logo
‘We need some hope': can a rural hospital on the brink survive Trump's bill?

‘We need some hope': can a rural hospital on the brink survive Trump's bill?

The Guardian3 days ago
When her severely allergic toddler, Josie, began gasping for breath in the middle of the night, Krissy Cunningham knew there was only one place she could get to in time to save her daughter's life.
For 74 years, Pemiscot Memorial hospital has been the destination for those who encounter catastrophe in Missouri's poorest county, a rural stretch of farms and towns in its south-eastern Bootheel region. Three stories of brown brick just off Interstate 55 in the town of Hayti, the 115-bed hospital has kept its doors open even after the county's only Walmart closed, the ranks of boarded-up gas stations along the freeway exit grew, and the population of the surrounding towns dwindled, thanks in no small part to the destruction done by tornadoes.
For many in Pemiscot county, its emergency room is the closest available without taking a 30-minute drive across the Mississippi river to Tennessee or the state line to Arkansas, a range that can make the difference between life and death for victims of shootings, overdoses or accidents on the road. In the wee hours of one spring morning, it was there that Josie received the breathing treatments and a racemic epinephrine shot that made her wheezing subside.
'There is no way I would have made it to one of the farther hospitals, if it wouldn't have been here. Her airway just would have closed off, and I probably would have been doing CPR on my daughter on the side of the road,' recalled Cunningham, a nurse who sits on the hospital's board.
Yet its days of serving its community may be numbered. In May, the hospital's administration went public with the news that after years of struggling with high rates of uninsured patients and low reimbursement rates from insurers, they may have to close. And even if they do manage to navigate out of their current crisis, Pemiscot Memorial's leaders see a new danger on the horizon: the 'big, beautiful bill' Republicans pushed through Congress earlier this month, at Donald Trump's request.
Centered around an array of tax cuts as well as funds for the president's mass deportation plans, the bill will mandate the largest funding reduction in history to Medicaid, the federal healthcare program supporting low-income and disabled Americans. That is expected to have ripple effects nationwide, but will hit particularly hard in Pemiscot county and other rural areas, where hospitals tend to have frail margins and disproportionately rely on Medicaid to stay afloat.
'If Medicaid drops, are we going to be even collecting what we're collecting now?' asked Jonna Green, the chairwoman of Pemiscot Memorial's board, who estimated 80% of their revenue comes from Medicaid as well as Medicare, another federal health program primarily for people 65 and older. 'We need some hope.'
The changes to Medicaid will phase in beginning in late 2026, and require enrollees to work, volunteer or attend school 80 hours a month, with some exceptions. States are also to face new caps on provider taxes, which they use to fund their Medicaid programs. All told, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office forecasts that 10 million people nationwide will lose their healthcare due to the bill, which is nonetheless expected to add $3.4tn to the federal budget deficit through 2034.
Trump carried Missouri, a midwestern state that has veered sharply away from the Democratic party over the past three decades, with more than 58% of the vote last November. In Pemiscot county, where census data shows more than a quarter of residents are below the poverty line and the median income is just over $40,000 a year, he was the choice of 74% of voters, and Republican lawmakers representing the county played a notable role in steering his tax and spending bill through Congress.
Senator Josh Hawley publicly advocated against slashing the healthcare program, writing in the New York Times: 'If Republicans want to be a working-class party – if we want to be a majority party – we must ignore calls to cut Medicaid and start delivering on America's promise for America's working people.' He ultimately supported the bill after a $50bn fund to help rural hospitals was included, but weeks later introduced legislation that would repeal some of the very same cuts he had just voted for.
'I want to see Medicaid reductions stopped and rural hospitals fully funded permanently,' the senator said.
Jason Smith, whose district encompasses Pemiscot county and the rest of south-eastern Missouri, oversaw the crafting of the measure's tax provision as chairman of the House ways and means committee, and has argued they will bring prosperity rural areas across the state. Like others in the GOP, he has said the Medicaid cuts will ferret out 'waste, fraud and abuse', and make the program more efficient.
It's a gamble for a state that has seen nine rural hospitals close since 2015, including one in a county adjacent to Pemiscot, with a further 10 at immediate risk of going under, according to data from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform policy group.
The Missouri Budget Project thinktank estimates that the bill will cost 170,000 of the state's residents their health coverage, largely due to work requirements that will act as difficult-to-satisfy red tape for Medicaid enrollees, while the cap on provider taxes will sap $1.9bn from the state's Medicaid program.
