logo
Trump's funding cut stalls water projects, increasing risks for millions

Trump's funding cut stalls water projects, increasing risks for millions

TimesLIVE3 days ago
US President Donald Trump administration's decision to slash nearly all US foreign aid has left dozens of water and sanitation projects half-finished across the globe, creating new hazards for some people they were designed to benefit, Reuters has found.
Reuters has identified 21 unfinished projects in 16 countries after speaking to 17 sources familiar with the infrastructure plans. Most projects have not previously been reported.
With hundreds of millions in funding cancelled since January, workers have put down their shovels and left holes half dug and building supplies unguarded, according to interviews with US and local officials and internal documents seen by Reuters.
As a result, millions of people who were promised clean drinking water and reliable sanitation facilities by the US have been left to fend for themselves.
In Mali, water towers intended to serve schools and health clinics have been abandoned, according to two US officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
In Nepal, construction was halted on more than 100 drinking water systems, leaving plumbing supplies and 6,500 bags of cement in local communities. The Himalayan nation will use its own funds to finish the job, according to the country's water minister Pradeep Yadav.
In Lebanon, a project to provide cheap solar power to water utilities was scrapped, costing 70 people their jobs and halting plans to improve regional services. The utilities are relying on diesel and other sources to power their services, said Suzy Hoayek, an adviser to Lebanon's energy ministry.
In Kenya, residents of Taita Taveta county said they are more vulnerable to flooding than they had been before as half-finished irrigation canals could collapse and sweep away crops. Community leaders said it will cost $2,000 (R35,430) to lower the risk, twice the average annual income in the area.
"I have no protection from the flooding the canal will cause. The floods will definitely get worse," said farmer Mary Kibachia, 74.
Trump's dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) has left life-saving food and medical aid rotting in warehouses and thrown humanitarian efforts around the world into turmoil. The cuts may cause an additional 14-million deaths by 2030, according to research published in The Lancet medical journal.
The Trump administration and its supporters argue the US should spend its money to benefit Americans at home rather than sending it abroad, and said USAID had strayed from its original mission by funding projects such as LGBTQI+ rights in Serbia.
With an annual budget of $450m (R7.9bn), the US water projects accounted for a small fraction of the $61bn (R1.08bn) in foreign aid distributed by the US last year.
Before Trump's reelection in November, the water projects had not been controversial in Washington. A 2014 law that doubled funding passed the two chambers of Congress unanimously.
Advocates said the US has over the years improved the lives of tens of millions of people by building pumps, irrigation canals, toilets and other water and sanitation projects. That means children are less likely to die of water-borne diseases such as diarrhoea, girls are more likely to stay in school and young men are less likely to be recruited by extremist groups, said John Oldfield, a consultant and lobbyist for water infrastructure projects.
'Do we want girls carrying water on their heads for their families? Or do you want them carrying school books?' he said.
The US state department, which has taken over foreign aid from USAID, did not respond to a request for comment about the impact of halting the water projects. The agency has restored some funding for life-saving projects, but secretary of state Marco Rubio has said American assistance will be more limited going forward. At least one water project has been restarted. Funding for a $6bn (R106.22bn) desalination plant in Jordan was restored after a diplomatic push by King Abdullah.
However, funding has not resumed for projects in other countries including Ethiopia, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), said people familiar with the programmes who spoke on condition of anonymity.
That means women in the areas will have to walk for hours to collect unsafe water, children will face increased disease risks and health facilities will be shuttered, said Tjada D'Oyen McKenna, CEO of Mercy Corps, a nonprofit that worked with USAID on water projects in the DRC, Nigeria and Afghanistan intended to benefit 1.7-million people.
'This isn't only the loss of aid, it's the unraveling of progress, stability and human dignity,' she said.
In eastern DRC, where fighting between DRC forces and M23 rebels has claimed thousands of lives, defunct USAID water kiosks serve as play areas for children.
Evelyne Mbaswa, 38, told Reuters her 16-year-old son went to fetch water in June and never came home, a familiar reality to families in the violence-wracked region.
'When we send young girls, they are raped, young boys are kidnapped. All this is because of the lack of water,' the mother of nine said.
A spokesperson for the DRC government did not respond to requests for comment. In Kenya, USAID was in the midst of a five-year, $100m (R1.77bn) project that aimed to provide drinking water and irrigation systems for 150,000 people when contractors and staffers were told in January to stop their work, according to internal documents seen by Reuters.
Only 15% of the work had been completed at that point, according to a May 15 memo by DAI Global LLC, the contractor on the project.
That has left open trenches and deep holes that pose acute risks for children and livestock and left $100,000 (R1.8m) worth of pipes, fencing and other materials exposed at construction sites, where they could degrade or be looted, according to other correspondence seen by Reuters. USAID signage at the sites makes clear who is responsible for the half-finished work, several memos said.
That could hurt the reputation of the US and potentially give a boost to extremist groups seeking fresh recruits in the region, according to a draft memo from the US embassy in Nairobi to the state department seen by Reuters.
The al-Qaeda-linked al Shabaab group based in Somalia has been responsible for high-profile attacks in Kenya, including an assault on a university in 2015 that killed at least 147 people.
"The reputational risk of not finishing the projects could turn into a security risk," the memo said.
In Kenya's Taita Taveta, a largely rural county that has endured cyclical drought and flooding, workers had only managed to build brick walls along 220m of the 3.1km irrigation canal when they were ordered to stop, community leaders said. Those walls have not been plastered, leaving them vulnerable to erosion.
'Without plaster, the walls will collapse in heavy rain and the flow of water will lead to the destruction of farms,' said Juma Kubo, a community leader.
The community has asked the Kenyan government and international donors to help finish the job at a projected cost of 68-million shillings (R9.3m).
They plan to sell the cement and steel cables left on site, Kubo said, to raise money to plaster and backfill the canal.
The county government needs to find "funds to at least finish the project to the degree we can with the materials we have, if not complete it fully," said Stephen Kiteto Mwagoti, an irrigation officer working for the county.
The Kenyan government did not respond to a request for comment.
For Kibachia, who has lived with flooding for years, help cannot come soon enough.
Three months after work stopped on the project, her mud hut was flooded with thigh-deep water.
"It was very bad this time. I had to use soil to level the floor of my house and patch up holes in the wall because of damage caused by the floods," she said.
'Where can I go? This is home.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mozambique seeks to prosecute opposition leader over post-election unrest
Mozambique seeks to prosecute opposition leader over post-election unrest

