
Thurmont reviewing proposed $4.9M general fund budget for fiscal year 2026
Thurmont's Board of Commissioners is considering about $4.9 million in expenses in the town's general fund for fiscal year 2026 — up from about $4.7 million allocated for general fund expenses in the current operating budget.
The proposed general fund budget lists revenues for fiscal year 2026 as $5.4 million, more than $250,000 over the revenues budgeted in fiscal year 2025. That leaves a surplus of about $575,000 to use for capital expenses.
Some of the largest expenses in the proposed budget include salaries and benefits for the town's departments, information technology costs and street sanitation.
The fiscal year runs from July 1 to June 30. In fiscal year 2025 up until March 31, the town has spent about $4.1 million and brought in about $3.6 million in revenues, leaving the town with a deficit of about $484,000.
In the current fiscal year, Thurmont has paid certain expenses that weren't allocated funds in the approved budget. Those include Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System requirements, general fund capital and construction-in-progress costs, and capital expenses for different departments.
The Board of Commissioners reviewed the general fund revenues and expenses for the mayor and commissioners on April 15.
The board held another general fund workshop on April 17 to review departmental expenses, as well as chat with some of the divisions about their budgets.
The departments included in the general fund budget are administration, planning and zoning, economic development, the police department, crossing guard, parks and recreation, and streets.
Thurmont's proposed water and wastewater budgets are separate from the general fund budget and were reviewed by the board on April 8.
The wastewater budget lists revenues as $1.9 million and shows a surplus of about $151,989 after paying for expenses. The water budget's revenues are $1.2 million, leaving a surplus of about $292,290 after expenses.
Those budgets do not include any changes to water and sewer rates.
BUDGET DETAILS
Out of all the departments in the proposed general fund, the police department has the highest expenses, totaling just over $2 million.
The town administration and streets department have the next highest expenses, totaling about $1.4 million and about $638,000, respectively.
Most of the proposed police department budget goes toward salaries, estimated to cost about $1.2 million, up almost $100,000 from what was budgeted for fiscal year 2025.
The department employs 15 police officers, a receptionist, an office manager and a staff support administrator.
The proposed budget also allocates about $46,500 for communications; $20,000 for camera licenses and maintenance; $20,000 for equipment like mobile radios, fire extinguishers, and in-car printers; and $14,500 for uniforms.
Thurmont Police Chief David Armstrong said the police department is fully staffed, meaning it's likely that officers will have fewer overtime hours.
He said the free licensing for the town's 38 Turing cameras positioned around the town expires in fiscal year 2025, which is why there's a jump in the costs this coming fiscal year.
In the last several months, the cameras have helped the police department solve nine hit-and-run crashes, an assault, a theft, a theft ring, a destruction of property incident, a shooting and an arson event.
'I wanted to be sure that we had sufficient funds in there to continue [to use the cameras],' Armstrong said.
The town administration's proposed budget allocates $181,000 to salaries. Its highest expenses are for employee benefits, like health insurance and retirement.
The administration expects to spend about $65,000 for information technology expenses, $55,000 for engineering expenses, $40,000 for legal expenses and $34,500 for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System requirements.
One line item, 'employee relations,' had $6,000 allocated. These funds go toward things like paid lunches for employees if a supervisor wanted to take their staff out to eat as a reward.
The board debated whether to keep this line item where it is. Commissioner Bob Lookingbill said he didn't like having taxpayers' money paying for employees' lunches, while Commissioner Marty Burns said employees should be recognized for their work.
Mayor John Kinnaird suggested lowering the allocated funds to $4,000, which the board agreed to.
The board also wanted the administration to allocate $750 to the Thurmont Addiction Commission rather than the $500 that was proposed.
Under the streets department budget, $181,800 is allocated for salaries. Additionally, $179,000 for sanitation, $160,000 for tipping fees, and $58,000 for street lighting.
The smallest budgets are the planning and zoning and the crossing guard budgets. The crossing guard budget consists of about $30,600 for crossing guard salaries.
The planning and zoning budget includes about $128,000 in expenses, most of which — $108,000 — goes toward salaries. The town's Planning and Zoning Commission's stipends total $1,500.
