'Indigenous Survivors Day': a day of reflection before Canada Day
Social Sharing
Today, the city of Thunder Bay is proclaiming June 30th as "Indigenous Survivors Day" and hosting community events. Sixties Scoop survivor Troy Abromaitis said he created Indigenous Survivors Day to honour children who were taken from their families and lands. He said Thunder Bay is the first city to make it a full-day event, and hopes other communities will follow.
Abromaitis said Canada Day represents celebrating a country that, for many Indigenous peoples, facilitated loss and separation from their families.
"By placing Indigenous Survivors Day on June 30th, we invite Canadians to reflect before they celebrate Canada Day and to remember the children who are taken and why this matters," said Abromaitis, who is a member of the Nlaka'pamux Nation from Lytton First Nation in British Columbia.
Thunder Bay is a city with painful truths to confront, he said. Choosing to lead the way in recognizing Indigenous Survivors Day is a sign of courage and growth, said Abromaitis. Other places have followed, including the provinces of British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick, and municipalities including Victoria, Edmonton, Ottawa and Niagara Falls.
"They give me hope that one day this will be a national day and a national movement," he said.
While the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation on September 30 honours the victims and survivors of residential schools, Abromaitis said there was a need to recognize survivors of other campaigns that separated Indigenous children from their families. Indigenous Survivors Day is meant to fill that gap, he said.
"This is not just about history. It's about healing what is still happening with regards to Sixties Scoop survivors, Millennium Scoop survivors, birth alerts and the over representation of children in the child welfare system who carry invisible pain," said Abromaitis.
10 years after apology, '60s Scoop survivors call for more support
11 days ago
Duration 2:01
Ten years ago, Manitoba's premier issued an apology to the survivors of the Sixties Scoop. On Wednesday, survivors, advocates and community members gathered at St. John's Park in Winnipeg to heal, and call attention to injustices they say are continuing.
The Sixties Scoop refers to the period between the 1950s and early 1990s during which thousands of Indigenous children in Canada were apprehended by child welfare agencies and placed with non-Indigenous foster or adoptive parents. Many children were subject to physical, emotional or sexual abuse while most lost connection to their cultures and languages.
The systematic removal of First Nations children from their families from 1991 on is referred to as the Millennium Scoop. The practice resulted in more Indigenous children ending up in foster care than were sent to residential schools at their peak.
The practice of birth alerts – where child welfare organizations notify hospitals when they believe a pregnant patient may be 'high risk' – led to newborns being taken from their parents for days, months or even years. The province ordered an end to birth alerts in 2022 after finding it disproportionately affected Indigenous and racialized families.
Indigenous children made up 53.8 per cent of all children in foster care across the country, according to Statistics Canada data from the 2021 census.
Thunder Bay Indigenous Survivors Day open to all
David Wilkinson-Simard, a traditional knowledge keeper and member of the City of Thunder Bay's Indigenous Advisory Council, will be leading a sacred fire and closing reflections at a community gathering at Hillcrest Park.
"This is a very new event, you know, even to Native people. And we're understanding where our place is too," he said. Wilkinson-Simard said the organizers have put out calls to drum groups and hand drummers to come celebrate. They plan to share traditional music and the stories behind some ceremonies at the gathering.
Wilkinson-Simard, who is also a survivor of the Sixties Scoop, said Indigenous Survivors Day is a time to share stories about the ongoing challenges Indigenous people have gone through and to celebrate their survival.
"It's an opportunity to help Canadians to understand why a lot of the things are the way they are and how First Nations are pulling themselves out of all of this," said Wilkinson-Simard.
While events like the Sixties Scoop and residential schools are often thought of as long-passed historical events, he said they are ongoing issues because the impacts are still felt by survivors and subsequent intergenerational trauma.
The event is open to all. Wilkinson-Simard said non-Indigenous participants are encouraged to attend.
