
Haitians saw a special Biden entry program as a promise. Will Trump kick them out?
Trump on Day 1 killed a Biden-era program that helped people from certain countries, including Haiti, come to the U.S. under humanitarian parole.
It remains unclear what will happen to people who are already in the U.S. on the two-year parole.
Loueise Mary Pierristil, who is now seeking asylum, said Haitians were invited here under the past administration. "The right thing to do is for whoever is president to respect that."
SPRING VALLEY - The Trump administration announced just after the inauguration that a special humanitarian program for immigrants from chaotic and dangerous countries was terminated. The program, introduced by the Biden administration in 2023, lets certain immigrants with a sponsor into the U.S. as they seek asylum and a possible path to citizenship.
Almost half of those using the program, said to be given "humanitarian parole," are from Haiti.
But what about those participants who are already here, including an estimated 3,000 now living in Rockland County?
Will the Trump administration allow them to complete the next step, which usually includes securing asylum and a pathway to citizenship?
"I hope so," said Renold Julien, CEO of Konbit Neg Lakay, a community center in Spring Valley that's been helping immigrants since 1996.
Loueise Mary Pierristil agreed.
"I was invited by President Biden," he said during a break from a morning English class that Konbit provides. "The right thing to do is for whoever is president to respect that."
Homeland Security says program fed 'invasion'
There has been no official word for what comes next for humanitarian parole recipients already here.
But a Jan. 21 statement by Homeland Security said the program had been "abused" and had allowed an "invasion."
Trump throughout the presidential campaign blasted immigration programs, especially those that supported Haitians.
One of the most memorable comments about Haitian immigration came during the presidential debates, when Trump repeated rebutted rumors that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were "eating the pets."
What is the 'Biden Program'?
Biden in 2023 reopened a special humanitarian parole pathway, given the government shorthand of CHNV, for people from dangerous, corrupt and chaotic countries like Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua.
Many who have been granted the status call it the "Biden Program."
To qualify, a person needs to have a sponsor in the U.S. who can demonstrate the ability to provide any needed financial support. The parole status is for two years and provides necessary working papers. During the parole, a person can seek asylum, which provides a pathway to U.S. citizenship.
As of December 2024, some 531,690 had been come to the U.S. under CHNV, with more than 40% coming from Haiti.
Choosing faith in the U.S.
Lauture Jean is among those seeking humanitarian parole who ended up in Spring Valley, long a nexus of Haitian community and culture that boasts the second-largest, per capita, Haitian population in the U.S.
Like Jean, many joined the "Biden Program" because their lives were in danger in the chaos of Haiti's political instability. Jean was a high-ranking police officer in Haiti, and became a target of gangs.
He received humanitarian parole in September 2023. His two-year window under parole would give him until September this year to establish some sort of permanent residency.
Jean is well into the asylum application process — he's even submitted fingerprints — and has faith that the application process would be allowed to proceed under Trump's changing policies.
"I can continue to be afraid of going back to Haiti," he said in Haitian Creole. He said he has faith that the commitment the U.S. made will stand.
Fulfilling promise is 'the right thing to do'
Most of the Biden Program participants are employed, often in jobs that offer nowhere near the pay or prestige of their professional careers in Haiti.
Pierristil was an engineer in Haiti; now he's cleaning Konbit's offices.
Was it his dream to come to the U.S. someday? For a vacation, he said.
But with his home country unstable and his family there still in hiding, he now hopes to get asylum and U.S. citizenship and bring his loved ones to safety here.
Pierristil arrived in May 2023, so his two-year period to make a plan ends this May.
'Invited' to U.S.
St. Jacques Pierre arrived to New York on humanitarian parole last May. He had been involved in politics in his hometown. It became dangerous for him and his wife, which endangered his extended family; when the couple left, things seemed to calm down for the rest of the family, he said.
Pierre's two sons, ages 13 and 10, are in Haiti, living with their grandparents. He said he dreams of going back to Haiti, if things were safe and calm.
But he is building a life here, applying for asylum and planning to bring his two boys to the U.S.
Julien of Konbit said that people from all over the world come to the U.S. seeking safety and security.
As the leader of a U.S. Department of Justice-recognized agency, Julien said he keeps close tabs on immigration enforcement, as well as the political rhetoric and tone.
"Why the only people the administration is running after are Black and Latinos?" he wondered. "My people, they were invited by the U.S."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House had passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. "What sense does that make?" she asked. "What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?" The measure is part of the version of President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful" bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill, as it stands, would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails, or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry, based largely on their experience, that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook, and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. "It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid," said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. "If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping." Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. "Should I expect the government to take care of him?" he asked. "I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity." About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt their ability or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. "Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern," she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able, but worries about how that would be sorted out. "It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it," she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with "serious or complex" medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in "gig" jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. "I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not having health insurance," she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. "There's no way I could have afforded that," he said. "I would have lost my foot and probably died." ___ Associated Press writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut, contributed to this article.


USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would end EV subsidies: Could this kill Tesla?
