Anti-doping amendment bill tabled in Lok Sabha by Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya on Wednesday tabled the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha, providing greater " operational independence " to the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) as prescribed by WADA The contentious National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports has been retained but it would no longer have the NADA appeals panel under its jurisdiction as was the case in the original act passed in 2022.That act could not be implemented as WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) objected to "government interference" in the NADA's functioning."The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025, seeks to enhance institutional and operational independence of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel and the National Anti-Doping Agency to ensure autonomy in their decisions pertaining to operations, investigations and enforcement activities," stated the bill's objectives.The Board was previously empowered to constitute the appeal panel and "oversee the activities" of NADA. This provision has been done away with in the amended bill which asserts NADA's autonomy."The Director General or any other staff member of the Agency shall have operational independence from any National Sports Federation, International Federation, National Olympic Committee, National Paralympic Committee or any Government department or agency with responsibility for sport or anti-doping," the amended bill states.A day before the bill's introduction, a sports ministry source had told PTI that amendments were necessary to ensure that India does not end up being suspended by WADA."If we had implemented the 2022 act, it would have invited a ban from WADA. Our lab would have been derecognised. So, the changes were necessary," the source had said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
CJI recuses from hearing Justice Varma's plea
CJI BR Gavai (File photo) NEW DELHI: Chief Justice B R Gavai on Wednesday recused from hearing a petition by Allahabad high court's Justice Yashwant Varma, who has sought quashing of an in-house inquiry panel report finding him complicit in the sacks of cash discovered at his official residence on the night of March 14 when he was a judge of Delhi HC. "It would not be proper for me (a bench headed by him) to take up the matter as I was part of the administrative processes related to the judge (linked to the cash-in-kothi incident). I will list it for hearing as soon as possible," CJI Gavai said. The other members of the bench were Justices K Vinod Chandran and Joymalya Bagchi. Sibal seeks urgent hearing before LS admits Varma removal motion Justice Yashwant Varma's counsel Kapil Sibal, who in his YouTube show has already doubted the procedure adopted by the inquiry panel and questioned then CJI Sanjiv Khanna's decision to send the report to the govt along with the recommendation to initiate a removal motion, sought urgent hearing before a bench headed by CJI Gavai a day after the govt garnered signatures of more than 150 Lok Sabha MPs for the removal motion. Probably understanding the need for an expeditious hearing prior to the Lok Sabha speaker admitting the removal motion, Sibal said, "There is some urgency. Please list the HC judge's petition for hearing. The recommendation for his removal raises some important constitutional issues." In his social media panel discussion, which included former SC judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul and ex-Delhi HC judge Mukta Gupta, Sibal had said sending the in-house panel report to the govt amounted to mixing politics with a purely constitutional process. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Justice Yashwant Varma's writ petition, filed through advocate Vaibhav Niti, has questioned why Delhi Police and Delhi Fire Service personnel, who discovered the cash, did not seize it or prepare a 'panchnama' (statement of witnesses in writing corroborating the discovery of cash), which alone could have been admissible evidence. Accusing former CJI Khanna of subjecting him to media trial by uploading "unsubstantiated" material against him on the SC's official website, Justice Varma has said principles of natural justice were violated as the then CJI did not grant him a personal hearing after offering him the choice of either resigning or taking voluntary retirement in the wake of the damning report. The May 3 report of the inquiry committee was sent to the President and the PM on May 8 with the recommendation to initiate removal motion.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
India's press and media ecosystem expands with over 1.55 lakh publications and 908 private TV channels: govt.
