TV presenter accuses police officer of sexual misconduct
Adedeji, who presents episodes of investigative TV show Untold, told Channel 4 News she raised an historical allegation of sexual misconduct in 2023 against a then serving police officer who was more than 15 years her senior, whom she met while he was on duty in east London.
The 31-year-old alleges that the officer initiated a sexual relationship while working and used a false identity throughout their years-long relationship; an identity that concealed his existing family while he served in the Metropolitan Police before he transferred to City of London Police.
The officer was arrested in February 2024 on suspicion of misconduct in public office, Channel 4 News said.
Adedeji, who also hosts the Courtroom Drama podcast, claims that when a detective was assigned to investigate her complaint, he made inappropriate comments to her throughout the process, including commenting on her appearance and joking about how the case brought them together.
Speaking to Channel 4 News, Adedeji said of the police misconduct process: 'These experiences have left me completely disillusioned.
'How can women feel safe coming forward when they're retraumatised by the very system that's meant to protect them?'
She also said City of London Police told her last year her case had been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) but was later told by the CPS that they had not received the file.
London Victims Commissioner Claire Waxman has since written to City of London Police Commissioner Pete O'Doherty to raise serious concerns about the investigation, Channel 4 News said.
Ms Waxman wrote: 'It's really important that those actually looking into the behaviour have not been accused themselves and have not been subject to allegations.'
Policing Minister Diana Johnson told Channel 4 News: 'I can't comment on the individual case but it concerns me greatly that we have this culture in policing.
'There is a huge job of work for the police to do to restore that public confidence, particularly in women and girls…And we know from some of the appalling cases that have happened in policing in recent years, trust and confidence in women and girls has reduced down and that has to be put right by the police.
'And I know there's a lot of work.'
A Met spokesman said: 'While the vast majority of our officers work every day with professionalism and integrity to keep London safe, it is right they are asked to uphold the highest of standards and are held to account when they fail to do so.
'The Government's new vetting regulations close a gap in the law and allow us to ensure only officers who maintain a suitable standard of clearance throughout their career can police the streets of London.
'This is fundamental to public trust and confidence and in the last 18 months around 100 officers have been sacked or resigned after having their vetting removed.
'We are working extremely hard to build an environment and culture where the public and colleagues feel empowered to report concerns and know that those concerns will be addressed and dealt with effectively.'
In a statement to Channel 4 News, City of London Police said: 'Last year a criminal investigation began following the arrest of an officer for misconduct in a public office.
'A separate complaint against the same officer was also investigated under Police Conduct Regulations, resulting in him being found guilty of gross misconduct.
'He is no longer a serving officer.
'We cannot disclose details of the criminal investigation that may prejudice the case but accept the victim's complaints and fully recognise the importance of trust and confidence in how our investigations are carried out.
'We referred all of the victims' concerns to the Independent Office for Police Conduct for consideration, and after receiving their advice it should continue to be investigated locally, we have listened to the concerns raised and passed the complaint to a separate force (British Transport Police) for independent review.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
2 days ago
- Channel 4
TAGGING JACKIE
As the government gets ready to roll out a massive expansion of the offender tagging programme in England and Wales, a whistleblower from inside Serco, the private company charged with running it, has told Channel 4 News the system is in 'chaos' and could be putting the public at risk. The Serco insider works at the company's monitoring centre. We've called him Aaron to protect his identity. He told us at one point the computer system was throwing out so much data, finding genuine breaches was 'like finding a needle in a haystack'. 'It was throwing out all these alerts that sometimes didn't mean anything but there'd be thousands and thousands. We didn't know how to identify the genuine breaches from all this traffic of data that was coming into the system.' He also claimed some offenders are going unmonitored and the company only realises it after being asked for information from police or probation looking for them. 