Long-term triple lock commitment ‘out of scope' of pensions commission
The Work and Pensions Secretary has announced that she is reviving the commission, which last met in 2006, to tackle the issue of working age adults failing to put enough money into their retirement savings.
Experts have warned that people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners.
The commission is expected to provide recommendations for how to boost retirement income in 2027.
Ms Kendall also confirmed that the next statutory Government review into when and how to raise the state pension age will start work now.
'Unless we act, tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, because people who are saving aren't saving enough for their retirement,' she said during a speech launching the commission.
Lowering the age and earnings threshold at which people are brought into auto-enrolment and as well as looking at easy-access 'sidecar' savings accounts will be among the options the commission looks into.
Ms Kendall was asked if she thought it was impossible to maintain the triple lock guarantee given its cost and if she could guarantee it would be in Labour's next manifesto.
She said: 'The triple lock is out of scope of the commission. We've got a very clear commitment to that for the entirety of this Parliament.
'And what we're asking the commission to do is genuinely look medium to longer term, the middle of this century, and how the state pension and second pensions work together.'
The Office for Budget Responsibility recently said that the triple lock has already cost three times more than initially expected and suggested it was unaffordable in the long term.
Ms Kendall was also asked about the potential hit to small businesses from increased automatic enrolment costs.
'I want our small businesses to be successful, but it is also the case, you know, flag forward to the middle of the century, 2050, if we don't act, the amount of pensioner poverty we face will cost everybody if we don't act,' she said.
She said she was 'under no illusions about how difficult this will be'.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said 45% of working-age adults were putting nothing into their pensions.
The previous pensions commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions, which has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55% in 2012 to 88%.
DWP analysis suggested 15 million people were under-saving for retirement, with the self-employed, low-paid and some ethnic minorities particularly affected.
Around three million self-employed people are said to be saving nothing for their retirement, while only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds are saving.
Women face a significant gender pensions gap, with those approaching retirement in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
20 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour has wrecked the economy… here's how YOU might be made to pay – from fuel duty to income tax
Find out which tax hikes could be coming — and how likely they are on a scale of 1 to 5 RYAN SABEY Labour has wrecked the economy… here's how YOU might be made to pay – from fuel duty to income tax Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) IF Rachel Reeves was heading into Parliament's summer break with a huge headache, things just got a whole lot worse. The Chancellor woke up yesterday to a storm around Government borrowing hitting £20.7billion last month. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 With soaring debt and past decisions hitting growth, Rachel Reeves is said to be preparing for a tough Budget and likely tax rises Credit: The Mega Agency The figure — higher than the £17.1billion forecast for the period — was fuelled by a rise in the interest charges on government debt. And now, instead of blue skies and sunshine over the summer, Ms Reeves will have to deal with dark clouds gathering over the Treasury. She has said that 'the world has changed' since her previous Budget, with Donald Trump's global tariffs creating uncertainty. But the harsh reality is that a series of decisions this Government made has wrecked what was always going to be a fragile recovery. READ MORE ON TAX RISES TAXING TIMES Keir Starmer opens door to Budget tax raid after inflation jumps to 3.6% The decision to increase NI contributions for employers had a devastating impact on expansion and hiring plans — and wrecked confidence. Anger was also levelled at her and Sir Keir Starmer for talking the country down when Labour first came to power, as they painted a gloomy economic outlook for Britain. This is all before businesses face the roll-out of the workers' rights package over the next two years, which will hit firms for £5billion, according to the Government's own impact assessment. And better prospects for working people appear doomed as wealth creators flee the country due to the high-tax environment, with around 16,500 expected to leave this year. Self-inflicted misery And this self-inflicted misery could be compounded further in the Budget this autumn as Ms Reeves tries to solve her spending shortfall. The financial black hole has only been made worse by this month's £5billion welfare reform U-turn and the £1.5billion she will now have to find after the partial retreat on Winter Fuel payments. Rachel Reeves FINALLY addresses Commons tears after she and Keir Starmer put on awkward show of unity Economists have already said that the Chancellor may have to fund a £30billion shortfall to meet her fiscal rules, and higher taxes are a near-certainty because Whitehall departments have already faced brutal cuts. Ms Reeves