logo
What to know about Trump's potential change in federal marijuana policy

What to know about Trump's potential change in federal marijuana policy

President Donald Trump is taking a new look at reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug in a move that could nudge the federal government closer to an approach already embraced in many states.
Trump said Monday that he hopes to decide in the coming weeks about whether to support changes to the way marijuana is regulated. The renewed focus on marijuana comes more than a year after former President Joe Biden's administration formally proposed reclassifying marijuana. No decision was made before Biden left office.
Meanwhile, many states have already gone further than the federal government by legalizing the recreational use of marijuana for adults or allowing it for medical purposes.
What's the federal policy on marijuana?
Possessing marijuana remains a federal crime punishable by fines and prison time. Selling or cultivating marijuana is a more serious offense, punishable by prison sentences of five years to life, depending on the quantity of the drug.
The Justice Department last year proposed to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD, to a less dangerous Schedule III substance, which includes such things as ketamine and some anabolic steroids. But that switch involved a lengthy bureaucratic process.
Nearly 43,000 public comments were submitted to the federal government about the proposed change. The Drug Enforcement Administration was still in the review process when Trump succeeded Biden in January, triggering a re-examination of policies across the federal government.
What would reclassifying marijuana mean? Reclassifying marijuana would not make it legal for recreational use by adults nationwide. Rather, it would change the way it's regulated and taxed.
Federal income tax deductions for business expenses aren't available to enterprises involved in 'trafficking' any Schedule I or II drug. Changing marijuana to a Schedule III drug could mean significant tax savings for businesses licensed to sell marijuana in states where it is legal.
It also could make it easier to research marijuana, since it's very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances.
Due to the potential for federal penalties, many banks and financial institutions don't provide debit or credit services, loans or other common banking products to marijuana businesses authorized under state laws. That's unlikely to change merely by rescheduling marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act, according to a Congressional Research Service report.
What is there for Trump to consider?
Trump is weighing the pros and cons of a marijuana policy change, noting it's a 'very complicated subject.'
'I've heard great things having to do with medical' use of marijuana and 'bad things having to do with just about everything else,' Trump said Monday.
Marijuana advocacy groups have long pushed for the federal government to soften its stance. As a candidate, Trump appeared open to relaxed regulation, posting on his social media platform last year that he would 'focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug.'
But reclassification faces resistance from some conservatives and law enforcement groups. The National Sheriffs' Association was among those submitting written opposition, highlighting prior determinations that marijuana has a 'high abuse potential' and pointing to cases of 'extreme intoxication' and fatal vehicle crashes.
What's happening in the states?
The medical use of marijuana is already allowed in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Over the past dozen years, the number of jurisdictions legalizing recreational marijuana for adults rose rapidly to 24 states and the District of Columbia.
But the movement suffered some recent setbacks.
Ballot measures to legalize recreational marijuana failed last fall in Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota. Florida's measure received a majority vote, which would have been sufficient in most states, but fell short of the 60% threshold needed to approve amendments to the state constitution.
Idaho lawmakers this year referred a proposed constitutional amendment to the ballot that would forbid citizen initiatives to legalize marijuana and instead leave such decisions only to the Legislature.
Initiatives continue elsewhere to try to place recreational marijuana on the ballot, including in Oklahoma, where voters defeated a measure in 2023.
What does the data say about marijuana use?
About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters conducted during last year's election.
Polling from Gallup shows support for marijuana legalization has grown significantly, from just 36% support in 2005 to 68% last year.
Marijuana use has also increased. More than 64 million Americans age 12 and older — or 22.3% of people — used marijuana during the past year, according to a 2024 national survey released recently by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. That was up from 19% of people in 2021.
The growth in marijuana use was driven by adults aged 26 and older, according to the survey. However, people ages 18-25 remained the most likely to partake in marijuana, with 35% reporting use during the past year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alligator Alcatraz Disease Outbreak Claims Spark Lawsuit
Alligator Alcatraz Disease Outbreak Claims Spark Lawsuit