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would end EV subsidies: Could this kill Tesla? Show Caption Hide Caption Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' aims at cutting EV tax credits President Donald Trump's tax bill includes a measure to kill an Obama-era electric vehicle tax credit. Billionaire Elon Musk is fighting to make sure federal tax incentives for electric vehicles (EVs) -- a key subsidy that makes buying EVs more affordable -- remain in place. President Donald Trump's new bill seeks to eliminate these tax incentives, which would otherwise be in place until 2032. Musk's company Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has already seen sales struggle to grow across many key geographies. Deliveries last quarter fell by 32% quarter over quarter, and by 13% year over year. Could the elimination of EV tax credits be a lethal blow to the struggling automaker? You might be surprised by the answer. Is Tesla struggling financially? When it comes to potential regulation "killing" an operating business like Tesla, the first thing investors must consider is the effect on sales growth. Already, demand growth has been stagnating for Tesla. And while the company has teased new potential revenue sources like its robotaxi venture, there aren't many high-visibility milestones ahead that will meaningfully boost revenue over the next year or two. Analysts expect the company to refresh its existing lineup, but details are scarce on releasing any brand new models in 2025 or 2026. Even if a new model is released, it's unlikely that production will scale meaningfully over the next 12 to 24 months. Is Tesla coming out with a new model soon? Where does this leave Tesla over the near term? In the same position it is in today, attempting to stoke demand for an increasingly stale lineup. Making the company's vehicles $4,000 to $7,500 more expensive -- the range of federal incentives that Trump is proposing to eliminate -- could ultimately accelerate sales declines for Tesla. Any potential demand boost from releasing a more affordable Model Y or Model 3, meanwhile, could be completely offset by eliminated tax credits, resulting in minimal net savings for customers. In return, Tesla may need to compress its profit margins in order to keep demand growth on track. Does Tesla have a lot cash on hand? Fortunately, Tesla has the capital to withstand a multiyear stagnation in sales growth. It has $16 billion in cash and equivalents on the books, more than every other competitor. Its profit margins are also positive -- a rarity in the EV world -- meaning it can afford to cut profits a bit without going into the red. It should be mentioned, though, that Tesla has also relied on selling automotive regulator credits -- earned by selling carbon-free vehicles -- to maintain profitability. The company earned $595 million last quarter by selling these credits versus a net income of $409 million. But most of this "free" income from selling credits comes from states like California and New York, as well as incentive programs in the E.U., making them unlikely to be cut should U.S. federal incentives change. Still, Tesla's biggest advantage is its $1 trillion market cap. Tesla could easily double the cash levels on its balance sheet while diluting shareholders by just 1% to 2%. This makes it very unlikely for the company to go under anytime soon. In fact, the elimination of EV tax credits could be a secret win for Tesla. Eliminating EV tax credits could actually help Tesla Many investors might be surprised to learn that ExxonMobil wishes for a carbon tax to be implemented. A carbon tax would make its output more expensive to buyers, potentially limiting demand. But if production costs rise, it's possible that many small competitors can't compete, leaving more of the market for well-capitalized behemoths like Exxon. The same may prove true for Tesla. Most of its EV competition comes from unprofitable companies with minimal room for error like Rivian and Lucid Group. These EV makers are roughly 99% smaller than Tesla, with limited ability to tap the market for more capital at will. The elimination of EV tax credits would hurt them more than Tesla, potentially leaving more long-term market share for Musk and his investors. Of course, the immediate effect will be negative for Tesla and the rest of the industry. But it should be stressed that bills are not laws. The EV tax credit may end up in place until 2032 like previously planned. But the elimination of these subsidies certainly won't "kill" Tesla. In fact, there's an argument that it could be a long-term advantage due to lessened competition. Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Offer from the Motley Fool: Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $368,190 !* if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,294 !* if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $653,702!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you joinStock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
Majority of Americans disapprove of Trump admin, but he leads on immigration: new poll
Majority of Americans disapprove of Trump admin, but he leads on immigration: new poll Show Caption Hide Caption Trump salutes Army during military parade, fireworks light up DC sky President Donald Trump saluted the U.S. Army on it's 250th birthday with a military parade and live music. WASHINGTON – A majority of Americans say they disapprove of Donald Trump's second term – with even some Republicans hitting the president – as immigration remains his strongest policy issue. A new NBC News Decision Desk Poll, conducted along with SurveyMonkey, found that 45% of Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, while 55% disapprove. Those figures remain unchanged from an NBC News survey in April. Trump's rating differ along party lines. Among Republicans, 89% approve of the president's second term in office, compared to eight percent of Democrats and 35% of Independents. Approximately 12% of Republicans said they disapprove of the president's job, compared to 92% of Democrats and 65% of Independents. Republicans were five percentage points less likely to report that they strongly support the president's administration, compared to the survey results from April. Much of that shift came from respondents who say they identify with the president's MAGA – Make America Great Again – movement. The survey also found an intensity gap among Republicans and Democrats over how they feel about the Trump administration's actions. Pollsters asked respondents to pick one emotion from a list of responses: Thrilled, happy, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, angry and furious. Fifty-one percent of Democrats agreed that they feel "furious" about the Trump administration, compared to 23 percent of Republicans who agreed. GOP survey respondents also shifted seven percentage points away from feeling "thrilled" about Trump from earlier surveys: 25% of Republicans said they felt thrilled over Trump's actions in the latest poll, compared to 32% who said the same in April. Still, only one percent of Republicans said they felt furious over Trump's actions. The latest survey was conducted among 19,410 adults nationwide between May 30 and June 10. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. Trump leads on immigration issue Trump has focused much of his presidency on advancing his immigration agenda, including deporting thousands of migrants to countries such as Colombia, Mexico and El Salvador. During his 2024 campaign, the sweeping deportations became his signature promise to voters. Now, Trump is leading on the issue. According to the survey, 51% of Americans approve Trump's handling of border security and immigration, while 49% disapprove. The survey was conducted as Trump had sent in National Guard troops to quell protests against immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area, against California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes. Additional protests against the Trump administration's immigration actions have broken out across the country. On the economy, approximately 45% of Americans reported that "their personal financial situation" is about the same as it was last year, and 34% said it has gotten worse. Approximately 21% said their finances have improved over the last year, results that didn't see a major shift from NBC's April survey.