Aussies are turning their back on the super for housing policy
Mitchell, a 26-year old renter working in the IT department told NewsWire the price of housing has skyrocketed in the last few years, pricing him out of the area where he grew up.
'There were a few times in my life I considered buying a house. One was in 20219 pre-pandemic when I was looking to go in with a mate to get a ground floor unit.
'Then I had a dream of being in the Sunshine Coast where I grew up and the plan was always to settle down and go back there.
'The plan was to turn 30, settle down and go back there. But you can't find anything for under $800,000-900,000.'
'Where it is now, I don't even think about it.'
Young Australians want practical solutions to the housing crisis. Picture: NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers
He believes the current policy by the Coalition will just drive house prices higher while ruining younger Aussies' chance at retirement.
'Personally I think it's just kind of doing two bad things at the same time,' Mitchell said.
'The main problem I have with these policies is they help one person at one time but then make it worse for everyone else by driving up the price.
'If everyone at the auction has access to this $50 grand then the house goes up, but this policy also means first home buyers burn their retirement.
The Coalition flagship housing policy will give first home buyers the choice to access up to $50,000 from their super towards a deposit to buy their first home.
Under the scheme, the $50,000 can be initially withdrawn from super but would need to be returned when the house is sold.
Mitchell is not alone with survey results by Everybody's Home showing 76 per cent of respondents opposed allowing first home buyers to access $50,000 from their superannuation for a house deposit.
According to the results respondents believe the policy will just inflate house prices as well as see their superannuation savings diminish.
Everybody's Home spokesperson Maiy Azize said people across the country are seeing through the Coalition's super for housing proposal.
'Voters know Super for Housing could pour fuel to the flames of an already overheated housing market,' Ms Azize said.
'Using superannuation for housing deposits is unfair, and does nothing to build more affordable homes. Instead, it robs people of their retirement savings and drives up house prices for everyone else.'
Everybody Home say the number of renters are on the rise. Picture: NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers
She said Australians want greater structure reforms over policies that only help a select few.
'We need greater investment in social housing, better protections for renters, and an end to tax breaks for property investors.'
'A growing number of Australians are renting and more than 640,000 people are experiencing rental stress or housing insecurity. These aren't just numbers - they are real people who are almost entirely missing from the current election debate.
Academics, inducing the University of South Australia the super-for-housing policy would just drive prices up 7 to 10 per cent.
'It is an uncontroversial finding – if you add demand to an inelastic market, prices are going to rise, with the unintended consequence of making housing less affordable' study author Chris Leishman said.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said that concern would be addressed by the Coalition's major 'supply side' policy including 500,000 new homes by investing in essential infrastructure, setting a target of 400,000 new apprentices to build houses and reduce migration.
Mitchell called on both parties to commit to policies that will actually help the housing market.
'I would say, think of your kids, but they, you know, they probably got their own bank of mum and dad thing going on,' he said.
'But, think of future generations, you know, think of the country that you grew up in, and don't you want everyone else to have that chance as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
13 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Electric vehicle tax: Road user charge to offset fuel excise losses could be coming soon
Rarely do Australians collectively put up their hands to volunteer for a new tax. But it appears to be happening in the automotive industry, with disparate groups calling for the introduction of a road-user charge for electric vehicles to support the nation's future transport needs. It is a proposal likely to be debated this week at the federal government's productivity roundtable after Treasurer Jim Chalmers signalled his support for future changes. But while infrastructure and transport groups agree on a road-user charge as a concept, they disagree on when it should be introduced, who should pay and whether petrol and diesel vehicle drivers should be charged more. While some argue the fee should only apply to electric vehicles not subject to fuel excise, others say a road-user charge would be more effective if applied to every vehicle. The debate over transport taxes follows record EV sales. Australians purchased more than 29,000 of them in the three months to June, according to the Australian Automobile Association, representing nine per cent of all car sales. It also comes amid falling fuel excise collection, which raised $15.71 billion in the 2024 financial year but could fall to zero by 2050 as electric vehicles replace fuel-powered cars, the Parliamentary Budget Office warns. Urgent changes are needed to address Australia's dwindling tax revenue for roads, Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer says. Groups attending a roundtable on the issue last Monday widely agreed the current system for charging motorists was 'unfair, unsustainable and inefficient,' he said. 