2 UK stocks and funds to consider buying during this market downturn!
Amid signs that US 'exceptionalism' could be waning, some analysts believe investors may start to switch their attention to other countries' equity markets. If data from Hargreaves Lansdown is to be believed, this trend could already have started in earnest.
The investment platform has said that purchases of UK shares have outweighed those involving US shares by a ratio of 3:1 in recent days. As fears over the economic and political landscape Stateside grow, this is a phenomenon I think could pick up substantially.
In this climate, researching a UK stocks fund like the iShares MSCI UK IMI Leaders ETF (LSE:UKEL) could be a good idea. This exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracks the performance of a basket of British stocks, the majority of which are the big beasts of the FTSE 100 and mid-cap growth shares of the FTSE 250.
Some of the largest holdings here are Unilever, National Grid, Lloyds and Reckitt Benckiser.
In total, the fund has holdings in 144 companies, allowing investors to effectively spread risk. What's more, it's focused on companies with strong environmental, social and governance (ESG) characteristics. This leaves it well placed to harness rising investor demand for ethical shares.
Beware, however, that returns could disappoint if market sentiment towards UK-based assets sinks again.
Another interesting piece of trading data from Hargreaves Lansdown caught my eye recently. This showed net purchases of gold ETFs up 157% last week compared to the week before.
This is no surprise given the yellow metal's role as a safe-haven asset in tough times. Many analysts expect gold prices to take out last week's record high near $3,171 per ounce as macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty swells.
I myself purchased a fund tracking the performance of a basket of gold mining stocks to capitalise on the metal's continued bull run. And I believe Hochschild Mining (LSE:HOC) could be a great individual stock to consider buying in the current climate.
Investing in specific mining stocks like this can be riskier than buying a fund that holds many. Project exploration, mine development and metal production can be rife with setbacks that can smack earnings and share prices. Investing across several companies reduces this risk on overall returns.
That said, I believe this risk is more than baked in to the cheapness of Hochschild's share price. City analysts think earnings will soar 103% in 2025, leaving the company trading on a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.7 times.
A sub-1 price-to-earnings growth (PEG) ratio of just 0.1 also underlines the company's cheapness.
I also like the fact that Hochschild produces silver alongside gold from its assets across the Americas. Both these metals rise sharply in demand during uncertain times. However, silver's wide use in industrial applications mean it can also rise sharply in price when economic conditions improve.
The post 2 UK stocks and funds to consider buying during this market downturn! appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
More reading
5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50
One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool
Royston Wild has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Lloyds Banking Group Plc, National Grid Plc, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, and Unilever. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
Motley Fool UK 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Crypto firms urge UK to form national stablecoin strategy to avoid falling behind U.S.
The U.K. should establish a national stablecoin strategy to enable adoption of the tokens and avoid falling behind the U.S. on the disruptive new technology, several major crypto firms said Wednesday. In an open letter addressed to Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, 30 crypto industry figures said that the U.K. "must act now to avoid being a rule-taker rather than a rule-maker in the digital asset era." "To ensure the UK is at the forefront, we believe a proactive, coordinated national strategy is needed - one that positions stablecoins not as a risk to be contained, but as a financial infrastructure to be responsibly embraced," the letter said. The U.K. Treasury department was not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency that is pegged to an existing government-backed currency. There are several stablecoins in issuance, however the most commonly known are Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC — both of which are tied to the U.S. dollar. The entire stablecoin market is worth over $280 billion, according to CoinGecko data. But for stablecoins pegged to the British pound, their combined market capitalization stands at just £461,224 ($621,197). Crypto industry insiders have taken issue with Britain's regulatory stance on stablecoins, saying it puts the nascent industry — and, in turn, the U.K.'s financial services landscape — at a disadvantage. One aspect of the U.K.'s approach that worries the industry is the legal definition of stablecoins as "crypto-assets with reference to fiat currency." "This definition focuses on form rather than function," they said in the open letter Wednesday. "This is akin to defining a cheque as paper with reference to currency, when both are essentially negotiable instruments backed by regulated