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

Alligator Alcatraz Disease Outbreak Claims Spark Lawsuit

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Detainees at a newly built immigration detention site in the Florida Everglades known as "Alligator Alcatraz" alleged that a respiratory disease, possibly Covid-19, spread through the facility and prompted legal filings that challenged conditions and sought greater access to lawyers for migrants held there. An attorney for one detainee described conditions at the remote tented camp as a "petri dish for disease," and protesters and lawyers said ambulances had been frequently observed arriving at the site. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the office of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for comment. Why It Matters The latest lawsuit against "Alligator Alcatraz" is one of several legal battles the newly constructed detention facility is facing, On August 7 a federal judge ordered a temporary halt to construction at the detention center as environmental groups argue that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to evaluate the environmental impact of major construction projects. Critics, meanwhile, have said detainees at the facility are forced to endure unsafe, unsanitary and inhumane living conditions and that Alligator Alcatraz runs afoul of environmental laws The remote detention facility is expected to cost Florida approximately $450 million annually to operate. The proposal comes as President Donald Trump's administration looks to conduct what they describe as the largest mass deportations operation in United States history. The administration has said the detention center is the state of Florida's responsibility. This image from a video feed shows Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking about deportation flights from the remote Everglades immigration lockup known as 'Alligator Alcatraz″ on July 25, 2025 in Ochopee, Florida. (AP Photo via Office... This image from a video feed shows Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking about deportation flights from the remote Everglades immigration lockup known as 'Alligator Alcatraz″ on July 25, 2025 in Ochopee, Florida. (AP Photo via Office Of Florida Governor Ron Desantis) More AP What To Know In a legal filing on Wednesday, an attorney for a detainee, Eric Lee, said his client, Luis Manuel Rivas Velásquez, reported respiratory symptoms and that multiple migrants in the camp had become ill over a period of days. Lee said Rivas Velásquez was taken to a Miami hospital, diagnosed with a respiratory infection, briefly returned to the camp and then transferred to another facility in El Paso, Texas. In a separate legal filing, detainees and attorneys alleged that Alligator Alcatraz had poor sanitation, limited access to legal counsel, and overcrowded tented housing, claims that featured in a broader complaint seeking increased lawyer access and improved conditions. In their complaint, plaintiffs portray the Alligator Alcatraz detention site as a remote Everglades encampment "without adequate medical infrastructure" where "hundreds of individuals are crammed into close quarters in extreme heat and humidity, with poor ventilation and limited access to hygiene." They allege that "migrants with fevers and coughs were left in their bunks without testing or treatment" as "ambulances... arrive multiple times a week," and accuse officials of erecting "an unconstitutional barrier between detainees and their counsel" by restricting visits and confiscating legal materials. The filing also claims the facility was "constructed without lawful environmental review," endangering both detainees and "the laws meant to protect the Everglades itself." Newsweek has previously heard several allegations of squalid, overcrowded, and inhumane conditions inside the facility from two people who spoke with detainees inside the facility. Federal judges have recently intervened in other detention settings to order improved conditions after lawyers documented unsafe and unsanitary environments, a legal backdrop cited by attorneys challenging the Everglades site. State and federal officials also faced a separate environmental lawsuit brought by conservation groups and the Miccosukee Tribe that argued construction had proceeded without required federal environmental review. Dianne Mourer waves an American flag as Rana Mourer stands in front of a sign reading "Alligator Alcatraz" outside the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Facility, Saturday, July 12, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. (AP Photo/Alexandra Rodriguez) Dianne Mourer waves an American flag as Rana Mourer stands in front of a sign reading "Alligator Alcatraz" outside the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Facility, Saturday, July 12, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. (AP Photo/Alexandra Rodriguez) Alexandra Rodriguez/AP Health authorities have previously identified correctional and detention facilities as high-risk settings for respiratory disease transmission because of crowding and shared air space, a concern that informed guidance for managing outbreaks in such locations. The combination of reported limited showers, alleged confiscation of detainee writings, and constrained lawyer access raised legal and health-safety questions that litigants asked the court to address. What People Are Saying Eric Lee, attorney for detainee Luis Manuel Rivas Velásquez, told The Guardian on Aug. 12, 2025: "It's a petri dish for disease." Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, in response to a federal judge on August 7 ordering a two-week halt to construction at the facility as it is investigated over whether it violates environmental laws: "Operations at Alligator Alcatraz are ongoing and deportations are continuing," What Happens Next A federal judge continued to weigh requests tied to both the environmental and detainee-rights litigation, including a temporary halt on new construction and motions seeking expanded lawyer access and improved medical care at the site. Litigants and courts could pursue medical inspections, additional reporting requirements, or injunctive relief if judges determine that detainees' health or constitutional rights were at imminent risk, but specific judicial orders and timelines remained under consideration at the time of reporting.

From crime to tariffs, Trump challenges the unacceptable. It's what good leaders do.
From crime to tariffs, Trump challenges the unacceptable. It's what good leaders do.