"I think that's very important that as a non-Indigenous person you take the opportunity and you also take the risk of going into and learning about something that might be uncomfortable for you at first. It also is an opportunity for you to understand the challenges that many First Nations have overcome and how you can champion them," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
37 minutes ago
- CTV News
Canada U-turn leaves Europe in the lurch on U.S. tech taxes
Prime Minister Mark Carney walks with U.S. President Donald Trump after a group photo at the G7 Summit, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Canada. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) PARIS -- Canada's dropping of a tax on U.S. tech giants under the pressure of Donald Trump is fuelling concern about the future of such levies in other countries, particularly in Europe. 'Currently, about half of all European OECD countries have either announced, proposed, or implemented' a digital services tax pending global action, said the Tax Foundation, a think tank which supports the introduction of such taxes. But the future of such measures is unclear after the Group of Seven nations agreed Saturday to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries. The move sparked a pointed reaction from Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz. 'This is about more than trade -- it's about whether democratically elected governments can regulate and tax powerful corporations or whether tech billionaires can dictate policy through political proxies,' he said. Who has imposed such a tax? Austria, Brazil, Britain, France, India, Italy, Spain and Turkiye are a dozen large countries which have imposed or planned to impose special taxes on big tech firms. The objective is to force them to pay taxes where they carry out business as well as to counter the tax optimization strategies they often practice. Generally, the taxes target sales revenue and focus essentially on US firms like Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Facebook (Meta) and Microsoft. But they differ from one country to another in terms of sales that are taxed, with some targeting advertising revenue and others sales of data. 'Most of the proposed or adopted rates are in the 2-5 per cent range,' of the revenue stream targeted, according to analysts at the Canadian Tax Foundation. Most nations adopted the taxes pending a global agreement which would see multinational companies pay some taxes in countries where they operate, but the prospects for such a deal now look bleak. What these taxes generate The taxes tend to raise more money year after year, according to the latest data from the EU Tax Observatory, which dates from June 2023. Britain, France, India, Italy and Turkiye have seen steady increases in the revenue their taxes generate. Both Britain and France each raised approximately US$1.1 billion last year via their digital services taxes. Italy saw its revenue from the tax jump by 90 per cent from 2021 to over $530 million last year, according to local media. But Spain, which hoped to raise more than a billion per year via its tax, only raised only around $350 million in 2023, according to La Vanguardia daily. Other dominoes to fall? Before Canada, India had already halted in April its six per cent tax on online advertising by foreign firms against the background of trade talks with the United States. The taxes may fall elsewhere. While Britain has reached a trade deal with the United States to avoid the worst tariffs, it wants to go further and has refused to rule out a modification or elimination of its digital services tax. EU nations so far haven't indicated that the tax is on the table. A German government spokesman said Monday that Canada's dropping its tech tax had 'absolutely no bearing' on Berlin's position as it considers it considers its tax policies. But worries remain. National digital service taxes are 'vulnerable to economic and political threats -- particularly from the US, which has historically protected its digital multinationals from fair taxation abroad,' said the Tax Justice Network, a coalition of researchers and activists. By Ali Bekhtaoui with AFP foreign bureaus
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Mark Carney promised internal free trade by Canada Day. Is that enough?
Daniel Schwanen is senior vice-president of the C.D. Howe Institute. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats have focused much needed attention on making trade within Canada easier. Prime Minister Mark Carney made a promise soon after the election: To have free trade by Canada Day. To that end, the federal Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act, part of Bill C-5 which became law on June 26, aims at promoting the free movement of goods and services interprovincially. Under the Act, the federal government will recognize provincial requirements such as product standards as meeting federal requirements, when both levels of government regulate the same aspect of a good or service traded interprovincially. Federal regulatory bodies must also recognize provincial regulatory bodies' authorizations to practise an occupation as satisfying their own comparable requirements. For Mr. Carney, it's a promise kept. But helpful though these provisions would be, they are not enough for Canada to truly have internal free trade. Mr. Carney's bill should be viewed as only part of a broader project. Opinion: Internal free trade by Canada Day? It'll take longer than that A guide to The Globe's Canada Day coverage By itself, recognition by federal regulators of provincial requirements as equivalent to their own does not facilitate trade or labour mobility between provincial jurisdictions with different standards and approval or certification processes that impede trade or labour mobility. For that, the provinces need to get in on the action. Helpfully, legislation in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Ontario and Manitoba adopted this year offers to recognize other provinces' standards and approvals processes when other provinces offer the same treatment to their goods and services. In turn, this has led to agreement between provinces (e.g. Ontario and Saskatchewan, Ontario and Alberta) to open trade in this way. Western provinces already have a similar arrangement in place between them under the 2010 New West Partnership Agreement. But even countrywide mutual recognition will not create an integrated market. For that, we need actual reconciliation of some standards and requirements. Even with mutual recognition, a truck transport company moving goods across provincial borders must still conform to many transportation rules unique to the