'A distance-based charge on light EVs is the logical starting point. 'Heavy EVs can be included but starting there alone won't address the issues structural to this debate, namely the core issue of fairness as more light EVs join the fleet.' But making electric vehicle drivers pay for all lost tax revenue would also be unjust, according to Polestar Australia managing director Scott Maynard. Fuel excise collection has been dropping for many reasons, he says, including more efficient internal combustion engines. 'Petrol cars ... have come down and down in their usage of fuel; their economy has improved and it would be unfair to try and recoup all of the targeted fuel excise revenue strictly from electric vehicle drivers,' Maynard said. 'To simply, in a really ham-fisted way, nail an addition cost to electric vehicles only at a transitional point where we're trying to get people to consider them as a true alternative to traditionally powered vehicles that pollute our air, is not the way to do it.' Adding an ongoing charge to electric cars at early stage in their adoption could make potential buyers reconsider or delay purchases, Maynard said. It is a concern shared by the Electric Vehicle Council, legal and policy head Aman Gaur says, which supports the introduction of a road-user charge but at a suitable time and if introduced for all vehicles. 'We support fair funding of our roads but I think there's been really important considerations that have been left out of what I would call a pretty shallow debate about fuel excise at the moment,' he says. 'We would only support a road-user charge if it's universal; universal and focused on emissions intensity.' Any road-user charge should apply to all light vehicles, Mr Gaur says, and should only be introduced to electric cars when their adoption hits 30 per cent. Several state governments have floated plans to introduce a road-user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles from 2027, including NSW, Tasmania, South Australia and Western Australia. However the legality of state-based charges is in question after the High Court found Victoria's Zero and Low Emission Vehicles charge unconstitutional in October 2023. The states' timeline for introducing a charge could be appropriate, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones concedes, as the nation's electric fleet is likely to reach 30 per cent of new car sales by that date. A road-user charge should be based on a vehicle's mass and how many kilometres it travels each year, he says, and should apply to all vehicles regardless of their fuel source. 'The average person drives 12,000km a year so it would work out to cost about $380 to $400 a year.' The government should also leave existing fuel excise charges in place, as they would act as an incentive for motorists to purchase low-emission vehicles. 'It's directly proportionate to how much pollution you cause,' Dr Jones said. 'It's an effective pollution tax and we want to discourage people from buying vehicles that run on petrol.' While a road-user charge is likely to be discussed at the Economic Reform Roundtable from Tuesday, Chalmers said the government will 'take the time to get this right'. In the meantime, Gaur said he hoped the road tax reform debate could be tackled sensibly and suggestions EV drivers do not pay to use roads can be discredited as fees include registration, stamp duty, luxury car and fringe benefits taxes, and taxes on electricity. 'EV drivers do pay tax,' he said. 'That is a really pernicious and completely untrue part of this conversation.'
Perth Now
13 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Nothing we can do': RBA's grim admission
Australians' living standards will fall and there's very little the central bank can do about it. According to the Reserve Bank's statement on monetary policy, there will be lower pay rises, weak consumer spending, falling business profits and an overall drop in living standards over the medium term. The central bank put the issue squarely on Australia's lack of productivity and points out it is powerless to stop it. 'Lower productivity growth means slower growth in business revenues, household incomes and ultimately demand,' the RBA's quarterly statement on monetary policy said. Despite the grim outlook, the RBA boss Michele Bullock was quick to point out there was little the central bank could do to fix these issues, even as she announced last Tuesday that the board was cutting interest rates by 25 basis points to 3.60 per cent. RBA governor Michele Bullock explains why the RBA can't help with productivity. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia '(The) productivity slowdown is a matter for the government that they are taking on,' Ms Bullock said. 'They're looking at what they can do.' Ms Bullock said businesses were also looking at the issue. 'There's nothing the Reserve Bank can do,' she continued. 'All the Reserve Bank can do is make sure we have low and stable inflation, and if we have full employment, both of those things are very stable environments for businesses to think about how they might improve productivity, how they might produce more for the same amount of labour and capital input.' The RBA's call comes just days ahead of Treasurer Jim Chalmers' much-hyped economic roundtable Economists, unions, business people and politicians will all head to Canberra next week for a three-day discussion aimed at lifting Australia's falling productivity. Australia's Cash Rate 2022 Why does it matter? Simply put, productivity matters because it improves living standards, leads to economic growth and a greater economy. Productivity is the measure of how efficiently resources such as time, effort and materials are used to produce a given output. