German factory orders fall amid tariff, growth woes
FRANKFURT: German industrial orders unexpectedly fell in June, official data showed Wednesday, as Europe's biggest economy struggles with prolonged domestic weakness and volatile US trade policy. New orders, closely watched as an indicator of future business activity, dropped 1.0 percent month-on-month, according to preliminary data from federal statistics agency Destatis, after a fall of 0.8 percent in May. Analysts surveyed by financial data firm FactSet had expected a rebound of 1.3 percent in June. Orders from abroad fell three percent, with a particularly heavy drop from countries outside the eurozone, while domestic orders increased slightly.
There were big falls for orders from the crucial automotive sector, of transport equipment such as trains and ships as well as metal products. The economy ministry said that big swings in orders were no surprise 'given the persistent high level of trade and geopolitical uncertainty'.
'The industrial economy is likely to be characterized by subdued foreign demand in the future in light of what are now likely to be permanently higher tariffs on exports to the United States,' it added in a statement. EU exports to the United States have already faced tariffs of varying rates for several months. Under a deal struck between the bloc and US President Donald Trump last month, they are set to face across-the-board levies from Thursday of 15 percent, which will hit export power Germany hard.– AFP
The majority of German companies expect further disruptions to transatlantic trade, according to a survey of about 3,500 enterprises by the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK). It found that 72 percent are already feeling the negative effects of the current US trade policy and that 58 percent fear new burdens.
'US tariff policy has no winners. It harms businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic,' said DIHK executive director Helena Melnikov. The German economy shrank for the past two years and the government's latest forecast, released in April, predicted zero growth for 2025 due to the impact of tariffs. Some institutes have, however, recently upgraded their forecasts to slight growth for this year, seeing signs that the downturn has bottomed out. – AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain
Higher tariffs on trading partners could inflict economic harm on Americans: Economists WASHINGTON: At a glance, US President Donald Trump appears to be winning the trade war he unleashed after returning to the White House in January, bending major trading partners to his will, imposing double-digit tariff rates on nearly all imports, narrowing the trade deficit, and raking in tens of billions of dollars a month in much-needed cash for federal government coffers. Significant hurdles remain, however, including whether US trading partners will make good on investment and goods-purchase commitments, how much tariffs will drive up inflation or stymie demand and growth, and whether the courts allow many of his ad-hoc levies to stand. On inauguration day, the effective US tariff rate was about 2.5 percent. It has since jumped to somewhere between 17 percent and 19 percent, according to a range of estimates. The Atlantic Council estimates it will edge closer to 20 percent, the highest in a century, with higher duties taking effect on Thursday. Trading partners have largely refrained from retaliatory tariffs, sparing the global economy from a more painful tit-for-tat trade war. Data on Tuesday showed a 16 percent narrowing of the US trade deficit in June, while the US trade gap with China shrank to its smallest in more than 21 years. American consumers have shown themselves to be more resilient than expected, but some recent data indicate the tariffs are already affecting jobs, growth and inflation. 'The question is, what does winning mean?' said Josh Lipsky, who heads economic studies at the Atlantic Council. 'He's raising tariffs on the rest of the world and avoiding a retaliatory trade war far easier than even he anticipated, but the bigger question is what effect does that have on the US economy.' Michael Strain, head of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's geopolitical victories could prove hollow. 'In a geopolitical sense, Trump's obviously getting tons of concessions from other countries, but in an economic sense, he's not winning the trade war,' he said. 'What we're seeing is that he is more willing to inflict economic harm on Americans than other countries are willing to inflict on their nations. And I think of that as losing.' Kelly Ann Shaw, a White House trade adviser during Trump's first term who is now a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said a still-strong economy and near-record-high stock prices 'support a more aggressive tariff strategy.' But Trump's tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation and policies to boost energy production would take time to play out. 