The Board of Commissioners struck a line item stating that the commission wanted to conduct a traffic study funded by Thurmont, listed as costing $5,000.
Kinnaird suggested that the commission ask a developer to expand the traffic study it will conduct to encompass the area the commission wants examined. That way, the developer would be paying for a traffic study, not the town.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ottawa County commissioners hold off on administrator decision
OLIVE TOWNSHIP, Mich. (WOOD) — With all but one finalist having dropped out of the running to be the next Ottawa County administrator, the Board of Commissioners did not make a decision on hiring Thursday. The board with U.S. Army Col. Michael Tremblay, speaking to him for about a 1.5 hours. But the board was not prepared to vote on whether or not to hire him, with commissioners saying they wanted time to consider next steps and additional candidates. The the search will resume during the board's June 24 meeting. The it wanted to pick a candidate this month, with the goal of the new administrator starting in late July or early August. It's unclear whether that timeline is still viable. Tremblay told commissioners he thinks he would be a good fit for the job, but acknowledged their 'demanding job' with 'a lot of competing interests.' 'You're going to go back and make a decision, drive on. I appreciate the opportunity to be here. And if ultimately decide to go a different way or do something else, I totally get that, too,' he said. 'I will tell you this: I think I would do a great job for Ottawa County. I think I do a great job for the commissioners. I think I do a great job for the county.' 1 candidate remains as Ottawa County seeks new administrator He was the only remaining finalist after four others pulled their names from consideration. Mark Eisenbarth, currently the Muskegon County administrator, withdrew Tuesday. Glen Salyer, currently a deputy county administrator in Florida, withdrew Monday. 'We lost four candidates and maybe one left … because of how we acted in our board meeting last week, but the others did not. There were legitimate reasons why people withdrew. And so among the board commissioners and throughout the community, nobody should be pointing fingers at anybody about where we are,' Board Chair John Teeples said. The the board's June 4 meeting was contentious as commissioners disagreed about whether discussion of a number of administrator candidates should be in public or in closed session. 'Nobody has a right to take credit. Nobody has a right to point (fingers). This is just part of the process, I think, and circumstances the way they are. So I think from that standpoint, we could all just take a breath, right? Remember we're on a common cause to find the absolute best under the circumstances,' Teeples said Thursday. Nearly all the board members are Republicans, but they are split into two factions. One is members backed by conservative political action committee Ottawa Impact. The other is Republicans unaffiliated with that group and includes . 'The last two times, we've lost a lot of candidates. And I think we, as a board, have a responsibility,' Teeples said. 'We are the face of the county and how we act gets out on social media, it's in the newspapers, it's in the national press. We need to be leaders that that that people can't go on YouTube and say, 'I don't want to go there.' We think, we all believe that Ottawa County is the plum colony of the state of Michigan. But people coming from the outside, they may not see that in us because of how we as a commission act.' 'I think our community needs to see us start to get along so that we can heal this county and have be less divisive,' he added. Ottawa County has been since February 2024, when then- board Chair Joe Moss and Ottawa Impact , whom they had during their first meeting in January 2023. Jon Anderson, a candidate for sheriff last year, filled the role on an interim basis before in October 2024. Deputy Administrator temporarily stepped in before he reached a severance agreement with the board in December. Gary Rosema, a former Ottawa County sheriff, has been since January. He said all along he would not take the job long-term and hoped to be done in about six months. The next county administrator will make between $200,000 and $260,000, according to a job description shared with commissioners in April. —News 8's Byron Tollefson contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
See who won the primary election for three Bergen County Commissioners seats
