Don't link J&K's statehood to terror, Omar says day after SC's Pahalgam reference
SRINAGAR: Chief minister
Omar Abdullah
decried Friday the practice of tying terror attacks to J&K's political fate and asserted that Pakistan should not be allowed to influence it through terrorism, a day after Supreme Court observed that 'incidents like Pahalgam' must be considered when deciding on statehood.
'Will the killers of Pahalgam and their masters in the neighbouring country decide whether we will be a state?' Omar said in his Independence Day speech, his first since taking office last Oct and the first by a CM since Article 370's abrogation and J&K's conversion into a Union territory Aug 2019.
Speaking at Srinagar's Bakshi Stadium, Omar termed SC's reference to Pahalgam 'unfortunate' and asked: 'What kind of justice is it? Every time we are close to statehood, they will do something to sabotage it.
Is this fair? Why are we being punished for a crime in which we had no role?' He pointed out that 'J&K's residents from Kathua to Kupwara' had protested the Pahalgam massacre of April 22 in which 26 people, mostly tourists, were gunned down.
The CM announced a signature campaign across all 90 constituencies of J&K in the next eight weeks with the aim of submitting signatures to Supreme Court in support of restoring statehood and to take 'people's voice directly to Delhi'.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Cost of a Virtual Dermatologist Consult Might Surprise You
AskLayers
Learn More
Undo
The top court on Thursday gave Centre eight weeks to respond to petitions seeking statehood. 'Me and my colleagues will use these eight weeks to go to each constituency,' Omar said.
In his speech steeped in lament, the CM cited reports in various quarters about an 'announcement this Independence Day from Delhi' -- an allusion to restoration of statehood. 'I had hoped that in some corner of today's (PM Narendra Modi's) speech, there would be an announcement for J&K.
We were told the papers are ready and it's only a matter of time. But nothing happened.'
Expressing his anguish further, Omar said he wished no one became the CM of a Union Territory with an assembly -- like J&K --comparing the National Conference (NC) govt he leads to 'a horse asked to run with two front legs tied'. 'It has nothing except pain and anxieties. I have been chief minister of the state and now of the UT. The system of dual governance is not for success but for instilling defeat.'
The Omar-led govt does not control key departments such as home, which is vested with Centre-appointed lieutenant-governor (LG) Manoj Sinha.
Omar said he had never imagined before taking office that his cabinet's decisions 'could be altered or thrown into the dustbin', remarks seen as an allusion to the LG's overriding powers. 'I am accountable to the assembly and assembly members to the people. But the bureaucracy in the present system is not answerable to the elected representatives.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
26 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
The illogic of meat bans
This week, several municipal corporations in Maharashtra banned the sale of meat or forced meat shops to close on Independence Day. In neighbouring Telangana, the Hyderabad civic body directed beef shops and slaughterhouses to remain closed not just on Friday, but also a day later for the Hindu festival Janmashtami. The authorities in Kalyan-Dombivli – one of the municipal corporations in Maharashtra – claimed that it was a routine action taken to ensure public order, and to observe important national occasions. But the directives sparked outrage in the state, which is ruled by a Bharatiya Janata Party-led coalition, with the Opposition describing the authorities' actions as 'food policing'. Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leader Aaditya Thackeray said that 'what we eat on Independence Day is our choice' and that the authorities had no right to interfere. 'Instead of imposing vegetarianism on the citizens, focus on improving the terrible roads and broken civic services,' Thackeray said. 'Citizens will eat whatever they want to – vegetarian/non-vegetarian.' Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar) MLA Jitendra Awhad claimed that Maharashtra's ruling coalition was 'fuelling a vegetarian-non-vegetarian divide ' after having 'exhausted other social controversies'. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis pushed back, claiming that the state was not interested in knowing what people eat. But he defended the directives saying that they were issued in line with a 1988 government resolution allowing the shutting of slaughterhouses on certain days. The municipal bodies had taken the decision themselves, he argued. The directive in Hyderabad, in Congress-ruled Telangana, was challenged in the Telangana High Court. The municipal corporation said that its order – which did not ban the slaughter of chicken or mutton – has been imposed for more than two decades because of law and order concerns. Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi said that the decision was 'callous and unconstitutional ', questioning the connection between eating meat and celebrating Independence Day. He said most people in Telangana eat meat and that such bans 'violate people's right to liberty, privacy, livelihood, culture, nutrition and religion'. What Indians eat has been a matter of debate for a long time. But in the last decade it has come to be hotly contested with largely BJP governments deciding to impose meat bans especially during festivals. There has been push back to such bans. Many have pointed out that, contrary to projections by many Hindutva supporters, Hindus are not a homogenous community when it comes to eating meat. And India is not a predominantly vegetarian country. Data proves this. The National Family Health Survey-5 conducted between 2019 and 2021 showed that 83.4% of Indian men and 70.6% of women in the 15-49 age group eat meat. In fact, Thackeray pointed out that it was a family tradition to offer prawns and fish to the deity during the Navratri festival. When Hindutva accounts criticised him, social media users highlighted that it was customary for some in the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu community – which the Thackerays belong to – to make meat offerings. The community is Hindu, they asserted. Similarly, eating meat during Durga Puja is common among Bengali Hindus and animal sacrifice is an important ritual for some in the community. Even Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, a crucial ally of the BJP, struck a discordant note. He said food is 'part of an individual's habit, culture and inheritance and geographical conditions', and what a person eats was the individual's choice. But this did not lead to a rollback of the municipal directives. As long as Hindutva is ascendant in India, the illogic of meat bans is here to stay. Here is a summary of last week's other top stories. Jammu and Kashmir flash flood. The toll from the flash floods in the Union Territory's Kishtwar district increased to 60 on Friday. Several were missing as rescue operations continued. A cloudburst took place on Thursday near Chashoti village, which is the last motorable village on the way to the Machail Mata temple. A large number of devotees had gathered in the area for an annual yatra that began on July 25 and was scheduled to end on September 5. Ensuring free and fair polls? The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to publish a district-wise list of about 65 lakh voters whose names were deleted from the draft electoral roll during the special intensive revision exercise in Bihar. The court directed the list be published on the websites of the state's district and chief electoral officers. The bench told the poll panel to specify that those who submit claims for inclusion in the list can furnish Aadhaar cards. The court also said the Election Commission must provide the reason for each deletion. Sharing this will improve 'voter confidence' in the institution, it added. The direction was given while listening to petitions challenging the voter roll revision in Bihar ahead of the Assembly polls expected in October or November. The order on street dogs. The Supreme Court said that the problems related to the street dog population in Delhi are because of the inaction of local authorities. It made the observation while reserving its order on pleas challenging the directions passed by a two-judge bench on Monday to capture and shift street dogs in Delhi, Noida and Gurugram to shelters within six weeks. The suo motu case on stray dogs was shifted to a three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath after some lawyers told Chief Justice BR Gavai that the directions issued on Monday conflicted with previous orders of other benches. The court order on Monday had triggered protests, with demonstrators arguing that shifting the dogs to inhumane shelters would not solve the problem. Follow the Scroll channel on WhatsApp for a curated selection of the news that matters throughout the day, and a round-up of major developments in India and around the world every evening. What you won't get: spam.
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Congress leader BK Hariprasad Calls Out RSS As 'Indian Taliban' Sparks Row Mohan Bhagwat
Congress leader BK Hariprasad Calls Out RSS As 'Indian Taliban' Sparks Row | Mohan Bhagwat | News 18 Last Updated: Breaking News Videos In a fierce backlash, Congress leader BK Hariprasad has dubbed the RSS as the 'Indian Taliban,' sparking a political firestorm. The veteran politician slammed Prime Minister Modi's Independence Day praise for the RSS, arguing that an organization he says 'disturbs peace' is hardly worthy of such reverence. n18oc_breaking-newsNews18 Mobile App -
Deccan Herald
26 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Modi government pushes for space debate in Parliament amid logjam over Bihar SIR protests
The last four days would also see the I.N.D.I.A bloc discussing a candidate to be fielded against the BJP-led NDA. On Monday, the I.N.D.I.A bloc floor leaders will meet to discuss floor strategy.