insisted yesterday that UK productivity was the problem. She said low investment levels compared to other G7 countries had led to UK output not keeping pace with our competitors. Reeves said it would be easy to cut capital spending, but these would be 'short-sighted, wrong decisions'. Here, we weigh up the Chancellor's options as she battles to balance the books, along with our likelihood rating of the moves being adopted later this year. 1. Wealth tax REEVES will fend off pressure from Labour MPs to bring in a wealth tax after being warned the well-off will flee the country. The Chancellor is set to reject calls for levies on property, investments and savings after Lord Kinnock called for a two per cent surcharge on assets worth more than £10million. But a host of other countries have already tried wealth taxes and they haven't raised the money needed to cover the public finances. Recent research shows that the UK has seen 18 billionaires quit these shores in the past two years alone. 1/5 2. Income tax threshold freeze IN one of the positives from last autumn's Budget, the Chancellor said there would be 'no extension' of the freeze in income tax and National Insurance thresholds. She said such a move would hurt working people and take more money from their payslips. But a freeze on income tax thresholds for the next two years would help Ministers raise around £8billion to fill the Budget black hole. The move would mean that even more people would be brought into the higher rate of tax, with the freeze due to come to an end in 2028. 4/5 3. Fuel duty on petrol & diesel 5 Keeping the duty frozen and maintaining the 5p cut brought in back in 2022 will cost around £5billion a year Credit: Alamy COST-of-living demands on households will pile the pressure on to freeze fuel duty at its current level for another year, rather than opting for a much-needed cut. Keeping the duty frozen and maintaining the 5p cut brought in back in 2022 will cost around £5billion a year. The Sun's successful Keep It Down campaign has saved motorists around £100billion since our battle with the Treasury started in 2011. The headline tax rate on petrol and diesel is currently 52.95p per litre. Back in October, Reeves said raising fuel duty would be the 'wrong choice for working people'. 2/5 4. Capital Gains Tax PROFITS made from sales on shares, investments and property could fall into play for raising funds for Treasury coffers. Reeves raised the top rate of CGT by four per cent at the last Budget, but experts say if it goes up again the move could backfire. Higher rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent CGT on the profits from sales, which contrasts with 40 per cent if it was earned income. Nimesh Shah, from accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'People may choose to hold on to things like houses so as not to crystallise the tax bill — or they may simply leave the UK and crystallise the gains abroad.' 2/5 5. Tourist tax on hotel rooms 5 Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is pushing for councils to have new powers to tax tourists, but there are worries this could hurt already struggling hospitality businesses Credit: AP DEPUTY Prime Minister Angela Rayner is pushing for councils to be given new powers to bring in a tax on tourists. The Labour number two is facing opposition from Reeves to bring in a surcharge similar to those other countries impose on hotel rooms. But the Treasury is understood to be concerned that it would just hit struggling hospitality businesses that have already been badly bruised by the National Insurance raid. 4/5 6. Income tax, VAT and NI pledge LABOUR promised at the last election to protect 'working people' from tax hikes, but uncertainty has arisen about who could be protected. A key pledge was not to hike the main revenue raisers of income tax, VAT or National Insurance when the party came to power. Treasury minister Darren Jones has insisted anyone who gets a payslip is a 'working person'. It comes after Cabinet colleague Heidi Alexander said those on 'modest incomes' would be protected. 1/5 7. Small business taxes 5 Craig Beaumont of the Federation Of Small Businesses says the Labour Government must prove it supports 'the country's everyday entrepreneurs' Credit: Alamy A MILLION bosses who own small businesses and set up as limited company directors fear being clobbered on their pay. The business community worry the first £500 of dividend income being tax free could be hit in the autumn Budget. Craig Beaumont, of the Federation Of Small Businesses, said: 'The Labour Government must show if it stands behind the country's everyday entrepreneurs'. 2/5 8. Pensions tax relief raid 5 Future pensioners could face cuts to tax relief on pension contributions, with a drop from 40 per cent to 20 per cent for high-rate taxpayers raising around £15 billion Credit: Getty FUTURE pensioners could see the tax relief on pension contributions lowered to help raise funds. Higher-rate taxpayers get 40 per cent tax relief and basic-rate taxpayers get a lower 20 per cent rate. If the rate was brought down to 20 per cent it could mean around £15billion would be raised. The idea appeared to be rejected last year. But it could be back on the table as autumn approaches to bring in necessary funding. 4/5
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office U-turn as it agrees to share location of asylum seeker hotels with Deliveroo and Just Eat to crack down on illegal workers
