U.S. threatens California with legal action over transgender sports law
'@CAgovernor, you'll be hearing from @AGPamBondi,' McMahon wrote, using the handles for California Governor Newsom and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi.
McMahon's statement on X was the latest salvo in the culture wars over transgender youth and ratchets up the personal rivalry between Trump and Newsom. Trump has made reversing advances in transgender rights a priority since returning to office on January 20, while California law has allowed student-athletes to participate in sports in alignment with their gender identity since 2013.
The Justice Department declined to comment and the Education Department did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for clarification on the meaning of McMahon's comment.
California's state Education Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Newsom's office and the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports, declined to comment.
The U.S. Education Department issued a statement in June declaring California in violation of the Trump administration's interpretation of Title IV, the education law banning sex-based discrimination, and demanding the state alter its policy.The state rejected the federal government's directive, and in June filed a pre-enforcement lawsuit against the U.S. Justice Department in anticipation of legal action.
With controversy brewing ahead of the state high school track and field championship in June, the CIF allowed girls displaced from the finals by a transgender athlete to also be granted space to compete. The CIF also allowed girls to appear on the winners' podium if they would have won a medal without a transgender athlete competing.
As a result, the CIF crowned two champions in the girls' high jump and triple jump after transgender girl AB Hernandez won both events.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
VP Vance meeting to discuss Epstein fallout canceled, source says
WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - A dinner for senior administration officials at Vice President JD Vance's residence to discuss topics including the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case has been canceled after news of it leaked, a source familiar with the matter said. A spokesman for Vance said the dinner, first reported by CNN, had not been planned. Sign up here. "There was never a supposed meeting scheduled at the Vice President's residence to discuss Epstein strategy," said Vance spokesman William Martin. The Trump administration has struggled for weeks to mitigate the political fallout from the Epstein investigation, amid public pressure for more transparency over its handling of files related to the convicted sex offender's case. President Donald Trump had promised to make public files related to the disgraced financier's case if reelected. In July, however, the Justice Department said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters, who have called for additional details to be released.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
Tens of thousands of U.S. college students without legal resident status are losing access to in-state tuition prices as part of President Donald Trump 's crackdown on immigration. The Justice Department has been suing states to end tuition breaks for students without legal residency, starting with Texas in June. It has also filed lawsuits in Kentucky, Minnesota and, most recently, Oklahoma. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, 'Federal law prohibits aliens not lawfully present in the United States from getting in-state tuition benefits that are denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens,' the Justice Department argued in a lawsuit this month in Oklahoma. 'There are no exceptions.' The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 57,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The state has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.
Spectator
16 hours ago
- Spectator
The return of Russiagate
In June, Tulsi Gabbard found herself in a difficult position. As a dovish Iraq war veteran who happens to be Donald Trump's Director of National Intelligence, she'd spent weeks trying to stop America launching air strikes against Iran. She'd cited intelligence reports which contradicted Israeli suggestions that Tehran was just days away from having a nuclear bomb. Trump didn't want to know. 'I don't care what she says,' he told reporters, before ordering the strikes on Iran. Gabbard had been humiliated. Surely she had to resign? Nothing is sure in Trumpworld, however, and humiliation is half the fun. Rather than falling out with the Donald, Gabbard instead redoubled her efforts to please him. She set her agencies to work harder digging up evidence about the 'Russia hoax' – arguably the political project closest to Trump's heart. She positioned herself at the forefront of a campaign to go after the creepy network of senior Democrats and deep-state operators who in 2016 engaged in what Gabbard calls a 'treasonous conspiracy' to smear Trump as a Kremlin asset. Gabbard has published a number of previously classified documents suggesting that President Barack Obama, the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic establishment did collude and conspire with the intelligence community as part of a 'years-long coup' against a legitimately elected Republican President. This has delighted the Donald. 