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australia's long-term productivity has slumped. In 2003-2004, productivity grew at 1.8 per cent a year; in 2022-2023, it was down to just 0.9 per cent a year. Australians will be thousands of dollars worse off if productivity continues to slump. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Under this grim reality, Australians' living standards are falling. To put a dollar figure on it, the Productivity Commission estimated that full-time workers would be $14,000 a year worse off by 2035 if Australia couldn't rediscover its previous growth and continued on its current trend. Separate RBA research found the slump in productivity came at the same time as a lack of competition in business, costing every Aussie about $3000 in today's dollars. Australians remain in the dark Despite having a wide-ranging impact on their lives, most Australians are unaware of what the government is doing or trying to achieve with its productivity roundtable. According to Amplify and YouGov polling, three in four Aussies haven't heard of the roundtable and a further 60 per cent are not confident it would lead to meaningful change. Amplify chief executive Georgina Harrisson said this issue hits every Australian household, but too often governments propose solutions that pit different parts of the community against each other. 'This roundtable can't just be a talkfest limited to the Canberra bubble – not when the issue is being felt in every Australian home,' she said. 'Australians are doing it tough, with rising bills, higher housing costs and lower productivity. NED-9175-Australia's GDP 'The government can't afford to waste this moment on words alone; we need action that delivers real wins in people's pockets.' Ms Harrisson said the government needed to do far more to bring the voices of everyday Australians into the discussion. 'When the community don't trust or feel understood by their political representatives, it is more important than ever to be reaching out and letting them in to the conversations that affect them most,' she said. Most Australians are unaware of the productivity roundtable despite it impacting all of them. Credit: News Corp Australia, NewsWire/ Monique Harmer Four things to lift productivity Meanwhile, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver says there are four key ways the government can lift productivity. He believes too much regulation, the current tax system, a lack of competition and government overspending is all holding Australia back. Dr Oliver said productivity is the 'secret sauce' that enables strong growth in real wages, living standards and profits while, at the same time, keeping inflation low. 'So hopefully, the Roundtable will kick off a process of economic reform that will boost the ability of the economy to produce goods and services with the aim of boosting long-term living standards,' he said. Dr Oliver said the government should lift productivity through removing red tape, tax reform, increasing competition and having government spending capped at 25 per cent of GDP. It is currently 28 per cent. 'Combined it should free up the supply side of the economy to make it easier for the economy to supply goods and services for any given level of hours worked by Australian workers,' he told NewsWire. 'For example, it should enable us to build more homes and allow businesses to produce more.' As part of the roundtable, the economist said there needs to be a rebalance away from income taxes to a broader GST, while compensating those on a lower income, and removing nuisance taxes like stamp duty, would be key to getting Australia's productivity back on track. Dr Oliver said an uplift in productivity was key to living standards. NewsWire / John Appleyard Credit: News Corp Australia 'This sounds politically difficult but if combined with an adjustment to income tax scales to offset the regressive nature of the GST, some measures to cap property tax concessions (like cutting the overly generous capital gains tax discount) and better tax gas exports a broad consensus could be reached,' he said. Dr Oliver also proposed keeping government spending below 25 per cent of GDP as it would ensure budget stability and boost productivity by not having the government taking more than required when it comes to workers. 'The reality of course is that everyone has their wish list and expectations running into the Roundtable appear to be running too high. It's likely just the start of long process through which (hopefully) the government will pick the best options and make some compromises,' he said. NAB chief executive Andrew Irvine said stronger business investment and less regulation was required to help lift Australia's ailing productivity. 'The vast amount of job growth in our country in the last 10 years has been in the public sector, not the private sector,' he said at the Australian Banking Association annual conference in Sydney. 'When I speak to our business customers, they say it's just too hard to start, scale and grow a business. We need to fix that and reduce red tape to create more jobs in the private sector.'
