Pakistan stock markets crash: India's actions, IMF report, and a persistent problem
The Pakistan stock market plunged by around 2,000 points on Thursday (April 24), after India acted against the neighbouring country following the Pahalgam terror attack.
According to the Pakistani newspaper Dawn, 'The benchmark KSE-100 index declined by 1,086.51, or 0.93 per cent, to stand at 116,139.63 from the previous close at 11:13am. At 2:56pm, the index plunged 2,116.92, or 1.81pc, to stand at 115,109.22.'
This was the second jolt for Pakistan's markets in the last few days. Before this, on April 22, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut the growth forecast for Pakistan to 2.6 per cent. All of this comes at a time when Pakistan's economy has been doing better by its standards after a long period of crisis, and can ill-afford further shocks.
In the past three months, the IMF, the World Bank, and the credits rating agency Fitch have all commented on Pakistan. Here's a snapshot of its economy from their reports.
IMF on Pakistan
Pakistan's economy is heavily dependent on the loans it has secured from the IMF — key being the 37-month Extended Fund Facility (EFF) — and thus that institution's assessment is crucial for it.
The IMF report released earlier this week slashed Pakistan's growth forecast for this fiscal year to 2.6 per cent from the 3 per cent it had projected in January. This was largely due to the expected impact of US President Donald Trump 's now-paused tariffs. Trump had slapped a 29 per cent tariff on imports from Pakistan, which he then paused for 90 days. The US imported goods worth $5.1 billion in 2024 from Pakistan, mainly textiles.
In the last week of March, an IMF team reached a staff-level agreement with Pakistan on the first review of the EFF and on a different loan under the IMF's Resilience and Sustainability Facility.
'The staff-level agreement is subject to approval of the IMF's Executive Board. Upon approval, Pakistan will have access to about US$1.0 billion (SDR 760 million) under the EFF, bringing total disbursements under the program to about US$2.0 billion,' the IMF said in a press release. Under the Resilience and Sustainability Facility loan, Pakistan will get $1.3 billion over 28 months.
Nathan Porter, the IMF team lead, said after the March agreement, 'Over the past 18 months, Pakistan has made significant progress in restoring macroeconomic stability and rebuilding confidence… inflation has declined to its lowest level since 2015, financial conditions have improved, sovereign spreads have narrowed significantly, and external balances are stronger.'
Aming risks, he highlighted 'potential macroeconomic policy slippages—driven by pressures to ease policies—along with geopolitical shocks to commodity prices, tightening global financial conditions, or rising protectionism', along with climate-related risks.
The World Bank
The World Bank released its estimates on April 23. 'Pakistan's economy continues to stabilise and is expected to grow by 2.7 percent in the current fiscal year ending June 2025, up from 2.5 percent in the previous year,' the report said.
It also highlighted the problems, 'Agriculture saw limited growth, in part due to adverse weather and pest infestations. Industrial activity declined, impacted by higher input costs and taxes, and reduced government spending. Similarly, growth of the services sector was muted given limited spillovers from weak agriculture and industrial activity. While expected to strengthen, economic growth will remain tepid, making job creation and poverty reduction amid high population growth challenging.'
All of this does not sound like the economy is doing well. However, things now are far better than they were at the crisis point of May 2023, when inflation was at 38.50%, growth was negative, and forex could cover barely a few weeks of restricted imports.
Fitch on Pakistan
In February, Fitch in a report said, 'The State Bank of Pakistan's decision to cut policy rates to 12% on 27 January underscored recent progress in taming consumer price inflation, which fell to just over 2% yoy in January 2025, down from an average of nearly 24% in the fiscal year ended June 2024 (FY24).'
