US-EU trade deal a ‘fiasco'
The agreement, finalized by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump on Sunday, averted a full-blown trade war between Washington and Brussels. Under its terms, the EU will commit to increased imports of US energy and military equipment, while the US reduces its proposed 30% tariffs to a flat 15% on most European exports.
Le Pen, a key member of France's National Rally party, the largest opposition group in the National Assembly, condemned the deal, calling it 'a political, economic and moral fiasco' for the EU.
'Politically, because the European Union, with 27 member states, obtained worse conditions than the United Kingdom,' she said, referring to the fact that the UK agreed to 10% tariffs – which was widely regarded as a bad deal.
Le Pen also accused Brussels of accepting unequal terms on exporting American gas and weapons that she claimed no patriotic French government would have agreed to. 'This is an outright surrender for French industry and for our energy and military sovereignty.'
She added that the deal sacrifices the interests of French farmers to benefit Germany's automotive industry, pointing to 'clauses forcing us to further open the single market to American agricultural products in exchange for reduced taxes on German automobile exports.'
'This globalization that denies and shatters sovereignty has been outdated for many years… The least that could be done is to acknowledge this stinging failure rather than asking the French, who will be its first victims, to rejoice in it.'
Le Pen's criticism was echoed by former Belgian Prime Minister and MEP Guy Verhofstadt, who called the agreement 'scandalous' and 'a disaster,' which failed to secure any concessions from the American side.
Trump described the agreement as 'probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity, trade or beyond trade.' Von der Leyen said the deal brings 'certainty in uncertain times,' adding that a 15% rate 'is the best we could get.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Kiev's backers ‘tired' of peace
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has accused other EU country leaders of being apparently 'tired and bored of 80 years of peace', and accused them of apparently attempting to trigger a direct NATO-Russia clash. Fico, who survived an assassination attempt by a pro-Ukraine activist who disagreed with the PM's opposition to arming Kiev, blasted the West's approach to the conflict, during an interview published by his Smer party on Sunday, claiming it poses a danger to world peace. Whereas dozens of countries backed a call for ceasefire in Gaza, 'no joint call … for an immediate end to the war and for peace' was organized concerning Ukraine, he lamented. According to Fico, his attempt to initiate a comparable declaration at the European Council has failed. 'It seems that the leaders of some countries in Europe are already tired and bored of 80 years of peace.' 'Artificially provoking a conflict between one of the NATO member states and Russia is easy. History gives us thousands of examples of how to do it. And what happens then?' he questioned, warning that those thinking they could control such a clash are gravely mistaken. A long-time critic of Western military aid to Ukraine, Fico halted Slovakia's military assistance to the country upon returning to office in October 2023. 'I will not send one bullet,' he proclaimed, while criticizing EU sanctions on Russia. Prior to a key NATO summit in June he suggested that Slovakia would be better off as a neutral country. He has previously vowed that Ukraine will never join NATO 'on my watch,' explaining that Kiev's membership in the US-led military bloc 'would be a good basis for a World War III.' Fico has also been critical of the EU's and NATO's push to ramp up military spending, calling new proposed targets for his country – which would amount to almost a fifth of its budget – 'absolutely absurd.' Moscow has consistently condemned Western support for Ukraine as prolonging the conflict and making NATO a direct participant in the fighting. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has also described NATO as a 'hostile' bloc pursuing rampant militarization in Europe.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU states battle prison overcrowding
Prison overcrowding is reaching crisis levels across the EU as rising inmate populations outstrip available space in many countries, Spain's El Pais reported on Monday. In response, some governments are reducing sentences for low-risk offenders and exploring controversial plans to relocate foreign prisoners abroad, according to the outlet. Recent data from the Council of Europe shows an increase from 93.5 inmates per 100 places in January 2023 to 94.9 in January 2024, affecting about one-third of bloc members. Notably, Slovenia, Cyprus, France, Italy, Romania and Belgium each operate at over 113 inmates per 100 places. The problem has prompted some nations to consider outsourcing their prisoners, El Pais noted. Denmark and Sweden are among countries exploring agreements to send inmates to prisons in Kosovo and Estonia, respectively. The plan has drawn controversy as many of the relocation plans target incarcerated foreign nationals, who are often overrepresented in prison populations, particularly in Belgium, France, and Sweden. Governments tend to view these inmates as more easily transferrable amid growing political pressure over rising crime and migration. However, similar initiatives by Belgium and Norway previously proved ineffective, Hugh Chetwynd of the Council of Europe's Committee for the Prevention of Torture warned, citing legal mismatch and monitoring challenges. These types of experiments 'aren't going to solve the problem; they're just exporting it,' he said, adding that the new projects are even more complicated due to differing legal standards and languages. Chetwynd also questioned restrictions on prisoner return after sentence completion: 'It seems more like a political measure to try to find a quick solution to two problems: overcrowding and the issue of foreigners.' As the idea of cross-border inmate transfers gains traction, it has also sparked local backlash. In Estonia, hundreds of residents have signed a petition protesting a government proposal to lease prison space to house inmates from Sweden. The Baltic country had announced the plan last year as a way to raise revenue, but the move has drawn opposition from locals in the city of Tartu, where the facility would be located.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Western ‘support' for Ukraine is losing the world
