Afrikaner 'refugee' lists R2 million house after 'flying to US for free'
Another Afrikaner 'refugee' has been questioned over her motive for leaving South Africa for the US, under President Donald Trump's Executive Order.
Like many others, Santana de Bruyn of Gqeberha is accused of being an 'opportunist' who hopes to reap the benefits of the resettlement programme for 'persecuted' people.
According to reports, the former Heineken employee has put her R2,3 million home on the market.
According to the Herald , Santana de Bruyn, her three children, and her mother, Susana, were part of the 49 Afrikaner 'refugees' who arrived in the US last week.
The publication reports that the 33-year-old has listed her R2.3 million home on the market.
Her uncle, Roelof de Bruyn, said: 'They said [President] Trump was flying them for free from Gqeberha to Johannesburg. And then to the US.
'Then he will give them houses, furniture, and vouchers to buy food'.
It's unclear what persecution she faced to warrant her being granted 'refugee' status.
According to the listing of her home, the five-bedroom property contains a 'vast entertainment area', complete with a 'refreshing pool' and a 'spacious flatlet'. It is described as a 'a true sanctuary that merges comfort, style, and endless possibilities'. An Afrikaner 'refugee' listed her R2,3 million home on the market. She reportedly 'flew for free' to the US under President Trump's resettlement programme.
Image via Remax
According to her LinkedIn account, Santana de Bruyn has worked for Heineken Beverages for over a decade. Prior to that, she lived in Rustenburg, where she completed her studies.
Like other 'refugees', Santana has also 'locked' her Facebook, possibly preventing the public from prying.
Santana de Bruyn is not the only Gqerberha resident, or Afrikaner 'refugee', whose claims of 'persecution' landed her a spot on Trump's resettlement programme.
Jacqueline Botha left her home in the affluent neighbourhood of Rowellan Park. She is accused of scoring a 'free flight' to allegedly reunite with her husband, who has been living in the US for years.
Limpopo Graniting mining businessman Charl Niehaus spoke to the media about leaving behind his five-bedroom home to find a better life abroad. He hopes to reunite with his brother, who lives in the US.
Similarly, another, IT businessman, Errol Langton – who claimed he was an Afrikaner English South African who farmed 'leafy green vegetables,' – sought 'refugee' status after experiencing crime in South Africa.
He also joins family members who live and work in the US.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Police probe more cases against syndicate that targeted Wits student Olorato Mongale
Olorato Mongale's mother Basetsana speaks during her funeral on Sunday. Image: Free State Provincial Government/Facebook Police have reported an increase in the number of cases that they are linked to the syndicate responsible for the death of the former Wits University student, Olorato Mongale - three more have been added to the 22 reported last week. Last week, the number of cases being investigated by the police stood at 22 cases with SAPS spokesperson, Brigadier Athlenda Mathe indicating that the number has increased to 25. "We are now standing at 25 cases linked to the syndicate," Mathe said without going into details about the latest developments in the matter. Police said they are closing in on Bongani Mthimkulu, the remaining suspect of an alleged kidnapping syndicate that targeted young women at shopping malls in several provinces. The main suspect, Philangenkosi Makhanya, was killed during a shootout with police at Amanzimtoti in KwaZulu-Natal last week. 'That is the only syndicate that we had identified that was going around the country targeting woman in various malls in various provinces. We are counting Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu- Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga as well as North West,' said Mathe. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Meanwhile, as the manhunt for Mthimkhulu continues, the spokesperson for the Mongale family, Dr Criselda Kananda and the entire Mongale family confirmed in a statement that the family has withdrawn its support for Fezile Ngubane - one of the recently cleared suspects. Police arrested Ngubane but later said he was targeted by the syndicate and was an innocent victim of identity fraud. In a statement issued on Tuesday, Kananda announced her withdrawal from supporting Ngubane's addiction rehabilitation journey after having supported the campaign aimed at helping him overcome his drug addiction. 'I would like to take a moment to express my appreciation for the outpouring of support regarding the call to help Fezile Ngubane with his rehabilitation. Our initial intention was to assist in placing Fezile at a free rehabilitation centre, as we believe that simply throwing money at someone struggling with addiction is not a sustainable solution. "However, with the introduction of monetary donations into this situation, I have decided to withdraw my engagement in Fezile's case. I believe it is best to those who have taken a different approach to carry on from here," she said.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Why the EFF went to court about the fuel levy, a regressive tax that punishes the poor and violates budgetary processes
