
Behar says Dem effort to reclaim men is a 'waste of money,' suggests 'teaching them to not be such sexists'
After their decisive defeat in November, Democrats are still figuring out how they should change their strategy and move forward as a party. The New York Times recently published a report claiming that Democrats are spending $20 million on a study called "Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan." The study is a project to "study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces" of male voters.
Co-host Joy Behar scoffed at the idea, deriding it as "20 million bucks just to talk to boys."
"You know what I think? I think it's a waste of money. Maybe these guys should spend their money on teaching men to not be such sexists," Behar said, as the audience applauded.
"But the stats don't bear that out," co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin said, arguing that Trump has done better with multiple demographics across races and sexes than his Republican predecessors did.
Behar suggested this was merely because he was "running against a woman."
"You think Democrats that were with Biden in 2020 left to be with Trump because they're sexist?" Griffin asked.
"I don't know the reason, but it's very suspicious," Behar replied.
Other co-hosts argued that Democrats have indeed alienated male voters.
Griffin mocked the idea of appealing to authenticity by hiring analysts and strategists to analyze how men speak, suggesting instead, "What made Joe Rogan or Theo Von or some of these manosphere guys huge was there's a level of authenticity."
Meanwhile, she noted Democrats not only have an "authenticity problem" but recalled that "Joe Rogan was a Bernie Bro. Democrats lost him. They had their own Joe Rogan and then alienated him with policies."
She added that men want to be able to speak about the issues they face as a group, particularly the phenomenon of men falling behind, without being accused of sexism or excluding women.
Haines brought up the appeal of both Trump and the manosphere. "What drove people to this manosphere was people were saying, 'It's okay to be a man, you have value.' I think the language around men with 'toxic masculinity' were sometimes misunderstood to make men the problem."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices dip ahead of Trump-Putin talks
Oil (BZ=F, CL=F) Oil prices dipped in early European trading on Friday morning, ahead of US president Donald Trump's meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska later in the day, to discuss the war in Ukraine. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures fell 0.6% to $66.44 per barrel at the time of writing, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) declined 0.7% to $63.51 a barrel. The talks are scheduled to take place at 8.30pm BST, so any developments would likely emerge after the US market close. This will be the first time Trump and Putin have met one-on-one in six years, as the US president tries to broker an end to Russia's war in Ukraine. Read more: Markets higher ahead of Trump-Putin summit in Alaska There are hopes that talks could lead to a potential end to sanctions limiting supply of Russian oil to other markets. In an interview with Fox News Radio on Thursday, Trump suggested that if the talks go well this could pave the way for a second meeting including Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, but also estimated that there was a 25% chance that the meeting would not be successful. Jim Reid, global head of macro research and thematic strategy at Deutsche Bank ( said: "[Trump] described this potential follow-up as 'very, very important', indicating it could be the forum for striking a deal. Our [economist] Peter Sidorov notes that while an imminent breakthrough is unlikely, the summit will still be an important signpost for US-Russia relations and the war in Ukraine." Gold (GC=F) Gold prices edged slightly higher on Friday morning, as investors remained cautious ahead of the Trump-Putin summit. Gold futures (GC=F) rose 0.1% to $3,387.20 per ounce at the time of writing, while spot gold advanced 0.2% to $3,343.85 per ounce. The precious metal is on course to end the week in the red, despite inflation data released on Thursday coming in hotter than expected. Gold is considered to act as a hedge against inflation, as when price growth erodes purchasing power, investors tend to look to the precious metal as a store of wealth. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio However, a higher-than-expected producer price index (PPI) reading on Thursday, dented investor hopes of a bigger 50-basis-point interest rate cut by the US Federal Reserve. Gold and interest rates tend to have an inverse relationship, as higher rates weaken the appeal of the precious metal as a non-yielding investment. US PPI for July showed inflation for businesses rose 0.9% over the prior month, well ahead of the 0.2% increase that was forecast, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed Thursday. On an annual basis, prices rose 3.3%, which was also ahead of the 2.5% expected. According to a Reuters report, Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade, said: "Gold is still grappling with the aftermath of the PPI jump, which raised questions over just how far the Fed may be inclined to reduce rates this year." Pound (GBPUSD=X, GBPEUR=X) The pound gained 0.2% against the dollar (GBPUSD=X) on Friday morning, to trade at $1.3555, helped by a weaker greenback. The US dollar index ( which measures the greenback against a basket of six currencies, fell 0.4% on Friday morning to 97.91. The moves come as Trump and Putin's talks loom, while investors also digest a raft of economic data both in the UK and the US released this week. Sterling hit a one-month high on Thursday, after UK economic growth data came in better than expected. Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 0.3% in the second quarter, which was stronger than the 0.1% expected, though it still marked a slow from a rate of 0.7% for the first three months of the year. Attention will now turn to the release of US retail sales data and industrial production data for July, due out later in the day. Read more: Analysts' top emerging market fund and trust picks Richard Hunter, head of markets at Interactive Investor, said: "The central theme of the US consumer will come under the spotlight today with the release of retail sales figures, where further detail will be sought as to sentiment among this key driver of growth. "Tariff impacts and a slightly weakening jobs market are feared to have brought purchases forward in previous month, leaving this release vulnerable to disappointment." In other currency moves, the pound was little changed against the euro (GBPEUR=X), trading at €1.1605 at the time of writing. More broadly, FTSE 100 (^FTSE) hovered around the flatline on Friday morning trading at 9,183 points. For more details, on market movements check our live coverage here. Read more: What are bitcoin ETNs? EU economic growth slows to 0.2% in second quarter How to contribute to a loved one's pension
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is right about homeless camps: Make them 'move out, IMMEDIATELY'
Whenever I return to visit family in Oregon, I am appalled by what I see. Not that I don't adore my home state and its abundance of natural beauty, from the mountains to the ocean. It's the endemic homelessness that's been allowed to fester in cities across the state that disgusts me. These 'encampments' litter sidewalks, underpasses, roadways, downtowns and even parks and natural areas. They are trash heaps that are not only eye sores but also create public health and safety hazards and ruin neighborhoods and businesses. I've seen it happen in my hometown of Salem, and it's true in cities up and down the West Coast. And the progressive elected officials who let this happen should be held to account. It's not just a Pacific Northwest and California problem, however. Other liberal states and cities have allowed homelessness to infect their communities, too. Since they don't seem capable of handling the situation on their own, I was pleased to see President Donald Trump's willingness to take action. This week, Trump turned his focus to crime and homelessness in Washington, DC, but he's also taken executive measures this summer to alleviate homeless camps across the country. Thank goodness. Opinion: Trump is racking up GOP wins no one else could. What do Never Trumpers say now? Is Trump 'cruel'? Maybe he's actually doing some good. In two executive orders issued Aug. 11, Trump laid out his plan for cleaning up the streets of the nation's capital, saying he wants people camping in public spaces to 'move out, IMMEDIATELY.' 'We're going to be removing homeless encampments from all over our parks, our beautiful, beautiful parks, which now a lot of people can't walk on,' Trump said. The president also said he'd focus on ridding underpasses and other public places of these camps. In a social media post, Trump compared his plan to push back on homeless camps to how efficiently he closed down former President Joe Biden's open border. This follows a July executive order aimed at curbing homelessness more broadly. The Trump administration points to the record number of people sleeping on the streets – more than 270,000 in 2024. The president pledged to make it a priority to stand by communities as they seek to enforce laws against public camping and drug use. 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order,' the order states. 'Surrendering our cities and citizens to disorder and fear is neither compassionate to the homeless nor other citizens. My Administration will take a new approach focused on protecting public safety.' Yet, for this to work, states and cities must get on board with making it illegal to set up 'camps' in the first place. It's shocking that some politicians – such as Democrats in Oregon – are refusing to do that. Liberals like to call Trump cruel for taking action against homelessness. They're wrong. Opinion: Trump's order on homelessness is more humane than failed liberal policies Supreme Court greenlighted efforts to curb homelessness. States should get on board. It's not just a Republican priority, either. Even California Gov. Gavin Newsom – who is about as progressive as they come – has gotten sick of the rampant encampments in his state and the unwillingness of cities to fight it. He's threatened to withhold funding from communities that do nothing, which is encouraging to see. Opinion: Shouldn't members of Congress love America first? Not if you're a Democrat. I feel for cities like Grants Pass, Oregon, that have tried to clean up public spaces but are hampered in their efforts. Grants Pass is the city behind the 2024 win at the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld bans on homeless people camping in public. The city started to clean up its streets and parks but was recently sued for violating state laws on homelessness. It's not a kindness to allow homeless people to live in squalor. And it's unfair to taxpaying citizens to allow their public spaces to be overrun with it. I am thrilled Trump is standing up to the liberal, do-nothing attitude. Our cities will all benefit if he succeeds. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump is taking much-needed steps to clean up homeless camps | Opinion
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Gavin Newsom announces redistricting plan ahead of midterm elections
Gov. Gavin Newsom unloaded on President Trump on Thursday, claiming he is trying to steal next year's midterm elections. Tom Wait reports. Solve the daily Crossword