issuers." A national stablecoin strategy would strengthen the U.K.'s role as a global financial center, generate new fee and foreign exchange revenue streams and support demand for gilts through new digital channels, the signatories to the letter said. The letter was signed by industry executives from Coinbase, Kraken, Copper, Fireblocks, BitGo and VanEck. Still, stablecoins are not without their concerns. In 2022, a stablecoin named terra and its sister token luna both collapsed to $0 after a failure in the cryptocurrencies' underlying technology. That also caused the value of USDT to temporarily fall below its $1 peg. USDT is currently worth $1. In a research note published Wednesday, HSBC's head of digital assets research, Daragh Maher, wrote that stablecoins could help bridge the gap between traditional finance and digital assets. "They are basically the cash equivalent of digital assets," Maher argued. "They are the reference or base currency for nearly every crypto asset. They can also be used for transferring money using blockchain pay rails rather than traditional banking methods." However, he added that regulatory issues remain the biggest hurdle to stablecoin adoption. "The key to capitalising on the potential of stablecoins lies in creating an appropriate regulatory environment for the sector," said Maher.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
£5,000 invested in Lloyds shares in August 2020 is now worth…
One share in Lloyds Banking Group (LSE:LLOY) is now (20 August) worth nearly twice as much as it was in August 2020, when Covid-19 was wreaking havoc on the world. Someone clever enough to have invested £5,000 at the time would now be sitting on a stake worth £9,836. In addition, they would have picked up £1,285 in dividends. Overall, that's a 122% return. However, the bank's share price was relatively flat for much of this period. It's only started to climb significantly since the start of 2024. With nearly all of its earnings being derived from the UK, it's not surprising that Lloyds' fortunes are closely connected to the performance of the domestic economy, which has struggled for most of the past five years. Post-pandemic inflation and the cost-of-living crisis dented consumer sentiment. Investors also saw better opportunities outside the country. But once the Bank of England started to cut interest rates, price rises eased and the economy began growing again, the Lloyds share price benefitted from improved earnings and renewed investor optimism. Uncertain times Unfortunately, recent economic data presents a more confused picture. Growth during the second quarter of the year exceeded city expectations but inflation, unemployment and government borrowing are all moving in the wrong direction. This could be an indicator of trouble ahead for the bank. An economic downturn would increase the risk of loan defaults and damage the group's earnings. As of 30 June, Lloyds made a provision in its accounts for expected credit losses of £3.402bn. This is equivalent to 0.72% of its gross loan book. However, under a 'severe downside' scenario, this would be £5.807bn — £2.405bn more. If a provision of this level was made, it would reduce the bank's expected profit for 2025 by 55% and, I suspect, lead to a cut in its dividend. Scenario Expected credit losses (£bn) Weighting (%) Probability-weighted (actual provision) 3,402 – Upside 2,578 30 Base case 2,995 30 Downside 3,831 30 Severe downside 5,807 10 Not that bad But I don't think even the most pessimistic economist is expecting the assumptions used in this scenario to become reality. This model assumes GDP growth of 0.1% in 2025, a contraction of 3% in 2026 and a flat 2027. However, as expected of a reputable business, I think Lloyds has been prudent in coming up with its estimate of bad and doubtful loans. Its probability-weighted forecast includes 10% of the severe downside result. So while I believe the UK economy remains fragile, I think the bank has already reflected this in its calculations. It also appears to have dodged a bullet with the recent ruling by the Supreme Court. Previous estimates had suggested that the alleged mis-selling of car finance could cost the industry up to £44bn. It's now likely to be £9bn-£18bn. Through its Lex Autolease and Black Horse Motor Finance brands, it's believed that Lloyds has a 20% market share. However, I still don't want to invest. The recent share price rally means its historical price-to-earnings ratio is the highest of the FTSE 100's five banks. Its price-to-book ratio is beaten only by NatWest. And although its dividend yield is above the index average, it's still lower than that of HSBC and NatWest. Personally, I think there are better (that is, cheaper) opportunities for me elsewhere. The post £5,000 invested in Lloyds shares in August 2020 is now worth… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. James Beard has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended HSBC Holdings and Lloyds Banking Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
The future of the ‘special relationship' between the US and UK