EFF National Chairperson Noluthando Nolutshungu and Mathibe Mohlala, convener of deployers to the Western Cape, outside the Cape High Court where the Party challenged the legality to increase the fuel levy by the Minister of Finance who wants to raise extra revenue. Image: Ian Landsberg / Independent Newspapers By Carl Niehaus On May 21, 2025, South Africa's Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana, announced a 16-cent fuel levy increase as part of the revised 2025/26 Budget, breaking a three-year freeze on such levies. The government claims this will generate R4 billion in revenue, but at what cost? The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have taken a bold stand, filing an urgent court application on May 28, 2025 in the Western Cape High Court to interdict this levy. The EFF argues that it's not only economically disastrous and regressive but also illegal and unconstitutional, as the Minister has bypassed critical budgetary approval processes. Moreover, the EFF's clarion call for a wealth tax offers a progressive alternative to fund public services without burdening the poor. This levy must be stopped, and here's why. The fuel levy is a direct assault on South Africa's working class and poor, who are already buckling under a relentless cost-of-living crisis. The January 2025 Household Affordability Index paints a grim picture: a minimum-wage worker earns just R4,854.08 per month, with R2,802.97—57.7%—going to electricity and transport alone, leaving a mere R2,051.11 for all other expenses, including food. Yet, the average food basket costs R5,433.70, leaving these workers short by over R3,000 just to meet basic nutritional needs. In towns like Springbok, a single food basket costs R773.13—more than many can afford even weekly. Now, add the burden of this fuel levy. For a worker already on the edge, this increase could mean the difference between eating and going hungry, between getting to work or losing a job. The ripple effects of this levy are profound. It will drive up transport costs for commuters relying on taxis, buses, or private cars. It will increase the price of food, as transportation costs cascade through the supply chain, making essentials like bread and vegetables unaffordable for many. It will raise electricity costs, as diesel powers backup generators and critical infrastructure logistics, especially for off-grid communities and businesses. There is no 'zero-rating' escape from fuel costs—this levy will touch every aspect of life, and it's the poorest among us who will bear the brunt. Unlike VAT, which is charged at the point of sale, the fuel levy cascades through the economy, inflating prices at every level, whether you drive or not. It's a regressive tax that deepens inequality, exacerbating an already dire cost-of-living crisis. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Regional disparities further highlight the injustice. South Africans are already paying up to R2 per litre more than our neighbours due to levies and taxes. In Gauteng, fuel costs R21.40 per litre, while in Botswana it's R19.50, in Lesotho R19.30, and in Namibia R20.67. Why are we being punished while fuel is supplied to these countries at lower rates? This disparity is a slap in the face to South Africans already struggling to make ends meet. The fuel levy's imposition is also illegal, and it cannot be implemented on June 4, 2025 because the Minister of Finance has bypassed critical budgetary approval processes mandated by South African law and the Constitution. Section 77 of the Constitution requires that any tax or levy, such as the fuel levy, must be introduced through a Money Bill passed by Parliament. This process ensures democratic oversight, transparency, and accountability, involving stages like tabling the budget proposal in the National Assembly, debates, committee reviews, public hearings, and a final vote by both the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces. As of June 1, 2025, no Money Bill incorporating this levy has been tabled, debated, or passed. The May 21 announcement left less than two weeks for this process—a timeline that makes compliance with these constitutional requirements impossible. Public hearings, a constitutional necessity, have not occurred, and parliamentary committees have not had the chance to scrutinize the proposal or consult affected communities. This mirrors the unlawful process used in the rejected VAT increase, which the EFF also opposed. The EFF's court application argues that the Minister's actions violate the Constitution by sidestepping Parliamentary oversight and that the levy disproportionately burdens the poor, violating principles of fairness and equality. The legal challenge also highlights the lack of transparency—no socio-economic impact assessments or public consultations were conducted, and there's no evidence of a progressive fiscal policy review or exploration of alternative revenue sources. The broader context of the 2025/26 Budget reveals a troubling picture. The EFF, through Senior Researcher Dr. Gumani Tshimomola's presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on Finance on 28 May 2025, has rejected this budget as weak, misguided, and disconnected from South Africans' lived reality. Dr. Tshimomola emphasised that the National Treasury's fiscal