'I think history will judge these policies, but he is the first president in my lifetime to make major changes to the global trading system,' she added. Trump has concluded eight framework agreements with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines that impose tariffs on their goods ranging from 10 percent to 20 percent. That's well short of the '90 deals in 90 days' administration officials had touted in April, but they account for some 40 percent of US trade flows. Adding in China, currently saddled with a 30 percent levy on its goods but likely to win another reprieve from even higher tariffs before an August 12 deadline, would raise that to nearly 54 percent. Deals aside, many of Trump's tariff actions have been mercurial. On Wednesday he ratcheted up pressure on India, doubling new tariffs on goods from there to 50 percent from 25 percent because of its imports of oil from Russia. The same rate is in store for goods from Brazil, after Trump complained about its prosecution of former leader Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. And Switzerland, which Trump had previously praised, is facing 39 percent tariffs after a conversation between its leader and Trump derailed a deal. Ryan Majerus, a trade lawyer who worked in both the first Trump administration and the Biden government, said what's been announced so far fails to address 'longstanding, politically entrenched trade issues' that have bothered US policymakers for decades, and getting there would likely take 'months, if not years.' He also noted they lack specific enforcement mechanisms for the big investments announced, including $550 billion for Japan and $600 billion for the EU. Promises and risks Critics lit into European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after she agreed to a 15 percent tariff during a surprise meeting with Trump during his trip to Scotland last month, while gaining little in return. The deal frustrated winemakers and farmers, who had sought a zero-for-zero tariff. Francois-Xavier Huard, head of France's FNIL national dairy sector federation, said 15 percent was better than the threatened 30 percent, but would still cost dairy farmers millions of euros. European experts say von der Leyen's move did avert higher tariffs, calmed tensions with Trump, averting potentially higher duties on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and cars, while making largely symbolic pledges to buy $750 billion of US strategic goods and invest over $600 billion. Meeting those pledges will fall to individual EU members and companies, and cannot be mandated by Brussels, trade experts and analysts note. US officials insist Trump can re-impose higher tariffs if he believes the EU, Japan or others are not honoring their commitments. But it remains unclear how that would be policed. And history offers a caution. China, with its state-run economy, never met its modest purchase agreements under Trump's Phase 1 US-China trade deal. Holding it to account proved difficult for the subsequent Biden administration. 'All of it is untested. The EU, Japan and South Korea are going to have to figure out how to operationalize this,' Shaw said. 'It's not just government purchases. It's getting the private sector motivated to either make investments or back loans, or to purchase certain commodities.' And lastly, the main premise for the tariffs Trump has imposed unilaterally faces legal challenges. His legal team met with stiff questioning during appellate court oral arguments over his novel use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, to justify his tariffs. A ruling could come any time and regardless of the outcome seems destined to be settled ultimately by the Supreme Court. — Reuters
Kuwait Times
2 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Influx of Afghan returnees fuels Kabul housing crisis
KABUL: Weeks after he was forced to return from Iran, Mohammad Mohsen Zaryab was still searching for somewhere to live in Kabul, where rental prices have soared along with an influx of Afghans expelled from neighboring countries. More than 2.1 million Afghans have returned from Pakistan and Iran so far this year, according to the United Nations refugee agency. They join earlier rounds of mass expulsions from the neighboring countries, deported or driven out by fear of arrest. Many of the returnees, like Zaryab, fled with their meager belongings to Kabul, expecting the swelling city of eight million to offer the best prospects of finding work in a country where half the population lives below the poverty line. Zaryab begged landlords to bring down prices for his family of eight, only to be told, 'If you can't pay, someone else will'. The 47-year-old factory worker said he had expected when he returned in July to find more solidarity for Afghans coming 'from far away with no home'. Multiple Kabul property dealers told AFP that rental prices had skyrocketed with the influx of returnees. 'Since landlords noticed that refugees (from Iran and Pakistan) were returning, they doubled their rents,' said real estate agent Hamed Hassani, calling for the government to 'intervene'. 