California Schools See 9% Surge in Homeless Students as Funds Decrease
The number of students experiencing homelessness who were enrolled in California's TK-12 public schools has jumped over 9% for yet another year, even as overall enrollment rates continue on a downward trend.
Nearly 20,000 more homeless students were enrolled by the first Wednesday in October, known as Census Day, during the 2024-25 school year. This increase represents a 9.3% change from the previous school year, and it means the homeless student population in the state has surged 37% in the last decade.
Schools say the spike in homelessness is due both to families' worsening financial troubles and improved identification efforts. Covid-era funding, refined data tracking, and improved training and protocol have resulted in schools being more likely to properly identify homeless students than in the past.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
'It's a combination of a perfect storm where you have all of these elements coming into play, which then speaks to that increase. The data is highlighting the need to continue these supports,' said Alejandra Chamberlain, youth services director for the Contra Costa County Office of Education.
Coachella Valley Unified School District's homeless student enrollment tripled, a reflection of the economic struggles their families are experiencing, said Karina Vega, a district support counselor.
Increased fear of immigration enforcement is contributing to homelessness in the area. Vega shared how a student's mother could no longer afford to pay rent after her husband was deported; another family lives in their car, and they travel each weekend across the Mexican border to spend time with a deported parent; others are constantly moving to stay off the radar of immigration officials because they fear being deported.
Many of her students live in inadequate housing. Electricity may need to be wired from one trailer to the next, water may have been shut off, or multiple families live in a small space due to financial hardship.
'We've seen more families than we've probably ever seen' experiencing homelessness, Vega said.
But she noted that students were identified at a greater rate after more school personnel learned that homelessness does not only mean someone is on the streets.
'The reality is, a lot of us that work for the school district grew up in the valley and some of these things that we see are typical, like trailer parks and inadequate housing,' Vega said.
This is where the (Riverside) county's training on identifying all types of homelessness, an effort they have championed down to the school sites, has made a significant difference, she added.
In Mendocino County, many families who once held jobs in the waning marijuana industry are now struggling to make ends meet, said Blythe Post, coordinator of foster youth and homeless services at the Mendocino County Office of Education.
Their rural 89,000-person county is vast, but there are few affordable housing options to choose from, she said, pushing more and more of their students and families into homelessness.
But increased homelessness is only one part of the problem.
Although the official number of homeless students continues to rise, liaisons believe the actual numbers are far higher.
Under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, every public school district, county office of education and charter school is required to hire a local liaison to ensure that homeless youth are identified and have the educational services they need to succeed academically. This federal law is also the reason that schools have counts of homeless students at all.
This law may be at risk under the Trump administration if the U.S. Department of Education is shuttered or its funding is lumped into a block grant as stated in Trump's budget proposal.
'There's going to be more kids to count and fewer people to count them, and then fewer services,' said Margaret Olmos, director of the National Center for Youth Law's Compassionate Education Systems.
Liaisons say accurate counts are difficult to reach for a host of reasons. The information is self-reported, and some families are reluctant to share their housing status with school personnel. It's rare that a school liaison only serves homeless students. Most have divided attention because they are supporting foster students and low-income students. In smaller districts, they may be the support liaison for all students.
In some ways, schools have been here before. During the 2022-23 school year, for example, the rate of homeless students enrolled in California schools rose 9% while overall student enrollment dipped.
Then, as now, families were confronting skyrocketing housing and cost-of-living expenses. The rolling impact of expiring eviction moratoriums put in place during the pandemic and the loss of housing due to disasters, including fires and floods, have further exacerbated the issue. And, similarly, liaisons attributed much of the increase to families being squeezed financially as identification practices were simultaneously improved.
But while the situation might appear familiar, liaisons say they are at a crossroads — and many do not think the odds are in their favor.
Liaisons said a 2021 state law requiring that schools include a housing questionnaire in enrollment packets has supported identification efforts. But many say what made the single, greatest difference is the one-time funding they received from the pandemic-era American Rescue Plan – Homeless Children and Youth (ARP-HCY) federal grant. The total amounted to $98.76 million for California, which was spread to 92.1% of districts over several years.
'ARP-HCY was the first time you saw school districts and counties be incentivized to find and care and count — and they did,' Olmos said.
How districts and counties applied the funds varied widely. Liaisons said it depended on their school community's needs. Some booked short-term motel stays for students whose families were being evicted or were on homeless shelter waiting lists or provided transportation to and from school. Other liaisons hired staff to improve data tracking or who spoke students' native languages. Still, others established after-school care, provided baby supplies for students' younger siblings, or purchased washers and dryers to provide free laundry services for families.
Some districts opted to focus a portion of funds on improving data tracking practices.
Mendocino County's Round Valley Unified went from one homeless student to 199 in just one school year — one of the greatest surges in the state. That increase was a reflection of more data training and tightened protocols, Post said.
'When I see those jumps in numbers … that tells me that there's a problem with identification or communication between who's inputting the records and who's submitting those data reports,' Post said.
There are no plans by either the federal or state government to replenish the one-time federal funds at anywhere near the same levels, which has left some liaisons to cut services and staff and lament a near future with lowered capacity to count and serve homeless students.
'There's going to be a number of families that just fall under the radar,' Post said. 'I anticipate we will see a huge drop in McKinney-Vento numbers; those families will just not be served or identified.'
Some districts do rely on funds from the federal McKinney-Vento law, but educators say the 1987 act was never adequately funded by the state or federal government. Funding cycles are every three years, and it's a competitive grant that reaches few districts. California received less than $15 million in this funding for the 2022-23 school year, for example, which went to just 6% of the state's school districts, according to an analysis by SchoolHouse Connection and the University of Michigan's Poverty Solutions program.
The state has released billions of dollars in recent years to address general homelessness. But funds aimed at youth are often targeted to those over the age of 18, including $56 million in new grants announced Friday by Gov. Gavin Newsom's office.
Liaisons have also long highlighted that few of those dollars ultimately reach students who are living doubled-up — where more than one family lives in a single home due to financial crises — which is how the majority of homeless students in the state and nationwide live. Doubling-up is identified as homelessness under the McKinney-Vento act, but not under other federal definitions of homelessness.
And while schools receive extra funding for homeless students from the state through the state's Local Control Funding Formula, or LCFF, this stream is often limited in how it can be spent and is shared among several vulnerable student groups with differing needs.
'There is a part of really acknowledging to the community that other special populations receive state funding to be able to carry out the responsibilities and to dedicate staff to do that work' while homeless students rely on the limited federal dollars, said Chamberlain, who is also one of three leads for the state's Homeless Education Technical Assistance Center network.
Advocates have pushed for the state to, at a minimum, match the McKinney-Vento dollars California receives, but that amount has yet to make it into the state budget.
Despite the increases, liaisons and advocates are clear that the rising numbers alongside decreasing dedicated funding puts kids at risk.
'If we cannot identify these kids early and serve them and ensure they go on to a choice-filled adulthood, they're so much more likely to end up experiencing homelessness as an adult,' Olmos said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's tariffs are forcing Canada to address its money laundering problem
On July 31, the Trump administration announced that it would raise tariffs on Canadian imports to 35 percent, citing Canada's failure to meaningfully address the growing use of its territory by fentanyl traffickers. Canada's response has been fractured. Federal officials called for renewed dialogue, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford demanded retaliatory tariffs. If that sounds like an overreaction from the U.S., it's not. It's a reaction to a real and mounting problem: Cartels are using Canada — not in theory, but in practice. Fentanyl super-labs have been discovered in British Columbia. Precursor chemicals from China are entering Canadian ports before making their way into domestic markets or rerouted across the U.S. border. The numbers are still small compared to the southern border. Fentanyl seizures along the northern corridor comprise less than 1 percent of total U.S. interdictions, but they're rising. And while the raw volume was low, the potency was not. According to White House estimates, the fentanyl seized from Canada in the past year was sufficient to kill more than 9 million Americans. The question isn't whether Canada is the dominant trafficking route. It's whether it's increasingly being utilized. And it is. The reason is structural. Canada has long been exploited by criminal networks due to regulatory blind spots, fragmented enforcement and opaque corporate formation laws. Canada is notorious for money-laundering through real estate. Trade-based money laundering schemes are commonly exploited. And bribery and corruption have long been identified as a substantial money-laundering risk. Canada, for too long, has treated organized crime as a localized public safety issue, not a transnational finance and border security risk. The Trump administration's tariff spike isn't just a trade war headline. It's part of a broader strategy of nation-level accountability. Venezuela's Cartel de los Soles, a state-embedded trafficking network directly linked to the Maduro regime, was designated a Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity under expanded fentanyl authorities just days before the action against Canada. Mexico has not been spared, either. In February, the U.S. imposed 25 percent fentanyl-linked tariffs on Mexican imports, citing the government's failure to curb cartel flows. In July, those