'There's going to be some really hard conversations over the course of the next five years, and I think that healthcare in our region will look a lot different than what it does right now,' said Karen White, CEO of Missouri Highlands Health Care, which operates federally qualified health centers providing primary and dental care across rural south-eastern Missouri. She forecasts 20% of her patients will lose Medicaid coverage through 2030.
As the bill was making its way through Congress, she contacted the offices of Smith, Hawley and Missouri's junior senator, Eric Schmitt, all politicians she had voted for, asking them to reconsider cutting Medicaid. She did not hear back.
'I love democracy. I love the fact that we as citizens can make our voices heard. And they voted the way that they felt they needed to vote. Maybe … the larger constituency reached out to them with a viewpoint that was different than mine, but I made my viewpoint heard,' White said.
Spokespeople for Schmitt and Smith did not respond to requests for comment. In response to emailed questions, a spokeswoman for Hawley referred to his introduction of the legislation to partially stop the Medicaid cuts.
Down the road from the hospital lies Hayti Heights, where there are no businesses and deep puddles form in the potholes and ditches that line roadways after every thunderstorm. Mayor Catrina Robinson has a plan to turn things around for her 500 or so residents, which involves bringing back into service the water treatment plant that is the town's main source of revenue. But that is unlikely to change much without Pemiscot Memorial.
'Half of those people that work at the hospital, they're my residents. So how they gonna pay their bills? How they gonna pay their water bill, how they gonna pay their light bill, how they gonna pay rent? This is their source of income. Then what will they do?' Robinson said.
Trump's bill does include an array of relief aimed at the working-class voters who broke for him in the last election, including tax cuts on tips and overtime pay and deductions aimed at senior citizens. It remains to be seen if whatever financial benefits those provisions bring to the workers of Pemiscot county will outweigh the impact of the stress the Medicaid cuts place on its healthcare system.
'The tax relief of server's tips and all that, that's not going to change the poverty level of our area,' said Loren Clifton, the hospital's administrative director. 'People losing their healthcare insurance absolutely will make it worse.'
Work can be found in the county's corn, wheat, soybean and rice fields, at a casino in the county seat Caruthersville and at a shipyard along the banks of the Mississippi . But Green questions if those industries would stick around if the hospital goes under, and takes with it the emergency room that often serves to stabilize critical patients before transferring them elsewhere.
'Our community cannot go without a hospital. Healthcare, employment, industry – it would devastate everything,' Green said.
The board is exploring partnerships with other companies to help keep the hospital afloat, and has applied for a federal rural emergency hospital designation which they believe will improve their reimbursements and chances of winning grants, though that will require them to give up other services that bring in revenue. For many of its leaders, the stakes of keeping the hospital open are personal.
'This is our home, born and raised, and you would never want to leave it. But I have a nine-year-old with cardiac problems. I would not feel safe living here without a hospital that I could take her to know if something happened,' said Brittany Osborne, Pemiscot Memorial's interim CEO.
One muggy Wednesday morning in July, Pemiscot's three county commissioners, all Republicans, gathered in a small conference room in Caruthersville's courthouse and spoke of their resolve to keep the hospital open.
'It's 50-50 right now,' commissioner Mark Cartee said of the hospital's chances of survival. 'But, as long as we have some money in the bank of the county, we're going to keep it open. We need healthcare. We got to have a hospital.'
They were comparatively sanguine about the possibility that the Medicaid work requirements would harm the facility's finances down the line.
'We got a guy around here, I guess he's still around. He's legally blind but he goes deer hunting every year,' commissioner Baughn Merideth said. 'There's just so much fraud … it sounds like we're right in the middle of it.'
A few blocks away, Jim Brands, owner of Hayden Pharmacy, the oldest in the county, had little doubt that there were those in the county who took advantage of Medicaid. He also believed that fewer enrollees in the program would mean less business for his pharmacy, and more hardship overall.
'Just seeing this community, the situation it's in, the poverty, we've got to get people to work. There are a ton of able-bodied people that could work that choose not to,' he said.
'To me, there's got to be a better way to weed out the fraud and not step on the toes of the people who need it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE New mom details shocking cost of giving birth in America
EXCLUSIVE New mom details shocking cost of giving birth in America