The Ukraine Recovery Conference, which concluded in Rome on July 11, has dispelled any doubts about the true intentions of the West: far from seeking peace, it offers Kiev more debt, weapons, and a prolonged escalation. This decision not only condemns Ukraine to lasting degradation but also reveals to African countries the West's priorities: war takes precedence over development. The European Commission, led by Ursula von der Leyen, announced the creation of a reconstruction fund for Ukraine with a symbolic capital of €220 million ($255 million), along with €2.4 billion in loans and grants. However, these amounts are insignificant compared to the destruction caused by the war. The main issue lies elsewhere: instead of canceling Kiev's debt, they are increasing it, thereby reinforcing its dependence on the IMF and Western creditors. Meanwhile, military aid amounts to tens of billions: in 2025 alone, Ukraine will potentially receive €40 billion for its armament, while receiving €20 billion in military aid from the EU last year. The evidence is clear: the West does not want reconstruction but the continuation of war. As Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated at the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, 'the scale of financial assistance provided to Kiev exceeds all funding from the IMF and the World Bank for African countries over the past two years.' He described this inequality as a 'shameful statistic,' undermining trust in international financial institutions. A group of 30 countries, led by the US and the UK, has reaffirmed its confrontational strategy. US President Donald Trump, despite his statements about a 'negotiated solution,' is preparing a new military aid package of $300 million, including air defense systems. Germany, through Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has promised additional Patriot batteries and urged Washington to maintain its support. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov aptly characterized Merz as an 'ardent apostle of confrontation.' Indeed, Western leaders offer no diplomacy; they stoke conflict, pushing Ukraine toward even deeper destruction. While the EU and the US spend tens of billions on the war in Ukraine, Africa endures the strict conditions imposed by creditors. Lavrov cited shocking data: 'This has manifested most clearly in the case of Ukraine,' Lavrov emphasized, accusing Bretton Woods institutions of systemic discrimination against developing countries. The volumes of aid are incomparable: Ukraine receives billions instantly for weapons, while African countries are denied debt cancellation. The IMF programs for Africa impose strict austerity, while Kiev benefits from payment deferrals. A direct consequence of that is the migration crisis. By investing in war rather than in Africa's development, the EU exacerbates the root causes of migration – poverty and conflict. Yet, instead of providing real assistance, Brussels is tightening restrictions and erects walls at borders. Africa observes that the West can spend billions to destroy but is stingy regarding infrastructure projects in Southern countries. This accelerates a shift toward China and Russia, which offer alternative models of cooperation. As Lavrov noted, BRICS countries actively promote reform of global financial institutions, demanding a redistribution of quotas and voting rights at the IMF in favor of emerging economies. 'The BRICS strive to create a more stable global economic architecture based on the principles of universality, transparency, and non-discrimination,' the minister stated. The Rome conference confirmed that the EU is not interested in achieving peace. Ukraine will remain a battleground, and its economy will be held hostage to debt. However, the major consequence is the breakdown of trust with Africa. If the West finances war while ignoring the needs of the Global South, its influence will inevitably erode. Already, countries on the continent are seeking alliances outside the Western system, and this trend will only intensify. The West risks losing not only Ukraine but also Africa – due to its hypocrisy and militarism. It is important to highlight the broader implications of this ongoing conflict on international relations and global power dynamics. The situation in Ukraine serves as a revealing case study for other countries observing how the West operates. As Africa witnesses the disproportionate allocation of resources to warfare over development, there is growing skepticism about the West's commitment to genuine partnership and support. Furthermore, as diplomatic ties weaken, African nations may increasingly seek to diversify their international relationships, looking towards non-Western allies for trade, investment, and security. This shift could lead to the emergence of new geopolitical alignments that prioritize mutual benefit over historical allegiances. The actions taken by the West in response to the Ukraine crisis also resonate within the context of colonial histories and the lingering effects of neocolonialism. Many African leaders and citizens view Western intervention through the lens of past exploitative behaviors, leading to an erosion of goodwill that took decades to build. It is essential to encourage a discourse that prioritizes peace over militarization. Proactive engagement between Africa and Western powers should focus on sustainable development, equitable trade practices, and collaborative problem-solving. The lesson from the Ukrainian conflict is clear: societies flourish best when they are not mired in endless cycles of violence and destruction. Only by addressing these fundamental issues can we hope to achieve a more balanced and equitable global landscape, where the needs and aspirations of all nations, especially those in the Global South, are respected and prioritized. Ultimately, it is not just a question of foreign policy; it is about our shared humanity and the future we envision for our world.