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Entitled generation: what adult kids are doing to ensure an inheritance
With the cost of living soaring and home ownership out of reach for many of the younger generations, some are hell-bent on protecting an inheritance they believe should be theirs. Over a quarter of Australians are not sure if they will have enough money for their retirement, according to Finder and with the average cost of a house now $1.002 million across the nation, many are hoping an inheritance will save them. But there are concerns an entitled attitude can lead to elder abuse and The Senior has already reported on "Inheritance Impatience", when family members pressure a person for early access to their money. And as the cost of health care for pensioners is set to rise on November 1 and an entry deposit into aged care soared up to $750,000 on July 1, some beneficiaries are trying to cut down their parents' costs. Council on the Ageing (COTA) NSW CEO Gohar Yazdabadi told The Senior the Government's changes to aged care mean that retirees will need to tap into more of their "savings, super and assets" so they can age "safely". "We're seeing more instances of 'inheritance protection', where family members stop older people from spending money on care, so there's more left to inherit, which is clearly a form of elder abuse," she said. "The idea that inheritance is a right, rather than a possibility, is shifting the dynamics of ageing." Ms Yazdabadi said the rise in inheritance impatience is making families forget or not care that retirees need their money to live and age well. "Older people are finding themselves in the difficult situation of having to navigate these expectations along with managing their own financial needs." she said. Eastern Community Legal Centre Managing Lawyer in Elder Abuse Paul Were said the chances of elder abuse can increase when choosing someone to make your medical decisions if you are incapacitated - and they are also in the will. "There's a chance that they might go and make bad decisions, potentially cheaper decisions, so they can try and retain their inheritance," he said. "Some of those medical decisions might be things like how to prolong someone's life. "If that person is also a beneficiary in the will ... they actually may benefit from the death of the person they're supposed to be caring for." The Victorian lawyer said it is hard to know if someone you love and trust might make a decision in their favour to speed up their inheritance, and if retirees are unsure who to appoint, they always have the option to not name anyone. The lawyer said the clients he usually sees are retirees who have discovered their adult children have been mishandling their funds. "Taking money from their bank accounts," he said. "Perhaps they're forcing them to sign documents against their wishes, or transferring their property into their own name." The lawyer also said adding to the problem is when older Australians are being blamed for the housing crisis and the younger generation "develop a sense of entitlement" because they think they also deserve a house. "There's really strong links between elder abuse and ageism," he said. Mr Were did say that despite the risks, many parents feel a sense of "pride" knowing they will be able to gift an inheritance to their family members, which he thinks is "lovely". "It's just the crossover when there's this expectation of that happening ... which is what often leads adult children to take advantage of their parents when they are deteriorating." With the cost of living soaring and home ownership out of reach for many of the younger generations, some are hell-bent on protecting an inheritance they believe should be theirs. Over a quarter of Australians are not sure if they will have enough money for their retirement, according to Finder and with the average cost of a house now $1.002 million across the nation, many are hoping an inheritance will save them. But there are concerns an entitled attitude can lead to elder abuse and The Senior has already reported on "Inheritance Impatience", when family members pressure a person for early access to their money. And as the cost of health care for pensioners is set to rise on November 1 and an entry deposit into aged care soared up to $750,000 on July 1, some beneficiaries are trying to cut down their parents' costs. Council on the Ageing (COTA) NSW CEO Gohar Yazdabadi told The Senior the Government's changes to aged care mean that retirees will need to tap into more of their "savings, super and assets" so they can age "safely". "We're seeing more instances of 'inheritance protection', where family members stop older people from spending money on care, so there's more left to inherit, which is clearly a form of elder abuse," she said. "The idea that inheritance is a right, rather than a possibility, is shifting the dynamics of ageing." Ms Yazdabadi said the rise in inheritance impatience is making families forget or not care that retirees need their money to live and age well. "Older people are finding themselves in the difficult situation of having to navigate these expectations along with managing their own financial needs." she said. Eastern Community Legal Centre Managing Lawyer in Elder Abuse Paul Were said the chances of elder abuse can increase when choosing someone to make your medical decisions if you are incapacitated - and they are also in the will. "There's a chance that they might go and make bad decisions, potentially cheaper decisions, so they can try and retain their inheritance," he said. "Some of those medical decisions might be things like how to prolong someone's life. "If that person is also a beneficiary in the will ... they actually may benefit from the death of the person they're supposed to be caring for." The Victorian lawyer said it is hard to know if someone you love and trust might make a decision in their favour to speed up their inheritance, and if retirees are unsure who to appoint, they always have the option to not name anyone. The lawyer said the clients he usually sees are retirees who have discovered their adult children have been mishandling their funds. "Taking money from their bank accounts," he said. "Perhaps they're forcing them to sign documents against their wishes, or transferring their property into their own name." The lawyer also said adding to the problem is when older Australians are being blamed for the housing crisis and the younger generation "develop a sense of entitlement" because they think they also deserve a house. "There's really strong links between elder abuse and ageism," he said. Mr Were did say that despite the risks, many parents feel a sense of "pride" knowing they will be able to gift an inheritance to their family members, which he thinks is "lovely". "It's just the crossover when there's this expectation of that happening ... which is what often leads adult children to