
The week the US president's vendetta against renewables went global
But on one topic Trump has remained resolutely consistent: he hates wind turbines – and, more latterly, renewable energy in general. This enmity burst into view in 2011 – four years before he descended his golden escalator to announce he was running for US president – when Trump waged an unsuccessful battle to halt 'ugly' offshore turbines visible from his Scottish golf course.
In a sort of circular moment, Trump was back in Scotland earlier this week to fulminate once again about wind energy.
'Wind is a disaster,' the US president said in a press conference at his Turnberry golf course in Scotland, beside a doleful-looking Keir Starmer. 'You are paying massive subsidies to have these ugly monsters all over the place.'
Starmer, for his part, said that 'we believe in a mix' that includes wind but did not mention the pressing reason for clean energy – a climate crisis that is unleashing its fury in increasing bursts in the UK, US and elsewhere. Instead the British prime minister embraced the more Trump-friendly theme of energy security.
But Trump's distress at wind turbines now holds global, rather than merely golfing, implications. As president he has banned renewable energy projects from federal lands and signed a spending bill that kills off tax credits that were fostering a boom in new, clean energy supply.
The amount of new clean energy additions is now expected to be half of what it would have been over the next decade as a result, with the added loss of several hundred thousand jobs and billions of dollars of investment that was set to gush into rural and exurban America. 'It's an expensive energy, it's an ugly energy and we won't allow it in the United States,' Trump boasted at his Scottish summit with Starmer.
As the world's second-largest carbon emitter, the US's decision to bring the hammer down on renewables has major implications for a rapidly warming planet. Around 7bn tonnes of extra greenhouse gases are set to be added to the atmosphere in just the next five years – more than double India's annual emissions – as American utilities turn to gas and coal rather than cleaner sources of energy.
Clean energy still remains remarkably attractive – wind and solar have plummeted in cost over the past decade and are now almost always cheaper than fossil fuels even without subsidies, as the United Nations pointed out last week. Almost all new electricity capacity in the US is set to come from renewables this year – after all, it's not only cheaper but far quicker to start up a windfarm than a gas plant.
But the climate crisis has always been a timed challenge. Even as renewables advance, they must do so far faster if the world has a chance of fending off spiralling climate disasters. The fixation of one man in the White House is stamping on the brakes at the very moment when scientists are urging accelerated cuts in emissions.
The backtracking on renewables also poses geopolitical, as well as environmental, questions. China, which Trump often disparages as a rival, is already streaking ahead of the world in erecting wind and solar facilities and envisions a future run on clean energy that it will then sell to other countries – a Chinese EV in the garage overlooked by a Chinese-made windfarm in the hills.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
The US is making a very different bet: that the world will continue to run, as it has for more than a century, on the burning of fossil fuels and it will look to America's vast supply of oil and gas for sustenance. 'This is the most pro-combustion administration since Nero,' as one environmental group put it this week as Trump unveiled plans to eliminate a foundational finding that greenhouse gases harm human health and set about demolishing pollution limits for cars and oil and gas drilling sites.
The pathway that the world chooses will not only shape our shared climate but also, potentially, the fortunes of the world's two superpowers in the decades ahead. 'This marks a new chapter in the global climate story, it will significantly reposition these two major powers,' as Li Shuo, an expert in China's climate policies, told me. 'The last chance for the US to jump on the green bandwagon has left the station.'
Read more:
Tilting at windmills? Trump's claims about turbines fact-checked
'Shooting ourselves in the foot': how Trump is fumbling geothermal energy
Trump effort to ditch greenhouse gas finding ignores 'clearcut' science, expert says
This is an edited version of Down to Earth, or climate crisis newsletter. To sign up to receive the full version in your inbox every Thursday, click here
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump, Carney to speak in coming days, Canadian official says
WASHINGTON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, also told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he was "encouraged" by recent discussions and believed a deal to bring down tariffs remained an option. "We're encouraged by the conversations with Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer, but we're not yet where we need to go to get the deal that's in the best interest of the two economies," LeBlanc said, referring to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The trade minister said he expected Carney and Trump to speak "over the next number of days." "We think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs provide greater certainty to investment," LeBlanc said. Washington linked Friday's tariff announcement in part to what it said was Canada's failure to stop fentanyl smuggling. It was the latest blow in a months-long tariff war which Trump initiated shortly after returning to power this year. Carney says Canada accounts for just 1% of U.S. fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce the volumes.


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu asks for Red Cross help to get aid to hostages in Gaza
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.


Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Millions of motorists will have to wait until next year to receive motor finance compensation after Supreme Court case, competition watchdog reveals
Millions of motorists overcharged for car finance will have to wait until next year for settlements – with consultation on a proposed compensation scheme worth up to £18bn not due to launch until October. The Financial Conduct Agency announced the development this afternoon after a Supreme Court ruling on Friday – but said it would 'take time to establish a (compensation) scheme'. The FCA estimates 'most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation' per claim, with the total value of the scheme between £9bn and £18bn. Some individuals who bought several cars via hire purchase could receive multiple payouts. Officials said they hope 'to start getting people any money they are owed next year'. In the meantime, the watchdog urged people to wait rather than taking action via a claims management company or law firm as it could 'cost you a significant chunk of any money you get'. It said it has already taken action against publishers of 225 adverts 'about potentially exaggerated amounts of compensation'. The FCA's stance was today backed by Money Saving Expert guru, who told his followers on X (formerly known as Twitter) to avoid claims firms or solicitors and that 'the most important thing is to DO nothing'. The FCA said 'many motor finance firms were not complying with rules or the law by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans'. It defended its action in the wake of the court ruling, saying it 'moved quickly' on 'steps to set up a proposed compensation scheme because it wants to provide clarity and certainty to consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible'. But FCA officials stressed that 'want to ensure the integrity of the motor finance market so it works well for consumers now and in the future' and that the compensation scheme would need to 'balance principles including fairness, timeliness, and certainty'. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm.' He added: 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal.' The FCA is working on rules to govern the finance schemes, used by 2.2m people each year, to ensure lenders 'consistently, efficiently and fairly decide whether someone is owed compensation and how much'. The FCA said motorists who have already complained don't need to do anything but urged others to submit a complaint, if they think they have paid too much for motor finance. It added it would be 'working intensively and engaging widely over the coming weeks on the detail of how a scheme would work'. The Supreme Court's ruling found that hidden commissions from lenders to dealers on car loans were not in themselves unlawful, excluding several million motorists from making claims. The court said car dealers did not need to operate with a 'single-minded' duty to 'act only in their customers' best interests' when arranging finance – and rejected a claim finance companies had bribed car dealers. But it found the payment of particularly large commissions, without customers' knowledge, were unfair and affected customers in those cases should be compensated. The five judges said a case where the commission was 55pc of the total charge for credit was 'unfair' and that a failure to disclose the 'exact nature of the commission, and the concealment of the commercial tie between the dealer and the lender' was wrong. Analysts for investment bank Jefferies heralded the judgement as a 'huge win' for car financing firms as it means the companies can avoid a much larger compensation bill which some market experts forecasted could be as large as that for PPI (payment protection insurance). The scandal led to payouts totalling £50bn. To make a report about potential mis-selling of car finance, visit