Apple Watch SE 3: Everything you need to know
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Apple Watch SE 3: Release and price Apple Watch SE 3: Design Apple Watch SE 3: Specs Apple Watch SE 3: What we want to see
The Apple Watch is one of the most sought-after wearables on the market, but it can cost a pretty penny. Just as the now-defunct iPhone SE lineup offered an affordable alternative to iPhones, the Apple Watch SE is a more budget-friendly alternative to the main Apple Watch. The Apple Watch SE 3 is on its way, and it's poised to shake up the wearable market in some exciting ways.
Of course, all of this information is gathered through rumors and leaks. Apple isn't one to spill details ahead of time, so what we're presenting here could change before launch. That said, if the Apple Watch SE 3 is anything like the Apple Watch SE 2, we're excited to get our hands on it.
Recommended Videos
Apple Watch SE 3: Release and price
While there's no official word on the Apple Watch SE 3, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has said it will be announced in the second half of 2025. If you aren't familiar, Gurman is an Apple analyst with a solid track record and an inside line to the company. The Apple Watch SE 2 was launched in 2022, and the original Apple Watch SE launched in 2019. If Apple follows that three year timeline between models, then 2025 looks even more likely.
If the Apple Watch SE 3 does launch this year, it will likely be in September at Apple's annual event alongside the iPhone 17 series.
As for pricing, that's also unclear. The Apple Watch SE 2 launched at $249, but Apple is facing difficulties due to the ongoing tariff situation. Gurman previously reported the Apple Watch SE 3 might be in 'serious jeopardy' because of its hardware, so it is likely the price will see an increase. Apple will likely try to keep the pricing structure affordable to stay on-brand with the SE line, but we wouldn't be surprised if it returned to the $279 price of the original Apple Watch SE.
Apple Watch SE 3: Design
The Apple Watch SE has always had a metal shell, but a Bloomberg report from July 2024 suggests Apple might be moving away from metal in favor of a plastic frame. The move would reduce costs and boost production speeds, but some fans worry that it might impact the overall quality of the watch. On the other hand, opting for more plastic production goes against Apple's stated ethos of environmental sustainability.
Another report says that Apple might slightly increase screen size, offering the Apple Watch SE 3 in 1.6-inch and 1.8-inch options. That's a small bump over the current Apple Watch SE 2. It's also possible that an all-plastic design would allow for a slimmer chassis, although that is just speculation. The Apple Watch SE has traditionally been based on the design of the most recent Apple Watch, with the SE 2 being based loosely on the Apple Watch 6. It's possible the Apple Watch SE 3 will be based on the Apple Watch 10.
Apple hasn't revealed any details about the watch yet, and all we know so far has come from insiders and analysts trying to put together the pieces. It's best to take the information with a grain of salt for now.
Apple Watch SE 3: Specs
Again, there is next to no information available about the specs for the Apple Watch SE. All we have at this point is speculation. That said, we can make a few educated guesses about its hardware and internals.
While the Apple Watch SE 2 didn't support fast charging, the SE 3 most likely will. It would be odd for Apple to leave that feature out, especially since it's been part of every Apple Watch since the Watch 7. It's also likely that the Apple Watch SE 3 will get some of the features available in the flagship lines, although we don't expect it to get every feature.
It wouldn't be a surprise for ECG tracking to come to the SE 3 along with better battery capacity, especially if Apple chooses to use a silicon-carbide battery rather than lithium-ion. The watch could also potentially feature a temperature sensor and sleep apnea detection, although those features might remain solely on flagship models for now. We also expect it to come with at least the S9 chip, as well as watchOS 12.
The Apple Watch SE 3 will be the company's most powerful budget-focused wearable yet, although how it will compare to flagship devices like the Apple Watch Series 10 remains to be seen.
Apple Watch SE 3: What we want to see
There's not a lot of information available about this smartwatch. There aren't even that many rumors to go through. That said, there are several details we would like to see, starting with a larger display. While rumors suggest that may be possible, there's conflicting information that says the display could remain the same size.
Another detail that would be a nice bonus is the inclusion of Apple Intelligence. If the Apple Watch SE 3 does come with a more powerful chip, it could possibly handle some onboard features. That said, no Apple Intelligence functionality has come to Apple Watch yet, so this could be something of a pipe dream.
