logo
Children at play in Jeff City: Secretary of state and legislature upend 22 lives

Children at play in Jeff City: Secretary of state and legislature upend 22 lives

Yahoo08-06-2025
Missouri's coffers are so flush with cash that the governor and legislature have committed $1.5 billion to keep the Chiefs and Royals from moving to Kansas.
Meanwhile, nearly two dozen state employees have been needlessly fired, their lives upended because of a secretary of state who appears to have no human decency and a childish feud among Jefferson City politicians.
I have seen the resulting carnage firsthand. As one of dozens of volunteers at the Missouri State Archives, I visit the wonderful research room in Jeff City once a week to help staffers dig into public requests for information.
This past week, the research room was emptier and significantly less joyful.
Secretary of State Denny Hoskins had mercilessly eliminated 17 of the 60 employees under his purview in the Records and Archives Division the previous Friday. For good measure, he canned five of 16 workers in the State Library upstairs from the Archives.
Hoskins became Missouri's secretary of state, a job that includes running elections, handling business filings and protecting the state's public records, after winning the November election in a landslide. He ran on a pro-MAGA, anti-woke platform, so maybe it's no surprise he would pull such a stunt.
You might remember Hoskins, a former state senator, as one of the three Freedom Caucus members who maliciously — and wrongly — identified an Olathe man in social media posts as the shooter at the Chiefs' deadly Super Bowl celebration in 2024. He never apologized, and the falsely accused man was found dead in April as he pursued lawsuits against the three public officials.
Now Hoskins has turned his attention to other innocent victims, and the situation stinks to high heaven. It resulted, by all appearances, from a feud between him and his former Republican cohorts in the state Senate — primarily Mike Cierpiot of Lee's Summit.
This much is certain: Hoskins is solely responsible for how he dismissed these 22 state employees under his leadership.
With no notice or even a suggestion that anybody might be fired, his victims were ambushed at their desks one by one. They were walked into a meeting room, where a supervisor, a human relations person and a state legal counsel informed them they were unemployed as of the end of the fiscal year on June 30. Then, after getting a few minutes to clean out their desks, they were escorted out of the building.
Hoskins was nowhere to be found, of course. He evidently didn't have time in his schedule, just as when he was asked for an interview on the matter. He did send an email statement in which he boasted about his agency's operation, then said, 'This is not a decision I wanted to make, nor one I would ever make lightly.'
His spokeswoman, Rachael Dunn, followed with, 'Secretary Hoskins did not choose these cuts — the legislature did.'
As that great Missourian, Col. Sherman T. Potter of 'M*A*S*H,' liked to say, 'Horse hockey!'
Usually, a story about job cuts such as these transitions into something like, 'This is part of wider cuts caused by the budget crisis' or 'an economic emergency.' But, no, there is no budget crisis or economic emergency in Missouri.
Just some grownups acting like children.
It is no secret in Jefferson City that Hoskins and his Freedom Caucus cronies made a lot of enemies in the General Assembly over the past three years by holding the lawmaking process hostage as they promoted their far-right agenda.
Things got personal between Hoskins and Cierpiot. The Lee's Summit Republican decided to lob a grenade at his foe by pushing through a budget amendment earlier this year to cut 25 of the secretary of state's roughly 60 unfilled full-time equivalent employees (of 267 total positions) and $680,000 from a fund that helps pay salaries.
But Hoskins chose to trim real people instead of unfilled positions.
Caught up in the fracas were 22 faithful employees, including at least two who were due pay raises of 10% in the next fiscal year under the new budget rewarding longtime employees. It's probably just a coincidence that Hoskins eliminated them just before their raises were to kick in and put a bigger dent in his budget.
State Sen. Mike Bernskoetter, a Jefferson City Republican, issued a statement saying in part: 'The budget we passed did not require any layoffs or cuts to current staff. … The decision to cut current employees and use that money elsewhere ultimately lies with the secretary of state.'
Although Cierpiot and other senators have confirmed that sentiment, Dunn insists her boss 'had no choice' and 'our hands were tied.'
Even if that were true — and she and Hoskins might be the only people who think so — Hoskins could have distributed the cuts throughout his agency so that one department wasn't so thoroughly ravaged, especially when that department works so intimately with the public.
He could have stepped up to publicly defend the reasons for his actions.
He could have treated the victims of his purge with some semblance of humanity.
Instead, he issued canned statements and played the blame game.
Dunn used the word 'dignity' in describing the firing process. Sure, if you consider it dignified to treat your employees as if they were enemies of the state.
'There's no dignity here,' Bob Priddy said.
Priddy knows dignity. The near-legendary Missouri broadcaster also knows the State Archives, which he called 'the most visible part of the secretary of state's office.' He's on the board of directors of the Friends of Missouri State Archives and is a former president of that group.
The veteran of Missouri politics also writes a blog, and he was working on a new entry last week.
'It basically says that the state Senate and the secretary of state are engaging in a urinary contest, and the only people getting wet are the more than 20 people who don't deserve to get wet.'
Still, Priddy maintains a somewhat optimistic outlook.
'I'm hopeful there can be some grownups in the room that can get together and work this thing out,' he said. 'But history is not in favor of grownups these days in the Capitol.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clevenger concedes to Rhyne in race for Spartanburg County Sheriff
Clevenger concedes to Rhyne in race for Spartanburg County Sheriff

