Alex Jones accused of trying to shield assets as Sandy Hook families seek payment on $1B judgment
Three new lawsuits filed by the trustee on Friday alleging fraudulent asset transfers are the latest developments in Jones' long-running bankruptcy case, which has been pending in federal court in Houston for more than two years. In financial statements filed in bankruptcy court last year, Jones listed his net worth at $8.4 million.
The Sandy Hook families won nearly $1.5 billion in judgments in 2022 in lawsuits filed in Connecticut and Texas accusing Jones of defamation and emotional distress for saying the school shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators was a hoax. Victims' relatives testified in court about being terrorized by Jones' supporters.
Attempts to liquidate Jones' Infowars broadcasting and product-selling platforms and give the proceeds to the families and other creditors have been hindered by a failed auction and legal wrangling. Jones, meanwhile, continues to appeal the Sandy Hook judgments.
Here's what to know about the status of Jones' bankruptcy case:
Trustee sues Jones alleging improper money and property transfers
The trustee, Christopher Murray, alleges that Jones tried to shield the money through a complex series of money and property transfers among family members, various trusts and limited liability companies. Other named defendants include Jones' wife, Erika; his father, David Jones; and companies and trusts.
Murray alleges that a trust run by Jones and his father fraudulently transferred nearly $1.5 million to various other Jones-associated entities in the months leading up to the bankruptcy. Jones is also accused of fraudulently transferring $1.5 million to his wife, more than $800,000 in cash and property to his father and trying to hide ownership of two condominiums in Austin, Texas, with a combined value of more than $1.5 million.
Murray is trying to recoup that money and property for creditors.
Jones' bankruptcy lawyers did not return email messages seeking comment.
In an email to The Associated Press, Erika Wulff Jones called the lawsuits 'pure harassment' and said she already had sat for a deposition. She said 'the accounting has been done,' but did not elaborate.
A lawyer for David Jones did not immediately return an email seeking comment.
Jones railed against the new allegations on his show on Saturday. He has repeatedly said Democratic activists and the Justice Department are behind the Sandy Hook defamation lawsuits and bankruptcy proceedings, and claimed they were now 'trying to get' to him by suing his father, who he says is seriously ill.
The fraud allegations are similar to those in a lawsuit in a Texas state court filed by Sandy Hook families. Jones also denied those claims. That lawsuit was put on hold because of the bankruptcy.
Sandy Hook families still haven't received money from Jones
Jones says the fact that the Sandy Hook families haven't received any money from him yet should be expected because he is appealing the $1.5 billion in judgments.
Infowars' assets continue to be tied up in the legal processes. Those assets, and some of Jones' personal assets, are being held by Murray for eventual distribution to creditors.
An effort to sell Infowars' assets was derailed when U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez rejected the results of a November auction in which The Onion satirical news outlet was named the winning bidder over only one other proposal by a company affiliated with Jones. The Onion had planned to turn the Infowars platforms into parody sites.
Lopez had several concerns about the auction, including a lack of transparency and murky details about the actual value of The Onion's bid and whether it was better than the other offer. The judge rejected holding another auction and said the families could pursue liquidation of Jones' assets in the state courts where the defamation judgments were awarded.
In a financial statement last year, Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems, listed $18 million in assets, including merchandise and studio equipment.
What's next
Lawyers for the Sandy Hook families said they will soon move their effort to sell Infowars' assets to a Texas state court in Austin, where they expect a receiver to be appointed to take possession of the platform's possessions and sell them to provide money to creditors. A court schedule has not been set.
'The families we represent are as determined as ever to enforce the jury's verdict, and he will never outrun it,' Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the Sandy Hook families in the Connecticut lawsuit, said Tuesday.
Jones' appeals, meanwhile, continue in the courts. He said he plans to appeal the Connecticut lawsuit judgment to the U.S. Supreme Court, after the Connecticut Supreme Court declined to hear his challenge. A lower state appeals court upheld all but $150 million of the original $1.4 billion judgment. The $49 million judgment in the Texas lawsuit is before a state appeals court.
He said in 2022 that he believes the shootings were '100% real.'