However, it also pointed out that, 'Progress on difficult structural reforms will be key to upcoming IMF programme reviews and continued financing from other multilateral and bilateral lenders.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
9 minutes ago
- The Wire
Vandalism of Karachi Bakery and the Weaponisation of Food to Portray a Shallow Form of Patriotism
A branch of the famous Karachi Bakery in Shamshabad locality of Hyderabad was vandalised by workers of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on May 10, amidst the then ongoing Operation Sindoor. The attackers, who wore saffron shawls were seen stepping on Pakistani flags and specifically vandalising the name 'Karachi'. Karachi Bakery was established in 1953 by Khanchand Ramnani, a Sindhi Hindu who migrated from Karachi to Hyderabad following the partition of India in 1947. He named the bakery as a homage to his hometown. Over the years, Karachi Bakery has become a part of the culinary fabric of Hyderabad, famed for its biscuits, especially the Osmania Biscuit. It has also emerged as a pan Indian brand, with branches in various cities across the country. Multiple attacks on Karachi Bakery over the years In the past few years, Karachi Bakery has had to face multiple attacks and protests from right wing forces only because of its name. In 2019, in the aftermath of the Pulwama terror attack, the shop was vandalised. Both in 2019 and 2025, one of the owners had to come and clarify that they have no links to Pakistan. Moreover, in 2019, a group of people claiming to be from a human rights organisation covered the bakery's name in one of its branches in Ahmedabad. In 2021 the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) led a protest outside the bakery's Bandra outlet in Mumbai to demand that its name be changed, which eventually led to the outlet's shutting down. Every time there is a conflict with Pakistan, Karachi bakery has to pay the price. 'We request the Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy and senior officers of administration to support to prevent any change in the name. People are putting up Tricolour in the outlets of the bakery across the city, kindly support us as we are an Indian brand and not a Pakistani brand,' the owners issued a statement after the latest incident last month. Despite the repeated attacks over years, the owners have continued to stay in the business and even expanded to the quick commerce platforms such as Zepto and Blinkit. The owner of a general store in Mumbai's Chembur says that there has been no change in the demand for Karachi Bakery products, especially the Osmania and fruit biscuits. A screengrab showing people vandalising the Karachi Bakery. Photo: X/@anusharavi10. So, if consumers are not hesitant in buying their products, it begs the question that who really has a problem with them and why? Why is it that a well known beloved Indian bakery is associated with Pakistan and consequently portrayed as a villain? This is not the only instance of food being weaponised in the backdrop of Operation Sindoor in the past few weeks. In an attempt to contribute to the patriotic fervour, Tyohaar sweets and Bombay Mishtan Bhandar of Jaipur declared that they are dropping the word 'Pak' from all their sweets like Mysore Pak and Moti Pak, assuming it stems from 'Pakistan'. Tyohaar Sweets declared they will replace it with the word 'shree'. 'People who think that pak is somehow related to Pakistan are so ignorant. It shows that they have no awareness about south Indian culture, language and practices. Paaka in Kannada means the sticky, sweet syrupy base that holds the sweet together, sometimes soft, sometimes chewy, sometimes hard, based on what people prefer. There are thousands of words with pak in them. Are all these names going to change and are those changes going to make one more nationalistic or ensure the security of the country?' Dr. Sylvia Karpagam, a renowned public health doctor and researcher who has worked extensively on the intersections of food and politics, told The Wire in an interview. Whenever there is a conflict with Pakistan we see how restaurants and food are targeted. Vandalising Indian restaurants and changing names of Indian dishes become the easiest way of portraying a shallow form of patriotism. It amounts to nothing but political narrative setting. 'Food is an easy way to divide communities' Karpagam feels that it is 'not surprising' such attacks happen, in fact it would be surprising if they didn't. ' These attacks are not unusual. the culture of extra-judicial actions, rakshaks of various objects and spaces, encounter killings etc. are valorised. Mainstream media and even so called leaders – political and religious – participate in this valorisation. People don't seem to find it ridiculous to target people who have nothing to do with terrorism or war or inter-country issues,' she added. These attacks and protests could be seen in the larger context of weaponising food to create political narratives. Food has always been politicised and used as a tool to discriminate and conduct violence. Recently there has been discourse about challenging the perceived supremacy of vegetarianism and beef eating practices. 