USA Today

timea minute ago

  • USA Today

From crime to tariffs, Trump challenges the unacceptable. It's what good leaders do.

Progressives' meltdown over Trump sending 800 National Guard troops to help make DC's streets safe is an example of how wrong they've been about the consequences of the president's actions. Progressives have been consistently wrong about the consequences of President Donald Trump's actions. Their overreaction to Trump's decision to establish law and order in Washington, DC, is the most recent example. On Aug. 11, Trump described our nation's capital as full of "bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." He then deployed National Guard troops and vowed to take over the Metropolitan Police Department to 'help reestablish law, order and public safety' in the city. I lived in the DMV area − DC, Maryland, Virginia − for about a decade. Many of us have our own anecdotes, supported by data, about the decline of our nation's capital. Trump's order prompted a wave of fact-checking in mainstream media. The New York Times, for example, wrote about fact-checking Trump's "false and misleading claims" about crime. Progressive leaders insisted that the president was not only wrong but also acting like a bully. Did Trump exaggerate about the level of crime in Washington? Perhaps. But the reality is that the crime rate in the capital city is far above an acceptable level. See for yourself: Maybe people don't read those statistics and think Washington is filled with mayhem and squalor, but the city isn't just about midnight strolls beside the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, either. The president's order raises important questions: Just how much violence should we accept in our cities? Is there really no viable way to help more Americans feel safer in their homes and neighborhoods? Trump is challenging an unacceptable status quo, which is what good leaders should do. Are you worried about crime? Do you agree with Trump's actions in DC? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Progressives' meltdown over Trump sending 800 National Guard troops to assist in making Washington streets safe is another example of how wrong they've been about the consequences of the president's actions. Liberals were wrong about Trump's tariffs For months, liberals screamed that Trump was destroying the U.S. economy with his tariffs. Inflation would spike. Unemployment would skyrocket. The public would revolt because of the financial pain he was so ruthlessly inflicting on them. None of it has happened. According to the latest consumer price index data released Aug. 12, prices rose 0.2% in July, with the annual inflation rate at 2.7%. This spring, grocery prices fell at the fastest rate in five years. Gas prices were down nearly 10% in July from a year ago. The stock markets also have shaken off their fear of tariffs. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq have set multiple record highs in recent weeks, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average surged almost 2% in the five-day period ending Aug. 13. That's fantastic news for the tens of millions of Americans who have retirement and other investment accounts. The doomsday predictions about tariffs from only four months ago turned out to be drastically overblown. But I have yet to hear any progressives publicly admit they were wrong. Trump's wins expose the left's disturbing pattern This pattern has happened on other issues, like border security. Under President Joe Biden, migrants crossed the border illegally in record numbers. Trump, after returning to the White House in January, quickly regained control. In fact, Customs and Border Protection reported that the agency released zero illegal immigrants into the United States in May. That was an incredible feat. Yet, it was hardly recognized in the news media. Opinion: Democrats have devolved into a clown show. No wonder polls show voters prefer GOP. The left has developed a pattern in overreacting to Trump that will ensure the Democratic Party's continued decline. It goes like this: Trump proposes a policy change or issues an executive order. Democrats and their allies in the media predict imminent doom. Trump's policy decisions turn out to be correct. Then progressives ignore the results and simply move on to shouting about something else. Progressives are so anti-Trump that they're now anti-common sense too. Democrats will pay a heavy price for traveling down such a self-destructive path. In 2028, voters will have to choose between a conservative candidate who stands for less crime, border security and balanced trade policies that promote prosperity and a Democratic candidate who rejects commonsense solutions for ideological reasons. I know who I'll choose. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.

Stocks to Watch Friday: UnitedHealth, Intel, Apple
Stocks to Watch Friday: UnitedHealth, Intel, Apple

Wall Street Journal

time2 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Stocks to Watch Friday: UnitedHealth, Intel, Apple

↗️ UnitedHealth (UNH): Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) sold shares in Apple (AAPL) last quarter, while adding UnitedHealth to its portfolio. Shares in the embattled health insurer surged 13% in off-hours trading. Apple stock was little changed. ↗️ Intel (INTC): The chip maker and the Trump administration are discussing the government potentially taking a stake in the company, people familiar with the matter said. Shares gained 4.5% in premarket trading, adding to a Thursday afternoon rally. 🔎 Rivian (RIVN): The electric truck maker said the rollback of fuel economy rules has led to a $100 million holdup in its revenue related to regulatory credits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store