Because Infowars' assets are still tied up in the courts, Jones has been allowed to continue broadcasting his shows and hawking merchandise from Infowars' Austin studio.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
JB Pritzker Responds To Mamdani's No Billionaires Message
Billionaire Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has responded to fellow Democrat and New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's assertion that billionaires should not exist. 'How much money you have doesn't determine what your values are,' Pritzker said in an interview with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. 'I'm a Democrat because I believe that we've got to stand up for our democracy and against the MAGA Republicans who are literally trying to take away people's rights all across this country.' Pritzker has an estimated net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes, in part due to his family's ownership of the Hyatt Hotel chain. The governor's remarks came in response to a statement made by self-proclaimed Democratic-Socialist Mamdani—who won the New York City Democratic primary last month—who said: 'I don't think we should have billionaires.' 'Frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' he told the same show, Meet the Press, in late June, when he already appeared to have the votes to win the primary. 'And I look forward to working with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fair for all of them,' he added. Both Priztker and Mamdani are seen as rising stars of the Democratic Party, but on opposite ends of the spectrum. Mamdani's victory in the financial capital of the world was seen as a galvanizing moment for the progressive wing of the party and a sign of an insurgent mood among its base. Pritzker, meanwhile, is often spoken of as a potential 2028 presidential contender if the Democrats opt to appeal to moderate voters. Mamdani's concerns are not his alone. Income inequality has been on the rise in the U.S. for decades. The top 1% percent in the U.S. hold more than two-thirds of the nation's wealth, while the least-wealthy 50% of Americans have less than 4%, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Wealth inequality and affordability were major voting factors during the 2024 presidential election, as many voters cited concerns about rising cost-of-living and inflation rates. The 60-year-old Priztker, however, asserted that his politics are shaped by his belief in Americans' right to health care and free public education. Pritzker announced his re-election bid for governor this June.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump warns homeless to leave Washington, D.C., ‘immediately'
President Donald Trump on Sunday again signaled that he is ramping up plans to target crime in Washington, D.C., even as data shows that crime rates in the nation's capital are falling. He also issued a stark warning for the homeless. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital," he wrote on Truth Social. Trump's remarks come as he has increased his rhetoric about countering crime in the District in recent days, after a former member of the Department of Government Efficiency was assaulted in an attempted carjacking. "It's all going to happen very fast, just like the Border," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "We went from millions pouring in, to ZERO in the last few months. This will be easier — Be prepared!" "There will be no "MR. NICE GUY." We want our Capital BACK," he said. Trump last month signed an executive order making it easier for cities to remove homeless people, and his social media post is the latest sign that he seeks to follow through on this effort, particularly in the nation's capital. Trump's comments are at odds, however, with data from the Justice Department that shows that violent crime in D.C. in 2024 was at a 30-year low, and homicides, robberies and armed carjackings have all declined. Trump also reiterated in his social media post that he plans to hold a press availability at the White House on Monday about crime in D.C. The White House last week also announced a seven-day effort to counter crime in the city, including an increased presence of federal law enforcement across the District. The district has been a frequent target of Trump's, including during his first term, but he his language has become more forceful in recent days, drawing pushback from Democratic leadership in the city. "Any comparison to a war torn country is hyperbolic and false," D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said on MSNBC's "The Weekend." "I also just really want to say we always want to get better, and there are ways more than any other city in America that the federal government can help the District of Columbia," she continued.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
New Jersey's electric bills tripled this summer — and could cost Dems the state
When my friend Rebecca in Highland Park, NJ, opened her PSE&G gas and electric bill last month, she almost fell out of her seat: It had tripled. It's now costing her more than $1,000 a month to keep her modest home running. 'It's been creeping up for months, in spite of the fact that nothing about our house has changed,' she told me. 'In years past, it was averaging about $300 a month.' Advertisement 'I don't know how we're expected to absorb these new bills,' she posted on Facebook. Her neighbor Felix Urman wondered the same as he ticked off his household costs for me. 'Property taxes are up 6.3%,' he said — on top of what had already been the nation's highest. Advertisement 'Car insurance up 15%. Home insurance up 17%. Health insurance up 19%. 'I don't know how non-dermatologists are living in New Jersey,' he concluded. That question — how are we expected to live here? — is why the solidly blue Garden State is rapidly turning purple. Affordability and taxes, at 54% and 43% respectively, have become the defining issues in New Jersey's tightening governor's race. Advertisement The latest survey, released this week, showed Democratic Party nominee Mikie Sherrill leading Republican Jack Ciattarelli by just 6 percentage points. Those who ranked affordability as their primary issue were split over which candidate is better equipped to handle it: 36% of them named Sherrill, while 34% chose Ciattarelli. But on taxes, Ciattarelli holds a commanding lead. When asked which candidate would do a better job lowering them, 50% picked the Republican, compared to just 15% who went for the Democrat. Advertisement It's clear New Jersey residents have lost confidence in their Democratic lawmakers when it comes to tax policy. Once they realize that Democrats' bungled energy policies are to blame for their exploding utility bills as well, it could blow November's race wide open. 'They took generation off before they brought generation on,' one energy expert told me, pointing to the state's aggressive shutdown of coal-powered plants under Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy and the closure of the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in 2018. The result? A shrinking energy supply, at a time when demand is exploding. Dan Lockwood, a spokesperson for PJM Interconnection, the regional grid operator, explained the problem plainly to the New Jersey Monitor. 'These higher prices are the result of a loss in electricity supply caused primarily by decarbonization policies that have led to an uptick in generator retirements,' Lockwood said. On top of that came 'an unprecedented spike in electricity demand,' he added, due to burgeoning AI data centers and the increasing use of 'green' technologies like electric vehicles and appliances. In short: the state is using more electricity than ever before, after legislators systematically dismantled the infrastructure that used to provide it. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And the New Jersey lawmakers who championed these green policies as bold and forward-thinking left regular families to foot the bill. Adding insult to injury, they apparently thought a $30 rebate would make a difference. 'If you just opened your July electric bill and noticed a $30 'credit,' don't be fooled — it's not relief,' state Assemblyman Alex Sauickie snarked last week in Central Jersey Newswire. Advertisement 'It's a failed rebate scheme from Gov. Phil Murphy and the Democrat-controlled Legislature. It was designed to distract you.' 'That's not help,' Sauickie scoffed. 'That's an insult . . . a Band-Aid over a bullet hole.' No one prepared the grid for this transition. No one told Rebecca or Felix that their bills would quietly triple while they were busy chauffeuring kids to camp and grocery shopping for dinner. The policymakers pushed the policies, but didn't build the safety net, or the replacement energy sources, first. Advertisement Instead, families face a double squeeze. Their bills are rising, and so are the taxes funding the very lawmakers who forced costs up. Voters are rightly asking: What am I getting in return for this crushing cost of living? The answer, so far, is not much. Rebecca's story is hardly unique. Families across the state are considering relocating, cutting their budgets to the bone, or simply skipping utility payments and hoping for the best. Advertisement That's not how it should be in one of the wealthiest states in the country. This isn't about politics, it's about survival. And as New Jersey's election heats up, candidates who ignore the pain of middle-class families do so at their peril. The bills are real. The frustration is growing. And the demand for accountability is rising along with the utility costs. Voters are watching, and they're not buying the excuses anymore. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars.