logo
Hamas says it is ready for ceasefire talks with Israel 'immediately' - which could see a 60-day truce and 10 hostages released from Gaza

Hamas says it is ready for ceasefire talks with Israel 'immediately' - which could see a 60-day truce and 10 hostages released from Gaza

Daily Mail​14 hours ago
Hamas has said it is ready to start ceasefire talks with Israel 'immediately' in a move that could see a 60-day truce and 10 hostages released from Gaza.
Security officials in Tel-Aviv reportedly met tonight to discuss their next steps before Benjamin Netanyahu heads to Washington for talks on Monday with US President Donald Trump.
And it is believed that the Israeli cabinet have decided to send a delegation to Qatar for talks on a possible deal, according to Israel's Channel 12 whose report cited a senior official.
It was unclear whether the delegation will fly to Qatar on Saturday or Sunday.
The move comes after Trump launched a renewed push to end nearly 21 months of war in Gaza - where the civil defence agency said a further 35 people were killed in Israeli military operations today.
'No decision has been made yet on that issue,' an Israeli government official said when asked about Hamas' s seemingly positive response to the latest ceasefire proposal.
The militant group said yesterday it was 'ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place' a US-backed truce proposal.
Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions told the AFP news agency that the proposals included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel.
They said the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system.
Hamas ally Islamic Jihad said it supported ceasefire talks but demanded guarantees that Israel 'will not resume its aggression' once hostages held in Gaza are freed.
When asked about Hamas's response aboard Air Force One, Trump said: 'That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza.'
The war began with Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which sparked an Israeli offensive in the territory that aimed to destroy Hamas and bring home all the hostages seized by Palestinian militants.
Previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States secured temporary halts in fighting and the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners.
Of the 251 hostages taken by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
The Egyptian foreign ministry said today that top diplomat Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with Washington's enjoy to th Mid, Steve Witkoff, to discuss recent developments 'and preparations for holding indirect meetings between the two parties concerned to reach an agreement'.
The Egyptian foreign ministry said today that top diplomat Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with Washington's enjoy to th, Steve Witkoff, to discuss recent developments 'and preparations for holding indirect meetings between the two parties concerned to reach an agreement'.
Pictures of the remaining Israeli hostages held in the Gaza Strip are displayed on a table by a beach outside the US embassy branch office in Tel Aviv on July 4, 2025
The Hostages and Missing Families Forum has also renewed calls for a negotiated agreement to bring the hostages home.
'This is the hour to bring about a comprehensive deal that will guarantee the return of the last hostage,' they said.
Recent efforts to broker a new truce have repeatedly failed, with the main point of contention said to be Israel's rejection of Hamas's demand for guarantees of a lasting ceasefire.
The war has created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip, where Israel has recently expanded its military operations.
US and Israel-backed group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, took the lead in food distribution in the territory in late May after Israel partially lifted a more than two-month blockade on aid deliveries.
The group said two of its US staff members were wounded 'in a targeted terrorist attack' at one of its aid centres in southern Gaza's Khan Yunis on Saturday, adding that reports indicated a pair of assailants 'threw two grenades at the Americans'.
The Israeli military said it had evacuated the injured.
UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
Its operations have been marred by near-daily reports of Israeli fire on people waiting to collect rations.
UN human rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said yesterday that more than 500 people have been killed waiting to access food from GHF distribution points.
GHF chairman Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical leader allied to Trump, on Wednesday rejected calls for the lead role in Gaza aid distributions to revert to UN agencies, saying: 'We will not be shut down.'
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said Israeli military operations killed 35 people across Gaza on Saturday.
The Hamas attack of October 2023 resulted in the deaths of around 1,200 people, who were mostly civilians.
Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 57,338 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers these figures reliable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I was naive in being hopeful': Labour voters feel let down after first year
‘I was naive in being hopeful': Labour voters feel let down after first year

The Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘I was naive in being hopeful': Labour voters feel let down after first year

Labour supporters have told the Guardian of their dissatisfaction with the party's first year in government, as Keir Starmer marks 12 months since becoming the first Labour prime minister since Gordon Brown. Members and voters said initial optimism had given away to unhappiness about the government's record, although many were keen to state the positives they felt had been forgotten under the weight of recent events. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Jan, a former Labour member from Manchester said she was 'disillusioned, disappointed and despairing' with Starmer's tenure so far. She recalled the strategy often attributed to the Labour leader in the run-up to the election last year, and said: 'I kept telling myself that really, Keir Starmer was a man with a Ming vase on a polished floor, and that somehow after they were in power that things would really start to change and we would have an alternative to the Tory government that left the complete mess we're in at the moment.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ She said she had resigned her membership over the last year as a result of her unhappiness with the party's policies on the war in Gaza, and wider changes to welfare. She said: 'I'm more sad than I am angry, and that's [a] very difficult place to be, to feel so let down, betrayed and disappointed.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ In south London, Desanka, a social housing tenant and worker, said Labour's housing policy would not sufficiently cut local authority housing waiting lists. 'What we need is genuinely affordable housing. Without housing, without good safe housing, you can't have healthy people, and you can't get an education,' she said. 'I think until they address that, if they were to do that, and to have a genuine response to allow councils to build more, and put money in it, and bring back affordable housing grants that used to be. I know times are hard, but you have to make choices.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ While she was keen to credit the government for attempting to rebalance the country, she said she wouldn't back the party again at the ballot box. She cited disagreement with the party's policy on asylum seekers on small boats not being able to apply for citizenship. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Kennedy was another who believed Labour was not getting recognition for the positives so far. Giving the party a B grade for its first year, he said he was a supporter of the family farms tax policy and introducing VAT on private school fees. He said Starmer and his cabinet had stabilised the country, but disputed how stereotypically Labour the government's policies had been. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ 'They need to be hitting the rich more than hitting the poor,' Kennedy said. 'So again, the welfare bill, again, that was another political suicide. Where do they think they're going? And why are they hitting the most vulnerable sectors in society? They need to be hitting the super-wealthy, the super-rich, big business, big corporations, people who really can't defend themselves.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Laura, a lifelong member, said she was 'overwhelmingly disappointed' with the party's performance. She said she was unhappy with policies she thought had targeted the poorest in society. She said: 'I remember driving to work and feeling a sense of optimism and hope for the future for the first time in a very long time. That hope and optimism has now vanished and I feel despair, disappointment and quite often guilt and regret at having voted for this government.' The NHS worker continued: 'I've lost trust in these politicians in whom I initially had so much hope.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Sympathy was the overarching feeling for Hazel Lamb, who said the government was dealing with a 'much worse situation than they anticipated'. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ 'What I love is the fact that the government is honest,' Lamb said. 'I think that people have integrity and are trying their best. I don't have a sense that there's self-interest going on here, I have a sense that people are actually trying to do something about all the difficult situations that we've got.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Lily Raper, who has spent most of her life under Conservative-led governments, said her excitement was replaced with dismay at Labour's foreign policy, and its policies on trans rights. She said: 'I hoped for a solid stance from the Labour government in halting the arms sales to Israel, in preventing the genocide occurring in Palestine. Obviously we've not seen that, and I've seen Labour effectively throwing trans women under the bus. Disappointment is too light a word.' Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Barney Duff said the initial successes of Labour's first 100 days had been forgotten. He referred to the creation of Great British Railways, and changes to renters' rights that are still going through parliament, but said things had since gone awry. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ 'It's just been a bit of a train wreck,' Duff said. He added: 'I thought they were going to pivot when they got in charge. I was hopeful that they'd return to their manifesto that won the leadership, but I was quite naive in being hopeful.'

‘Blatant misinformation': Social Security Administration email praising Trump's tax bill blasted as a ‘lie'
‘Blatant misinformation': Social Security Administration email praising Trump's tax bill blasted as a ‘lie'

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘Blatant misinformation': Social Security Administration email praising Trump's tax bill blasted as a ‘lie'

An email sent by the US Social Security Administration (SSA) that claims Donald Trump's major new spending bill has eliminated taxes on benefits for most recipients is misleading, critics have said. The reconciliation bill – which the president called the 'one big, beautiful bill' before signing it on Friday after Republicans in Congress passed it – includes provisions that will strip people of their health insurance, cut food assistance for the poor, kill off clean energy development and raise the national debt by trillions of dollars. But the bill also 'eliminates federal income taxes on social security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples', the previously apolitical SSA stated in an email circulated on Thursday. Frank Bisignano, the commissioner of the agency, said in a statement that nearly 90% of social security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits. 'This is a historic step forward for America's seniors,' Bisignano said. 'By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect social security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned.' However, the spending bill does not actually eliminate federal taxes on social security due to the rule constraints of passing a bill this way – through the reconciliation process, to avoid a Democratic filibuster. Instead, the legislation provides a temporary tax deduction of up to $6,000 for people aged 65 and older, and $12,000 for married seniors. These benefits will start to phase out for those with incomes of more than $75,000 and married couples of more than $150,000 a year. Previous SSA officials said that the Trump administration's framing of the bill was misleading. 'People are like: 'Is this real? Is this a scam?' Because it's not what they signed up for,' Kathleen Romig, a former senior adviser at the SSA during the Biden administration, told CNN. 'It doesn't sound like normal government communications, official communications. It sounds like – you know – partisan.' Jeff Nesbit, who served as a top SSA official under Republican and Democratic presidents, posted on X: 'The agency has never issued such a blatant political statement. The fact that Trump and his minion running SSA has done this is unconscionable.' The New Jersey representative Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the House's energy and commerce committee, wrote on X that 'every word' of the SSA's email on Thursday 'is a lie'. 'This big, ugly bill doesn't change that,' Pallone wrote. 'It's disturbing to see Trump hijack a public institution to push blatant misinformation.'

Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call
Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call

Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin , but acknowledged peace with Ukraine is not on the immediate horizon. On the call that lasted about one hour and 15 minutes, Trump disclosed they discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia 's air bases. Kyiv delivered a devastating blow to the Russian air force on Sunday and Putin has vowed revenge including by stockpiling a massive contingent of battle tanks and ammunition. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace,' admitted Trump. The president also stated that Putin told him he plans to retaliate against Ukraine after the recent attacks. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump disclosed, without details about whether he pushed back on the Russian leader. Trump has been vocal about wanting to end all fighting and bombing between the two nations immediately as the death toll continues to rise in the now years-long conflict. 'We also discussed Iran , and the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons , which must be made quickly! I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement.' 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion. It is my opinion that Iran has been slow-walking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store