'We have many refugees who come to ask us for an apartment to rent, and most of them cannot afford what's available,' he said. A year ago, a three-room house would on average cost 10,000 Afghanis ($145) per month, but renters now pay 20,000, said Nabiullah Quraishi, the head of a property dealership. The cost amounts to a fortune for the majority of Afghanistan's 48 million people, 85 percent of whom live on less than one dollar a day, according to the UN. Two years ago, multiple landlords would come to Quraishi's business every month seeking help renting their property. Now, demand outstrips supply, he said. The municipality denies any housing crisis in the city. Major urban development plans, which include building new roads even if it means bulldozing numerous residences, are further straining housing access. 'Seventy-five percent of the city was developed unplanned,' municipality spokesman Nematullah Barakzai told AFP. 'We don't want this to happen again.' Zahra Hashimi fears being evicted from the single basement room that has served as her home since she and her family returned from Iran. Her husband, who works odd jobs, earns about 80 Afghanis per day (a little over a dollar), not enough to pay the rent for the property, which has no electricity or running water. 'We lost everything when we returned to Afghanistan,' said Hashimi, whose eldest daughter can no longer attend school under Taliban rules that deny women and girls schooling and employment. Her two primary-school-aged daughters could still attend, but the family cannot afford the tuition. The housing pressures have also affected long-time Kabul residents. Tamana Hussaini, who teaches sewing in the west of Kabul, where rents are lower, said her landlord wants to raise the 3,000 Afghani rent for their three-bedroom apartment. The family of eight tried to move out, but 'rents are too high', she told AFP. 'It's a frustrating situation where you can't stay, but you can't leave either.' — AFP
Kuwait Times
3 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Russia and India talk up ‘strategic partnership' after Trump tariff hike
Moscow, New Delhi hope to build a new 'world order' • Putin to visit India this year MOSCOW/NEW DELHI: Russia and India stressed their commitment to a 'strategic partnership' in bilateral security talks in Moscow on Thursday, a day after US President Donald Trump announced higher tariffs on imports from India because of its purchases of Russian oil. Interfax news agency quoted Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval as saying that New Delhi was looking forward to a visit from President Vladimir Putin by the end of the year. At Doval's meeting with Sergei Shoigu, secretary of Russia's Security Council, both sides emphasized the importance of the countries' relations. Trump's imposition of an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from India, coming into force on August 28, signals the most serious downturn in US-India relations since his return to office in January, threatening to disrupt India's access to its largest export market. KAZAN: Russian President Vladimir Putin meets Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (left) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (right) on the sidelines of the BRICS summit on Oct 22, 2024. - AFP photos 'We are committed to further active cooperation in order to form a new, more just and sustainable world order, ensure the supremacy of international law, and jointly combat modern challenges and threats,' Shoigu told Doval in televised comments. Interfax quoted Doval as saying: 'We have now established very good relations, which we value very much, a strategic partnership between our countries'. India and China have become the top buyers of Russian seaborne crude oil since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, precipitating Western efforts to choke the Russian economy. Trump had threatened measures against countries buying Russian oil before he announced the new tariff on Indian goods, which raised the total duty to 50 percent. On Tuesday, the Kremlin accused the United States of exerting illegal trade pressure on New Delhi, saying India has the right to trade with whomever it chooses. India's state refiners have stopped Russian oil purchases as the discounts narrowed and Trump warned countries not to buy Moscow's oil, industry sources said. Private refiners Reliance Industries and Nayara are Russia's top oil clients in India, trade data shows. An Indian official familiar with the matter said Doval would discuss India's purchases of Russian crude during his visit to Moscow. He was also expected to discuss India's defense collaboration with Russia, the official said. India signed a $5.5 billion deal with Russia in 2018 for five S-400 Triumf long-range surface-to-air missile systems, which New Delhi says it needs to counter a threat from China. But deliveries of the systems have been delayed several times. Moscow is expected to deliver units of the final two S-400 systems to India in 2026 and 2027. New Delhi has traditionally relied heavily on arms imports from Russia, although it has dramatically reduced those imports and shifted to Western buyers in recent years. — Reuters