The number of publications registered with the Press Registrar General of India has increased from 1.05 lakh in 2014-15 to 1.55 lakh in 2024-25, according to the government. In response to a query in Lok Sabha, Union Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting L. Murugan on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) said the number of private satellite TV channels have also increased from 821 in 2014-15 to 908 in 2024-25. 'As of today, 92 private channels and 50 Doordarshan channels are available on DD Free Dish. Both private and DD channels operate in various regional languages, ensuring a wider audience reach across the country,' said the reply.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre reached out to VP Jagdeep Dhankhar hours before he quit
At least two senior central ministers reached out to former vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar after the government found out that he had acknowledged an Opposition-sponsored notice for the impeachment of justice Yashwant Varma and one of them hinted at Prime Minister Narendra Modi's disapproval of the move, but the 74-year-old said he was acting within the rules of the House, people aware of the matter said on Wednesday. Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned on Monday, citing health concerns.(Sansad TV/ANI Video Grab) Union health minister and leader of the Rajya Sabha JP Nadda and Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju spoke to Dhankhar on Monday after he spoke in the Rajya Sabha about an impeachment notice against the sitting high court judge signed by 63 members. Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned on Monday citing health concerns.(HT) 'Rijiu told Dhankhar that in the Lok Sabha, there is a process of building a consensus on the impeachment and pointed out that the leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, had signed the notice. He even indicated that the PM is not happy about the sudden development,' said one of the persons quoted above, requesting anonymity. But Dhankhar indicated that he was acting well within the rules of the House, this person cited above added. It is only after this exchange -- which came after the first business advisory committee of the Rajya Sabha at 12:30pm -- that the leaders chose to not go for the second BAC meeting that was held at 4.30pm on Monday. HT reported on Tuesday that the former Vice President's move to kickstart the impeachment process of justice Varma in the Rajya Sabha took the government, which wanted the process to go through the Lok Sabha, by surprise, and it was the trigger that prompted the abrupt resignation. The developments emerged on a day the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced that it had already kicked off preparations to hold the next vice-presidential elections as politics heated up over a series of meetings in Delhi following the dramatic resignation two days ago. Union home minister Amit Shah, Union health minister and Leader of the Rajya Sabha JP Nadda, and Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju met Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla amid intense speculation on whether the former VP admitted the Opposition-sponsored notice for the impeachment of justice Varma in the Rajya Sabha. Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh also met Birla for a marathon meeting. According to two senior officials, the pending impeachment notices were one of the key topics of discussion. Government officials indicated that the government didn't want to sit on the issue and may urge the presiding officials to start the impeachment process by appointing a committee of jurists, who will look into the allegations and give a report to Parliament. 'The government is in no mood to take up the Opposition-sponsored notice,' said a senior government functionary, adding that the Centre would prefer the Lok Sabha notice to proceed. Separately, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge told HT that constituents of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) will meet and collectively decide the strategy for the upcoming VP election, and take a call on any candidate. On Monday night, Dhankhar, 74, resigned on health grounds, in an unprecedented and unexpected move that came after he presided over the first day of the monsoon session in the Rajya Sabha. In his resignation letter to President Droupadi Murmu, Dhankhar said, 'To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.' The Union home ministry formalised the decision through a gazette notification, that came on the same day as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's terse message, 15 hours and 18 minutes after the resignation was posted at 9.25pm by the Vice President's X handle The poll watchdog said it has started constituting the electoral college comprising MPs of both Houses of Parliament. Both elected and nominated members are eligible to vote in the vice presidential election. It is also finalising the returning officer and assistant returning officers. 'On completion of the preparatory activities, the announcement of the election schedule to the office of the Vice President of India will follow as soon as possible,' ECI said. In the 782-member electoral college, comprising parliamentarians from both houses, the National Democratic Alliance holds the edge with 426 members. The INDIA bloc has 312 members. ECI said the formal 'announcement of the election schedule to the office of the Vice-President of India will follow as soon as possible' once the foundational steps are complete. According to Clause 2 of Article 68 of the Constitution, an election to fill a vacancy in the office of the vice president occurring due to his death, resignation or removal, or otherwise, will be held 'as soon as possible' after it goes vacant. The person elected to fill the vacancy will be entitled to hold office 'for the full term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office'. From the day the notification is issued, 'calling the electoral college to vote', and till the day of the poll, a period of 30 days is stipulated. A person cannot be elected as the vice president unless he is a citizen of India, has completed 35 years of age and is qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha. The entire debate on the impeachment motion – justice Varma is facing allegations of corruption after wads of cash were recovered from his residence in Delhi in March – now hinges on whether Dhankhar admitted the notice signed by 63 Opposition members on Monday. HT reported on Tuesday that last week, Dhankhar asked some Opposition leaders to give a notice for the impeachment of justice Varma in the Rajya Sabha, even as the government wanted to bring the notice only in the Lok Sabha. Accordingly, a senior Congress lawmaker who is also a lawyer, hurriedly prepared an impeachment notice on Sunday; all 63 MPs who signed it on Monday were from the Opposition parties. Not a single National Democratic Alliance (NDA) MP signed the Opposition-sponsored notice in the Rajya Sabha. The reason: The NDA had no idea that such a notice was being prepared. Dhankhar himself came to the House after the first Business Advisory Committee meeting on Monday and announced, 'I need to inform you that I have received notice of motion under Article 217(1)(B) read with Article 218 and Article 124…to constitute a statutory committee for removal of justice Yashwant Varma. This has been received by me today. It is signed by more than 50 members of the Council of States.' The notice derailed the government's meticulous plan to remove justice Varma. A furious Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) decided that party chief and Leader of the Rajya Sabha JP Nadda and parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju would not attend the second BAC meeting led by Dhankhar in the evening. Hours later, Dhankhar had resigned. (With inputs by Vrinda Tulsian)