The Home Office has finally agreed to share the location of asylum hotels with food delivery companies to help crack down on migrant illegal working. Deliveroo said last week it had asked civil servants for the hotel addresses so it could block accounts operating from these locations, only to be refused due to 'safety concerns' for hotel occupants. But the Home Office has now changed its stance and will share this information with Deliveroo, as well as its competitors Just Eat and Uber Eats. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said tonight: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement. 'The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.' Last month it emerged that migrants living in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels – including those who arrived by small boat – are securing work as fast food delivery riders within hours of entering Britain. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said he had found evidence of asylum seekers breaking rules which bar them from working while their claim is processed by the Home Office. The Tory politician visited an asylum hotel in central London and posted a video showing bicycles fitted with delivery boxes for Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats parked outside. Days later, the Home Office said it had called in all three companies for a dressing down – and the meeting led to pledges to introduce 'facial recognition' systems on rider apps, such as those used by banks to confirm someone's identity. However, Deliveroo was refused access to hotel location data despite assurances it would be treated confidentially, the Times reported. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said at the time: 'The fact that the Home Office is refusing to help them just shows how topsy-turvy this country's approach to migration has become. 'Crossing the Channel illegally is a crime. Working here illegally is a crime. 'Too many people are brazenly breaking the rules and it's a disgrace that the Home Office is aiding and abetting them.' Eddy Montgomery, Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime at the Home Office, said following tonight's u-turn: 'This next step of co-ordinated working with delivery firms will help us target those who seek to work illegally in the gig economy and exploit their status in the UK. 'My teams will continue to carry out increased enforcement activity across the UK and I welcome this additional tool to disrupt and stop the abuse of our immigration system.' The Government has also announced the trialling of AI-powered facial recognition technology to determine whether Channel migrants are being wrongly identified as children. The Home Office announced testing on new technology will begin later this year with the hope it could be fully integrated into the asylum system in 2026. Ministers admitted that assessing the age of asylum seekers is 'an incredibly complex and difficult task' but said AI might soon provide quick and cost-effective results. More than 23,000 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, up more than 50 per cent on the same point last year and the highest number in the first six months since figures began in 2018. The Home Office says there are 32,345 asylum seekers being put up at taxpayer expense in hotels, with another 66,683 in houses and flats. These have regularly been the target of protests, some of which have turned violent.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Glitch made my 'smart' dishwasher order me enough tablets to last three YEARS: SALLY SORTS IT
My dishwasher is linked up to the internet, and I allowed it to monitor my usage and automatically reorder Finish dishwasher tablets when I was down to my last ten. The dishwasher is connected to the Finish app on my phone. However, when I ran low on tablets, the app ordered me a new delivery on four consecutive days. I only found this out when packets kept turning up on my doorstep. I now have about three years' supply for which I was automatically billed £45. I have complained, but two months on I've got nowhere. J.C., Ware, Herts. Rinsed: A reader's smart dishwasher ordered new packages of tablets on four consecutive days landing them with a £45 bill Sally Hamilton replies: I was intrigued by the concept of intelligent ordering. It sounds a great way of ensuring you never run out of dishwasher tablets. I'd find such a subscription service handy for other areas of domestic life such as loo rolls, though I'm not sure that many toilets are linked to the internet. I do know some people who use a similar service for the re-ordering of ink for printers and there are smart fridges that prompt owners when they are running out of essentials. The service you signed up to is called SmartFinish, which, as you described, tracks dishwasher usage and automatically sends out a new pack. Ideal, if it works. Customers need to own a Wi-Fi-enabled dishwasher to take advantage of such auto-reordering. The system is matched to the customer, so if you use the dishwasher more than usual, orders will turn up more frequently. Gremlins seemingly got into the re-ordering system in your case, landing you with a pile of unwanted tabs. When you initially complained, Finish said you must have made the additional orders yourself, which you said was laughable. Why would you order three years' worth of tabs over a few days? Scott Dixon of consumer service Complaints Resolver, suggests customers getting nowhere with an over delivery like yours quote section 25 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. He says: 'This says the business is responsible for collecting and refunding the excess items at no cost to the customer.' You asked Finish to do this but hit a brick wall. I contacted Reckitt, the consumer goods