Senior Citizen Savings Scheme VS Public Provident Fund: Key Differences
Differences Between Senior Citizen Savings Scheme and PPF, Senior Citizen Savings Scheme, Public Provident Fund, SCSS Benefits, PPF Features
Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS) and Public Provident Fund (PPF) are both popular money-saving and investment tools used by Indian citizens for stability and future financial goals. It is common for salaried employees and those seeking retirement welfare to safeguard their money in these two schemes because of the range of benefits they come with, catering to a wider section of society. While diversifying your investment portfolio with both PPF and SCSS can be beneficial, what if you had to choose one of the two schemes? Here are the key differentials for you to understand.
The goal with investments in the Public Provident Fund is to accumulate wealth and build a significant retirement corpus. With the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme, those nearing the end of their professional life can get a regular income stream. While the PPF is open for all Indian citizens, the SCSS is specifically designed for senior citizens aged 60 years and above.
Investment Tenure
Public Provident Fund investments are fixed over a tenure of 15 years that you can extend in blocks of up to five years. On the other hand, the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme has an initial tenure of five years, which can be stretched for an additional period of 3 years.
The interest rate on PPF investment currently stands at 7.1 per cent per annum, compounded annually. The Indian government reviews the interest rates on PPF every quarter. SCSS offer a higher return of 8.2 per cent annually, which is also subject to periodic revisions.
Tax Benefits
Investments in the PPF scheme up to a maximum limit of Rs 1.5 lakhs per financial year are eligible for tax deductions under the Indian government's Income Tax Act Section 80C. Both the interest earned and maturity amount are tax-exempt, giving it an edge over the SCSS. While contributions to the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme also fall under the Income Tax Act benefit, the deductions are subject to the overall limit and the interest earned is taxable.
Minimum Investment and Withdrawal
The maximum PPF investment may be Rs 1.5 lakhs, but you can start a PPF account with a minimum sum of Rs 500. The minimum deposit required for the SCSS scheme is Rs 1,000, with a maximum limit of Rs 30 lakhs.
Withdrawals are allowed under both the schemes. Investors can make partial withdrawals from the 7th year onwards under PPF, subject to certain conditions. Full withdrawals are only allowed upon maturity. You can make premature withdrawals from SCSS upon completion of one year with due penalties deducted.
view comments
First Published:
July 24, 2025, 09:00 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
Is Maga sign off on 25% India tariff Trump's response to PM Modi's Miga pitch or is he playing to the gallery?
Trump's 25% tariff on India and MAGA sign-off sparks questions: Is it policy pushback against MIGA, or a performance for US voters ahead of elections? read more US President Donald Trump's abrupt imposition of a 25% tariff on all Indian imports and his brash 'MAGA!' sign-off has raised sharp questions about America's true intent: is this really about protecting US economic interests, or is Trump signalling to his political base just as much as he's responding to India's MEGA partnership push? Heavy-handed tariff, personal diplomacy undone Trump announcement to slap a sweeping 25% tariff on Indian imports beginning August 1, heaping on an additional 'penalty' for New Delhi's military and oil purchases from Russia. The move, which Trump justified by citing India's 'strenuous and obnoxious' trade barriers and non-tariff hurdles, stung especially after he started his announcement calling India 'our friend'. Yet, what set this measure apart from similar tariffs on other nations was Trump's conspicuous sign-off—MAGA ('Make America Great Again')—at the very end of his decree, a slogan with loaded domestic political meaning. Five months ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had projected his own vision during a state visit to the US: 'In India, we are working towards a Viksit Bharat, which in the American context translates into Make India Great Again (MIGA),' he said, explicitly linking the two leaders' slogans in hopes of forging a 'MEGA partnership'. At the time, both leaders touted a 'MEGA' partnership anchored in prosperity and trade expansion. The optics of that ambitious pitch are now in tatters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why the MAGA sign‑off? While the new 25% US tariff is roughly in line with duties Trump has levied on other Asian exporters this year, the 'penalty' for buying Russian arms and oil appears custom-tailored for India, further amplifying the sense of a bilateral rift. Analysts note this approach is in line with Trump's long-standing grievance that India is a 'tariff king' which keeps US goods out while flooding America with its own, echoing criticisms dating back to his first presidential term. The agricultural and dairy sectors proved insurmountable sticking points: India's reluctance to open its vast rural market to US subsidised produce remains politically non-negotiable, with over 700 million livelihoods at stake. This 'red line' is partly why trade talks dragged on even as both leaders professed friendship and strategic cooperation. Yet, the MAGA-centric post stood out because Trump had not concluded earlier tariff threats on countries like South Korea, the Philippines or Egypt, with the same