
Student Loan Collections Starts Today—5 Ways To Avoid Being Garnished
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 30: Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the ... More White House on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. McMahon announced the resumption of collections efforts against defaulted federal student loan borrowers earlier that month. (Photo by)
The Department of Education is set to resume collections activities against defaulted federal student loan borrowers on Monday. The collections system had been largely suspended for more than five years, largely due to pandemic-era relief programs. But those programs have now expired, and the Trump administration signaled last month that efforts to forcibly collect from defaulted federal student loan borrowers will quickly ramp up.
'The Department has not collected on defaulted loans since March 2020,' said a department announcement last month. 'Resuming collections protects taxpayers from shouldering the cost of federal student loans that borrowers willingly undertook to finance their postsecondary education.'
'American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies,' said U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in a statement last month accompanying the announcement. 'Going forward, the Department of Education, in conjunction with the Department of Treasury, will shepherd the student loan program responsibly and according to the law, which means helping borrowers return to repayment—both for the sake of their own financial health and our nation's economic outlook.'
The collections activities will commence this week with the resumption of the Treasury Offset program. Treasury Offset authorizes the government to intercept federal tax refunds, garnish Social Security payments, and offset other federal income streams, including federal salaries. Administrative wage garnishment, which allows the government to seize a portion of a borrower's employment income from private and public employers, will resume later this summer.
Federal student loan collections actions can have significant financial ramifications for student loan borrowers. Here's how to protect yourself.
Only federal student loans that are in a default status can be subject to Treasury Offset and administrative wage garnishment. 'Default' is a term that has a specific definition under federal law for Direct and FFEL-program loans: the loan must be past due by at least 270 days (roughly the equivalent of nine months) to be in default.
'For a loan made under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program or the Federal Family Education Loan Program, you're considered to be in default if you don't make your scheduled student loan payments for at least 270 days,' says Department of Education guidance.
If you are in regular repayment on your student loans under an approved repayment plan, you are not in default. In addition, certain periods of non-payment (such as a deferment, a forbearance, or a grace period) do not constitute default, even though no payments are being made.
To verify whether you have a defaulted federal student loan, log into your account at StudentAid.gov. Your account dashboard will summarize your outstanding federal student loans and should alert you if you have any accounts that are in default.
If you have fallen behind on your federal student loans, that's not ideal. Missing payments on a student loan is known as 'delinquency,' and can lead to late fees and negative credit reporting. But there may still be time to avert default, cure the delinquency, and bring your account back to good standing again.
'The first day after you miss a student loan payment, your loan becomes past due, or delinquent,' says Department of Education guidance. 'If you are delinquent on your student loan payment for 90 days or more, your loan servicer will report the delinquency to the national credit bureaus, which can negatively impact your credit rating. If you continue to be delinquent, you risk your loan going into default.'
If you are less than 270 days past due on a federal student loan, there may be time to avert default. You can pay the past due balance, or you can contact your loan servicer to request a retroactive deferment or forbearance; this can cancel out the past due balance and bring the account current. Borrowers who apply for an income-driven repayment plan, a type of payment plan tied to income and family size, may be put into an administrative forbearance to suspend payments while their application is processed.
While a loan must be in good standing to qualify for certain federal student loan forgiveness programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness or Teacher Loan Forgiveness, certain administrative discharge programs are available regardless of the loan's status.
One of the most popular administrative discharge programs is the Total and Permanent Disability Discharge program, also referred to as TPD Discharge. This program allows borrowers to request cancellation of their federal student loans if they are unable to engage in substantial, gainful activity due to a severe medical impairment. The Department of Education recently resumed processing TPD Discharge applications after a pause earlier this year during a system transition.
There are also several school-based discharge options. These programs include a Closed-School Discharge if a borrower was unable to complete their program due to a school closure, and an Ability to Benefit discharge if they did not have a high school diploma or GED at the time of enrollment, and their school did not adequately test their ability to benefit from the educational program.
Borrowers can also pursue a discharge of their federal student loan debt through bankruptcy. It is difficult, but not impossible, to do this. A borrower must be able to demonstrate that repayment of their student loan would be an undue hardship; to do that, they must initiate an adversary proceeding against their lender (which, for Direct federal student loans is the government) in the bankruptcy court. A new financial attestation process can make it easier for some borrowers to pursue a bankruptcy discharge.
If you're in default on a federal student loan, you may have pathways to get out of default and back into good standing again. Doing so can allow a borrower to avoid involuntary collections actions such as Treasury Offset and administrative wage garnishment. However, default resolution programs can come with some downsides.