giant that owns Finish, to ask it to resolve your dishwasher tab mountain pronto. I didn't get anywhere at first so understood your frustration at the limited response to your complaint. But when I chased a couple of weeks later, it turned up the dial and soon Finish refunded your £45 and told you to keep the excess product. It said the problem was due to a 'technical issue' with the app, which was quickly resolved. When it asked if you wanted to continue the subscription, you politely declined. Scam Watch Drivers should beware a scam email that impersonates insurance company Admiral, consumer website Which? warns. The email claims that you have been selected to win a free 'car emergency kit' that includes tools and a hazard triangle. Scammers say to win the kit you need to answer a few questions by following the link on the email. Do not click on this link. It aims to steal your personal and financial information. Instead, report the email by forwarding it to report@ Rental car mix-up left me with £375 bill I booked a flight with EasyJet to arrive at Edinburgh on May 14, but in error reserved a rental car for pick up from Drivalia a day earlier. I realised my mistake on May 13 and phoned the firm but was advised to sort it out on arrival. When I arrived, I was issued with a second booking at a cost of £375 and received no refund for the first one. I realised later that I was charged again in the second booking for May 13. I even got charged a further £115 for a parking offence that took place on May 13, before I even got to Edinburgh. Please help. J.R., Hampshire. Sally Hamilton replies: Any holiday that involves a vehicle rental fills me with dread as the process seems designed to catch customers out, whether it's the extortionate price of excess insurance at the desk, high charges for extras such as satnavs and child seats or the tricky rules around whether the fuel tank should be returned full or not. Your experience highlights the costly risk of being tardy for picking up a rental car – even though you tried to correct the error in advance. We all make mistakes, and you were prepared to take it on the chin – up to a point. But to be charged twice for the rental is not fair. I asked Drivalia to reconsider, emailing both its chief executive and customer services. I heard nothing back from the former, but the latter requested you complete an online complaint form. In that process you respectfully asked for a refund of the first booking and the extra day charged on the second rental. They declined, though they did refund the parking ticket and admin fee. How kind. Hitting a roadblock with Drivalia, I approached EasyJet, since you had booked the hire from a link on its website. EasyJet told me that while the site enables customers to make such bookings, these are provided by third party partners. In your case, the Drivalia deal was found through EasyJet partner CarTrawler, a platform listing various hire options. I am pleased to say CarTrawler's response was at the speed and standard I would have liked to have seen from Drivalia – with no hesitation in offering you a full refund of both hire bills, a total of £446. A CarTrawler spokesman says: 'We were sorry to hear about J.R's experience. We understand booking errors can have a significant impact on travel plans, and we appreciate how frustrating this experience must have been. 'Although the original issue resulted from a date selection error, and the charges applied were in accordance with the car rental supplier's terms, a full refund of the original hire and additional rental costs has been arranged.' CarTrawler adds: 'We encourage all customers to carefully review the travel dates and rental terms outlined in their booking voucher. 'Should any problems arise at any stage, our dedicated customer care team is available 24/7 to support travellers before, during, or after their journey.' Straight to the point I have had a policy with home repair company HomeServe since 2021 and I have never claimed on it. Now we have a badly dripping tap in our shower – but it is refusing to repair it as it is in a shower. Dripping taps are covered in my policy documents. Please help. J.W., Lincolnshire. Homeserve apologises but says the policy includes a simple 'what is and what isn't covered' image which reveals showers and shower controls are not included. You can cancel your policy at any time. *** I retired in July 2024, and my final pension contribution and salary sacrifice of around £2,268 was paid by my company to Aegon. I tried to move it to my Sipp in September but found out Aegon has received the money but it had not been credited to my account. At the end of last year it gave me £250 as an apology but it still hasn't added the missing amount to my pension. Aegon still can't say when my complaint will be dealt with – even one year on. Please help. S.G., Hampshire. Aegon says the funds have now been applied to your plan and you have received a £300 goodwill gesture for the delay. *** My family and I make regular trips from Leeds to Malaga and sometimes buy food and drink on the plane. Since 2022, the payments have been card only. The menu is priced in euros so I pay with my Spanish bank account. But when I checked my bank account I was paying more than I thought, so a bottle of water cost €4.10 instead of €3.60. What's happening? E.V., Leeds. You were charged in pounds, without your knowledge, on flights to the UK from Spain where the 'local' currency was euros. You were subject to the airline's exchange rate and your bank would charge you to convert the pounds payment back to euros. The airline says you can choose to pay in euros.