tariffs were scheduled to increase to 30 percent. Although Mexico negotiated a temporary reprieve, committing additional National Guard resources to its northern border in February, the escalation framework remains in place. The goal is not symbolic but structural. Pressure the sovereign, disrupt the enabler. Canada now finds itself in that same pressure chamber. Unlike Venezuela, it is a U.S. ally and a U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement partner. But those relationships don't exempt governments from consequences. Canada's fentanyl enforcement effort has been reactive, fragmented and, until very recently, deeply under-resourced. That posture changed the moment the 35 percent tariff went live. To its credit, Ottawa has shown that it is willing to act with urgency. The newly announced border security initiative includes enhanced lab detection infrastructure, dual-nation strike teams and an aggressive crackdown on shell entities used to obscure cross-border fund flows. These moves are overdue. In 2024, Canada's two largest banks, Royal Bank of Canada and TD Bank, were at the center of major anti-money laundering failures. Royal Bank of Canada's U.S. subsidiary, City National Bank, was fined $65 million for violating the Bank Secrecy Act, while TD admitted in U.S. federal court to allowing over $650 million in suspected fentanyl proceeds to flow through its accounts. TD paid a $3 billion penalty and agreed to oversight by a government-appointed monitor. Regulators called the sector's anti-money laundering risk ' under-appreciated,' exposing deep structural gaps that persisted until the failures became too large to ignore. None of this is partisan. None of this is rhetorical. It is structural enforcement built around financial leverage, and it reflects a doctrine that has quietly reshaped the American approach to trafficking: Drug routes are no longer just a law enforcement issue. They are a sovereign accountability issue. The tools of response — tariffs, sanctions, financial denial mechanisms — reflect that shift. Canada's economy isn't the target. Its vulnerabilities are. But if they remain unaddressed, the economic impact will be severe. Trade penalties will expand. Correspondent banks will de-risk. Investment flows will hesitate. And trust — financial, diplomatic and regulatory — will erode. The Canadian government has a narrow window to solidify enforcement credibility. That means closing anti-money laundering loopholes, coordinating proactively with U.S. agencies, and enacting a serious national strategy against transnational organized crime. Not just speeches. Not just appointees. Results. Because fentanyl isn't waiting. Neither are the traffickers. And neither, apparently, is the Trump administration.

Miami Herald
15 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's plan to hit Mexico's drug cartels will only make them more popular
President Trump's reported secret order to develop military options for a cross-border intervention against Mexico's drug cartels could backfire spectacularly. Instead of keeping drugs out of your neighborhood, it could actually make the cartels more popular at home and even more powerful. Even some of Trump's toughest former advisers admit it — a solo U.S. invasion or drone attack without Mexico's green light would be a dumb idea. It would spark a wave of nationalism south of the border and likely push Mexico's government to ditch anti-narcotics and migration deals with Washington. John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser and hardly a dove, didn't mince words when I interviewed him recently. A U.S. attack on Mexico's cartels 'doesn't make any sense at all,' he told me. Bolton told me there's no question Mexico's drug cartels are a problem and something needs to be done about them. But believing that the United States can fix things militarily, without Mexico onboard, is a fantasy. If anything, 'it will make things worse,' he told me. Trump has reportedly sent a secret directive to the Pentagon asking for options to attack Latin American drug cartels that the U.S. has branded as terrorist organizations, The New York Times and NBC News reported on Aug. 8. U.S. officials said later that Trump is considering all options, although no decision has been made. U.S. officials say the president is just weighing his options for now but nothing's set in stone. I wouldn't be shocked if all this talk about military action was a White House leak intended to nudge Mexico into okaying a military attack and spinning it publicly as a joint operation. But if Trump decided to go it alone, here's why that could blow up in his face. First, as Bolton told me, such a move could actually boost the cartels' popularity in Mexico. Drug traffickers bankroll many people in rural communities, essentially buying local support and protection. Musicians belt out ballads— 'narco-corridos'—in their honor. A U.S. attack might just gain them even more support. Second, a unilateral U.S. attack would trigger a nationalistic reaction across Mexico. President Claudia Sheinbaum would be under serious pressure to scrap key anti-drug and migration deals with the United States. Sheinbaum has already stepped up fentanyl seizures and border checks in response to U.S. pressure in recent months. But she has drawn a hard line: unilateral U.S. military action is 'absolutely ruled out,' she said. Third, and maybe the biggest issue, a U.S. military strike on a Mexican drug lab would do little to slow down the drug trade. As long as the U.S. remains a giant, illegal-drug-consuming country, the flow of illicit narcotics will continue. Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, a director of George Mason University's Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center, told me Trump is following a mistaken diagnosis. Fixating just on foreign cartels ignores the bigger picture. Without tackling both supply and demand — meaning more drug prevention at home — the problem will stick around, she said. Even if you kill some cartel bosses, drug trafficking rings will split into more cells and continue operating. They are networks that adapt and survive. 'The cartels aren't vertical structures anymore, like in the days of [Colombia's drug baron] Pablo Escobar,' she told me. Odds are, Trump's secret order to the Pentagon was just him asking for every possible option. But I wouldn't be surprised if, down the road, he decides to order a strike against Mexico. Trump is a master of distraction. One of his trademarks is being very good at shifting the spotlight. If the U.S. economy sours because of his tariffs, or if the political scandal over late financier Jeffrey Epstein's files grows, Trump could be tempted to launch a military attack. It would certainly make huge headlines. Many in his nationalist, anti-immigrant base would cheer him on, even if the end result is stronger cartels and less safety here at home. Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog:

18 hours ago
Mexico transfers 26 cartel figures wanted by US authorities in deal with Trump administration
WASHINGTON -- Mexico sent 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States Tuesday in the latest major deal with the Trump administration as American authorities ratchet up pressure on criminal networks smuggling drugs across the border. Those handed over to U.S. custody include Abigael González Valencia, a leader of 'Los Cuinis,' a group closely aligned with notorious cartel Jalisco New Generation or CJNG. Another defendant, Roberto Salazar, is wanted in connection to the 2008 killing of a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy. Other prominent figures have ties to the Sinaloa Cartel and other violent drug trafficking groups. The transfers are a milestone for the Trump administration, which is made dismantling dangerous drug cartels a key Justice Department priority. It's the second time in months that Mexico has expelled cartel figures accused of narcotics smuggling, murder and other crimes amid mounting pressure from the Trump administration to curb the flow of drugs onto American streets. 'These 26 men have all played a role in bringing violence and drugs to American shores — under this Department of Justice, they will face severe consequences for their crimes against this country,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. 'We are grateful to Mexico's National Security team for their collaboration in this matter.' The cartel figures were put on planes to the U.S. after the Justice Department agreed not to seek the death penalty against any of the defendants or against any cartel leaders and members sent to the U.S. in February. That transfer was of 29 cartel figures, including drug lord Rafael Caro Quintero, who was behind the killing of a U.S. DEA agent in 1985. 'This transfer is yet another example of what is possible when two governments stand united against violence and impunity,' U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said in a statement. 'These fugitives will now face justice in U.S. courts, and the citizens of both of our nations will be safer from these common enemies.' The February transfers came as Mexican officials were trying to head off the Trump administration's threat of imposing tariffs on Mexican imports. Late last month, President Donald Trump spoke with Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum and agreed to put off threatened 30% tariffs for another 90 days to allow for negotiations. Sheinbaum has shown a willingness to cooperate more on security than her predecessor, specifically being more aggressive in pursuit of Mexico's cartels. But she has drawn a clear line when it comes to Mexico's sovereignty, rejecting suggestions by Trump and others of intervention by the U.S. military. Also included in the group expelled Tuesday was Servando Gómez Martinez, also known as 'La Tuta,' a former school teacher who became one of Mexico's most-wanted drug lords as head of the Knights Templar cartel. He was captured in 2015 and sentenced to 55 years in a Mexican prison in June 2019. Gomez led the quasi-religious criminal group that once exercised absolute control over Michoacan and he liked to appear in interviews and videos. The cartel orchestrated politics, controlled commerce, dictated rules and preached a code of ethics around devotion to God and family, even as it murdered and plundered. Abigael González Valencia is the brother-in-law of CJNG leader Nemesio Rubén 'El Mencho' Oseguera Cervantes, a top target of the U.S. government. Abigael González Valencia was arrested in February 2015 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco and had been fighting extradition to the United States since then. The U.S. government has offered a reward of up to $15 million for information leading to 'El Mencho's' arrest or conviction. Alongside his two brothers, Abigael González Valencia led 'Los Cuinis,' which financed the the founding and growth of the CJNG, one of the most powerful and dangerous cartels in Mexico. CJNG traffics hundreds of tons of cocaine, methamphetamine, and fentanyl into the United States and other countries and is known for extreme violence, murders, torture, and corruption. One of his brothers, José González Valencia, was sentenced in Washington's federal court in June to 30 years in a U.S. prison after pleading guilty to international cocaine trafficking. Jose González Valencia was arrested in 2017 under the first Trump administration at a beach resort in Brazil while vacationing with his family under a fake name.