One option is loan rehabilitation, which is a temporary payment program typically lasting nine to 10 months. Borrowers make payments based on their income during the rehabilitation period. After successful completion of the rehabilitation program, their student loan would be restored to good standing again, eliminating any immediate risk of offset or wage garnishment. Rehabilitation can also result in the deletion of any default-related credit reporting, although the record of missed payments can remain in a borrower's credit report for some time. Borrowers should be aware that FFEL guaranty agencies and the Department of Education are authorized under law to charge hefty collections fees, which can be rolled into the overall loan balance upon completion of the rehabilitation program.
Another default resolution option is Direct loan consolidation, which allows borrowers to take out a new loan through the Department of Education that repays any federal student loans that are in default. There is no credit check associated with this process, and borrowers do not have to make payments while in default to consolidate (unlike for rehabilitation), but they must select an income-driven repayment plan for the Direct consolidation loan. Consolidation does not delete any 'default' reference on a borrower's credit report, and – like rehabilitation – can come with significant collections fees. Consolidating loans that have existing IDR credit toward student loan forgiveness can also result in the erasure of that credit.
A final default resolution option would be settlement. However, settlements of defaulted federal student loans are governed by fairly strict guidelines, which limits any resulting balance reduction. Settlements typically must be paid in a lump sum payment, which may be prohibitively expensive for many borrowers. There may also be tax consequences associated with a settlement.
Before the federal government can refer a defaulted federal student loan borrower to Treasury Offset or start garnishing their wages, borrowers must receive an initial notice and an opportunity to respond. The response window is 65 days for Treasury Offset, and 30 days for administrative wage garnishment.
Federal student loan borrowers can dispute the debt during this notice window, or apply for an administrative discharge if they qualify. They can also request a hearing based on financial hardship, which requires that the borrower complete and submit a detailed financial statement form (which typically accompanies the notice paperwork). Any offset or garnishment should be postponed while the borrower's request is adjudicated, as long as the request is made within the notice period. After offset or wage garnishment has begun, borrowers can still object or request a hearing, but that won't stop the offset or garnishment unless the borrower ultimately prevails.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges
In 1789, in an address to the US House of Representatives, James Madison proposed amending the Constitution to include a Bill of Rights. In 1949, George Orwell's novel '1984' was first published. In 1966, a merger was announced between the National and American Football Leagues, to take effect in 1970. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, 34 American crew members were killed when Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a Navy intelligence-gathering ship in the Mediterranean Sea. (Israel later said the Liberty had been mistaken for an Egyptian vessel.) In 1968, US authorities announced the capture in London of James Earl Ray, the suspected assassin of civil rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In 1978, a jury in Clark County, Nev., ruled the so-called 'Mormon Will,' purportedly written by the late billionaire Howard Hughes, was a forgery. Advertisement In 1995, US Marines rescued Captain Scott O'Grady, whose F-16C fighter jet had been shot down by Bosnian Serbs on June 2. In 2009, North Korea's highest court sentenced American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years' hard labor for trespassing and 'hostile acts.' (The women were pardoned in early August 2009 after a trip to Pyongyang by former President Bill Clinton.) In 2017, former FBI Director James Comey, testifying before Congress, asserted that President Trump fired him to interfere with Comey's investigation of Russia's ties to the Trump campaign. In 2021, Ratko Mladić, the military chief known as the 'Butcher of Bosnia' for orchestrating genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in the Balkan nation's 1992-95 war, lost his final legal battle when UN judges rejected his appeal and affirmed his life sentence. In 2023, PresidentTrump was indicted by a grand jury in Miami on 37 felony counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents that had been moved to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida home. (The case against Trump was abandoned following Trump's November 2024 presidential election victory.)


