Ex-employee accuses Mathews Phosa of harassment, covert surveillance and public smear campaign
Image: Bongiwe Mchunu
A high-profile legal battle is set to unfold in the North Gauteng High Court next week. It involves serious allegations of harassment, unlawful surveillance, and manipulation of legal and media systems.
The case pits Jan Hendrik Stephanus Venter against prominent attorney and political figure Dr Mathews Phosa, with Venter claiming R25 million in damages for emotional trauma, reputational harm, and ongoing threats to his safety and dignity.
In an urgent affidavit filed with the court, Venter, who claimed to be Phosa's former employee, recounts in his founding affidavit a harrowing incident that he says marks the beginning of a pattern of malicious conduct.
Papers filed with the court state: 'One day before a meeting at the offices of his colleague, Ulrich Roux, I was taken into a bathroom and forced to strip naked under the pretext that I may have been wearing surveillance devices.
'I was in tears, traumatised, and emotionally destroyed. Others saw my condition in the boardroom immediately afterwards, including Mr Roux.'
Venter alleges that despite reporting criminal charges against a second respondent, the case 'went nowhere - no doubt due to his legal connections and influence'.
He accuses Phosa of orchestrating malicious media campaigns to discredit him, including arranging for legal papers to be served.
At the same time, he claimed he was incarcerated, falsely implicating him in a defamation case linked to the book 'Predator Politics'.
Venter claims that Phosa arranged for a media outlet to publish an article falsely portraying him as a 'secret weapon' supporting Phosa's legal battles — a story Venter describes as 'a malicious manipulation of facts' designed to damage his credibility.
'Only Dr Phosa could have supplied that false information to the journalist, as I had no access to media or communications while incarcerated,' Venter asserted.
He also detailed promises made by Phosa to support him financially and legally, promises which he says were never fulfilled, highlighting a pattern of betrayal and exploitation.
In response, Phosa expressed shock, telling IOL that he was never formally served with any legal summons and was unaware of the case's specifics.
'If a person intends to litigate, they must ensure we receive the summons first. We know he is currently in jail… so it is difficult to respond to something we don't know,' he said.
The third respondent, whom Venter accuses of persistent threats and unlawful surveillance, is also under scrutiny.
Venter claimed that this individual made verbal threats, employed intimidation tactics, and implied constant surveillance, contributing to his ongoing distress.
Venter's affidavit paints a bleak picture: 'I have lost all income, assets, and savings; I cannot find meaningful employment due to the reputational damage; I have been left without food, transport, housing security, or medication.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Another one bites the dust: FF Plus joins boycott of ANC's National Dialogue
The Freedom Front Plus joins AfriForum and Solidarity in boycotting Friday's National Dialogue, citing the ANC's refusal to abandon 'failed' economic and foreign policy directions. Image: File photo: Jacoline Prinsloo The Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) has also withdrawn from the Presidency's planned National Dialogue set for Friday, 15 August 2025. This announcement follows similar decisions by civil rights groups AfriForum and Solidarity, who also declared their intentions to boycott the event. The FF Plus highlighted the African National Congress's (ANC) continued commitment to 'failed' policies as the key reason behind their withdrawal. In a statement on Tuesday, the party emphasised its belief in dialogue but criticised the ANC's role in the process. "South Africa desperately needs meaningful, reasoned and solution-oriented dialogue – and the Freedom Front Plus will gladly participate in such a dialogue," said FF Plus leader Dr Corne Mulder. 'Unfortunately, it has become abundantly clear that the ANC, as the largest party in the Government of National Unity (GNU), is not ready to have a genuine, reasoned and solution-oriented dialogue.' The party pointed to comments by ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula, who stated that the ANC would not shift from its current economic and foreign policies. The FF Plus argues that these policies, including Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), expropriation without compensation, and cadre deployment, are at the heart of South Africa's economic decline. 'The root causes of South Africa's economic decline are no secret,' the party said. 'Failed ANC policies coupled with corruption and cadre deployment have destroyed state institutions and municipalities.' Mulder added that the ANC had 'a golden opportunity' after the 2024 elections to prove it could work collaboratively, but instead 'chose to double down on its outdated policies.' 'The results of the 2024 general elections clearly indicate that voters have lost confidence in the ANC and are no longer willing to trust the ANC to govern alone,' said Mulder. 'A political party with such a mindset and approach cannot act as a credible facilitator for the Presidency or a participant in a national dialogue.' The FF Plus also blamed the ANC's 'ideologically driven' foreign policy for South Africa's worsening international relations, including the recent imposition of 30% trade tariffs by the United States. The party said that, while it would not participate directly, its Chief Executive Officer, Pieter de Necker, has been instructed to attend the National Dialogue as an observer. It further called on other GNU parties to work together in finding 'practical solutions that prioritise South Africa's interests.' 'Truth be told, it may be time to conduct an honest national dialogue involving all those who are serious about progress and have South Africa's best interests at heart – without the ANC,' said Mulder. Mulder said the party would continue to 'fight for a country where merit and opportunities, not outdated ideologies and political agendas, set the tone.' At a press briefing held on Tuesday, AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel stated that both AfriForum and Solidarity are withdrawing because the dialogue has been 'captured' by the ANC and President Cyril Ramaphosa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'The national dialogue has become an ANC monologue. They want to dictate the agenda. The crisis we're facing is due to years of ANC mismanagement — how can we trust them to prescribe the solution?' said Kriel. Kriel said the organisations would instead focus on community-level dialogues and practical cooperation with groups such as the Barolong, Busuleka, Namabele, and Bakgatla communities. Solidarity CEO Dr Dirk Hermann also said the ANC had lost the trust of the public and called the process a "state-sponsored ANC revival project." 