logo
US Treasury chief slams ‘unreliable' China at House hearing on Trump trade policy

US Treasury chief slams ‘unreliable' China at House hearing on Trump trade policy

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent slammed Beijing on Wednesday for its aggressive export policies, urged it to be a more dependable partner and depicted China's disjointed economic structure as hurting not only the US but the entire globe.
'China currently has the most unbalanced economy in the history of the world,' Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, told the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
'They cannot be allowed to export their way back to prosperity, not only for working Americans but for working citizens around the world.'
Noting his return hours earlier from two days of negotiating with China in London, Bessent said
this week's bilateral agreement offered Beijing a chance to become a more balanced economic player.
The deal could also help China boost its domestic consumption rather than extend a long-standing pattern of excessive production distorting the global economy, according to the Treasury secretary.
But Bessent urged vigilance. 'China has proven an unreliable partner,' he testified before adding that 'we will see' if it is more reliable this time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US to assess ‘anti-American' views - including on social media
US to assess ‘anti-American' views - including on social media

South China Morning Post

time31 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

US to assess ‘anti-American' views - including on social media

US President Donald Trump's administration said on Tuesday it would look for 'anti-American' views, including on social media, when deciding on the right to live in the United States. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, which handles requests to stay in the United States or become a citizen, said it would expand vetting of the social media postings of applicants. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' agency spokesman Matthew Tragesser said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits - including to live and work in the United States - remain a privilege, not a right.' The US Immigration and Nationality Act, which dates back to 1952, defines anti-Americanism which at the time primarily focused on communists. But the Trump administration has already moved aggressively to deny or rescind short-term visas for people deemed to go against US foreign policy interests, especially on Israel.

Protest-hit UK town wins bid to empty asylum-seeker hotel
Protest-hit UK town wins bid to empty asylum-seeker hotel

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Protest-hit UK town wins bid to empty asylum-seeker hotel

A UK judge on Tuesday blocked asylum seekers from being housed at a hotel in a town which has witnessed violent protests, dealing a blow to the government. Advertisement The High Court judge approved a request by the local authority in Epping, northeast of London, for a temporary injunction to stop migrants from being housed at the Bell Hotel. The ruling, which came after the interior ministry was unsuccessful in trying to dismiss the case, raises questions about the government's ability to provide accommodation for asylum seekers and refugees. It also comes as Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces serious political heat from the hard-right Reform UK party for failing to stop irregular migrants crossing the Channel to England on small boats. Protests broke out in Epping in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which he denies. Advertisement Since then, hundreds of people have taken part in protests and counter-protests outside the Bell Hotel. Further anti-immigration demonstrations have also spread to London and around England. The council argued that putting the migrants in the Bell Hotel presented a 'clear risk of further escalating community tensions'.

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'
Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

HKFP

time4 hours ago

  • HKFP

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

Handpicked judges presiding over jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai's national security trial have questioned whether content in his pro-democracy paper amounted to 'seditious publications,' as stipulated by the prosecution. The court continued hearing closing arguments on Tuesday after proceedings were twice delayed last week, first owing to bad weather and then to health concerns relating to the 77-year-old tycoon's heart. Delivering arguments for the seditious publications charge, lead prosecutor Anthony Chau referenced articles published in Lai's Apple Daily including an editorial calling for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong authorities. He said that those articles did not include 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations or ventured 'to suggest any solutions.' But High Court judge Esther Toh, one of the three judges chosen to preside over the security trial, cast doubt on the prosecution's argument that critical articles must propose solutions to be considered not seditious. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' Toh asked, appearing to reference a recent contract fraud case involving the drinking water supply at government offices. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill which sparked widespread protests and unrest in 2019 to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill… was that not a suggested solution?' The 2019 protests escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing's encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as 'riots.' Lee on Tuesday added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition.' Chau also referenced Lai's text messages directing the paper's English news division, which the court had earlier heard was set up to appeal for international support. Lai had told senior management that the paper was not supposed to have a 'balanced view' and only needed a view of the 'yellow' side — the colour associated with the city's pro-democracy movement, Chau added. Calls for sanctions 'in disguise' Besides the charge of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation, the tycoon also stands accused of two charges of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. He faces life behind bars if convicted. Based on Lai's prior exchanges with US politicians and diplomats, one could infer that the pro-democracy paper's criticism of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere, Chau told the court on Tuesday. That was after judge Toh asked whether the prosecution meant that the paper's articles were calls for sanctions 'in disguise.' The prosecution has alleged that Lai used his ties with foreign officials and politicians to impose sanctions against authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest, criminalising subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. Chau also maintained that the media baron had called for what the prosecution labelled 'Sanctions, Blockades, or Hostile activity' (SBHA) against the central Chinese authorities, despite not having made any open or direct requests for such actions after the enactment of Beijing's national security law in Hong Kong. The prosecution submitted that Lai had adopted a 'calculated and strategic approach' for foreign sanctions to be imposed on China and Hong Kong by deliberately and 'falsely' picturing the Chinese Communist Party in a negative light. Prosecutors named retired US army general Jack Keane, ex-US deputy secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz, ex-US state department advisor Christian Whiton, and Mary Kissel, an advisor to then US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, as Lai's foreign connections, among others. Chau also told the court that Lai had admitted, during his testimony, that he continued international lobbying efforts even after the enactment of the national security law to inform foreign governments of what was happening in Hong Kong and to appeal for condemnation of the Hong Kong and Beijing authorities. However, he denied lobbying overseas governments to influence foreign policy. Chau is expected to conclude oral submissions of the prosecution's closing arguments on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store