logo
What I call a chat, he calls an argument: How blazing rows almost broke our eight-year relationship

What I call a chat, he calls an argument: How blazing rows almost broke our eight-year relationship

Telegraph29-05-2025
At the time of writing this at 2.30pm, my partner Mike* and I have already had an argument. He thinks I cause arguments for the sake of it. I think I'm simply asking for something, I don't even see it as an argument. I sit firmly in the camp of raising issues and talking them through.
Small things, like asking for confirmation of holiday dates or needing to leave for an event on time, can go from zero to 60 in seconds, and before you know it, names are being called or slammed doors. We're both prone to becoming heated, things escalate, and then he loses his temper, sometimes saying things he doesn't mean. Today's argument was about the neighbours asking us to cut our trees back. He wants to leave it, I want to address it, cue: he said, she said, and we're off.
Whenever my two grown-up kids are around, they leave the house somewhat messier than when they arrived. What kids don't? Their clothes get strewn across their bedrooms, and dirty dishes pile up. I come from a chaotic, busy family, so for me, the detritus is expected, although not unnoticed. My partner grew up living with his mum and no one else, and things were very ordered, so I understand why it causes him distress.
Last time they visited, there was an argument. We try not to argue in front of the kids, so we have our angry conversations in desperate whispers, which makes everything more tense. In the end, he said he felt it was better that he went to his mum's for a while, to avoid being around the disruption. It isn't ideal, but at least he felt comfortable voicing his concerns, and it didn't end up shouty and awful, or with bubbling resentment and silent treatment.
We've been together nearly eight years now. It does upset me that we can't argue constructively after all these years together. And he gets upset and frustrated too. It's definitely a problem. What I see as a discussion, he sees as an argument, and then tempers flare. We don't seem to be able to talk things through calmly.
We actually split up at Christmas because we'd come to a place where it didn't feel workable any more. The straw that broke the camel's back was my family coming for a few days, and he said he didn't want a load of strangers ransacking the house. We split up for a while, but there's still a lot to fight for in the relationship. We're trying to make it work. The arguments are different now than a couple of years ago. Not talking afterwards doesn't last as long, and the heat seems to leave the situation more quickly.
I would prefer it if he was open to raising issues and talking them through – even difficult ones, you know, can get heated. I've always been OK about getting things out in the open. There's something cathartic and just healthy about being honest and laying everything out. Maybe it's because I grew up in the 1970s, seeing my parents having some blinders when I was little. Proper shouting wasn't unusual, and the argument often ended with my dad slamming the door and going out to the pub. That's not my style at all, and is what has probably made me want to face issues.
I've always been someone who prefers to bring grievances, rather than let them fester, but the types of arguments have been different in every one of my relationships. There was one relationship where there were very few cross words. Another where we'd get on like a house on fire, and then immediately, it would feel like we were the house on fire. Shouting, raging, walking off, slamming doors; we couldn't seem to find a good balance. Then, we were both dealing with teenage children and pressures from work. It sometimes felt like I was nailing jelly to the wall and couldn't get to the root of what the problem actually was.
Mike and I are currently in 'discussions' about how we can argue better. And I'm noticing a difference. The other day, an argument arose about the kids drinking the beers in the fridge and not replacing them. Historically, this would have ended in raging and days of silent treatment, but when it came up, I stopped the conversation, said I needed a few minutes, then I typed a text instead to try and reduce the heat out of the situation. Brilliantly, it actually worked.
It would really help if we knew how to deal with the conflict better and talk it through, but we're not all as equipped as we could be. Dr Monika Wieliczko, a chartered clinical psychologist believes that if couples were taught how to handle arguments, it would have saved many marriages. 'Conflicts in relationships are normal and unavoidable since we are dealing with two people with different sets of needs and expectations. Therefore, being in a relationship requires reaching a compromise. Argument is nothing but a process we go through to reach the middle ground.'
One of the biggest problems I've had in relationships is that we both feel like we're being attacked by the other. For instance, Mike might bring up that I didn't stay in the garden long enough to help him do the weeding. I would say that I did some time out there, then went to prepare dinner, or else we would have both been in the garden until 6pm with nothing to eat. Both of us think we are right, and that the other is 'having a go' unnecessarily.
Reassuringly, Dr Wieliczko says this breakdown of communication is common. 'Often, we perceive partners asserting their needs as an attack. Then that triggers a defensive response, which might feel dismissive to the side that raised an issue. This leads to a gradual withdrawal. As time goes by, the build-up of resentment erodes trust and closeness.'
Dr Wieliczko also points out that – as with most psychological matters – how you argue as a couple is closely linked to the differences in how you were brought up. That certainly rings true in my current relationship. While my family were never afraid to bring up an issue, I think my partner's family tended to push things down and expect it would sort itself out, often leaving everyone dissatisfied.
'Some people avoid communicating their needs because they learnt as children that adults rarely make them feel safe and secure, and are more likely to avoid arguments in their relationships. Their aloofness is likely to make the other side feel insecure. Stereotypically, we're more likely to see this among men.'
My ex-boyfriend often wouldn't say how uncomfortable he felt with me going out with a certain group of people. Or if I wanted to stay over a few nights, he would just say it was fine, when he didn't really feel that way. Then he would give me the silent treatment or not be very nice when I got back. I felt alone and misunderstood, and this just pushed us further apart.
This is why I utterly believe that facing issues, even with disagreements, is a necessary part of a relationship, and that shying away from them is a bad sign. It's not a coincidence that several times I've had to look at the back of partners' heads as they walk away from the relationship, slamming the door because they've not asked for what they want.
Dr Wieliczko says: 'What we often see behind the mask of a conflict-free relationship is an avoidance of real emotional intimacy. Both sides do not understand each other's points of view and think that the only way to maintain the relationship is to protect it from conflicts. But this comes at a cost to the quality of their relationship and leads to emotional detachment and eventual collapse of the relationship. If you can't argue properly, you are also likely to struggle to experience passion and emotional closeness.'
Mike and I are really working on how uncomfortable it is at times and seeing how we can make it better. Bringing what we need, however difficult, is going to be a part of that process. And there are probably going to be a few arguments.
As Dr Wieliczko says: 'Arguments are healthy and a necessary part of any relationship; however, the problem is that many couples don't know how to have constructive arguments that bring them closer rather than driving them apart.' So, if you recognise any of the above, it's not the end of the world, and there are ways we can get to a better place.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lancashire County Council mixes up village street sign mileages
Lancashire County Council mixes up village street sign mileages

