Serbia's bold protests and buried crimes
For months now, Serbian students have braved intimidation and arrest to fill streets across their country in vibrant protest. Their demands are clear: an end to corruption, abuse of power, and the tight grip of President Aleksandar Vučić's lengthy rule. They want transparent governance, a free press, and courts that uphold the law rather than serve leaders.
The challenge now is how to realise that brighter future while honestly grappling with Serbia's darker past – and connecting the fight for justice at home with accountability for abuses that crossed borders and generations.
That link comes into sharp focus this month, as Bosnia and Herzegovina marks the 30th anniversary of the genocide at Srebrenica. On July 11, survivors and families, and many around the world, will again remember how Bosnian Serb forces massacred more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslim boys and men – Europe's worst atrocity since World War II. The Vučić government continues to reject Serbia's responsibility in enabling and supporting that crime. And the student-led democratic movement is still grappling with how, or whether, to reckon with this heavy legacy.
Some critics accuse the students of avoiding this history to calm or appease nationalist currents. Others argue it is unfair to expect young people – many of whom were not even born at the time – to answer for crimes committed decades ago.
But whichever view one takes, the connection cannot be ignored: a more democratic society, rooted in the rule of law, will stand on shaky ground without an honest reckoning with the crimes that came before.
Consider the recent case of Vlastimir Djordjevic, who ran Serbia's powerful police during Slobodan Milosevic's rule and the 1998–99 war in Kosovo. Last month, Djordjevic returned home after serving an 18-year sentence handed down by a United Nations tribunal for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Within days of his release, he stood proudly at a ceremony to rename a street after the special police units he once commanded – forces responsible for torture, mass killings, sexual violence, and the secret removal of around 1,000 bodies to hide the evidence.
Those remains, dumped in mass graves at police compounds and other sites across Serbia, have never been fully found.
His warm welcome is no anomaly. Other senior officials convicted by the UN tribunal have come home to applause. They speak at public events, appear on state TV, and deny the crimes for which they were convicted – even as domestic war crimes trials stall and high-level suspects remain untouched.
The brave students protesting in Belgrade and other cities may not carry signs about Srebrenica or the mass graves hidden beneath Serbian soil. But their struggle is bound to the same truth: A state that shields political cronies is the same state that protects war criminals.
A government that buries the truth about the past cannot be trusted to deliver genuine justice, transparency and democratic rule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
4 days ago
- Euractiv
Britain, France, and Germany ready to reimpose sanctions on Iran
The European powers have told the United Nations they are ready to reimpose UN-mandated sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme if no diplomatic solution is found by the end of August, according to a joint letter obtained by AFP. The letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the UN Security Council says the three European powers are "committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon" unless Tehran meets the deadline. The foreign ministers from the so-called E3 group threaten to use a "snapback mechanism" that was part of a 2015 international deal with Iran that eased UN Security Council sanctions. Under the deal, which terminates in October, any party to the accord can restore the sanctions. All three have stepped up warnings to Iran about its suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), after Israel launched a 12-day war with Iran in June, partly seeking to destroy its nuclear capability. The United States staged its own bombing raid during the war. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snap back mechanism," foreign ministers Jean-Noel Barrot of France, David Lammy of Britain and Johann Wadephul of Germany said in the letter. All three countries were signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with the United States, China, and Russia that offered the carrot and stick deal for Iran to slow its enrichment of uranium needed for a nuclear weapon. President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the accord in 2018 during his first term and ordered new sanctions. The European countries said they would stick to the accord. But their letter sets out engagements that the ministers say Iran has breached, including building up a uranium stock more than 40 times the permitted level under the 2015 deal. "The E3 remain fully committed to a diplomatic resolution to the crisis caused by Iran's nuclear programme and will continue to engage with a view to reaching a negotiated solution." "We are equally ready, and have unambiguous legal grounds, to notify the significant non-performance of JCPOA commitments by Iran ... thereby triggering the snap back mechanism, should no satisfactory solution be reached by the end of August 2025," the ministers wrote in the letter first reported by the Financial Times. End of cooperation The United States had already started contacts with Iran, which denies seeking a weapon, over its nuclear activities. But these were halted by the Israeli strikes in June on Iran's nuclear facilities. Even before the strikes, the international powers had raised concerns about the lack of access given to IAEA inspectors. Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes, but it announced that the agency's deputy chief was expected in Teheran for talks on a new cooperation deal. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the UN last month saying that the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European ministers called this allegation "unfounded". They insisted that as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of UN resolutions "to trigger UN snap back to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose UN sanctions."
