, particularly in cost and infrastructure.' A Huge Lack of Fueling Infrastructure Perhaps the biggest obstacle to widespread adoption of HFCVs is the severely limited public fueling infrastructure. It's the same problem that plagued early BEVs, though public charging has grown significantly along with increased sales of the vehicles—and drivers can charge their electric cars at home. As of June 2025, there are some 74,000 public EV charging stations online in America, compared to just over 50 hydrogen fueling stations, of which most are in California. In early 2024, Shell announced it was closing seven hydrogen stations in California, which was not only a blow to HFCV owners and automakers but also a setback for the California-based nonprofit Hydrogen Fuel Cell Partnership, which was formed by automakers, fuel providers, and government agencies in a bid to grow fueling infrastructure. 'The idea was to coordinate the efforts of OEMs with the fuel providers,' said Ivor John, a hydrogen fuel consultant. After initial success in California, there was a push to roll the program out nationally. 'The dynamics are very different in each state when you're bringing government entities together with the OEMs and the different providers, so they've kind of stumbled.' In addition to the challenge of building out a hydrogen fueling infrastructure, other hurdles include the high costs of hydrogen production, transportation, and storage, according to Sergey Paltsev, a senior research scientist for the MIT Energy Initiative. 'To gain traction with consumers, either these costs have to go dramatically lower, or some sudden issues with internal combustion and electric vehicles would arise to make these more established options less appealing,' Paltsev said. 'To win consumer preferences, hydrogen cars have a long way to go in terms of reducing their costs for vehicles and fuel.' As is the case with public EV chargers, HFCV stations are not always operational and available, and given those stations require hydrogen to be generated, compressed, and delivered, it can potentially add hours to refueling wait times. In June 2019, HFCV owners in the San Francisco Bay Area found out just how fragile the retail hydrogen infrastructure is when an explosion at a chemical plant in the area caused a severe shortage of working fueling stations. Bay Area HFCV drivers had to check an online report to make sure they could access a fueling station to fill their tanks, while Toyota and Honda offered free rental cars to affected HFCV owners. MotorTrend experienced a similar if not quite as volatile Hydrogen Fuelpocalypse during our long-term test of a 2021 Toyota Mirai. And it's only gotten worse: In early 2025 hundreds of HFCV owners in California banded together to sue automakers and the state, asserting they were misinformed about fuel availability. High Hydrogen Fuel Prices Along with limited availability, HFCVs can cost more to drive compared to charging a BEV or filling a tank with gasoline. Over the year with our 2021 Mirai, the price of hydrogen, which is sold per kilogram (kg), was relatively stable, and the stations we visited charged between $13.14 to $18.69 per kg. Topping off the Mirai's 5.5-kg tank from a quarter full generally cost us between $45 and $50. Driving the Mirai 13,882 miles, we spent $2,996.37 on hydrogen, which averaged to about 21.7 cents/mile. By comparison, our 2020 Hyundai Sonata used $2,746.91 worth of gasoline after driving it 17,000 miles, and we paid an average of $3.89 per gallon, or about 16.1 cents/mile. We didn't have to pay out of our pocket for the hydrogen because every new Mirai comes with a $15,000 prepaid fuel card that works at all hydrogen stations. Honda and Hyundai also provide buyers and lessees with free hydrogen fuel for limited periods. If we had to pay after the fuel freebie ended, we would have paid more because in 2023 California's largest hydrogen supplier, True Zero, boosted prices to $36/kg from a cost of $13.14/kg less than three years before—meaning filling Mirai's 5.5-kg tank from empty could have cost as much as $175. HFCVs Cost More In addition to paying more for the fuel itself, HFCVs on average cost more than their BEV and ICE counterparts. 'The cost gap between HFCVs and BEVs continues to undermine the former's viability,' Liu said. The 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV, for example,jointly developed with GM, uses a 17.7-kWbattery that can be plugged in and charged to provide 29 miles of additional range on top of the 241 miles supplied by the fuel cell. It starts at $50,000 and has a total range of 270 miles, whereas the 2026 CR-V Hybrid starts at $35,630 and has a maximum gasoline/electric range of 590 miles, and the 2025 Honda Prologue BEV, also codeveloped with GM, has an EPA-rated range of 308 miles and starts at $47,400. The growing availability of BEVs is also making HFCVs even less competitive from a price perspective. 'We're seeing substantial competition in the market for electric cars in terms of different car makers and the models they offer,' MIT's Paltsev said. 'It puts a downward pressure on the prices for electric cars. Hence, the cost disparity between EVs and FCVs is growing rather than narrowing.'HFCVs not only are being outpaced by BEVs but also face rising competition from plug-in hybrids, range-extending vehicles, and a growing supply of used BEVs. Heavy-Duty Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles All is not lost on the hydrogen power front, however. For automakers that serve transportation needs beyond passenger vehicles, HFCVs have more practical applications in the heavy-duty and commercial vehicle sectors. 'In the commercial vehicle space, a more diversified refueling strategy is emerging, ranging from fast charging and battery swapping to hydrogen fuel cells,' Omdia's Liu said. Toyota, Hyundai, and other automakers are working with heavy-duty truck manufacturers and other stakeholders to bring HFCV technology to the logistics industry. 'Both Korea and Japan are well aligned with that,' John said of the promise of commercial applications. 'There's no question that hydrogen is a better fit for Class 8 semi-tractor-trailers where you can refuel the vehicles in 10 to 15 minutes.' In addition to the fast refueling time, HFCV semis also don't have to haul the massive weight of batteries, which reduces a BEV big rig's maximum cargo capacity and range. HFCVs also make more sense for heavy-duty trucks than for passenger vehicles because fueling infrastructure can be installed at private depots where they need to stop to load and unload. In turn, more hydrogen-powered commercial vehicles could help drive more public fueling options. 'The expansion of highway-based hydrogen stations could in theory support fuel cell passenger vehicles,' Liu said. 'However, the utilization of these stations is likely to be dominated by heavy-duty trucks, not passenger cars.' But even if this scenario were to play out to perfection, Paltsev believes it's a long way into the future, if at all. Living the Hydrogen Future in the Present John is living the hydrogen future now. He's on his second Toyota Mirai and has been driving a hydrogen-powered car for roughly nine years now. Of course, it helps that there's a hydrogen station a mile or so from his home in Santa Barbara, California. He said he's been unable to refuel only twice—once when he had to come back the next day and once within a couple of hours. 'I have reliable five-minute fueling, I can drive about 400 miles in the Mirai, and range anxiety isn't an issue as long as I know where the next station is,' John said. But it's not his only means of transportation given the Mirai's limitations. He owns a Nissan Leaf for around town and recently bought a Toyota RAV4 Prime plug-in hybrid for longer trips. 'I really love battery electric for this, the hydrogen vehicle for that, and RAV4 plug-in has 42 miles of electric range, and when I go on a trip I don't worry about finding a charging station,' he said. While it's hard to envision HFCV passenger cars being anything more than the novelty they are now for the foreseeable future, John believes there are still opportunities ahead for the powertrain, particularly in the aforementioned heavy-duty vehicle space. 'Toyota is very committed to developing the heavy-duty vehicle opportunity with hydrogen along with Hyundai,' John said. 'But I wouldn't rule out hydrogen vehicles coming back as a light-duty alternative, and I think we should see where it takes us.'
