
I Asked Ring Home Security and Nextdoor About Tracking ICE Raids With Their Tech: Is It Allowed?
Law enforcement, which has grown accustomed to requesting home security videos for its own purposes, doesn't appear to be a fan of doorbells and security cameras being used against its activities. Security companies walk a tightrope when deciding what to allow and what to block while following the latest laws and court orders. Owners, meanwhile, wonder what this means for their privacy and safety, and their freedom when it comes to using the tech they paid for.
I dug into the issue, asked Ring and Nextdoor where they stand on the subject, and found the rules everyone should know about using security tech to track official activities.
Rules about reporting law enforcement activity on apps like Ring Neighbors
Posts that name streets and other nearby locations are less likely to be removed.
Tyler Lacoma/CNET
When I reached out to Ring about its Neighbors app policies regarding recent events and police raids (as well as Reddit reports about posts being taken down), the company provided helpful information about its specific policies.
I found out the reasons why Ring does tend to remove certain posts or stop them from going live on Neighbors. For one thing, posts about a general law enforcement presence can get nixed. So if someone said ICE was spotted in "Bell Gardens," their post would be denied because that's just too vague. Or if a post asked, "Hey, is there any ICE activity in town?" it wouldn't be allowed. Other posts get banned if they:
Explicitly obstruct law enforcement
Voice political opinions
Assume immigration status, or other types of prejudice
Don't pertain to local events
Ring Neighbors does allow posts about specific law enforcement activity
Ring posts generally allow for specific information, but not broad discussion or accusations.
Tyler Lacoma/CNET
Posts that cite an exact location, or images showing agents directly connected to an event, tend to be fine. If someone said, "I saw ICE knocking on doors at the IHOP on Florence and Pico," that would be allowed, according to Ring's guidelines. Other allowed posts provide info on the exact cross streets, addresses, complexes, blocks and so on.
Bans aren't always immediate. Sometimes posts that violate guidelines are taken down after the fact, either as a result of postpublication moderation, user flagging or user deletion. And customers can usually appeal moderation decisions for the sake of consistency.
When I turned to Nextdoor, another popular neighborhood app used for discussing events, a company spokesperson said something similar: "Our platform fosters discussions of local issues and, as such, our Community Guidelines prohibit broad commentary or personal opinions on national political topics." As long as it's a local issue and users follow the basic community guidelines (be respectful, don't discriminate, use your true identity, and so on), then posts should be fine.
Guidelines for posting on Ring Neighbors and more
App users need to give details in their posts, and thorough descriptions, especially if they're including a picture.
Tyler Lacoma/CNET
When I visit my own Neighbors app, I see -- contrary to some reports -- that users frequently post about hearing sirens or police activity in their own neighborhoods, ask about masked strangers or raise questions about law enforcement.
Posts like these make it clear: You can still post about security concerns on Ring Neighbors and other apps, even and especially when they involve police activity. You can also post about people you don't recognize and strangers knocking, which opens the door (not literally) to talking about masked federal ICE agents that aren't wearing any identifiers.
In other words, it looks like what Ring said holds true. Explicit information citing current, local events, preferably with address data, is allowed.
"Focus on the behavior that raised your suspicion," Nextdoor recommends. "Describe the potentially criminal or dangerous activity you observed or experienced -- what the person was doing, what they said (if they spoke to you). Include the direction they were last headed." If you post with an eye toward the safety of your neighborhood, your post is less likely to be removed.
Finally, avoid posts that include gruesome content, or that violate someone's privacy, which are also red flags likely to lead to a block.
Can users coordinate with one another on apps like Ring Neighbors?
Ring tends to allow conversations about what people can share concerning ongoing police events.
Tyler Lacoma/CNET
This is a gray area and it's difficult to know if discussions will get removed. In my experience on the Neighbors app, many discussions about sirens and unexplained police presence were left up, allowing people to provide additional information from their own perspectives, what they heard on police scanners, and so on.
It's possible that the more these posts mention ICE or federal enforcement, the more likely they'll be removed, and if conversations move into discussions about national issues or general legal advice, they may be taken down. But many people have reported that they've successfully used apps like Neighbors to talk about nearby law enforcement raids, so I don't see any evidence of a blanket ban.
Groups using the Neighbors app to communicate important information or provide help should also be aware of the Neighbors Verified tag, which is available to both public safety agencies and community organizations. This tag makes it easier for users of Neighbors to trust information and announcements from specific accounts. Verified accounts don't have access to any additional information about users.