'Food is an easy way to divide communities depending on who owns them and who eats there. Even though only 20% Indians identify as vegetarian, they dictate which foods are considered as pure/touchable and which are untouchable and impure. If there are attacks on Muslim or Dalit communities, there is a tacit support, silence and collusion by the larger society,' said Karpagam. This leads to a lot of impunity among people who are actually anti-social elements who are valorised as heros. When brutal murders happen by the so-called vigilantes , they are celebrated. This is a violation of the Constitution and rule of law. Now the Muslim community is being targeted for occupying a space that was left empty because of caste prejudices against meat,' she added. Therefore, such instances when a karachi bakery is vandalised, a Mysore Pak is renamed, a Sabir Malik is lynched to death on suspicion of eating beef, or when a Dalit man is denied entry in a restaurant in Bellari, they are just manifestations of caste and class supremacy through food. Deciding the narratives on who can eat what and where and to decide what is acceptable is a power wielded by the privileged. Such manifestations go against the ethos of our constitution and shows how food can be used to otherise identities and remains a deeply political subject. The author is an intern at The Wire. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade war: Trump, Xi speak amid deadlock over tariffs; what was discussed
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a phone call on Thursday, Chinese state media reported, as negotiations over contentious trade tariffs between the two nations remain stuck in a gridlock that has rattled global markets. The discussion on Thursday followed Trump suggesting it was tough to reach a deal with Xi. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Trump wrote on Truth Social yesterday. Talks between the US and China had temporarily resumed after a May 12 agreement to lower tariffs, but no breakthrough has followed. Behind the stalemate is an intensifying race for economic dominance. China, Trump said, is 'slow-walking' negotiations, while Beijing insists it is sticking to its principles. The call also came hours after Trump doubled down on tariffs, raising aluminum and steel levies from 25% to 50%, further fueling tensions with allies like Canada and Mexico, who immediately threatened retaliation. China was hit hardest by Trump's earlier April tariff blitz, with additional duties of up to 145%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo It responded with countermeasures on US goods reaching 125%. A temporary easing agreed last month now appears fragile. While the White House had hinted at a Xi-Trump call to defuse tensions, Trump's rhetoric suggested the opposite. In response, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian reiterated that Beijing's approach to US relations remains 'consistent.' Meanwhile, global concerns are growing. OECD leaders convening in Paris warned that the trade war is weakening economic growth. The US-EU trade talks offered a sliver of optimism, with both sides calling recent meetings 'constructive.' But the US president's unpredictable tariff escalations have left even American allies on edge. Canadian PM Mark Carney called the new levies 'illegal,' while Mexico's Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said the country would seek exemptions or consider countermeasures. Trump's trade war is also under legal scrutiny. Though some tariffs are being challenged, most remain in place pending appeals, an uncertainty that continues to shake industries from steel to aviation.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping speak amid stalled tariff negotiations: Chinese state media
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on Thursday (June 5) amid escalating tensions over stalled tariff negotiations. The conversation was reported by China's official news agency, Xinhua, while the White House has not sent out an immediate comment. The call comes amid rising tensions after Trump accused Beijing of breaching last month's tariff rollback agreement, reached in Geneva, and Beijing asserting that Washington 'has made bogus charges and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus". The phone call also comes just one day after Trump aired frustrations on his social media platform, posting: 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' The blunt remarks added to the uncertainty surrounding the status of ongoing trade negotiations, which have been effectively frozen for weeks. Negotiations have remained in limbo since a May 12 agreement struck in Switzerland, in which both nations agreed to a 90-day suspension of most tariffs. The pact also required China to ease export restrictions on rare earth materials and for the US to reduce barriers on Chinese imports. However, both sides have since accused the other of undermining the terms. Beijing has not significantly relaxed its control over rare earth exports, while Washington has moved forward with fresh restrictions on China's access to advanced technologies. Tensions were further inflamed last week when the Trump administration announced a crackdown on Chinese student visas. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the US would 'aggressively revoke visas' for Chinese nationals studying in sensitive research areas. Beijing responded by calling the move 'unreasonable' and 'discriminatory.' During a Tuesday meeting with US Ambassador to China David Perdue, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi criticised Washington's recent actions. 'These negative measures are based on groundless reasons,' Wang said, according to the official Chinese readout. 'They severely undermine China's legitimate rights and interests.' Thursday's call marks the first direct conversation between the two leaders since January, just before Trump was sworn in for his second term. Trump had recently hinted that a call was likely, as the White House suggested direct talks could help defuse rising tensions.