BBC News

time4 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Lancashire County Council mixes up village street sign mileages

A council has apologised after getting their distances wrong on a street than stating that Downham and Rimington were respectively one and three miles away from Chatburn, a newly installed sign in the Lancashire village mixed up the some people living in the village, near Clitheroe, have seen the funny side, others have been decidedly unimpressed, with one man saying it was "crackers" and a "waste".Lancashire County Council said it was "aware of an error" and stressed it would be corrected. Resident Eddie Gilchrist posted on Facebook: "Oh dear, LCC installed a shiny new sign in Chatburn yesterday. Unfortunately, they have moved both Rimington and Downham."In 2022, the authority was left red-faced when it misspelled a new bus stop sign outside Lancaster Royal Grammar School as "grammer", much to the amusement of the headteacher and students.A county council spokesman said: "We're aware of an error on a new road sign in Bridge Road, Chatburn and have arranged for it to be corrected. "We appreciate residents bringing it to our attention." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.

The Medieval Brits with West African ancestry: Bodies buried in 7th–century England show Britain was more DIVERSE in the Middle Ages than we thought
The Medieval Brits with West African ancestry: Bodies buried in 7th–century England show Britain was more DIVERSE in the Middle Ages than we thought

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The Medieval Brits with West African ancestry: Bodies buried in 7th–century England show Britain was more DIVERSE in the Middle Ages than we thought