Reports of law enforcement covering up home doorbells and cameras
An NBC affiliate in Denver, 9News, published footage of what it reported were federal agents covering up a video doorbell during a raid. (The Independent reported that ICE said it "does not comment on specific tactics, capabilities, or operational details.")
It's unclear if a move like this is illegal under protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, but civil rights attorneys have said it is. If anything like this happens, it's best to immediately save the recording -- and remember that agents almost always need a warrant to enter your home.
A few final rules to follow
Often the best response to a federal raid is no response at all, as well as remembering your rights.
Westend61/Getty Images
Whether you're worried about federal raids, curious about what law enforcement is doing in your area, or just want clarification about worrying events, remember a few basic rules as outlined by the National Immigrant Justice Center and the American Civil Liberties Union:
Don't escalate: In cases where federal agents or people appearing to be agents have knocked on doors, people have done nothing and simply waited for agents to leave. Remember, without a warrant, they usually can't enter a house, and if you have a video doorbell, it can still record everything that happens. Avoid confrontation when possible, and don't give law enforcement anything to act on. Remember, everyone still has the right to remain silent.
If you feel your safety is endangered, call 911 or seek help from a nonprofit: Calling 911 is very helpful if you feel unsafe because of nearby events. You can explain the situation and have a record of the call. 911 is an emergency response service and isn't in the business of reporting to federal agents. There are also local immigrant rights agencies you can contact to report ICE, and groups like the ACLU can usually point you in the right direction.
For more information, take a look at the latest news on what Ring is letting the police see (it's good news for privacy fans), the legal ramifications of recording video or audio in your home, and what you and landlords can legally do with security cameras.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
5 minutes ago
- CBS News
2 charged with murder for explosion, fire that left 5 dead at Los Angeles County cannabis laboratories
Two people were charged with murder in connection with a fiery explosion in Irwindale and a deadly fire in South El Monte that left five people dead at illegal cannabis laboratories in recent years, Los Angeles County prosecutors announced on Friday. On Oct. 9, 2023, four people died when a warehouse in the 1400 block of Arrow Highway in Irwindale exploded, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. Prosecutors say that all four of the victims were employees at the warehouse, which was being used for honey oil extraction. Nearly a year after, another person died at a laboratory in South El Monte, which was also being used as an illegal cannabis operation, prosecutors said. On Friday, Ted Chien, 54, was charged with five counts of murder in connection with the explosion and fire, which killed Yi Luo, 47, of Baldwin Park, Xin Chen, 59, of Rosemead, Guangqi Fu, 35, of Chino and Quizhuo Liang, 35, of Monterey Park and Bordin "Tony" Sikarin, 57, of Buena Park. Those murder charges against Chien also include the special circumstance allegation of multiple murders, prosecutors said during a news conference on Friday. They are expected to decide at a later time whether to seek the death penalty against Chien, who also faces two counts of felony arson causing great bodily injury, three felony counts of maintaining a place for selling or using a controlled substance and eight felony counts of manufacturing a controlled substance. Chien's parter, 55-year-old Rosemead man Han Quan Jiao, was also charged with one count of murder in connection with the deadly fire in South El Monte. Additionally, he faces one count of arson causing great bodily injury, three counts of maintaining a place for selling or using a controlled substance and eight counts of manufacturing a controlled substance. If convicted as charged, Jiao faces life in prison, the DA's office said. Both Chien and Jiao are scheduled for arraignment on Sept. 11 in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom. Both are accused of continuing the illicit operation, illegal extracting and distributing concentrated cannabis, despite the deaths of their employees, prosecutors said. Four other people were charged on Friday, all of whom also allegedly worked for Chien and Jiao. Xiaolong Deng, 36, Chengyan Xu, 61, Christopher Reyes, 30, and Frank Herrera, 35, each face one count of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. Xu was also charged with two counts of manufacturing and compounding or producing a controlled substances, while the other three were charged with one count of the same offense, the DA's office noted. Deng, Xu and Reyes are expected back in court on Sept. 24 after previously entering not guilty pleas. At that time, a judge will determine if there is substantial evidence to allow the case against them proceed to trail. Herrera is due in court on Monday for arraignment. Xu faces a maximum sentence of eight years and eight months in prison, while Deng, Reyes and Herrera each face up to seven years if convicted as charged, prosecutors said. More than 150 law enforcement agents served search warrants at nine different Los Angeles County locations earlier this week in connection with the investigation, which they dubbed "Operation Sugar Diamond," according to the DA's office. "This case shows the deadly and disastrous results when illegal cannabis operations recklessly put greed over the safety of their employees and neighbors," said a statement from LA County District Attorney Nathan Hochman. "Cannabis may be legal in California, but this kind of high-risk, illegal activity is not. These drug-trafficking organizations have no place in our communities and my office will continue to work with law enforcement at the local, state and federal levels to hold those accountable who engage in this illicit trade."