logo
Is it time to accept the truth? Islam Makhachev is greater than Khabib Nurmagomedov

Is it time to accept the truth? Islam Makhachev is greater than Khabib Nurmagomedov

Independent16-05-2025

Islam Makhachev has always done a fine job of emulating Khabib Nurmagomedov. Both fighters were forged in Dagestan, made it to the UFC, won the lightweight title, became pound-for-pound No 1, and gave up the belt in their prime. The question now is whether Makhachev has in fact surpassed his childhood friend.
Five years after Khabib vacated the strap, retiring as champion after the death of his father and coach Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, Makhachev has relinquished the title. The difference in the latter's case is that he is not done fighting; the gleam of welterweight gold has caught his eye, and like a Magpie, Makhachev has been drawn to it – and so a title shot awaits later this year.
Regardless, the end of each Russian's reign saw him keep his word. For Khabib, retiring meant honouring a promise to his grieving mother. For Makhachev, a move up to welterweight could only occur because his friend Belal Muhammad lost the belt.
Khabib ended his career aged 32, shockingly, while Makhachev might turn 34 by the time he challenges for the 170lb title. Khabib achieved three successful title defences at lightweight, a joint-record, before Makhachev broke it with four.
The friends even have a shared opponent: Dustin Poirier, whom both submitted to retain the title – Khabib in 2019, Makhachev last June. If you want to compare them based on their respective showings against the 'Diamond', Khabib secured the finish in round three to cap off a dominant performance, while Makhachev submitted the American in the fifth and final round, having engaged in a striking shootout for much of the bout (in which he was always one step ahead, truthfully).
That brings us to their skillsets. Nurmagomedov, now 36, was one of the greatest examples of complete mastery in one field, so much so that his deficiencies elsewhere were rendered irrelevant. The UFC had never seen such suffocating, indefatigable wrestling before Khabib began providing routine exhibitions of that Dagestani style. However, his striking was at times almost humorously ungainly.
That said, it only ever needed to be good enough to set up his wrestling, and the threat of the latter skill kept opponents on edge to the extent that Khabib could land strikes in spite of his technique. The most iconic example came against Conor McGregor, when Khabib feinted a takedown attempt only to launch an overhand at the Irishman, dropping the striking specialist to his backside. It is also worth noting that Khabib's striking did improve slightly over time.
Nevertheless, it does not touch Makhachev's. While Makhachev's wrestling is essentially as effective as Khabib's, his kickboxing is leagues above. There was a time when Makhachev, 33, was deemed 'an underrated striker' but not an outright great one; that time has passed, as proven by Makhachev winning the majority of his striking exchanges with Poirier, one of the UFC's best boxers.
In fact, these specific skill levels lead one to wonder who would've won between Khabib and Makhachev, who no doubt shared hundreds of sparring rounds over the years, but who would never have faced each other in the Octagon (just as Makhachev waited for Muhammad to lose the 170lb, his plan at 155lb was always to wait for Khabib to leave the division before going for gold). Makhachev, one could imagine, would have the tools to neutralise his friend-turned-coach's greatest strength and exploit his glaring weakness.
Some will point to each man's record, specifically how Khabib achieved the rarest feat in MMA: staying unbeaten, and at the elite level, no less. Meanwhile, Makhachev has one professional loss to his name, a first-round knockout by Adriano Martins in 2015. Yet as impressive as Khabib's zero is, there is a feeling that he would have tasted defeat eventually, if he had stayed around long enough – or tested himself at welterweight.
On those notes, it feels Makhachev's sole loss should not be overplayed, so common as they are in MMA, and he will be testing himself at 170lb. With that venture, he'll have the chance to deepen his legacy in a way that Khabib did not.
And delve further into each man's legacy via his record, Khabib's most notable wins came against McGregor, Poirier, Justin Gaethje, and Rafael dos Anjos. All are former undisputed or interim champions, and only 'RDA' escaped a finish against Khabib, while the Russian submitted McGregor, Poirier and Gaethje back-to-back-to-back. An all-time great run, in his final three fights.
Makhachev, meanwhile, kickstarted a fearsome run by submitting Charles Oliveira – the UFC's greatest submission artist, statistically – to win the belt. He then outpointed and knocked out featherweight champion Alexander Volkanovski across two bouts, before submitting Poirier. And while Volk's size disadvantage could be seen as an asterisk against Makhachev, those fights pitted No 1 vs No 2 on the pound-for-pound list.
Khabib retired at 29-0 with 19 stoppages, while Makhachev is 27-1 with 18 stoppages, and the similarity of those records is emblematic of the more general margin between them: a near-imperceptible one. Khabib was unbeaten, but Makhachev had more title defences. Khabib saw off more legends, but Makhachev is the more well-rounded fighter. Khabib retired at his peak, but Makhachev will go on.
In that respect, there is still a chance for Makhachev to pull clear of Khabib – or to damage his own legacy in defeat. When it comes to Khabib vs Makhachev in the cage, Indy Sport knows who it would favour. When it comes to their legacies... settle for a draw?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jon Jones trolls Dana White and UFC fans as he finally reveals fight plans after leaving Tom Aspinall in limbo
Jon Jones trolls Dana White and UFC fans as he finally reveals fight plans after leaving Tom Aspinall in limbo