Euractiv
4 days ago
- Euractiv
EU environment Commissioner ready to do plastic pollution deal ‘but not at any cost'
The European Union is ready to do a deal to land a groundbreaking treaty on plastic pollution, but not at any cost, the EU's environment commissioner insisted Tuesday. With just over two days left to strike a global accord in talks at the UN in Geneva, Jessika Roswall said it was "time" to clinch a deal between oil-producing countries and more ambitious nations, including EU countries. Five previous rounds of talks over the past two and a half years have failed to seal an agreement, including a supposedly final round in South Korea late last year. The current talks in Geneva opened a week ago but are due to close on Thursday. "The EU is ready to do a deal but not at any cost," Roswall told reporters. "We do like plastic... and we will continue to need it. However, we don't like plastic pollution and it's time to end plastic pollution as quickly as possible," the commissioner said. She said any treaty should give businesses the certainty of a clear global framework in which to operate. Stalled Geneva talks threaten landmark plastic pollution treaty The first week of talks in Geneva fell behind schedule, producing no clear text as countries remained split on step one: the treaty's purpose and scope A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group – including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and Iran – want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. The EU and others want to go much further by reining in plastic production – which on current trends is set to triple by 2060 – and by phasing out certain especially toxic chemicals. Drama in the pipeline Danish Environment Minister Magnus Heunicke admitted that the "wide gap" between the rival camps was making negotiations a challenge but said the work of tackling plastic pollution "will only get harder the longer we wait. So now's the time". "There's going to be a whole lot more drama in the days to come," he said, "but our goal is this drama should end up in a deal", he said, speaking alongside Roswall at the United Nations. He said all parties, including the EU, had to re-examine their red lines and see where they could tweak them in the interests of landing a deal by Thursday. "If we all stick to our red lines then a deal is impossible," he said. "So we have to look at those red lines and we have to negotiate and compromise -- because we will be worse off if we don't succeed in making a deal. "That's not me saying 'a deal at any price': Not at all. But a deal that is legally binding and has strong text and lays the ground for our work in the years ahead in order to tackle plastic pollution." (cp) Plastic promises: EU enters tough talks with petrostates over global treaty No result will be achieved without shifts in position from all sides, an EU official said
Euractiv
6 days ago
- Euractiv
Stalled Geneva talks threaten landmark plastic pollution treaty
With just four days left to reach a landmark global agreement on tackling plastic pollution, negotiations in Geneva remain deadlocked after a stalled first week of talks. The UN negotiations in Geneva follow a failed round in Busan, South Korea, last year. The first week fell behind schedule and produced no clear text, and after a Sunday pause, negotiators returned Monday to a draft riddled with unresolved issues. "We have to speed up negotiations," said EU environment chief Jessika Roswall, who arrived on Monday for the final stretch. "With four more days to go, we have more square brackets in the text than plastic in the sea." The 34-page draft, intended as the basis for high-level talks, remains bracketed throughout, reflecting deep divides over scope and ambition. A US-led alliance wants the treaty to address only plastic pollution, while an EU-led bloc is pushing to include limits on production. OECD projections show that global plastic output could triple by 2060. Rival camps square off The EU-led "ambitious" group, backed by Australia, Canada, Switzerland, the UK, much of Africa and Latin America, and small island states, is seeking binding measures, such as the phasing out of the most dangerous chemicals. Small island nations "will not stand by while our future is bartered away in a stalemate", said Palau envoy Ilana Seid on Sunday, speaking for 39 members of the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) group. Opposing them is the 'Like-Minded Group', led by Russia and major petrostates, which wants the treaty to focus on waste management and recycling. Last week, the US aligned with them, sending a memo urging delegations to scrap an article referencing plastic production. The struggle for consensus The treaty requires approval from all states, but observers say low-ambition countries are in no rush to compromise. "We risk having a meaningless treaty without any binding global rules like bans and phase-outs," Eirik Lindebjerg of NGO WWF told AFP . "Expecting any meaningful outcome to this process through consensus is a delusion. With the time remaining, the ambitious governments must come together as a majority to finalise the treaty text and prepare to agree it through a vote," he added. The text has ballooned to include nearly 1,500 bracketed sections – five times more than at the start of the talks – making agreement increasingly unlikely before the talks close on Thursday. (de)