TimesLIVE

time30 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

Mozambique seeks to prosecute opposition leader over post-election unrest

Mozambique is seeking to prosecute the country's main opposition leader, Venancio Mondlane, over civil unrest that followed a disputed election last year, a document presented to Mondlane by prosecutors showed. Mondlane, who says President Daniel Chapo of the long-ruling Frelimo party won the election through vote-rigging, was summoned by prosecutors on Tuesday. He was shown the 40-page document laying out a series of accusations including that he incited the unrest. An adviser to Mondlane shared the document with Reuters on Wednesday and said the opposition politician denied all the prosecutors' accusations. Prosecutors in the resource-rich Southern African country declined to comment. The post-election protests, in which more than 300 people were killed, were the largest against Frelimo since independence from Portuguese colonial rule in 1975.

Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ
Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ

TimesLIVE

time30 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ

Brazil is finalising its submission to join South Africa's genocide case against Israel's actions in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, the foreign ministry said in a statement on Wednesday. South Africa filed a case in 2023 asking the ICJ to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. The case argues that in its war against Hamas militants, Israel's military actions go beyond targeting Hamas alone by attacking civilians, with strikes on schools, hospitals, camps and shelters. Other countries — including Spain, Turkey and Colombia — have also sought to join the case against Israel. In its statement, the Brazilian government accused Israel of violations of international law, 'such as the annexation of territories by force', and it expressed 'deep indignation' at violence suffered by the civilian population. Israel denies deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians, saying its sole interest is to annihilate Hamas. Lawyers for Israel have dismissed South Africa's case as an abuse of the genocide convention. The Israeli embassy in Brasilia said the Brazilian statement used 'harsh words that do not fully portray the reality of what is happening in Gaza,' while Brazil also 'completely ignored' the role of Hamas within Gaza's reality. Brazil's National Israeli association CONIB said in a statement in response to Wednesday's decision: 'The breaking of Brazil's long-standing friendship and partnership with Israel is a misguided move that proves the extremism of our foreign policy'. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has long been an outspoken critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, but Wednesday's decision carries added significance amid heightened tensions between Brazil and Israel ally the US. The Trump administration announced 50% tariffs on all Brazilian goods this month. A diplomat familiar with the thinking of the Lula administration told Reuters that Brazil does not believe its decision to join South Africa's case will affect its relationship with Washington. The US has opposed South Africa's genocide case under both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican. In February, Trump signed an executive order to cut US financial assistance to South Africa, citing in part its ICJ case.

US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship
US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship

A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that US President Donald Trump's executive order curtailing automatic birthright citizenship is unconstitutional and blocked its enforcement nationwide. The 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals marked the first time an appeals court has assessed the legality of Trump's order since the US Supreme Court in June curbed the power of lower court judges to enjoin that and other federal policies on a nationwide basis. The Supreme Court's June 27 ruling in litigation over Trump's birthright citizenship order limited the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directed lower courts that had blocked the Republican president's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions allowing courts to potentially still block it nationally again. That has already allowed a judge in New Hampshire to once again halt Trump's order from taking effect by issuing an injunction in a nationwide class action of children who would be denied citizenship under the policy. The 9th Circuit's majority in Wednesday's ruling said the Democratic-led states that had sued to block the policy — Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon — likewise still were entitled to a nationwide injunction as a more narrow order would not provide them 'complete relief'. 'The court agrees that the president cannot redefine what it means to be American with the stroke of a pen,' Washington attorney-general Nick Brown said in a statement. The Trump administration could either ask a wider panel of 9th Circuit judges to hear the case or appeal directly to the Supreme Court, which is expected to have the final word in the litigation. 'We look forward to being vindicated on appeal,' said White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson. In a statement, she said the 9th Circuit misinterpreted the US constitution's 14th Amendment in reaching its decision. Trump signed the order on January 20, his first day back in office, as part of his hardline approach towards immigration. Trump's order directed federal agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a 'green card' holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys-general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognise that virtually anyone born in the US is a citizen. The constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship clause states that all 'persons born or naturalised in the US, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the US and of the state wherein they reside'. The first judge to block Trump's directive was Seattle-based US District judge John Coughenour, an appointee of Republican president Ronald Reagan, who called it 'blatantly unconstitutional'. The 9th Circuit's ruling upheld his decision. US Circuit judge Ronald Gould, writing for Wednesday's majority, said Coughenour rightly concluded that Trump's executive order violated the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th Amendment by denying citizenship to many persons born in the US. Gould said a geographically limited injunction would harm the four states by forcing them to overhaul their government benefits programmes to account for how people denied citizenship under Trump's order might move into them. 'It is impossible to avoid this harm absent a uniform application of the citizenship clause throughout the US,' Gould wrote. His opinion was joined by US Circuit judge Michael Hawkins, a fellow appointee of Democratic president Bill Clinton. US Circuit judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee, dissented, saying in his view the Democratic-led states lacked standing to challenge Trump's order, as he warned of the risks of 'judicial overreach'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store