The incumbent Democratic candidates for Bergen County's Board of Commissioners claimed the nominations on June 10 to run for reelection in November against three Republican challengers. Bergen County's incumbent Democratic commissioners Tom Sullivan, Mary Amoroso and Germaine Ortiz won the primary election against three challengers — Chris Chung, John Vitale and Dolores Witko — who were backed by Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, who lost his bid for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination to Assemblywoman Mikie Sherrill. Sullivan, Amoroso and Ortiz, who were backed by the county Democratic committee, garnered 34,432 votes, 39,448 votes and 32,961 votes, respectively, according to unofficial vote totals as of Wednesday morning. Former Palisades Park Mayor Chris Chung, former Bergen County Democratic Organization state Assembly candidate John Vitale and former Closter Councilwoman Dolores Witko received 27,407 votes, 23,958 votes and 21,887 votes, respectively. They will face Republican candidates Jeffrey 'Jay' Costa Jr., Linda Barba and Andrea Slowikowski, who ran with support from the county GOP organization, won their party's nomination against Armen Azarnia and John Dinice, according to unofficial vote totals. NJ elections: Has NJ ever had a female governor? What states have female governors now? During the campaign, Amoroso, the vice chairwoman of the commissioners, said that she and her running mates are dedicated to building a strong future for everyone, citing increased funding for special education programs and the planned opening of a new career and technical school later this year. She was first elected to public office in 2015 to the Mahwah Township Council and is running for a third term as a commissioner. Ortiz, the chairwoman of the Board of Commissioners, was first elected in 2016. A financial analyst for more than two decades, she said she was focused on improving residents' quality of life while maintaining fiscal discipline and expanding on shared services agreements across the county. Sullivan was first elected to the county board in 2015. In 2021, he was nominated by Murphy and confirmed by the Senate to the New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority. Vitale, Chung and Witko were hoping to take advantage of the elimination of the party line on ballots. With the new ballot, the candidates believed they might reach voters who in the past may have voted down the line, which would group candidates who won the backing of county political parties. The practice led to keeping the same people in office and the county hadn't seen a competitive Democratic primary for the Board of Commissioners in years. On Tuesday, however, even with the new ballots, both Democratic and Republican candidates who had support from their parties secured the nominations to run in November's general election. 'While I'm disappointed with the outcome of the primary, I want to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who supported our campaign and believed in our vision for Bergen County,' Chung said. This article originally appeared on See Bergen County Commissioners primary election results for 2025
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Matthews to require annual audit of one organization after setting nonprofit funding threshold
MATTHEWS, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Matthews is going to require all organizations that receive at least $50,000 from the town to submit an annual audit – but only one group qualifies at this time. The Board of Commissioners initially was to consider requiring the audit for either all nonprofits who use town funds or annually receive direct or in-kind support excess of $75,000. A compromise of sorts was made, coming up with the $50,000 figure since it aligned with IRS tax-exempt guidelines. This threshold only covers the Matthews Alive festival. 'Is no one else concerned that Matthews Alive is the only organization from which we're requiring an audit,' asked Mayor John Higdon. Commissioner Gina Hoover agreed. Matthews approves agreement with CMS board to construct Discovery Place on elementary campus The multi-day festival is a staple of Labor Day weekend, held annually at Stumptown Park with a parade, live music, vendors and more. 'This board was so challenged by Matthews Alive for so many years, and now we're no longer concerned?' asked a frustrated Commissioner Ken McCool. 'I just don't understand how we continuously do this.' Town Attorney Daniel Peterson noted that from a legal standpoint, 'this is a lawful exercise of treating people differently.' Outgoing Town Manager Becky Hawke said she's explained to festival leaders the reasoning for singling them out for this potential policy. 'They receive significantly more funding, significantly more in-kind support than any other organization in town,' she said. 'There is wide margin, and when you add in in-kind support provided to Matthews Alive, that pushes them beyond six figures. That was where I felt comfortable creating the differential in the threshold.' Hawke added that there's another nonprofit that has requested more funding, and given commissioners' support later this year, would pass the $50,000 mark. 'For these other organizations, we essentially cut them a check and don't have direct involvement in anything else that they do,' she said. 'It's much different with Matthews Alive. We are intently involved in that event. That was the difference.' North Carolina statute states that if a city or county grants or appropriates $1,000 or more in any fiscal year to a nonprofit organization, the municipality may require that the group have an audit performed. If the nonprofit has an annual budget of less than $300,000, the town will provide an additional $5,000 in annual support to complete the audit. The policy was approved unanimously. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.