The Sun

time36 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Jon Jones trolls Dana White and UFC fans as he finally reveals fight plans after leaving Tom Aspinall in limbo

JON JONES has finally given clarity on his fighting future. The former pound-for-pound king has ummed and ahhed with the prospect of retirement since his maiden defence of the heavyweight title last November. 6 6 6 6 That's despite the UFC brass meeting his demands to be paid "F**K YOU MONEY" for a mammoth unification bout with interim titleholder Tom Aspinall. UFC supremo Dana White has faced a deluge of calls to strip Jones of his heavyweight crown and breathe new life into the stagnating division. But Hall of Famer Jones has hinted that he'll give up the belt before White and Co. bite the bullet and relieve him of it. In an impromptu posting spree on X, Jones wrote: 'I spoke to the UFC a long time ago about what my future plans were. "I haven't really worked out since my last fight in New York City. 'Honestly, I believe it's been in the UFC's best interest to keep presenting me as the company's champion—not Tom. "I've just been playing the role of the company man by doing nothing at all… and holding the position. 'And truthfully, it's been incredibly lucrative. I've made more money off of Tom being the interim champ than Tom has himself. JOIN SUN VEGAS: GET £50 BONUS 6 "It sucks to see the rest of the division get slowed down like this, but that has nothing to do with me. I don't pull the strings. 'And remember, you can't strip a guy like me at this point. I give the belt up freely. Veni, vidi, vici.' The MMA masses have accused Jones of "ducking" Aspinall, with several going as far as to say he'll damage his legacy if he doesn't fight the Brit. But the former long-reigning light-heavyweight champion could care little about his detractors' thoughts on his impact in the sport. He said: "That's the problem with some young men, you think your last outcome is your legacy. "That's why when many of you fall short, you can't find the strength to return. "But here's the truth: your legacy isn't your last move. Legacy is what no one can take from you. You can't strip a guy like me at this point. I give the belt up freely. Veni, vidi, vici.' Jon Jones "It's built over time, not defined by a single win or loss. "If you're reading this, your legacy is far from over. "We wake up each day with a chance to build, to add, to rise. Make yours beautiful." Fan favourite Aspinall has been sat twiddling his thumbs on the sidelines since his 60-second demolition of Curtis Blaydes last July. The Wigan warrior has been frustrated by his inactivity, although SunSport understands an announcement for his next fight will be made imminently. 6

Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport
Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport

The Irishman was confirmed as a part owner of Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship last year, but not everyone seems to be onboard with the promotion Conor McGregor has been dealt a huge blow after an Australian politician revealed he is leading calls for bare knuckle fighting to be permanently banned in the country. The Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship, co-owned by McGregor, was set to make its Australian debut in Perth this July. However, the WA Combat Sports Commission has rejected the application. In response to this development, Australian Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas is urging the State Government to completely outlaw the sport, asserting it has no place in Western Australia. ‌ "It was very clear that a significant majority of Western Australians did not want this brutal sport to be coming to Perth," He continued: "It should not have taken this long, and there are still lots of questions," said Zempilas. He further added: "We don't know what criteria was not met, or how the decision was reached. We don't know whether there were discussions between the Minister and the Commission, and it would appear the door is still open." ‌ Zempilas is convinced that a ban is the only appropriate measure to prevent future applications. "That's what we want. Clearly that's what the people of Western Australia want," the 53-year-old said. "It sets a bad example, there is very little demand. And it took the long way and a confusing way to get there, but I'm pleased that the common sense decision was ultimately reached." Last year, the former dual-weight UFC champion and his company "McGregor Sports and Entertainment" became part-owners of BKFC, which has since seen a stunning growth, staging events worldwide with McGregor often in attendance. However, not everyone is thrilled about the bare-knuckle fighting promotion. However, not everyone appears to be onboard with the promotion. Zempilas' comments were echoed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Speaking to Triple M, Albanese said: "A bit of common sense - you've got to look after people's health a bit and maybe save people from themselves. I just think we've got to be much more conscious about health issues." When asked directly about bare knuckle fighting, the Prime Minister replied: "It's a bit crazy!" BKFC President David Feldman had previously insisted that the event would still go ahead. The lineup was set to feature ex-UFC heavyweight Ben Rothwell against Aussie powerhouse Alex 'Godly Strong' Simon, and 'Rowdy' Bec Rawlings slated to face Jade event was set to take place at RAC Arena on July 19, but with calls for a ban heating up, it seems very likely that the BKFC will struggle to host an event in Australia. Recently, McGregor vowed to compete in BKFC despite the controversy. "Yes. Yes. The warrior spirit burns strong inside me," he said at a BKFC press conference in Italy earlier this year. "For sure. If you think I'm up here giving these speeches and leading these men into battle and I won't step in there myself, think again. For sure. Conor McGregor will fight in Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship – mark my words." "I would wish to be the Bare Knuckle world champion. That is a significant belt to hold in your career. Nobody from boxing to mixed martial arts can speak nothing bad on a Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship world champion. So for sure, I'd be coming in looking for the world title. "There are many bouts, showcase bouts you could say. Michael Perry, Mike Perry. You could say Jeremy Stephens. You could say a rematch against Eddie Alvarez. You could say many matches. But the lightweight title, who is the champion right now, lightweight or welterweight? Let's see. I'm open. We'll see when it comes."

Jon Jones reveals 'truth' as UFC star drops bombshell amid Tom Aspinall delay
Jon Jones reveals 'truth' as UFC star drops bombshell amid Tom Aspinall delay

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Jon Jones reveals 'truth' as UFC star drops bombshell amid Tom Aspinall delay

Jones and Aspinall have been deep in negotiations over a potential fight the last few months, but as of yet, nothing has been made official Jon Jones has b oastedthe UFC would rather have him as the undisputed heavyweight champion over Tom Aspinall. The American fighter has not been active since he clinched the heavyweight title in 2023, defeating Ciryl Gane with a first-round submission. Jones was set to defend his belt shortly after his victory over the Frenchman against Stipe Miocic, but he had to pull out due to a severe pectoral tendon injury sustained during training. ‌ Miocic was left waiting an entire year before the heavyweight dust-up was rescheduled. When they finally clashed, Jones dominated and secured a knockout win over Miocic in the third round in New York. Since then, the 37-year-old has been locked in talks for a potential fight with Aspinall. ‌ However, fans are becoming increasingly impatient with Jones' reluctance to commit to fighting the British fighter and there have been calls for him to be stripped of his title. In response, Jones has disclosed why the anticipated fight hasn't materialised yet. In a post uploaded to X - formerly known as Twitter - on Friday morning, 'Bones' explained that he had discussed his future with the UFC some time ago. "I spoke to the UFC a long time ago about what my future plans were. I haven't really worked out since my last fight in New York City. Honestly, I believe it's been in the UFC's best interest to keep presenting me as the company's champion—not Tom," he tweeted. "I've just been playing the role of the company man by doing nothing at all… and holding the position. And truthfully, it's been incredibly lucrative. I've made more money off of Tom being the interim champ than Tom has himself. It sucks to see the rest of the division get slowed down like this, but that has nothing to do with me. I don't pull the strings." After surprisingly admitting he has not trained regularly since his bout with Miocic, many are wondering if Jones has effectively retired. Ahead of UFC 316 on Saturday, fans voiced their discontent by calling for the heavyweight champion to be stripped of his title. A petition has been circulating, demanding Jones be officially stripped of his title, and has gained thousands of signatures. When asked about the petition, UFC commentator Jon Anik was interrupted by the audience at the press conference on Thursday evening, who chanted "strip Jon Jones" repeatedly, making their feelings clear. Anik eventually opened up about ongoing situation with Jones, saying: "So I think a fight between Jon Jones and Tom Aspinall is bigger if they are both champions. I'm hopeful they're going to fight in December in Las Vegas. I have no inside information. But I don't know that Jon Jones really gives a rip if they strip him of the heavyweight championship. He's still going to fight Tom, hopefully, and it's still going to be a bag."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store