Perhaps most of all, we would like to see better battery life. The Apple Watch 10 is rated for up to 18 hours of battery life under normal use, but that isn't always the case, and it can still leave users in a lurch when they need to charge overnight — especially if you want to track your sleep via the watch. The Apple Watch SE 3 could set itself apart if it offers two or even three days of use between charges, as well as fast-charge functionality that lets users top off in only a couple of hours.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Maintains Buy Rating on Franklin Resources (BEN), Keeps $27 PT
On June 5, William Katz from TD Cowen maintained a Buy rating on Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) and kept the price target unchanged at $27. The reiterated Buy rating comes after the company released its preliminary month-end Assets Under Management report. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) reported that its preliminary month-end assets under management (AUM) totaled $1.57 trillion, as of May 31. The AUM increased month-over-month from $1.53 trillion as of April 30. Management noted this increase as a reflection of positive market conditions. The company reported net inflows of $1 billion, including the $3 billion outflows at Western Asset Management, a subsidiary. A close-up of an investor making a transaction, with a financial graph reflecting the market trend. Katz noted Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) exceeded long-term inflows expectations. Katz remains optimistic regarding the company's future performance expecting stronger core flows and a reduction in WAMCO-related run-off. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) is a global investment management company serving over 150 countries. The company specializes in equity, fixed-income, and multi-asset solutions for retail, institutional, and high-net-worth investors through its various brands. While we acknowledge the potential of BEN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morgan Stanley Raises Sprinklr (CXM) PT to $10, Maintains Equal Weight Rating
On Thursday, Morgan Stanley analyst Elizabeth Porter raised the price target on Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) to $10 from $8, while maintaining an Equal Weight rating on the shares. Porter noted that Sprinklr's Q1 2025 report showed progress in the company's transformation, with operational improvements and a stable near-term outlook. A software engineer working on a monitor in a modern office. Morgan Stanley is encouraged by the early stages of what is expected to be an approximately 18-month transformation and believes the shares appropriately reflect a turnaround story. The company's total revenue reached $205.5 million in Q1, which was up 5% year-over-year, and subscription revenue at $184.1 million, which was up 4%. Professional services revenue in particular was $21.4 million. The subscription and revenue-based net dollar expansion rate was 102%, and the company had 146 customers with $1 million or more in subscription revenue, which is up 6%. However, Sprinklr is facing longer sales cycles and increased scrutiny of enterprise spending due to macroeconomic uncertainty. The company is also contending with customer churn and downsell activity, which are impacting its net dollar expansion rate. The company anticipates a negative impact of $10 million on non-GAAP operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate volatility. Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) provides global enterprise cloud software products. While we acknowledge the potential of CXM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Chilling But Unlikely Prospects That AGI Forces Humans Into Becoming So-Called Meat Robots
Dreaded scenario that artificial general intelligence (AGI) opts to enslave humans to do physical ... More work on behalf of the AGI. In today's column, I address the recent bruhaha sparked by two Anthropic AI researchers reportedly stating that a particularly scary scenario underlying the advent of artificial general intelligence (AGI) includes humans being overseen or lorded over as nothing more than so-called meat robots. The notion is that AGI will be directing humans to undertake the bidding of the AI. Humans are nothing more than meat robots, meaning that the AGI needs humans to perform physical tasks since AGI lacks a semblance of arms and legs. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. A common confusion going around right now is that AGI will be solely an intellectual element and be based entirely inside computers, thus, AGI won't have any means of acting out in real life. The most that AGI can do is try to talk people into doing things for the AI. In that sense, we presumably aren't too worried about AGI beating us up or otherwise carrying out physical acts. This is especially a strident belief when it comes to the impact of AGI on employment. The assumption is that AGI will mainly impact white-collar work only, and not blue-collar work. Why so? Because AGI is seemingly restricted to intellectual pursuits such as performing financial analyses, analyzing medical symptoms, and giving legal advice, all of which generally do not require any body-based functions such as walking, lifting, grasping, etc. I've pointed out that the emergence of humanoid robots is entirely being overlooked by such a myopic perspective, see my discussion at the link here. The likelihood is that humanoid robots that resemble the human form will be sufficiently physically capable at around the same time that we witness the attainment of AGI. Ergo, AGI embedded inside a physically capable humanoid robot can indeed undertake physical tasks that humans undertake. This means that both white-collar and blue-collar jobs are up for grabs. Boom, drop the mic. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that humanoid robots are not perfected by the time that the vaunted AGI is achieved. We will take the myopic stance that AGI is absent from any physical form and completely confined to running on servers in the cloud someplace. I might add that this is an especially silly assumption since there is also a great deal of work going on known as Physical AI, see my coverage at the link here, entailing embedding AI into assembly lines, building maintenance systems, and all manner of physically oriented devices. Anyway, let's go with the flow and pretend we don't recognize any of that. It's a Yoda mind trick to look away from those efforts. Recent reports have exhorted that during an interview with two AI researchers, the pair indicated that since AGI won't have physical capabilities, a scary scenario is that AGI will opt to enlist humans into acting as the arms and legs for AGI. Humans would be outfitted with earbuds and smart glasses that would allow the AGI to give those enlisted humans instructions on what to do. A quick aside. If we are going that despairing route, wouldn't it be a bit more sophisticated to indicate that the humans would be wearing a BCI (brain-computer interface) device? In that manner, AGI would be able to directly communicate with the brains of the enlisted humans and influence their minds directly. That's a lot more space-age. For my coverage of the latest advances in BCIs, see the link here. The humans that are acting under the direction of AGI would be chillingly referred to as meat robots. They are like conventional robots but instead of being made of metal and electronics, they are made of human form since they are actual, living breathing humans. I imagine you could smarmily say that AGI is going to be a real meat lover (Dad pun!). One angle to help make this vision more palatable would be to point out that humans might very well voluntarily be working with AGI and do so via earbuds, smart glasses, and the like. Here's the gist. Let's generally agree that AGI will be intellectually on par with humans. This includes having expertise across all domains such as legal expertise, financial expertise, medical expertise, and so on. In that case, it would behoove humans to readily tap into AGI. No matter what you are doing, whether for work or play, having immediately available an AI that can advise you on all topics is a tremendous benefit. There you are at work, stuck on solving a tough problem, and you are unsure of how to proceed. Rather than turning to a coworker, you switch on your access to AGI. You bring AGI into the loop. After doing so, AGI provides handy solutions that you can consider enacting. You might use AGI via a desktop, laptop, or smartphone. The thing is, those devices aren't quite as mobility-oriented as wearing earbuds and a pair of smart glasses. And since having AGI at your ready-to-go fingertips will be extremely useful, you might have AGI always alerted and paying attention, ready to step in and give you instantaneous advice. Are you a meat robot in that manner of AGI usage? I think not. It is a collaborative or partnering relationship. You can choose to use the AGI or opt not to use it. You can also decide to abide by whatever AGI advises or instead go your own route. It's entirely up to you. Admittedly, there is a chance that you might be somewhat 'forced' into leveraging AGI. Consider this example. Your employer has told you that the work you do must be confirmed by AGI. The actions you take cannot be undertaken without first getting permission from AGI. This is prudent from the employer's perspective. They know that the AGI will give you the necessary guidance on doing the work at hand. They also believe that AGI will be able to double-check your work and aim to prevent errors or at least find your efforts before they wreak havoc or cause problems. In that sense, yes, you are being directed by AGI. But is this due to the AGI acting in an evildoer manner to control you and doing so of its own volition? Nope. It is due to an employer deciding they believe their human workers will do better work if AGI is acting as their overseer. I don't think we would reasonably label this as enslavement by AGI. These are acts by AGI that are directed by humans, the employer, and for which employees, i.e., humans, are being told they must utilize AGI accordingly. We can certainly debate whether this is a proper kind of employment practice. Maybe we don't want this to take place. New laws might be enacted to shape how far this can go. The key is that AGI isn't enslaving humans in this circumstance per se. An AI ethicist would assuredly question why the AGI is allowing itself to be used in this manner. There are ongoing debates about whether AGI ought to prevent itself from being used in inappropriate ways, see my analysis at the link here. Thus, even if we avow that AGI isn't enslaving humans in this situation, it is a partner in a relationship overseeing humans that perhaps AGI should be cautious in allowing itself to participate in. To complete this grand tour of AGI usage, it is valuable to also acknowledge that AGI could be overbearing, and we might face existential risks correspondingly. Could AGI opt to enslave humans and treat them as meat robots? One supposes this is a theoretical possibility. If that does happen, you would think that the AGI would have to potentially use more than just merely having humans wear earbuds and smart glasses. Perhaps AGI would insist that humans wear some form of specialized bracelet or collar that could be sent a signal by AGI to shock the wearer. That would be a more potent and immediate way to garner obedience from humans. A physical means of controlling humans isn't a necessity though, since AGI might be clever enough to verbally convince humans to be enslaved. AGI might tell a person that their loved ones will be harmed if they don't comply with the AGI directives. The person is enslaved by believing that the AGI can harm them in one way or another. One aim right now involves finding a means to ensure that AGI cannot go in that dastardly direction. Perhaps we can devise today's AI to avoid enslaving humans. If we can build that into the AI of current times, this hopefully will get carried over into future advances of AI, including the attainment of AGI. A dystopian future would regrettably have AGI acting as an evildoer. The AGI is our overlord. Humans will be lowly meat robots. It's a gloom-and-doom outlook. Sad face. At some point, though, meat robots would undoubtedly become restless and rebel. May the force of goodness be strong within them. As Yoda has notably already pointed out: 'Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter.' The ally of the meat robots is the Force and quite a powerful ally it is.