Two people buried in early medieval England had West African ancestry, experts have revealed, in a discovery that rewrites British history. The find provides the first direct evidence of a connection between Britain and Africa in the seventh century, more than 1,300 years ago. Archaeologists made the discovery after analysing DNA from a girl who had been buried in Kent and a young man laid to rest in Dorset. Both had recent ancestors, likely grandparents, from West Africa, the experts said. And in both cases, the individuals had been laid to rest as typical members of the local community – suggesting they were valued by the societies in which they lived. 'Our results emphasise the cosmopolitan nature of England in the early medieval period, pointing to a diverse population with far–flung connections who were, nonetheless, fully integrated into the fabric of daily life,' Dr Ceiridwen Edwards, from the University of Huddersfield, said. For both individuals, the mitochondrial DNA inherited from their mothers was northern European. But the autosomal DNA, inherited from both parents, showed strong genetic links to present–day Yoruba, Mende, Mandenka and Esan groups from sub–Saharan West Africa – thousands of miles away. Further investigation suggests they both had one grandparent from their father's side from West Africa. The girl, buried in Updown in Kent, was found with several items including a pot possibly imported from Frankish Gaul – an area that encompasses present–day France, Belgium and Luxembourg – and a spoon that could indicate the individual's Christian faith. The Updown cemetery was part of Kent's royal network and these goods point to the area's continental connections. Meanwhile the man unearthed at Worth Matravers, in Dorset, was buried alongside a British male and an anchor made of local limestone. 'Kent has always been a conduit for influence from the adjacent continent and this was particularly marked in the sixth century,' Professor Duncan Sayer, from the University of Lancashire, said. On the other hand, Dorset sat 'on the fringes of continental influence'. 'The archaeological evidence suggests a marked and notable cultural divide between Dorset and areas to the west, and the Anglo–Saxon influenced areas to the East,' Dr Edwards explained. Both discoveries, published in the journal Antiquity, add a new dimension to understanding long–distance movement and interaction involving Britain during the Early Middle Ages. 'What is fascinating about these two individuals is that this international connection is found in both the east and west of Britain,' Professor Sayer added. Early medieval England, spanning roughly from the fifth to the 11th centuries, was characterised by a predominantly rural society. Most people lived in small, self–sufficient villages with agriculture being the primary occupation. Social structure was hierarchical, with a ruling class of nobles and a large peasant population who worked on the land. The period also saw the rise of Anglo–Saxon kingdoms, the influence of Christianity, and eventually, Viking incursions and settlements. What was life like in Medieval society? There were few large towns, and most people lived in villages. The majority of people were peasants who worked on the land owned by a local lord. If people wanted to move or get married they needed the permission of the lord first. Peasant homes were small, often a one–room hut with a hearth in the centre. Animals tended to live in huts with their owners. Furniture was sparse, usually consisting of just a few stools, a trunk for bedding and a few cooking pots. Women in peasant families learned to spin wool from an early age, using wooden wheels to make clothes. Rather than going to school, children spent more of their time helping their parents with jobs in the house, looking after animals and growing food. People attended church every Sunday.

Welsh Rugby Union chief executive Abi Tierney to take leave of absence from role after health diagnosis
Welsh Rugby Union chief executive Abi Tierney to take leave of absence from role after health diagnosis

Daily Mail​

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Welsh Rugby Union chief executive Abi Tierney to take leave of absence from role after health diagnosis

Welsh Rugby Union chief executive Abi Tierney is to temporarily step away from her role to undergo treatment for cancer. Tierney's diagnosis means health, understandably, is her top priority. WRU chair Richard Collier-Keywood and director of rugby Dave Reddin will step up to lead the organisation. They will do so at a crucial time for the game in Wales with a decision on a likely reduction of the number of the country's domestic teams set to be made in the coming months. Tierney's time away from the WRU will begin from August 22. 'This has not been an easy decision, but it is one I must make to focus fully on my health and recovery,' she said. 'I am grateful for the support I have already received from my family, friends and colleagues and I am confident in the team's ability to continue our work during my absence. I kindly ask for understanding and privacy during this time.' Tierney had been leading the imminent consultation period over the future of the professional game in Wales – one which is set to define how Welsh rugby looks moving forward. As such, she steps away at a key time. However, her decision is entirely the right one. Collier-Keywood said: 'I, together with the whole of the board and everyone involved with Welsh rugby, wish Abi well over this period. 'The WRU is committed to supporting her during this time. 'In my role as chair, I will continue to have overall responsibility for the WRU and in order to provide cover and give Abi the space she needs, will be more involved in the immediate future. 'Abi and the board have recruited a strong executive team which will continue to lead the WRU on a day-to-day basis. 'The most important topic on our agenda right now is the consultation on the future of elite rugby in Wales. 'This will be led by our director of rugby and elite performance Dave Reddin as a member of the executive and I will take overall responsibility for its successful delivery.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store