framework prioritises neoliberal austerity over the needs of the people, undermining Parliament's constitutional role in budgeting. He stated: 'Parliament must reclaim its constitutional role in budgeting to ensure that fiscal policy serves the people, not the interests of capital.' He criticised the regressive nature of the fuel levy and the failure to explore progressive alternatives like a wealth tax—a long-standing EFF clarion call. A wealth tax on the richest South Africans would target the top 1%, who hold a disproportionate share of the nation's wealth, to fund public services without burdening the poor. This progressive measure could raise billions to support education, health, and social development, reducing inequality and fostering inclusive growth, unlike the fuel levy, which punishes the most vulnerable. Dr. Tshimomola's presentation revealed that between the March and May versions of the budget, over R28 billion was cut from non-interest spending, including reductions in education, health, social development, and the criminal justice system. These cuts weaken the state's ability to deliver basic services at a time when unemployment, poverty, and infrastructure collapse are at their worst. This is not a growth budget—it's an austerity budget that prioritises fiscal consolidation over the needs of the people. The government claims debt will stabilise at 76.2% of GDP, but this comes at the expense of investment in transformative sectors and job creation. South Africa spends over R382 billion annually on servicing a debt of more than R6.2 trillion, with little to show for it. More than 11 million people are jobless, despite the fiscal space to drive labor-absorptive growth. The budget fails to propose state-led industrialisation, doubling down on neoliberal policies that prioritise profit over national developmental interests. The Standing Committee on Finance's report on the 2025 Fiscal Framework, dated 1 April 2025, supports this critique, noting that the Treasury's austerity measures—through regressive taxes like the fuel levy and cuts to key sectors—hinder socio-economic rights and economic transformation. EFF President Julius Malema has been unequivocal: 'This fuel levy is a tax on the poor, plain and simple. The Minister of Finance is playing a dangerous game with the lives of South Africans, and we will not stand by while he pushes millions deeper into poverty.' We must ask the Minister: Why impose a levy that's just as destructive as the withdrawn VAT hike? Why not adopt a wealth tax instead? The EFF demands an urgent review of the fuel levy, transparent alternatives like a wealth tax to fund public services, and immediate relief for working-class families. This is not just a technical change—it's a tax that punishes the poor and violates our Constitution. We call on all South Africans to join this fight—in the courts, on the streets in the picket lines. The people united will never be defeated, and together, we will achieve economic freedom in our lifetime. * Carl Niehaus is an EFF Member of Parliament (MP) ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
2 hours ago
Truth: Is Kaizer Chiefs interested in ex-Orlando Pirates striker?
Kaizer Chiefs are expected to add at least two strikers ahead of the next season, as they look to improve. Chiefs failed to finish in the top eight, despite winning the Nedbank Cup, that partially due to a blunt attack. Upon arrival at Chiefs last season, Nabi made it clear that the club still needs a striker. He was heavily reliant on Ranga Chivaviro as well as Wandile Duba at that time. Later in that season, Ashley du Preez returned from injury and featured more, with two new forwards signed. Tashreeq Morris and Glody Lilepo were those additions, and to mixed fortunes. While Lilepo was a success with five goals, making him the club's joint top goal scorer, Morris flopped. It is then no surprise that Nabi is back making it his personal mission to find a complete striker for Chiefs. That has since seen numerous names mentioned as possible suitors for the club in the next transfer window. One of those names has been Fiston Mayele, who recently scored in the CAF Champions League final. His goal was one of two that ensured that Pyramids FC won their first ever continental title, at the expense of Mamelodi Sundowns. Another Chiefs are rumoured to be interested in is Etiosa Ighodaro, from Sundowns. Now a shock name that has returned to the conversation is former Orlando Pirates striker Bienvenu Eva Nga. The Cameroonian was previously linked with Chiefs before joining Pirates. But according to Soccer-Laduma , the current rumours are false. 'No, not at this stage, that's not the move you can expect. There was a possibility of that in the past but not at this moment (Chiefs being interested in Eva Nga).' Said one source to the same publication. Another also poured cold water on the prospect of Eva Nga joining Chiefs. 'Chiefs are focused abroad for attacking players at the moment. I haven't heard anything about the player (Eva Nga) you are mentioning.' Said the source. Chiefs fans, are you happy that Eva Nga won't be joining your club? Let us know by clicking on the comment tab. Or by emailing info@ or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. You can also follow @TheSAnews on X and The South African on Facebook for the latest news.