'Where's Tulsi?' he called out at a White House event. 'She's, like, hotter than everybody. She's the hottest one in the room.' Gabbard's findings were then passed on to Pam Bondi, another Trump-appointed hottie who has found herself in a tricky spot. As Attorney General, Bondi had talked up the release of the US government's files on the late child rapist Jeffrey Epstein. But then her Justice Department and the FBI suddenly felt compelled to release a statement insisting there was no 'client list' of powerful blackmailed men and Epstein had abused girls purely for his own sick gratification. Bondi's volte-face aroused suspicion worldwide, partly because Donald Trump once had a sort of friendship with Epstein and partly because Team Trump – especially the new FBI director Kash Patel – had spent years suggesting that the real Epstein story was a giant cover-up to protect the paedophilic liberal elite. Now, however, Bondi finds herself back on the legal offensive thanks to Tulsi's efforts on Trump-Russia. This week she ordered a grand jury investigation into the conspiracy to tie Trump to the Kremlin. In other words, Trump's long-promised 'retribution' for the eight years of legal torment he suffered at the hands of the fiercely Democratic establishment in Washington, D.C., has formally begun. 'Half the lawyers in Washington just went under retainer,' said the legal scholar Jonathan Turley on Monday. 'And it seems like the other half are retaining them.' Trumpists are celebrating the exposure of what they refer to as 'the greatest political crime in American history' – even if the depth of the conspiracy remains hard for most mere mortals to fathom. Trump's opponents, meanwhile, suggest that the President, Bondi, Gabbard, Patel and others are engaged in a blatant attempt to distract from the Epstein saga. (In a curious twist this week, as part of their Epstein investigation, the Republican House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas to various Department of Justice figures, as well as to Bill and Hillary Clinton.) It is amusing to watch Trump's appointees bend over backwards in order to keep Daddy happy. But the revival of Russiagate is much more than a mere smokescreen. It has always been a key part of Trump's plan for his second term. Indeed, Trump appointed Bondi precisely because he trusted her to be more aggressive than his previous attorney generals when it came to the Russia accusations. Trump's inner circle have long believed that revealing the truth about Operation Crossfire Hurricane – the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election – will in turn expose the whole secret history of the Democratic party's eight-year lawfare campaign to destroy Trump. It's all about the weaponisation of justice and the Democratic party's co-opting of intelligence agencies and the media in subsequent scandals. It's about the Hunter Biden laptop story and the 'stolen election' in 2020, as well as the contorted campaign to put Trump behind bars during Joe Biden's presidency. Sources close to Trump suggest that he has softened towards his enemies since he barely dodged an assassin's bullet last year. His supporters may be crying out for Obama and Hillary Clinton to be criminally prosecuted but Trump seems unlikely to pursue such a path, even if he enjoys posting memes of Barack and Hillary behind bars. Yet the legal hounding of Trump did result in several of his associates and advisers serving time in prison. Naturally, then, Trump's allies are now salivating at the possible indictment and conviction of figures such as John Brennan, the former head of the CIA under Obama, or James Comey, the former FBI director, or James Clapper, the former director of National Intelligence. 'We're going to be a banana republic unless we take care of business now,' says Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon, who also went to jail over a Trump-related charge last year. Bannon has called for 'rough, Roman justice' and this week he urged Bondi's department to 'stick the landing' or risk further disgruntlement within the Make America Great Again movement. The use of a gymnastics metaphor is apt, since Bondi will have to pull off some impressive legal acrobatics in order to prosecute leading anti-Trump figures without being exposed herself at some point for weaponising the justice system. Whichever prosecutor she chooses must prove beyond reasonable doubt that Trump's opponents knowingly attempted to commit treason or some other serious crimes. Her Republican backers, meanwhile, will have to keep saying that the Democrats derailed Trump's first term with all their judicial wrangling at the same time as the Trump administration sets in motion a course of legal activities that seem certain to clog up his second term. There's no escape from Russiagate.