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Clevenger concedes to Rhyne in race for Spartanburg County Sheriff

Bill Rhyne opened a large lead in early returns for Spartanburg County Sheriff, prompting a concession from his opponent, Spartanburg County Coroner Rusty Cleveger The two faced off in a runoff in the Republican Party primary. "The voters have spoken -- we just didn't have the numbers," Clevenger told the Herald-Journal at about 8 p.m. "I can't say enough about the people who have supported me. I appreciate them more than they may ever know." Clevenger was reelected as coroner in 2024. "We'll move forward as part of the team with a new sheriff," he said. Following the resignation of former Sheriff Chuck Wright in May, Clevenger and Rhyne were among nine candidates to file for the Republican nomination for November's special election. There's no Democrat on the November ballot. Rhyne and Clevenger previously served in the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office before taking different career paths. Clevenger has served as Spartanburg County coroner since 2009. Rhyne went to work with the South Carolina Highway Patrol, where he served as the lead public information and community engagement officer. During the primary -- especially the two weeks before the Aug. 19 runoff -- Clevenger touted his experience while Rhyne described himself as "the change candidate." This article originally appeared on Herald-Journal: Voter turnout 'solid' in Spartanburg Republican primary runoff race Solve the daily Crossword

Man who lied to police in parking lot shooting sentenced to jail
Man who lied to police in parking lot shooting sentenced to jail

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Man who lied to police in parking lot shooting sentenced to jail

Aug. 19—ROCHESTER — A man who falsely told police he fired the gun at the scene of a fatal shooting was given six months in jail for giving a false statement to investigators. Jose Abraham Gutierrez Ojeda, 28, was sentenced in Olmsted County District Court Tuesday, Aug. 19, on a felony charge of aiding an offender. He admitted to telling police it was he, and not his brother, who shot and killed a man in a Chick-fil-A parking lot in Rochester in February 2024. Video and witness accounts confirm it was Isaac Gutierrez, Jose's brother, who fired the shot that killed Osbel Ornelas, 24, during a fight in the Chick-fil-A parking lot on South Broadway in Rochester on Feb. 3, 2024. Video shows Jose was the first to exit the car after the car he was in nearly struck the car Ornelas was driving. Jose displayed a pistol and later put the weapon back into the car and scuffled with Ornelas. Isaac then retrieved the firearm and shot Ornelas in the head. Jose pleaded guilty in February this year to the charge. Jose apologized to members of Ornelas' family, at least one of whom was in the courtroom Tuesday. "I can't imagine their loss," he said. "I want them to know I'm truly sorry." Jose said he didn't intend to hinder the police investigation of the shooting but was only trying to protect his brother. "I felt responsible for my little brother and what happened that day," he said. On that point, Judge Kathy M. Wallace, who presided over the proceeding Tuesday, agreed. "I think you truly realize that this wouldn't have occurred but for your actions," Wallace said to Jose. However, Wallace disagreed with Jose and his attorney's attorney, Eric Olson, who both said Jose's statement to police was made out of regret, remorse and sense of protectiveness for his younger brother who did pull the trigger. Olson also said the statements didn't hinder the investigation into the incident thanks to witness statements and video. "I don't find it to be an impulsive decision," Wallace said, noting that after the shooting Jose took the gun from Isaac and switched seats in the car with his brother before giving his false statement. "The fact that law enforcement figured it out is not attributable to the defendant," Wallace said. "It was because of the police work." Olson asked Wallace to lower the offense to a gross misdemeanor and not impose a prison sentence. Instead, Wallace imposed a 75-month sentence that will be stayed as long as Jose complies with terms of his probation. She ordered Jose to serve 90 days in jail beginning immediately with the possibility of work release and to serve another 90-day sentence beginning on the anniversary of the 2024 murder. Isaac was convicted by a jury of the murder and sentenced to five years in prison. The state is appealing the sentence arguing it's too lenient.

US military vets are helping Afghans fight deportation
US military vets are helping Afghans fight deportation

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US military vets are helping Afghans fight deportation