'People do not want to talk to the ANC. The real dialogue already started at the ballot box in 2024. We will continue dialogue — but not with the government,' Hermann said. He added that Solidarity would engage with unions, civic groups, and cultural communities to discuss alternatives beyond the current government structure. Several highly respected foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, and Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, also announced their withdrawal last Friday. In a joint statement, they said: 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately shifted towards government control.' They expressed regret but stressed the need to protect the credibility and integrity of the dialogue process. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
The Herald
3 hours ago
- The Herald
AfriForum, Solidarity withdraw from national dialogue first convention
'In addition, agreements that were reached have often been broken shortly thereafter by the ANC, only for them to stumble along alone in its socialist dead-end street, dragging the country with it.' The group said it would adopt a 'wait and see' approach to the national dialogue while engaging with cultural communities to address the country's issues. 'We are too busy trying to address the consequences of failed ANC policies, and do not have the time to listen to their outdated blame politics and a repetition of unimaginative ideas for weeks and months on end. 'Our experience is that 'community dialogues' can bear more fruit than a state dialogue, and discussions between communities yield more practical results. That is why we plan, in co-operation with other cultural communities, to submit a position on the country's pressing issues to the national dialogue, but we will not participate on Friday.' Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann said the ANC wants to pursue its own agendas with the dialogue that has been happening in communities. 'People talk at workplaces, around the braai, at sporting events and in churches about a yearning for a different dispensation. The state hears this and wants to hijack that spontaneous community dialogue. 'It was conceived in the Union Buildings by the president. The moment that happened, the national dialogue was stillborn.'
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa-Mbeki feud reignites as foundations withdraw from National Dialogue
Analysts say the roots of the tension lie in ANC negotiations of the early 1990s, when Mbeki was replaced as chief negotiator by Ramaphosa. The renewed feud between President Cyril Ramaphosa and former president Thabo Mbeki dates back to before 1994 and their disagreement over preparations for the upcoming national convention has opened old wounds, experts say. Political analyst Sandile Swana and University of South Africa political scientist Prof Dirk Kotzé said the tension between the two leaders started during negotiations in 1990s for the new democratic dispensation. Foundations withdraw from dialogue preparations They were reacting to the decisions by six legacy foundations – the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Oliver & Adelaide Tambo Foundation and Desmond & Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation – to withdraw from the National Dialogue preparations. The foundations said the convention has deviated from the plan to have the process led by civil society, or citizens. Instead, matters were being rushed without proper consultation by the government, which had centralised the process. Ramaphosa said this week's convention would go ahead as planned, implying it would move on without the foundations' participation. Roots of the rivalry in the 1990s negotiations The experts said the tension between Mbeki and Ramaphosa was exacerbated when Mbeki, as the ANC's first chief negotiator assisted by Jacob Zuma, were removed and replaced with Ramaphosa, who was assisted by Mohammed Valli Moosa. ANC insiders at the time saw this as a snub for Mbeki and Zuma and an embrace of Ramaphosa, whom they claimed emerged from nowhere into Nelson Mandela's inner circle after his release from jail. ALSO READ: National Dialogue will go ahead despite withdrawal of foundations, Ramaphosa says Ramaphosa was subsequently elected ANC secretary-general at the party's 48th national conference in 1991, succeeding Alfred Nzo. Mandela wanted Ramaphosa as his deputy and successor as president, but the ANC old guard wanted Mbeki, who was Oliver Tambo's right-hand man in exile. Mandela gave in to the majority within the party and was further convinced by Kenneth Kaunda and other Southern African Development Community leaders that Mbeki was the right candidate to succeed him, as that was part of Tambo's plan. Role of the ANC's left wing and SACP Kotzé said Mbeki's removal as ANC chief negotiator was engineered by the left within the ANC, especially Joe Slovo and other senior SA Communist Party (SACP) leaders. The left saw Mbeki as unreliable because, as a then SACP politburo member in exile, he acted against the party's position for a total insurrection against apartheid when he held secret talks with Afrikaner delegations for a negotiated settlement. Possible reasons for Mbeki's recent withdrawal Kotzé said Mbeki was fully involved in the dialogue with Afrikaners and the National Intelligence Service before 1990, but this was opposed by the SACP leadership, of which Mbeki was part. Subsequently, Mbeki did not continue his SACP membership. 'Because of that history, the SACP, particularly Joe Slovo, made it impossible for him to be the chief negotiator of the ANC. 'Instead, they got Ramaphosa in as ANC chief negotiator. From a Mbeki perspective, those things he would never forget. I don't want to suggest there is open hostility; at the same time, there is no close friendship,' he said. ALSO READ: National Dialogue must be place for 'women to raise their voices', Ramaphosa says Kotzé said, he could only speculate that Mbeki's decision to pull out of the National Dialogue process was because he saw himself as an initiator of it. 'He is almost a father figure of this. My impression is that the foundations were initially very prominent in the preparations and very recently, the government took over. 'This is exactly what the foundations, the Mbeki Foundation specifically or Mbeki himself, do not like.'