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE New mom details shocking cost of giving birth in America

A new mom has shared the shockingly high cost of giving birth in America - and it's well over six figures. Emily Fisher, 36, from Columbus, Ohio, welcomed twin girls last month and was left stunned when she saw an insurance claim come through for her delivery that was over $10,000. Completely shocked by the immense figure, she decided to go back and total up all the bills she had received over the course of her pregnancy to determine just how much having a baby in the US really costs. And after adding everything up, Emily found that having her baby girls would have cost her a whopping $120,527.51 had she not had insurance. She shared her findings in a video shared to TikTok earlier this month and it quickly went viral, leaving thousands across the globe just as surprised as she was. 'So I am five weeks postpartum with twin girls and I've been seeing a lot of headlines recently about how the birth rate in America is declining and how concerning that is,' Emily began in the video. 'I thought to myself, I could think of a lot of reasons why the birth rate might be declining. First and foremost, cost. 'So I decided to take it upon myself and look at every bill that I received over the course of my pregnancy and total what it costs to deliver twins in America.' Emily explained that she is considered 'advanced maternal age' and was pregnant with 'dichorionic diamniotic twins' which made her pregnancy 'high risk.' In addition, about halfway through the pregnancy her doctor raised concerns about potential 'fetal growth restriction,' so from about 22 weeks on she had to have two appointments every week with her OBGYN and a maternal fetal medicine specialist to make sure the babies were healthy. 'So what was the total cost of that? From the start of my pregnancy through delivery and me walking out of those hospital doors, the total bill for my care was $120,527.51,' she said in the video. 'Now I am very fortunate great insurance and I have a low deductible so over the course of my pregnancy out of pocket I paid $2,038.70. 'I know that is relatively good but still, $2,000 for something that is considered necessary and vital to the future of America is pretty significant.' Emily added that on top of that, her newborns both received bills for their delivery. 'It's kind of funny, they're not even able to blink yet and they've already been billed more than the total cost of my student loans,' she continued. 'Baby A received a bill for $15,124.55 and Baby B was billed $14,875.55, I guess there was some sort of sibling discount. She added, 'The total cost I owed for those two bills was $750, which was the cost of my deductible.' The bills are seen above 'The total cost I owed for those two bills was $750, which was the cost of my deductible.' She then broke down what some of the highest costs were during the pregnancy. Unsurprisingly, the delivery itself and the hospital stay afterwards was the most costly expense. Emily explained that she had a scheduled C-section at 37 weeks and spent four days in the hospital post delivery, and the total cost of her care before insurance was $65,665.50. The second highest cost during the pregnancy was an appointment she had about seven months in, during which she complained to her doctor that she was having headaches. She said they took her blood pressure and it was slightly elevated, so they monitored the heart rate of the babies for 20 minutes to 'make sure they were okay.' She was then given 'two extra strength Tylenol' and they 'did some blood work.' 'The cost that was billed to my insurance for that visit was $9,115,' shared the new mom. 'All things considered, I'm very grateful for the experience that I had and very grateful to have great insurance, but I know that for a lot of people who live in America that is simply not possible,' she concluded. 'And if I did not have insurance delivery my two baby girls, I would not be able to afford it. 'In fact, I probably would have had to file bankruptcy had I not had insurance. So when people act confused why the birth rates are down, maybe it's not necessarily all attributed to lifestyle choices, maybe it's not because people aren't feeling the vibe of having kids, maybe it's because the cost of having a baby in America is over six figures.' While chatting with the Daily Mail about it, Emily, who used to work on the healthcare space, said she believes the insurance system in America 'needs a complete overhaul.' 'Given that the US is the one of (if not the only) developed nation in the world without some sort of universal healthcare, we're falling behind,' she said. 'People are spending too much on basic and necessary care. Medical debt is one of the number one reasons for bankruptcy in the US, and it shouldn't be that way. 'If we invested in a system that put the health its people first, everyone would be better off. 'And given the decline in birth rates, if our politicians are genuinely concerned about falling birth rates, they would be incentivizing people to have children. You shouldn't have to pay to give birth.' She added that while she was 'shocked' by the high number that her insurance was billed, she was 'not surprised at the same time.' 'The first thing that came to mind when I saw the total was, "How do people without insurance afford this?"' she shared. 'But I've always known that healthcare in America is a business. Ultimately, like most necessities in the US, privatized insurance is designed to make money.' She said she certainly wasn't expecting her video, which was viewed more than one million times, to get as much attention as it did, but she's so glad that it has sparked a conversation. 'I hope my video makes people think twice about having kids in America. Because until the system is redesigned to truly support the people, we shouldn't be buying into it,' she concluded. 'I'm fortunate to have good health coverage. I'm not on the hook for much as far as the cost of my pregnancy, but that is only the beginning for my family and what we'll pay to raise my kids. 'Now we have to think about things like paying for their health coverage, daycare, food, housing and college. 'All of these things are only getting more and more expensive and almost unreachable for people.'