'We've had somebody who they want to arrest for rape or potential assault, a serious assault of a victim, and you'd look up the records to identify the person that they're asking about. There's been instances where we haven't been able to give them that information because something has gone wrong when it's been installed, or something's happened in the system where the person has got a tag on, but we're not actively monitoring them. There's been instances where it's been weeks and weeks of where we think we're monitoring someone but they're not actively being monitored.' Aaron described staff at the centre being asked by police for GPS location details of a tagged domestic abuse offender after his ex partner was found dead and he became a potential suspect. Aaron claims staff found he hadn't been monitored effectively 'due to an error.' Serco won the 200 million pound government contract back in 2023 and it came into operation in May the following year, but it's had a troubled history . The company has been fined for poor performance on the contract every month since it started. In April, failures in the tagging system were exposed by Channel 4's Dispatches programme, including offenders going untagged for weeks. In response, Serco said it was tagging a record number of people and its performance would continue to improve 'at pace.' But Channel 4 News has uncovered potential flaws across the entire system – not just with Serco. 'If I was a victim of domestic abuse, I would be extremely scared having been told that tagging is the solution to my safety and then to find it's not.' Twenty one year old Samuel Mattocks was found by police with a knife in his bag. He was initially told to expect prison but, for his first offence, magistrates decided instead to give him a three month community sentence, a critical part of it being a tag to make sure he observed his curfew. He was told the tag would be fitted in two or three days. For weeks, Samuel says he waited for the tagging company to arrive, initially being told they went to the wrong address. He told us he tried to contact the company to make sure they had his new details but was left on hold for hours. Eventually, he says – a fortnight to go before his three month curfew ended – the tag was fitted. When we tried to find out why it had taken so long, there were problems identified throughout the process. Samuel was put on probation on March 14, but no specific instructions for the tag were sent from Probation to Serco for another two weeks. Serco told us after that it did attempt to fit the tag three times, going 'above the requirements' of its contract, but he wasn't at the address Serco had been given. Serco said he was in breach of his conditions and this was reported to Probation. Probation says from Serco's first visit on 11 April until 6 May, Samuel was deemed to have withdrawn his consent to be tagged, because he had been at the wrong address. They say he was told at a meeting on 15 April to return to his original address which he confirmed he had done at a meeting the following week. Samuel says he had already notified the authorities about his change of address and had tried to contact both Serco and the Probation Service to ensure they had the correct one. What is accepted is that Samuel remained untagged until May 23 – the vast majority of the time he was supposed to be being monitored. We put his story and the whistleblower's claims to the National Chair of the Magistrates Association, Mark Beattie. He said: 'We tell an offender that the tag will be fitted in the next two days and the expectation is it's fitted in the next two days. We're very concerned about what we're hearing if we're now being told it's not being fitted for weeks, then you question whether tagging is an effective solution.' Mr Beattie said tagging should be a useful tool to both punish the offender but also to protect the victims of crime. He said if they can't trust the process 'that's a disaster'. 'If I was a victim of domestic abuse, I would be extremely scared having been told that tagging is the solution to my safety and then to find it's not.' This is all a problem for the government itself. In an effort to relieve the prisons crisis , there will be more community sentences and a massive expansion of the tagging programme. It's expected tens of thousands more offenders will be tagged in the coming months. Mark Beattie says if magistrates can't trust the system they will just send offenders to prison instead, defeating the government's plans to send fewer offenders to jail. He says before they expand the tagging programme there should be a complete review of how it's working. 'I think we need to understand the scale of the problem. If they can't deliver now what we have been ordering through the courts, then we have to understand what the recovery plan is. So at the point that it ramps up, we have to have confidence that they're going to be ready to deliver it.' In a statement , Antony King, the Managing Director of Citizen Services at Serco, said: 'We are proud of the challenging work our people do, working with multiple partners across the criminal justice system in delivering an essential and critical public safety service, often with complex and ever increasing requirements. Our performance continues to improve, which the MoJ recognise, and we continue to monitor record numbers of people in the community supporting our colleagues in probation and the Home Office.' The Ministry of Justice told us: 'While we cannot comment on individual cases, we dispute many of the claims being made. Tagging is an important and effective way to monitor and punish offenders and any delays are totally unacceptable.' But it did add that while the backlog of tagging visits had been significantly reduced, Serco's overall performance 'remains below acceptable levels'. Serco to repay £68m for wrongly billed electronic tagging G4S and Serco face SFO 'criminal investigation' over tagging Is electronic tagging too costly and out of date?
ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
'She was a vulnerable child': Mother of girl groomed by Neo-Nazi believes lessons must be learned
'She should never have been charged': Rhianan's mother believes authorities should have dealt with her case differently 'She was just such a loving child. She was funny. You couldn't have wanted for better really.' Emily Carter is heartbroken at the death of her youngest daughter. Compounding her grief is the belief that if authorities had listened, Rhianan could still be alive. Through her early childhood, Emily describes a 'funny, kind and considerate' child, but her teenage years were troubled. At 15, Rhianan Rudd became the youngest person charged with terror offences in the UK. Five months after those charges were dropped, the teenager was found dead. Emily cites Covid as a trigger for Rhianan's isolation from society. She described a change, saying she spent more and more time on her computer. She had regularly checked her daughter's online activity, reassured by parental controls she'd put on her computer. She had no idea the teenager was being groomed by a far-right extremist in the US. When Rhianan finally confided in her mum and shared some of her newfound thoughts, she was horrified. Two days later, Emily referred her daughter to Prevent, a government programme aimed at stopping individuals from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism. She'd hoped it would help de-radicalise her, but instead of finding help and support, her case was closed, and Rhianan was arrested by counter-terrorism officers and placed under investigation by MI5. The charges were eventually dropped, but Rhianan lived in constant fear that she would be re-arrested. She took her own life on May 19 2022. The inquest over Rhianan's death heard on Monday that the criminal investigation would have frightened the 15-year-old and left her psychologically scared. Chief Coroner Judge Alexia Durran said there were chances for the police and Derbyshire County Council to refer Rhianan Rudd earlier for consideration as a potential victim of modern slavery. But she added the failings were 'not systemic', and said she could not be sure Rhianan intended to take her own life. Nick Price, Director of Legal Services at the CPS, said: 'This is a tragic case, and I want to send my sincere condolences and sympathy to Rhianan's family. We do not prosecute young or vulnerable people lightly. Terrorism offences are extremely serious, and these are decisions our specialist prosecutors take great care over.' Emily has spoken out in the hope that other children will be supported. Rhianan was autistic, and her mum wants agencies to have a better understanding of autism and recognise children's vulnerability. She thinks about her daughter every day and remembers the happy, fun little girl who just wanted to show kindness: 'She was always there for people, and that's how I want her to be remembered."
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Grandmother prosecuted after breaking neighbour's gnome
A grandmother was prosecuted for damaging her neighbour's garden gnome during a dispute over rights of access. Lorraine Hutton, 66, accidentally broke one of the legs off the 18in-ornament when she moved it from a communal pathway outside her flat in Springbourne, Bournemouth. Ms Hutton said she had apologised to owner Lilijana Cekauskiene and posted £20 through her letter box to cover the damage. But her neighbour insisted on calling the police. Ms Hutton was asked to attend a formal interview at a police station before being charged with criminal damage. She appeared in court three times, including for a three hour trial over the matter. The 15-month saga, which began in March 2024, concluded with Ms Hutton being found not guilty of criminal damage. She has now criticised both the police and CPS for allowing the matter to go to court and for wasting taxpayer money. Ms Hutton said: 'This has just been an enormous waste of time and public money. 'I have never been in trouble with the police in my life and for people of my generation to have to go to court is embarrassing. 'I wrote a letter of apology and gave her money to cover the damage. I could have been dealt with without all this expense to the taxpayer.' It is believed the case cost several thousands of pounds as Ms Hutton says she received legal aid and required a psychiatric assessment before going to court. A Lithuanian interpreter costing £55 an hour was required for Ms Cekauskiene. The CPS has insisted the case was in the public interest. Ms Hutton added: 'I am 66 and disabled. I have no previous convictions, not even a parking ticket. I don't see how it was in the public interest to take it to court. 'I was happy to sort it out of court and would have paid up front but I was not going to lie under oath and said I did it on purpose when I did not.' After proceedings finished, a spokesman for Wessex CPS said: 'It is not the Crown Prosecution Service's function to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for a court to consider. 'In this case, we decided that there was sufficient evidence and that it was in the public interest to proceed. 'We previously sought to join this case with another involving the complainant and defendant but, ultimately, this was rejected by the court.' A spokesman for Dorset Police said: 'We will always carry out an investigation into reported criminal damage incidents irrespective of the type of damage alleged to have been caused. 'As part of an investigation, we will speak to all parties involved to gather the full circumstances of an incident. 'A case is then submitted to the CPS, who will then decide whether or not to bring a case before the courts.'