Anyone who works in British foreign policy knows that we talk about 'the special relationship' with the U.S. infinitely more than Americans do. But there is a straightforward reason: it really matters to us. It is not just an emotional response, nor an attempt to cling to great-power status. Those are lazy and only partial explanations. The International Relations and Defence Committee in the House of Lords is currently conducting an inquiry into the U.K.'s future relationship with the U.S. In the evidence I submitted, I said very clearly that the U.S. is Britain's most important bilateral ally, in terms of trade, defense, intelligence, diplomacy and myriad cultural and historical connections. But that relationship is always evolving. What Socrates said about the unexamined life applies just as well to unexamined policy assumptions — and in international affairs particularly, nothing is unchanging. The Coalition for Global Prosperity is a nonpartisan group launched in 2018 by former Prime Minister David Cameron and ex-Defence Secretary Penny Mordaunt. It argues for three inseparable pillars in British foreign and security policy: an effective development budget, active diplomacy and a strong defense strategy. Last month, it published a report titled ' Transatlantic Ties: U.K.-U.S. Relations to 2045,' which examines the changing political landscape and proposing ways for the U.K. to strengthen and renew the alliance. (Full disclosure: I was recently appointed senior fellow for national security at the group, but I took the position after the report had been written and had no involvement in its content.) Donald Trump's return to the presidency has shifted U.K.-U.S. relations in ways that have sometimes been uncomfortable for Britain, and which have put new strain on the relationship between our two countries. The report acknowledges that Britain needs to increase its defense expenditure and footprint as part of a fairer burden-sharing. London also has to appreciate Washington's very different perspectives on matters like trade and tariffs, Ukraine and international aid. Disagreements will remain, but they can be managed, provided they are properly understood. Underpinning the report's recommendations is what Alexander Stubb, the president of Finland, recently described as a 'reverse-Kennedy' in the age of Trump. European nations should 'ask not what the Americans can do for you, ask what you can do for America.' This does not mean accepting any kind of military or diplomatic vassalage, but identifying areas of common interest where the U.K. can use its particular influence or capabilities for mutual benefit. The report recommends that, while the British government must meet the new NATO defense spending target, it should go further and show leadership, setting out a concrete plan for increasing expenditure on core defense commitments to 3.5 percent of GDP by 2030, well in advance of the agreed upon 2035. No one seriously doubts that the British armed forces need this kind of investment, but putting ourselves ahead of the curve would make a powerful statement of intent to partners and adversaries alike. America's focus on China as the principal threat to its interests over the coming decades is shaping policy across the board, shifting the strategic focus towards the Indo-Pacific. China presents itself as an alternative ally and patron for smaller nations — think of the Belt-and-Road Initiative and Chinese-sponsored maritime facilities in Cambodia, Peru and Sri Lanka. The report urges the U.K. to do much more to challenge this narrative, highlighting China's human rights abuses, repression and self-interest. The U.K. is well placed in this respect because of its membership in so many overlapping forums, including the United Nations, NATO, the G7, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Trade Organization and the Commonwealth. The other recommendations concern what are called 'minilateral' organizations, combinations of a small number of countries to achieve specific, limited objectives. There are several areas in which this approach offers real opportunities: Pillar Two of the tripartite AUKUS agreement, on research, development and production of new technologies; the Joint Expeditionary Force, the U.K.-led alliance of 10 European states that provides rapid response and expeditionary capability in the Baltic and the Arctic region; a proposal to develop a U.S.-U.K.-led minilateral group for 'a radical rethink about priorities and mechanisms of development.' There are two fundamental messages underpinning this. The transatlantic relationship has brought huge benefits to both countries. The U.K. cannot assume it will endure through the simple momentum of history, but it can work to strengthen and renew the relationship through specific, discrete projects that will yield tangible benefits for both countries. This would include an increase in defense spending; taking a harder public line on China; proving how AUKUS can deliver even more for its participants; and inviting U.S. observers to Joint Expeditionary Force summits, so they can see what Europe is doing independently to strengthen its security. Yes, Trump is transactional and wants to see how America gains from every situation. The U.K. has to be focused on issues where it can deliver. If that sounds less elevated and more businesslike than the Atlantic Charter or the emotional bond of the Reagan-Thatcher years, it is only a reflection of a new reality. Eliot Wilson is a freelance writer on politics and international affairs and the co-founder of Pivot Point Group. He was senior official in the U.K. House of Commons from 2005 to 2016, including serving as a clerk of the Defence Committee and secretary of the U.K. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
