ST Index up on Wednesday, mirroring regional indices
The STI rose 0.6 per cent or 23.02 points to 4,231.28. Across the broader market, advancers outnumbered decliners 427 to 164 after 2.4 billion shares worth S$1.7 billion changed hands.
The trio of local banks closed higher on Wednesday, with DBS up 1.9 per cent or S$0.88 at S$48.13. UOB rose 0.6 per cent or S$0.23 to S$37.23 and OCBC closed up 0.1 per cent or S$0.02 at S$17.21.
DFI Retail Group was the top gainer on the STI, closing up 9.2 per cent or US$0.29 at US$3.45. The biggest loser was ST Engineering , which dropped 2.1 per cent or S$0.18 to S$8.27.
Across the region, major indices ended higher, with the Kospi gaining 0.4 per cent and the Nikkei 225 up 3.5 cent. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index closed up 1.6 per cent and the KLCI rose 0.7 per cent.
The fading momentum of tech stocks is starting to weigh on major US benchmarks, said Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers. But the wider US market remains positive, as every other major sector was still upbeat during a quiet day for economic releases.
Overreliance on the 'Magnificent 7' – comprising Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Meta and Nvidia – is contributing to the market turning defensive, picking up Treasuries, gold and volatility protection instruments, said Torres.
With tech and communications services' rally bolstered by looser regulations, financial services could see the same impact as efforts are made to loosen regulations,' he added.
'While less red tape is poised to improve profitability at banks, the lending and capital expenditure implications of reducing regulations are also quite stimulative to the economy because additional funds are opened up for consumption, investment and fixed income purchasing,' said Torres.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Brunei tweaks Bridgewater bet to a lucrative 20% stake in firm
[NEW YORK] Brunei's sovereign wealth fund pulled money from an investment in a Bridgewater Associates strategy to buy an almost 20% stake in the hedge fund manager's holding company, a move that has helped spur higher gains for other institutional investors. The Brunei Investment Agency is the latest longstanding client to buy a piece of the firm founded by Ray Dalio, which managed US$92 billion as at Dec 31. It's unclear which Bridgewater vehicle Brunei pulled money from, although the sovereign wealth fund remains an investor in all of the firm's funds, according to a source familiar with the money manager. Bridgewater's flagship Pure Alpha II, like many macro funds, has improved its performance in the past few years, but over a longer period, returns have been uneven. That means a long-term investment in the firm itself can be more lucrative than betting on its most popular product. Bridgewater has been selling stakes to institutions for more than a decade. The Teacher Retirement System of Texas, the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund and the International Monetary Fund have all purchased a piece of the Westport, Connecticut-based firm. The Texas teachers pension fund invested US$250 million in Bridgewater's holding company in 2012 and reported making an annualised return of 8.7 per cent to Mar 31. An investor in Pure Alpha would have gained an annualised 2 per cent from the beginning of 2012 to June 2025. Last year, the fund climbed 11.3 per cent and it's up 17 per cent in the first half of this year. Dalio recently completed his exit from the company, selling the final slug of his remaining shares in the money manager he started 50 years ago, and resigning from the board. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Airbnb touts good talks with New York City mayor candidates on rental ban
[CHICAGO] After pouring more than US$1 million into New York's mayoral race, Airbnb said that it's having 'really good conversations' with candidates about restrictions that wiped more than 80 per cent of its listings in the city. Chief business officer Dave Stephenson said that he is optimistic and that politicians are starting to realise the rules have not been good for residents, who cannot supplement their incomes with short-term rentals. It has also sent hotel prices in the city soaring, he said. Airbnb plans to spend US$10 million on getting homesharing-friendly politicians into New York City and state offices just this year. The company is pushing back on New York City's Local Law 18 regulation, which outlawed most of its short-term rental listings when it came into effect in 2023. 'Conversations are happening there, top-level conversations with the mayor and with mayoral candidates,' Stephenson said on Thursday (Jul 31). 'We are having really good conversations about the importance of supporting the communities and the economics in those communities and I think that they are realising that the law is not serving the community well.' New York politicians have argued short-term rentals have exacerbated the city's housing affordability crisis. The measure, which wiped out more than 18,000 of Airbnb's listings in the city within a year of coming into force, was strongly supported by the powerful hospitality workers union, the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council. Stephenson, who was in Chicago to mark Airbnb's first global live music partnership with Lollapalooza festivals around the world, blamed the restrictions for rising hotel prices in New York. The average cost of a room in the city surged to a record US$439.71 in December, according to CoStar data. He also said smaller neighbourhoods are missing out on economic activity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'There are so many boroughs that are struggling now, because you can't stay in Brooklyn, you can't stay in Queens, you can't stay in Staten Island – there are no hotels,' he said. 'People are not able to earn income from their homes, so they're actually seeing the negative side of this.' The company's super-PAC spent over US$1 million in the Democratic primary, targeting three candidates who did not support rolling back the short-term rental ban during the race: Zohran Mamdani, Scott Stringer and Brad Lander, Politico reported at the time. In a separate statement, Airbnb said it's 'committed to supporting candidates who champion common-sense solutions to the affordability crisis, including empowering everyday New Yorkers, especially one- and two-family homeowners, to share their own homes as a way to afford their mortgages'. New York City Mayor Eric Adams did not respond to a request for comment. Remaining candidates, Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa, did not respond to requests for comment. Jim Walden, who is also running, declined to comment. Stephenson did not specify which candidates the company was speaking to. Advocates for short-term rentals are trying to revise the law ahead of next summer, when New York will be one of several North American host cities for the 2026 FifaWorld Cup, an event franchise Airbnb has also partnered with. In March, the chambers of commerce for New York City's five boroughs sent a joint letter to the city council saying the regulations have had 'devastating consequences for small businesses'. A bill relaxing some of New York's stringent ban has been introduced in the city council, but it's a long way from viability, the bill has only a few sponsors and has yet to receive a hearing. Cities across the US are grappling with an affordable housing crisis, and several have turned to the regulation of short-term rentals after concerns that real estate speculators are entering the market, purchasing housing and then renting it on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo. Chicago limits how many units within an apartment building can be used for short-term rentals and requires city approval and registration. While the city is weighing an ordinance that would allow council members to ban short-term rentals within their wards, the proposal has stalled. 'We found very specifically in Chicago that the actual residents of many of these neighbourhoods, we have civil rights people in the neighbourhoods, are actually advocating to keep Airbnbs because it's an important way for people to earn income,' he said. 'I'm really happy with where we are at in Chicago, because I think the neighbourhoods are actually starting to see the benefit and are speaking up.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
[MUMBAI] Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25 per cent tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the 'most strenuous and obnoxious', in a Truth Social post on Jul 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them 'dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25 per cent tariffs kicked in as at Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath, and not the subject to the very highest rates, but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-force' message 'Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice-president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai-based financial services firm. The levies 'feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message'. Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal, or the lack of it, was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As the US released rates across the world on Aug 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. 'The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the southern Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. 'We were expecting something in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being 'very disturbed'. A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40 per cent of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. 'The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for 'months and months', he said that he will have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25 per cent, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20 per cent tariff, Vietnam got a 20 per cent levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19 per cent duties. 'We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council. 'We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries 'special'. India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. 'It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment, but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi-based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Negotiating tactic Jewellery businesses 'are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. 'The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing 'seems like a knee-jerk reaction', according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. 'This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. BLOOMBERG