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gary Busey Pleads Guilty to Sex Crimes Charge, Admits 'It Was Not an Accidental Touching'
Gary Busey pleaded guilty to one count of fourth-degree criminal sexual contactNEED TO KNOW Gary Busey pleaded guilty to one count of fourth-degree criminal sexual contact on Thursday, July 31 Busey admitted he inappropriately touched a woman during the semi-annual Monster-Mania Convention at a Doubletree Hotel in New Jersey on Aug. 13, 2022 "He's glad to put this behind him," Busey's criminal defense attorney tells PEOPLEGary Busey pleaded guilty to one count of fourth-degree criminal sexual contact on Thursday, July 31. Busey entered his plea during a virtual court appearance where he admitted he inappropriately touched a woman at the semi-annual Monster-Mania Convention at a Doubletree Hotel in New Jersey in August of 2022. "It was not an accidental touching," Busey told the judge, according to The Guardian. Busey's criminal defense attorney Blair Zwillman tells PEOPLE that in order for the judge to accept the guilty plea, "there has to be a factual basis where he admits the offense. He had to admit that it was non-consensual.' 'This was the best disposition for him," says Zwillman. "He's glad to put this behind him. He is basically a family guy. He is not a criminal." Busey, who was initially charged with four counts of criminal sexual contact and one count of attempted criminal sexual contact, has yet to be sentenced. He faces fines and one to five years of probation. 'We're going to ask that he'd just be fined and end it,' says women reported that the actor touched them inappropriately during an autograph signing meet-and-greet at Monster-Mania in 2022. The actor initially denied any wrongdoing. "None of that happened,' he told TMZ. 'It was a partner, a camera lady and me, and two girls ... it took less than 10 seconds, and they left. Then they made up a story that I assaulted them sexually and I did not. Nothing happened, it's all false." Busey was nominated for an Oscar for his portrayal of Buddy Holly in The Buddy Holly Story. He also has appeared in dozens of other films including Predator 2 and Point Break. If you or someone you know has been a victim of sexual abuse, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Portillo's crash: Officials release new details on 2-year-old's death, driver involved
The Brief A 2-year-old boy died and 12 others were injured after a 50-year-old driver crashed into a Portillo's restaurant in Oswego on Wednesday. The Kane County coroner confirmed the child died from multiple traumatic injuries; further test results are pending as the investigation continues. Oswego police say it's too early to determine whether the driver will face charges, though the crash appears to have been accidental. OSWEGO, Ill. - New details have emerged about a deadly crash at a suburban Portillo's earlier this week that killed a 2-year-old boy and left 12 others injured. What we know A vehicle crashed through the front entrance of a Portillo's restaurant at 2810 Route 34 in Oswego at 1:55 p.m. Wednesday. Thirteen people total were injured in the crash, according to Oswego police. Eight were transported to local hospitals, while the remaining five received treatment at the scene. The hospitalized victims range in age from their 20s to their 60s. The 2-year-old boy was transported to Rush Copley Medical Center in Aurora, where he was pronounced dead, the Kane County coroner's office said. Following an autopsy, the coroner reported on Friday that the boy died from injuries consistent with multiple traumatic injuries. Additional test results are pending as the investigation continues. "This is a tragic and heartbreaking situation for our community. As a mother, it breaks my heart to think about the loss of a child who was sharing a meal with his family at a restaurant. I wish to extend my heartfelt condolences to the loved ones of the child and to all those who were injured in the crash," said Coroner Monica Silva. New Details on Driver On Friday, police said the driver in the crash was a 50-year-old woman from Canton, Michigan. "Preliminary findings suggest the crash may have been accidental in nature; however, the exact cause remains under investigation. At this time, it has not been determined whether charges will be filed against the driver…," police said. The vehicle involved in the crash was a 2011 Lincoln MKZ Sedan. What's next Oswego police are continuing to investigate the cause of the crash. The coroner's office is also investigating the circumstances surrounding the child's death. RELATED: Portillo's crash: Child killed, 13 others injured after car slams into Oswego restaurant