As a journalist in Afghanistan, Abdul says he helped promote American values like democracy and freedom. That work, he said, resulted in him being tortured by the Taliban after the US withdrew from the country in 2021. Now he's in California applying for political asylum, amid the looming threat of deportation. "We trusted those values," he said. "We came here for safety, and we don't have it, unfortunately." But when Abdul walked into a San Diego court to plead his case, he wasn't alone. Ten veterans showed up for his hearing – unarmed, but dressed in hats and shirts to signify their military credentials as a "show of force", said Shawn VanDiver, a US Navy vet who founded 'Battle Buddies' to support Afghan refugees facing deportation. "Masked agents of the federal government are snatching up our friends, people who took life in our name and have done nothing wrong," he said. Approximately 200,000 Afghans relocated to the US after Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, as the US left the country in chaos after two decades fighting the war on terror. Many say they quickly felt embraced by Americans, who recognised the sacrifices they had made to help the US military and fight for human rights. But since the Trump administration has terminated many of the programmes which protected them from deportation, Afghans now fear they will be deported and returned to their home country, which is now controlled by the Taliban. Afghan refugees feel 'betrayed' by Trump order blocking move to US Trump to end protected status for Afghans and Cameroonians 'We were friends of the US': Fearful Afghans face Trump travel ban Mr VanDiver, who also founded #AfghanEvac in 2021 to help allies escape the Taliban when the US withdrew, said US military veterans owe it to their wartime allies to try and protect them from being swept up in President Trump's immigration raids. "This is wrong." The Battle Buddies say they have a moral and legal obligation to stand and support Afghans. They now have more than 900 veteran volunteers across the country. Many of the federal agents working for ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are veterans themselves, he said, and the Battle Buddies think their presence alone might help deter agents from detaining a wartime ally. "Remember, don't fight ICE," Mr VanDiver told his fellow Battle Buddies outside court before Abdul's hearing, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE. "If somebody does fight ICE, capture it on video. Those are the two rules." As Abdul and his lawyer went into court, the veterans stood in the corridor outside in a quiet and tense faceoff with half a dozen masked federal agents. It was the same hallway where an Afghan man, Sayed Naser, a translator who says he worked for the US military, was detained 12 June. "This individual was an important part of our Company commitment to provide the best possible service for our clients, who were the United States Military in Afghanistan," says one employment document submitted as part of Naser's asylum application and reviewed by the BBC's news partner in the US, CBS News. "I have all the documents," Mr Naser told the agents as he was handcuffed and taken away, which a bystander captured on video. "I worked with the US military. Just tell them." Mr Naser has been in detention since that day, fighting for political asylum from behind bars. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told the BBC that there is nothing in his immigration records "indicating that he assisted the US government in any capacity". Whichever way Mr Naser's case is decided, his detention is what inspired veterans to form the Battle Buddies. They say abandoning their wartime allies will hurt US national security because the US will struggle to recruit allies in the future. "It's short sighted to think we can do this and not lose our credibility," said Monique Labarre, a US Army veteran who showed up for Abdul's hearing. "These people are vetted. They put themselves at substantial risk by supporting the US government." President Trump has repeatedly blamed President Biden for a "disgraceful" and "humiliating" retreat from the country. But the US's withdrawal from Afghanistan was initially brokered by President Trump during his first term. In their wake, American troops left behind a power vacuum that was swiftly and easily filled by the Taliban, who took control of the capital city, Kabul, in August 2021. Afghans, many who worked with the US military and NGOs, frantically swarmed the airport, desperate to get on flights along with thousands of US citizens. Over the ensuing years, almost 200,000 Afghans would relocate to the US - some under special programmes designed for those most at risk of Taliban retribution. The Trump administration has since ended this programme, called Operation Enduring Welcome. It also ended the temporary protections which shielded some Afghans, as well as asylum seekers from several other countries, from deportation because of security concerns back home. "Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilising economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about terminating Temporary Protected Status for Afghans. She added that some Afghans brought in under these programmes "have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security". Afghans in the United States scoff at the suggestion that they'd be safe going back, saying their lives would be in danger. "I couldn't work," said Sofia, an Afghan woman living in Virginia. "My daughters couldn't go to school." With the removal of temporary protected status, the Trump administration could deport people back to Afghanistan. Although that is so far rare, some Afghans have already begun to be deported to third countries, including Panama and Costa Rica. Sofia and other members of her family were among the thousands of Afghans who received emails in April from the Department of Homeland Security saying: "It is time for you to leave the United States." The email, which was sent to people with a variety of different kinds of visas, said their parole would expire in 7 days. Sofia panicked. Where would she go? She did not leave the United States, and her asylum case is still pending. But the letter sent shockwaves of fear throughout the Afghan community. When asked about protecting Afghan wartime allies on 30 July, President Trump said: "We know the good ones and we know the ones that maybe aren't so good, you know some came over that aren't so good. And we're going to take care of those people – the ones that did a job." Advocates have urged the Trump administration to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led government. Advocates are hopeful that Naser will soon be released. They say he passed a "credible fear" screening while in detention, which can allow him to pursue political asylum because he fears persecution or torture if returned to Afghanistan. The Battle Buddies say they plan to keep showing up for wartime allies at court. It's not clear if their presence made a difference at Abdul's hearing – but he wasn't detained and is now a step closer to the political asylum he says he was promised. "It's a relief," he said outside court while thanking the US veterans for standing with him. But he said he still fears being detained by ICE, and he worries that the US values he believed in, and was tortured for, might be eroded. "In Afghanistan, we were scared of the Taliban," he said. "We have the same feeling here from ICE detention."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store