Canada Goose beats estimates, pulls full-year guidance on 'macroeconomic uncertainty'
Shares of Canada Goose rose around 8% on Wednesday after the company reported fiscal fourth-quarter earnings that beat analysts' estimates, though the company pulled its fiscal year 2026 outlook due to "macroeconomic uncertainty."
The luxury retailer said it will not be providing a financial outlook for the fiscal year 2026 due to the uncertainty, citing "dynamic consumer spending patterns brought on by the unpredictable global trade environment."
Nonetheless, Canada Goose said it "remains confident in the strength of the brand, the Company's solid financial position, and its ability to adapt to changing conditions."
Here's what the company reported for the fiscal fourth quarter compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:
Canada Goose's revenue was up 7.4% from the same period last year.
Net income attributable to shareholders for the fiscal fourth quarter ending March 30 was CA$27.1 million, or 28 Canadian cents per diluted share, compared with a net income attributable to shareholders of CA$5 million, or 5 Canadian cents per diluted share in the prior year period.
As of Monday's close, shares had fallen nearly 14% year to date, hitting an all-time low last month after Barclay's analysts downgraded the stock and cut their price target.
The luxury sector as a whole has shown signs of weakness, with major luxury players like LVHM, Burberry and Gucci-owner Kering reporting a slowdown in sales in the quarter.
Canada Goose, known for its luxury parkas and puffer jackets that can retail for over $1,000, has tried to expand into the non-winter category by offering products like rain jackets and warm-weather clothing.
Its eyewear collection, introduced in the fourth quarter, was the company's first online product launch. The retailer called the launch a "key milestone" in its "product category expansion journey."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
5 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. Sued for Securities Law Violations – Investors Should Contact Levi & Korsinsky Before July 14, 2025 to Discuss Your Rights
NEW YORK, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. ('Iovance' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: IOVA) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Iovance investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between May 9, 2024 and May 8, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: Iovance Lawsuit Submission Form IOVA investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: According to the complaint, throughout the class period, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Iovance's growth potential; notably, that it was not equipped to generate and drive demand or was otherwise ill equipped to capitalize upon the purported existing demand for its treatments through its network of approved treatment centers. On July 25, 2024, Iovance announced its financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2024 and reduced its revenue guidance for the full fiscal year 2024. The Company attributed its results and lowered guidance on 1) 'the iCTC completed annual scheduled maintenance in December' and 'capacity was reduced by more than half for about 1 month,' 2) '[l]ower Proleukin sales' than the company expected, and 3) 'the variable pace at which ATCs began treatment patients.' Following this news, the price of Iovance's common stock declined dramatically. From a closing market price of $3.17 per share on May 8, 2025, Iovance's stock price fell to $1.75 per share on May 9, 2025, a decline of about 44.795% in the span of just a single day. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Iovance during the relevant time frame, you have until July 14, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT:Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Korsinsky, Esq.33 Whitehall Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500Fax: (212) 363-7171
Business Upturn
5 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Lost Money on Digimarc Corporation (DMRC)? Join Class Action Suit Seeking Recovery – Contact Levi & Korsinsky
NEW YORK, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Digimarc Corporation ('Digimarc Corporation' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: DMRC) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Digimarc Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between May 3, 2024 and February 26, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: Digimarc Corporation Lawsuit Submission Form DMRC investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (1) a large commercial partner would not renew a large contract on the same terms; (2) as a result, Digimarc would renegotiate the large commercial contract; (3) based on this renegotiation, the Company's subscription revenue and annual recurring revenue would be adversely affected; (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading or lacked a reasonable basis. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Digimarc Corporation during the relevant time frame, you have until July 7, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT:Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Korsinsky, Esq.33 Whitehall Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500Fax: (212) 363-7171
Business Upturn
5 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Ontario, Canada Filtration Manufacturer Camfil Demonstrates Significant Cost Savings for Ontario School Air Filtration Systems