take advantage of their parents when they are deteriorating." With the cost of living soaring and home ownership out of reach for many of the younger generations, some are hell-bent on protecting an inheritance they believe should be theirs. Over a quarter of Australians are not sure if they will have enough money for their retirement, according to Finder and with the average cost of a house now $1.002 million across the nation, many are hoping an inheritance will save them. But there are concerns an entitled attitude can lead to elder abuse and The Senior has already reported on "Inheritance Impatience", when family members pressure a person for early access to their money. And as the cost of health care for pensioners is set to rise on November 1 and an entry deposit into aged care soared up to $750,000 on July 1, some beneficiaries are trying to cut down their parents' costs. Council on the Ageing (COTA) NSW CEO Gohar Yazdabadi told The Senior the Government's changes to aged care mean that retirees will need to tap into more of their "savings, super and assets" so they can age "safely". "We're seeing more instances of 'inheritance protection', where family members stop older people from spending money on care, so there's more left to inherit, which is clearly a form of elder abuse," she said. "The idea that inheritance is a right, rather than a possibility, is shifting the dynamics of ageing." Ms Yazdabadi said the rise in inheritance impatience is making families forget or not care that retirees need their money to live and age well. "Older people are finding themselves in the difficult situation of having to navigate these expectations along with managing their own financial needs." she said. Eastern Community Legal Centre Managing Lawyer in Elder Abuse Paul Were said the chances of elder abuse can increase when choosing someone to make your medical decisions if you are incapacitated - and they are also in the will. "There's a chance that they might go and make bad decisions, potentially cheaper decisions, so they can try and retain their inheritance," he said. "Some of those medical decisions might be things like how to prolong someone's life. "If that person is also a beneficiary in the will ... they actually may benefit from the death of the person they're supposed to be caring for." The Victorian lawyer said it is hard to know if someone you love and trust might make a decision in their favour to speed up their inheritance, and if retirees are unsure who to appoint, they always have the option to not name anyone. The lawyer said the clients he usually sees are retirees who have discovered their adult children have been mishandling their funds. "Taking money from their bank accounts," he said. "Perhaps they're forcing them to sign documents against their wishes, or transferring their property into their own name." The lawyer also said adding to the problem is when older Australians are being blamed for the housing crisis and the younger generation "develop a sense of entitlement" because they think they also deserve a house. "There's really strong links between elder abuse and ageism," he said. Mr Were did say that despite the risks, many parents feel a sense of "pride" knowing they will be able to gift an inheritance to their family members, which he thinks is "lovely". "It's just the crossover when there's this expectation of that happening ... which is what often leads adult children to take advantage of their parents when they are deteriorating." With the cost of living soaring and home ownership out of reach for many of the younger generations, some are hell-bent on protecting an inheritance they believe should be theirs. Over a quarter of Australians are not sure if they will have enough money for their retirement, according to Finder and with the average cost of a house now $1.002 million across the nation, many are hoping an inheritance will save them. But there are concerns an entitled attitude can lead to elder abuse and The Senior has already reported on "Inheritance Impatience", when family members pressure a person for early access to their money. And as the cost of health care for pensioners is set to rise on November 1 and an entry deposit into aged care soared up to $750,000 on July 1, some beneficiaries are trying to cut down their parents' costs. Council on the Ageing (COTA) NSW CEO Gohar Yazdabadi told The Senior the Government's changes to aged care mean that retirees will need to tap into more of their "savings, super and assets" so they can age "safely". "We're seeing more instances of 'inheritance protection', where family members stop older people from spending money on care, so there's more left to inherit, which is clearly a form of elder abuse," she said. "The idea that inheritance is a right, rather than a possibility, is shifting the dynamics of ageing." Ms Yazdabadi said the rise in inheritance impatience is making families forget or not care that retirees need their money to live and age well. "Older people are finding themselves in the difficult situation of having to navigate these expectations along with managing their own financial needs." she said. Eastern Community Legal Centre Managing Lawyer in Elder Abuse Paul Were said the chances of elder abuse can increase when choosing someone to make your medical decisions if you are incapacitated - and they are also in the will. "There's a chance that they might go and make bad decisions, potentially cheaper decisions, so they can try and retain their inheritance," he said. "Some of those medical decisions might be things like how to prolong someone's life. "If that person is also a beneficiary in the will ... they actually may benefit from the death of the person they're supposed to be caring for." The Victorian lawyer said it is hard to know if someone you love and trust might make a decision in their favour to speed up their inheritance, and if retirees are unsure who to appoint, they always have the option to not name anyone. The lawyer said the clients he usually sees are retirees who have discovered their adult children have been mishandling their funds. "Taking money from their bank accounts," he said. "Perhaps they're forcing them to sign documents against their wishes, or transferring their property into their own name." The lawyer also said adding to the problem is when older Australians are being blamed for the housing crisis and the younger generation "develop a sense of entitlement" because they think they also deserve a house. "There's really strong links between elder abuse and ageism," he said. Mr Were did say that despite the risks, many parents feel a sense of "pride" knowing they will be able to gift an inheritance to their family members, which he thinks is "lovely". "It's just the crossover when there's this expectation of that happening ... which is what often leads adult children to take advantage of their parents when they are deteriorating."
