&w=3840&q=100)
US Supreme Court upholds Mississippi social media age verification law
The justices rejected an emergency appeal from a tech industry group, NetChoice, that is challenging laws passed in Mississippi and other states that require social media users to verify their ages. The court had been asked to keep the law on hold while a lawsuit plays out.
There were no noted dissents from the brief, unsigned order. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote to say that NetChoice could eventually succeed in showing that the law is indeed unconstitutional.
Kavanaugh said he nevertheless agreed with the court's decision because the tech group had not shown it would suffer legal harm if the measure went into effect as the lawsuit unfolded.
NetChoice argues that the Mississippi law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages.
A federal judge agreed and prevented the 2024 law from taking effect. But a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled in July that the law could be enforced while the lawsuit proceeds.
It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country.
Parents and even some teenagers are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media use on young people. Supporters of the new laws have said they are needed to help curb the explosive use of social media among young people, and what researchers say is an associated increase in depression and anxiety.
Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch told the justices that age verification could help protect young people from sexual abuse, trafficking, physical violence, sextortion, and more, activities that Fitch noted are not protected by the First Amendment.
NetChoice represents some of the country's most high-profile technology companies, including Google, which owns YouTube; Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
NetChoice has filed similar lawsuits in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio and Utah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Don't link J&K's statehood to terror, Omar says day after SC's Pahalgam reference
Omar Abdullah (File photo) SRINAGAR: Chief minister Omar Abdullah decried Friday the practice of tying terror attacks to J&K's political fate and asserted that Pakistan should not be allowed to influence it through terrorism, a day after Supreme Court observed that 'incidents like Pahalgam' must be considered when deciding on statehood. 'Will the killers of Pahalgam and their masters in the neighbouring country decide whether we will be a state?' Omar said in his Independence Day speech, his first since taking office last Oct and the first by a CM since Article 370's abrogation and J&K's conversion into a Union territory Aug 2019. Speaking at Srinagar's Bakshi Stadium, Omar termed SC's reference to Pahalgam 'unfortunate' and asked: 'What kind of justice is it? Every time we are close to statehood, they will do something to sabotage it. Is this fair? Why are we being punished for a crime in which we had no role?' He pointed out that 'J&K's residents from Kathua to Kupwara' had protested the Pahalgam massacre of April 22 in which 26 people, mostly tourists, were gunned down. The CM announced a signature campaign across all 90 constituencies of J&K in the next eight weeks with the aim of submitting signatures to Supreme Court in support of restoring statehood and to take 'people's voice directly to Delhi'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Cost of a Virtual Dermatologist Consult Might Surprise You AskLayers Learn More Undo The top court on Thursday gave Centre eight weeks to respond to petitions seeking statehood. 'Me and my colleagues will use these eight weeks to go to each constituency,' Omar said. In his speech steeped in lament, the CM cited reports in various quarters about an 'announcement this Independence Day from Delhi' -- an allusion to restoration of statehood. 'I had hoped that in some corner of today's (PM Narendra Modi's) speech, there would be an announcement for J&K. We were told the papers are ready and it's only a matter of time. But nothing happened.' Expressing his anguish further, Omar said he wished no one became the CM of a Union Territory with an assembly -- like J&K --comparing the National Conference (NC) govt he leads to 'a horse asked to run with two front legs tied'. 'It has nothing except pain and anxieties. I have been chief minister of the state and now of the UT. The system of dual governance is not for success but for instilling defeat.' The Omar-led govt does not control key departments such as home, which is vested with Centre-appointed lieutenant-governor (LG) Manoj Sinha. Omar said he had never imagined before taking office that his cabinet's decisions 'could be altered or thrown into the dustbin', remarks seen as an allusion to the LG's overriding powers. 'I am accountable to the assembly and assembly members to the people. But the bureaucracy in the present system is not answerable to the elected representatives.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Datanomics: Migration overtakes death for voter deletion in Bihar SIR
These revisions removed 9.4 million voters, with 1.7 million and 1.6 million deletions in 2009-10 and 2023-24, respectively. Jayant Pankaj New Delhi Listen to This Article The Supreme Court on August 14 directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to publish a booth-wise list of 6.5 million voters proposed to be excluded from Bihar's electoral roll during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The last SIR in Bihar was held in 2003. Between 2008-09 and 2024-25, the ECI conducted 17 Special Summary Revisions (SSRs), typically from October to December, using January 1 as the qualifying date. These revisions removed 9.4 million voters, with 1.7 million and 1.6 million deletions in 2009-10 and 2023-24, respectively. The current SIR would surpass previous records if all the deletions proposed are
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Supreme court dismisses Pernod Ricard's plea against use of ‘Pride' by another distillery
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court recently dismissed Pernod Ricard India's appeal seeking to block a smaller rival from selling London Pride whisky, dealing a blow to the liquor giant's efforts to monopolise the word Pride in India's booming spirits market. The apex court upheld the decisions of two lower courts, refusing to grant an interim injunction against the rival whisky brand in a trademark infringement and passing off suit. The judgment, arising from Civil Appeal No. 10638 of 2025, stems from a legal battle initiated by Pernod Ricard against Karanveer Singh Chhabra. Pernod Ricard, the maker of popular brands Blenders Pride (₹1,700 crore annual sales) and Imperial Blue (₹2,700 crore), had alleged that the Chhabra's London Pride whisky was not only phonetically and visually similar to their registered marks, but also that its packaging and trade dress were a colourable imitation of their established brands. The company argued that the use of the word 'PRIDE' in London Pride was a deliberate attempt to piggyback on the immense goodwill and reputation of their brand Blenders Pride, which has been in extensive use since 1995. However, the Commercial Court in Indore and the High Court of Madhya Pradesh had both previously rejected Pernod Ricard's application for an interim injunction, a decision now affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's detailed analysis found no grounds to interfere with the lower courts' concurrent findings. The court's reasoning centred on the core principle of trademark law: the likelihood of confusion in the mind of an average consumer. While acknowledging this principle, the court determined that the rival marks were not "deceptively similar." The judgment noted that the overall visual appearance, phonetic structure, and trade dress of the two products, despite sharing some generic elements like the colours blue and gold, were sufficiently distinct.