province it is in – it cannot transpose them from the province it originally set out from or the provinces it has driven through. Similarly, construction or mining companies must operate according to the laws and regulations of the province they are in – not according to those in their home province. That is why harmonization among provinces is important. For example, Ontario harmonized over 1,700 technical requirements with the new national construction code in January. Single sets of rules for safety equipment in construction or mining, or for truck tire dimensions, are further examples on which the slow but sure mechanisms of the Regulatory Cooperation and Reconciliation Table operating under the 2018 Canadian Free Trade Agreement can help. One of the valuable features of the CFTA was its use of a 'negative list,' an approach pioneered in Canada by the 2007 Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement between British Columbia and Alberta. This approach requires parties to list the specific sectors or measures for which the rules of open trade, investment or mobility do not apply – meaning that remaining discriminatory barriers are relatively transparent. Helpfully, the federal government and many provinces have reduced or eliminated their exceptions under the CFTA. Other important pieces of the internal trade puzzle that need to be solved include greater freedom for Canadians to purchase products, such as alcoholic beverages, from producers across the country, while still conforming to tax and other rules in their province of residence. Only Manitoba allows such sales now, although a 2024 agreement between Alberta and British Columbia allowing B.C. wineries to sell direct to Albertan consumers shows a path forward. Canada's market cannot be truly open to products from across the country until allocation of production quotas by province under our supply managed systems is ended. Given the need to 'de-risk' our economic prospects in an uncertain world, Canadian governments should continue to expand mutual recognition, remove discriminatory barriers, and push for greater harmonization of rules affecting businesses and workers. All Canadians should have access to economic opportunities regardless of where they emerge in Canada – and ultimately all Canadian governments are responsible to make sure that they do not thwart access to such opportunities.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Ontario paramedic shouldn't have been fired over Israel comments: union, law experts
Katherine Grzejszczak is shown in this handout image. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout - CUPE (Mandatory Credit) The Centre for Free Expression is calling for the reinstatement of a York Region paramedic whose union says she was fired over a social media post criticizing Israel's military operations in the Middle East. An open letter from James L. Turk, the director of the centre at Toronto Metropolitan University, and a group of lawyers and professors, expresses 'deep concern' that the dismissal of Katherine Grzejszczak violates her Charter right to freedom of expression. The letter, addressed to York Region Paramedic Services and several Regional Municipality of York officials, says the municipality has an obligation to uphold that right – even if it disagrees with the paramedic's comments. The Canadian Union of Public Employees says Grzejszczak, who has been a paramedic since 2010 and is a member of CUPE Ontario's executive board, was fired on June 20 over a Facebook comment that criticized Israel. A screenshot of the comment on a union post shared by CUPE shows Grzejszczak criticized Israel's bombing of Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, and accused the country of starving Palestinian children and killing health-care workers. The post also hailed CUPE for organizing a demonstration against Israel's bombing of Iran. Patrick Casey, a spokesperson for the Regional Municipality of York, says officials launched an investigation into an employee's 'concerning comments on social media' on June 19 and that person is no longer working for the municipality as a result. 'York Region remains committed to fostering welcoming and inclusive communities, as affirmed by the Inclusion Charter for York Region,' Casey wrote in a statement. But Turk said people should not be losing their jobs for exercising their right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. 'We wanted to speak out to say this way of responding to disagreement about a political matter is an unacceptable way to do so in a democracy,' he said in a phone interview on Monday. He said some people might find Grzejszczak's comments 'reprehensible' but they could challenge her views and offer the opposite perspective, instead of 'summarily' firing her. The paramedic did not engage in hate speech nor call for violence against any particular group, he added. 'We're always concerned when the constitutional limits are respected, but still people are penalized,' he said. Turk said he has seen an increasing number of people in Canada being penalized or fired over their comments since the beginning of the Israel-Hamas war, 'and this seemed an egregious case of that.' The war in Gaza began with the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which militants killed 1,200 people and took roughly 250 hostages. Gaza's Health Ministry said that another 88 people had been killed by Israeli fire over the past 24 hours, raising the war's toll among Palestinians to 56,500. The ministry, which operates under the Hamas government, doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The United Nations entity UN Women estimated in May that more than 28,000 women and girls were killed in Gaza since the start of the war. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas. CUPE Ontario president Fred Hahn says the decision to fire Grzejszczak is 'deeply problematic.' 'It's clear to us that Katherine, as a paramedic, has dedicated her professional life to actually helping to save lives, to reducing harm, that's her job,' Hahn said. Hahn said Grzejszczak's case has broader implications, as it might deter other workers from freely expressing their views. 'When people speak out against injustice, and war and genocide, they ought not to fear for their own livelihoods,' he said. Hahn has faced criticism himself over social media posts related to the Israel-Hamas war but he rejected calls for his resignation last year. He said the union has filed a grievance in Grzejszczak's case and believes the employer's 'very wrong' decision will be overturned. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025. With files from The Associated Press Sharif Hassan, The Canadian Press