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession . Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. Technology is a major sticking point The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei , a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased . One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. 'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls . China shows signs of easing up on rare earths One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths . They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Plan to revoke student visas adds to tensions Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Doesn't Seem To Care About Protesting Against Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Where the f*** is Gen Z?" asked TikTok creator @djangita in a video, which has at the time of reporting been viewed 2.3 million times, filmed at a protest in April. Since the reelection of President Donald Trump, thousands of people have turned out at protests across the country, including the "Not My Presidents Day" demonstrations in February, "Hands Off!" protests in April and "May Day" protests last month. And while protest movements have historically been driven by young people, the crowds at these protests seem noticeably older. So, where is Gen Z? Has the generation committed to a life of tradwives and the manosphere, leaving activism behind? Are they simply disenfranchised? Or has activism taken on a new meaning for a generation raised on tech? Newsweek spoke with experts to find out more. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Where Is Gen Z, politically? Looking at the perceived absence of Gen Z from the protest scene, the easy conclusion to make is they're not protesting Trump because they support him. The reality is a bit more complicated. As with much of American politics, where Gen Z sits politically is in a state of sharp polarization. Trump has had a significant amount of support from young men, having secured 55 percent of the vote from men aged 18 to 29 in 2024. There is, though, a wide gender gap in this age group, with 61 percent of women from the same demographic having voted for Vice President Kamala Harris. As of late April 2025, though, polling found that Trump's support among Gen Z had tailed off since the election, with 37 percent approving of him and 58 percent disapproving. Shifting Protest Culture It's not that young people are completely absent from political protests. "Young people's participation in major protests on issues like gun violence after the Parkland school shooting in 2018, racial justice after the George Floyd murder in 2020 and the Israel-Palestine conflict in the past two years have been a major feature of this generation's political engagement," Alberto Medina, communications team lead at the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), told Newsweek via email. But there's been a recent shift, and the image of an angry young person at a protest could now be relegated to the historical archives. "At the hands-off rally, there was a very clear demographic representation that excluded younger people," Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community & Equity and a professor at America University, told Newsweek, adding that young people are "just not turning up at these mainstream protest events." As for why, Fisher said: "Young people are feeling really frustrated with the political process. They're feeling really frustrated with the two-party system in America, and they have lost confidence in the notion that democracy in America can work for them." She recounted an interaction with a young student in her research team who put it bluntly, telling her: "Young people have given up on democracy in America." And young people's relationship with activism is changing, too. Newsweek spoke with Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, about this. "We have to consider that over the last year and a half, or last two years, when Gen Z has showed up to protest at college campuses in the last year in particular around what's happening in Gaza, they have been harangued, harassed, kicked out of school," Litman said. "They have faced incredible consequences. "I think the culture of protest, even in the last two years, has changed drastically." The current conflict between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. Israel retaliated and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to eradicate Hamas. The Gaza Health Ministry reports that at least 54,677 Palestinians have been killed since the conflict began, and there is a widespread humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with nearly all of the population having been displaced, according to the U.N. Students at universities across America have protested the conflict, with Columbia University becoming the epicenter of pro-Palestinian protests last spring. Protests have led to arrests, unrest and concerns have been raised about antisemitism. Commitment To Other Causes But just because Gen Z isn't out on the streets protesting Trump doesn't mean they're not out on the streets protesting. "A lot of young people who were engaged in all sorts of activism [are] shifting their focus to Gaza in the past year, year and a half since the violence broke out," Fisher told Newsweek. Newsweek spoke with Hatem Abudayyeh, national chair of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network (USPCN) about Gen Z presence at pro-Palestine protests. "We're still organizing protests every single week, and we still have a lot of college students, and even high-school-age students, Gen Z kids, who are coming to those," he said. "College-age young people and campus organizers and activists have been a part of all the social justice movements in the United States for decades." Pointing to the encampments and college protests, he said: "That clearly was something that not only the Palestine Support Movement had not seen in the United States before, but none of the social justice movements had seen [it] in the U.S. before since probably the Vietnam War era," and described Israel vs. Palestinians as "the Vietnam War issue of this era." New Era Of Activism It seems that activism, and political engagement itself, is changing significantly for young people. "It's evolving," Litman said. "Not all activism is flashy. It doesn't always make for a compelling video or photo. That doesn't mean it doesn't work." "In the first Trump administration, protesting was one of the primary ways that people showed their anger at Trump. And that was good for that moment. But we also saw the limits of that as a tactic. Gen Z is thinking about different ways that they can make their voice heard. "We're seeing young people be really intentional about the ways in which they can move the needle," Litman added, pointing to consumer activism and social media activism and highlighting that Trump cares about the latter. Medina told Newsweek:"Engagement online can serve as an entry point for youth to learn about and find opportunities to engage in issue advocacy or other forms of political participation. The key is ensuring that those opportunities are available and accessible to young people, that the structures and support systems are in place for youth to get involved and find political homes. "Young people are looking for opportunities to learn, to be heard and to have an impact on issues they care about. That process can begin with a post on social media but requires more sustained support that can empower youth to do more than be passive consumers of political ads or information." And beyond the discourse online or on the streets protesting, Litman highlighted one thing young people are clearly thinking about: running for office, she said. "Run for Something has had nearly 50,000 young people raise their hands to say they want to run for office in the last seven months," she said. "We've had more people raise their hands since the election than we did in the first three years of Trump's first term."