US-first bluster. Indian commentators and US-watchers see a calculated message: Trump is playing to his domestic gallery, reaffirming that even so-called 'friends' must ultimately yield to America's interests, especially in the run-up to a tough election season. There's a deeper context: MAGA supporters had recently criticised Trump for being 'soft' on India, especially after the appointment of a Chennai-born tech executive to head US AI policy and his earlier hints at easing immigration curbs for skilled Indian workers. With negotiations still underway and a new deadline looming, the move begs the question: is Trump responding to Modi's MIGA vision, or merely performing for his electoral gallery? India stands firm India's government has indicated that it's carefully reviewing the tariff implications while reaffirming its commitment to a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' trade agreement with the US. Some experts believe the tariffs are part of a negotiation tactic dubbed the 'TACO trade' — Trump Always Chickens Out, where threats escalate before backing off to secure deals under pressure. As Trump signals potential flexibility, suggesting cuts to Indian tariffs in return for wider concessions, the interplay of slogans and substance continues to unfold. Whether MAGA was a strategic policy pivot or political posturing remains open to interpretation, just like the final outcome of the India–US trade standoff. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Eicher Motors says rare earth shortage hit Royal Enfield output in Q1FY26
Eicher Motors, which manufactures Royal Enfield bikes, on Thursday said that a shortage of rare earth magnets impacted the production of some of its performance motorcycles during the first quarter of the financial year 2025-26 (Q1 FY26), Reuters reported. The shortage is attributed to China's export restrictions on rare earth magnets, imposed earlier this year. The company added that it has begun transitioning to alternative materials. 'We started working on the alternative material... at least about three or four months back. Now (the import of) that alternative material is not a major issue,' Eicher Managing Director B Govindarajan told analysts during a post-earnings call, as quoted by Reuters. The models that were impacted due to the shortage include the Himalayan, Scram, and newly launched Guerrilla, the report added. Other Indian manufacturers, such as TVS Motor and Ola Electric, are also exploring alternatives to rare earth magnets. A senior Maruti Suzuki executive described the shortage as a 'challenging situation' and said engineers are actively working to minimise its impact. China controls 90 per cent of the global production of rare earth magnets and more than 70 per cent of rare earth elements, which go into the making of magnets. Eicher Motor Q1 FY26 result Eicher reported a 9.4 per cent year-on-year rise in consolidated net profit to ₹1,205 crore for the quarter ended June 30. The company's revenue from operations rose 14.8 per cent to ₹5,042 crore, its highest ever for a first quarter, while earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (Ebitda) increased to ₹1,203 crore. Royal Enfield recorded a 14.7 per cent growth in sales, delivering 261,326 motorcycles in Q1 FY26, compared to 227,736 units in the same quarter last year. Meanwhile, VE Commercial Vehicles (VECV)—a joint venture between Eicher and Volvo Group—posted revenue of ₹5,671 crore, up 11.9 per cent year-on-year. VECV's Ebitda rose 32.6 per cent to ₹511 crore, as it sold 21,610 vehicles during the quarter, compared to 19,702 in the previous year.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sundram Fasteners Q1 net up 4% to record Rs 148 crore, exports dip
Sundram Fasteners, the Chennai-based auto components major, reported its highest-ever consolidated net profit of Rs 147.94 crore for the first quarter of FY26, a 4 per cent increase from Rs 142.69 crore in the same quarter last year. The company also posted record consolidated revenue of Rs 1,533.39 crore, marking a 2 per cent year-on-year growth. The consolidated earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, stood at Rs 7.06. Managing Director Arathi Krishna attributed the strong performance to resilient domestic demand and robust execution. 'This progress is a testament to the dedication and expertise of our teams, who continue to drive operational excellence and uphold the highest standards of product quality,' she said. Operational highlights Standalone revenue from operations rose to Rs 1,350.17 crore, up from Rs 1,310.33 crore last year. Export sales, however, declined to Rs 379.14 crore from Rs 422.65 crore, reflecting pressures from global economic and geopolitical uncertainties. The EBITDA for the quarter reached Rs 238.77 crore, the highest in the company's history, up from Rs 223.06 crore in Q1 FY25. The EBITDA margin improved to 17.5 per cent, supported by stable commodity prices, a favourable product mix, and stronger domestic sales. Gross margins improved significantly, from 57.5 per cent to 59.9 per cent. Outlook and strategy Despite global headwinds, Krishna emphasised the company's continued focus on long-term growth. 'We remain confident in the competitive strength of our product portfolio and the durability of our long-term partnerships,' she said. Sundram Fasteners plans to continue investing in innovation, capacity expansion, and customer engagement, aiming to fortify its leadership in the Indian and global automotive component markets. The company's robust quarterly performance highlights its ability to weather external shocks, even as exports slow, and positions it for continued expansion through strategic domestic investments.