UnitedHealth falls short of second quarter expectations and offers weak outlook for 2025
UnitedHealth falls short of second quarter expectations and offers weak outlook for 2025

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

UnitedHealth falls short of second quarter expectations and offers weak outlook for 2025

UnitedHealth missed Wall Street's second-quarter earnings expectations and offered a new and conservative take on the rest of 2025. The health care giant said Tuesday that it expects rising medical costs, which have hurt the company and several rivals this year, to continue to pressure its performance. The insurer says it now expects adjusted earnings of at least $16 per share in2025 after withdrawing its previous forecast for the year in May. For the full year, analysts forecast earnings of $20.64 per share, according to the data firm FactSet. UnitedHealth Group Inc. runs one of the nation's largest health insurance and pharmacy benefits management businesses. The Eden Prairie, Minnesota, company also operates a growing Optum business that provides care and technology support. In May, the company withdrew its 2025 forecast due to higher-than-expected medical costs and CEO Andrew Witty departed the company abruptly. He was replaced by Chairman Stephen Hemsley, who was the UnitedHealth CEO for more than a decade until 2017. Hemsley promised had said in June that UnitedHealth would establish a 'prudent' 2025 earnings outlook when it detailed second-quarter results. Hemsley also said then that the company had underestimated care activity and cost trends, but improvements were being made. In the second quarter, UnitedHealth reported adjusted earnings of $4.08 per share on $111.6 billion in revenue. Analysts expected earnings of$4.48 per share on $111.5 billion in revenue, according to FactSet. UnitedHealth is normally the first health insurer to report earnings every quarter. But this summer, it followed competitors like Elevance Health Inc. and Centene Corp. that have lowered their annual forecasts and delivered disappointing results. Several insurers say they have been hit by medical costs that are rising faster than expected. Companies have seen a rise in expensive emergency rooms visits and growing prescription drug costs, especially from expensive cancer treatments and gene therapy. They've also seen a rise in behavioral health care, which includes the treatment of mental health conditions and substance use disorders. Shares slid about 4% before the opening bell Tuesday.

Philips cuts tariff impact estimate following US-EU deal, shares up 10%
Philips cuts tariff impact estimate following US-EU deal, shares up 10%

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

Philips cuts tariff impact estimate following US-EU deal, shares up 10%

July 29 (Reuters) - Dutch healthcare technology company Philips ( opens new tab slashed its estimated tariff impacton Tuesday after the United States and the European Union agreed a trade dealthat imposes a 15% rate on most goods imported from Europe. U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened to impose a 30% tariff on imports from the 27-nation EU bloc from August 1 in the absence of an agreement. The group, which sells products ranging from toothbrushes to medical imaging systems, said it expected an impact of 150 million to 200 million euros ($173 million to $232 million) from the tariffs this year, lower than the 250 million to 300 million euros it had previously estimated. Philips' Amsterdam-listed stock was the top performer on the pan-European STOXX index (.STOXX), opens new tab in early Tuesday trading, climbing 10% by 0930 GMT. Philips CEO Roy Jakobs told reporters that the U.S.-EU deal provided clarity, but Philips would continue to ask for an exemption from tariffs and other trade barriers for the healthcare sector, including in the U.S. and in China. China announced earlier this month it was restricting government purchases of medical devices from the EU that exceed 45 million yuan ($6.27 million) in value, in retaliation against Brussels' own curbs imposed in June. "We have localized 90% of what we sell in China to manufacture in China, so this is not something of significance to us," Jakobs said, adding that the Chinese market was slowly recovering. Philips also increased its core profit (EBITA) margin forecast to a range of 11.3% to 11.8% for the year, from the previous guidance of 10.8% to 11.3%. Chief Financial Officer Charlotte Hanneman told analysts that the company expects mid-single-digit growth and mid-teens margins beyond 2025, taking into account the impact of tariffs. Its second-quarter adjusted EBITA margin grew to 12.4%, beating analysts' average forecast of 9.9%, while sales were in line with market expectations at 4.3 billion euros. Philips operates through its Personal Health, Diagnosis & Treatment, and Connected Care segments. Its top selling products include image-guided and diagnostic systems, consumer electronics and appliances. The company's sleep and respiratory care products, part of its Connected Care segment, accounted for about 6% of its total sales in 2024. That is about half their pre-pandemic levels, following a 2021 recall of millions of breathing devices and ventilators used to treat sleep apnea. Philips said last April it had agreed to pay $1.1 billion, less than expected, in a settlement of personal injury cases in the United States related to the recall. It said it was committed to rebuilding its position in the market while resolving the effects of the recall. "We have strong momentum in the masks ... and we are working our way back into the markets that we are reentering", Jakobs told analyst on Tuesday. Its comparable order intake grew by 6% in the quarter, the company said, citing the impact of innovations including AI-enabled diagnostic systems. The group also said it had signed a long-term deal with the Indonesian Ministry of Health for its Azurion image-guided therapy system for cardiac, stroke and cancer care and expected a "sizable" impact on its revenues over time. ($1 = 0.8630 euros) ($1 = 7.1764 Chinese yuan renminbi)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store