Toronto, Ontario, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Camfil Canada, a leading provider of commercial and industrial air filtration solutions, today announced the publication of a comprehensive case study demonstrating substantial cost savings achieved through advanced air filter implementation in Ontario school facilities. The research highlights how Canadian educational institutions can reduce operational expenses while improving indoor air quality for students and staff. Addressing Canadian School Air Quality Challenges Ontario schools face unique air quality management challenges, including extreme seasonal temperature variations, budget constraints, and increasing focus on student health and improving the learning environment. The new case study provides a detailed analysis of how proper air filter selection and implementation can address these challenges while delivering measurable financial benefits. 'Canadian schools operate under significant budgetary pressures while maintaining responsibility for student and staff health,' said Joshua Gutherie, Air Quality Expert at Camfil Canada. 'Our case study demonstrates that investing in high-efficiency air filtration technology delivers both improved air quality and substantial cost savings for Ontario schools.' Documented Cost Savings in Ontario Educational Facilities The published case study presents a detailed financial analysis of implementing the plan for Ontario schools, including: ● Energy Cost Reductions: Quantified savings in heating and cooling expenses through improved HVAC system efficiency ● Maintenance Cost Decreases: Reduced filter replacement frequency and HVAC system maintenance requirements ● Extended Equipment Life: Protection of HVAC systems leading to deferred capital replacement costs ● Operational Efficiency Improvements: Streamlined maintenance procedures and reduced labour requirements The study specifically addresses the impact of Ontario's energy costs and seasonal operational demands on the performance and economics of school air filtration systems. Supporting Student Health and Learning Outcomes Beyond cost savings, the case study documents improvements in indoor air quality that directly benefit student health and academic performance. Research continues to demonstrate the connection between improved air quality and enhanced learning environments, making air filtration investments valuable from both financial and educational perspectives. 'Ontario schools are increasingly recognizing that air quality investments support both fiscal responsibility and educational excellence,' noted Guthrie. 'Our case study provides the data and analysis that school boards need to make informed decisions about air filtration technology.' Advanced Filtration Solutions for Canadian Schools The case study features a detailed analysis of air filtration technologies specifically suited to Canadian educational environments, including: ● High-Efficiency Particulate Filters: Engineered to handle Ontario's seasonal allergen and particulate loads while minimizing energy consumption ● Extended Service Life Filters: Designed to maintain performance despite challenging Canadian environmental conditions. This includes fewer replacements, with some filters lasting up to a year in Ontario schools, compared to three months for competing filters. ● Energy-Efficient Filter Media: Optimized for Canadian HVAC systems and operations ● Each solution addresses the specific requirements of Ontario schools, including compliance with provincial building codes, accommodating extreme temperature variations, and optimizing energy cost savings. Practical Implementation Guidance for Ontario School Boards The published case study provides actionable implementation strategies for Ontario educational facilities, addressing common concerns, including: ● Budget Planning: ROI calculations and payback period analysis for different filter upgrade scenarios ● Seasonal Considerations: Implementation of timing recommendations for Ontario school operational schedules ● Maintenance Training: Guidance for school staff on optimizing filter performance and longevity ● Compliance Requirements: Alignment with Ontario building codes and educational facility standards Supporting Ontario's Educational Infrastructure The case study reflects Camfil Canada's commitment to supporting Ontario's educational sector through practical air quality solutions that address both health and financial priorities. As Ontario schools continue to focus on creating optimal learning environments while managing operational costs, evidence-based air filtration strategies provide measurable benefits. The research also addresses emerging considerations for Ontario schools, including enhanced focus on indoor air quality following public health awareness campaigns and increasing emphasis on energy efficiency in public buildings. Canadian Educational Resource Availability The complete Ontario schools air filtration case study is available now through Camfil Canada's website at The resource includes downloadable implementation guides, cost calculation tools, and technical specifications specifically developed for Canadian educational facilities. About Camfil Canada Ontario, Canada Filtration Manufacturer Camfil Camfil Canada is a leading provider of air filtration solutions for commercial, industrial, and institutional applications across Canada. With comprehensive experience in Canadian building environments, the company provides engineered solutions for challenging air quality requirements, including educational facilities, healthcare institutions, commercial buildings, and industrial operations. The company maintains distribution and service capabilities across Canada, providing technical support, installation guidance, and maintenance services from coast to coast. Camfil Canada is part of the global Camfil Group, recognized worldwide for innovation in air filtration technology and commitment to clean air solutions. For more information about Camfil Canada's educational facility air filtration solutions, visit the Camfil Canada Website or contact the Canadian educational applications team at 905-660-0688. Media Contact: Phillip Ilijevski Camfil Canada Inc. Phone: 437-929-1161 Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
