FACT BOX-What's in Trump's move to ease US automotive tariffs
Trump's latest orders mark the latest softening of his multi-layered tariff assault on trading partners as he seeks to negotiate deals aimed at lowering other countries' trade barriers to U.S. exports.
Earlier this month, Trump's administration exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics largely made in China from triple digit tariffs at least temporarily.
Here's what's in Trump's latest proclamation and executive order on autos tariffs.
ENDS AUTOS TARIFF 'STACKING'
Trump has ordered that autos and auto parts subject to his new 25% Section 232 autos tariffs will no longer be also subject to other 25% tariffs that he has imposed on steel and aluminum or on Canadian and Mexican goods related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis.
But the order specifies that other tariffs, including Trump's duties on Chinese goods that have reached 145%, would still apply, as would the longstanding 2.5% 'Most Favored Nation' tariff rate for automotive imports.
CREDIT FOR U.S. VEHICLE ASSEMBLY
The Trump administration also will offer automakers a credit of 3.75% of the total Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price value of all vehicles assembled in the U.S. from April 3, 2025 through April 30, 2026, that can be applied to an equal amount of duty-free parts imports – except from China.
For each $50,000 vehicle built in the U.S., an automaker would be able to import $1,875 worth of parts duty free.
The vehicle credit drops to 2.5% for the second year to April 30, 2027, then disappears altogether as an incentive for automakers to return parts production to the U.S.
The percentages reflect the duty owed when a 25% tariff is applied to 15% of the value of a U.S.-assembled vehicle in the first year and 10% in the second year.
Vehicles assembled in Canada and Mexico are not eligible for the credit.
RATIONALE
Trump's order said the revised tariffs 'will more quickly reduce reliance on foreign manufacturing and importation of automobiles and automobile parts (and) strengthen United States vehicle assembly operations by encouraging companies to expand domestic production capacity.'
It said this was critical from a national security standpoint because it would allow more automotive research and development by American-owned automotive manufacturers into 'cutting edge technologies that are essential to the United States defense industrial base and our military superiority.' DM
(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Lincoln Feast.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Investing in What Matters – And Avoiding What Doesn't
Recent global investor discussions have tended to focus on macro challenges, Trump tariffs, and the concentration of market value in a small number of technology companies. In addition, our Laurium Capital global equity team has spent a lot of time highlighting to investors the runway of growth benefiting electrification stocks as well as select pharmaceutical companies. In the case of the electrification investment thesis, the companies in our portfolio remain ongoing beneficiaries of positive demand growth as well as the need to renew and upgrade the existing electricity grid infrastructure as new generation sources are added and load management becomes more complex. In the pharmaceutical arena, we have been confronted with the opportunities presented by significant advances in oncology treatments as well as weight-loss drugs – the GLP-1 (or 'Ozempic') boom. These specific areas have provided for much of the content of our investor debates and discussions, and we have often expanded on this in our written market commentaries. However, there is another aspect of our work that we have hardly mentioned. This is what has been the 'missing' element from our global equity portfolio in recent periods – the areas of the global economy and stock market that we have actively avoided investing in, and why. In our case, the most noteworthy of these has been in consumer goods. In recent times, we have generally steered clear of companies that produce discretionary consumer goods and even those involved right through the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) value chain, save for some Coke bottlers and Heineken (we will touch on those later). This underweight is unusual for a fund that follows a 'quality' style-bias, as we do, where a company's strong financial health, pricing power, and enduring end-demand for the underlying product or service usually appeals to us as investors. These characteristics have often been closely associated with the large, successful FMCG and consumer blue-chips. So, what has kept us from investing a greater proportion of the portfolio in these consumer goods businesses, and why has this view been justified? The Concept of 'Over-Earning' Many consumer-focused businesses benefited from a unique, favourable confluence of events following the pandemic—boosted demand out of lockdown, limited competition, and enhanced pricing power. On this latter point, many companies used this strong inflation period to push prices up very meaningfully, in some cases well ahead of the level that customers are willing and/or able to pay. As a result, we believe that many of these discretionary goods companies (even in the luxury goods space) are now 'over-earning' relative to their long-term potential. This raises the risk of earnings normalization or even decline, which could leave valuations exposed. Cyclical and Macro Headwinds Consumers globally are grappling with higher interest rates, tighter credit, and renewed cost-of-living pressures. These factors weigh particularly heavily on discretionary spending and have started to challenge the revenue growth and margin stability of many traditional consumer goods companies. Meanwhile, elevated cost inflation continues to pressure input costs, making it more difficult for companies to maintain historical profitability levels. This pressure will be exacerbated by tariffs and trade barriers that raise the costs for the end-consumer. Structural Behaviour Shifts Consumer behaviour has been evolving. There is increasing demand for health-conscious, sustainable, and locally relevant brands, which challenges the dominance of traditional global FMCG giants. Digital-first and direct-to-consumer brands are growing in market share, and brand loyalty is no longer as dependable. Private label brands are of good quality, and easy to buy. As such, many of the previously 'defensive' brands in the consumer space may be less well-positioned for the next phase of consumer evolution. Hurdles to the Flow of Goods Ongoing global tensions have created several friction points in global trade, notably between producers in China and consumers in the US: Tariffs and protectionist policies, some originating during the first Trump administration as well as under Biden, remain in place and have expanded in scope. Strategic near-shoring and shifts in supply chains have increased costs and reduced efficiency. Immigration controls and labour shortages in certain markets have impacted production and distribution. Cultural fragmentation and regionalization are making global brand strategies more complex and costly. Taken together, these headwinds introduce structural challenges for global consumer businesses, especially those heavily reliant on scale and smooth cross-border logistics. Selective Exposure While we've generally remained underweight in consumer goods, we have made selective investments in companies like Coca-Cola bottlers and Heineken. These companies have demonstrated resilient demand, strong local execution models, and better ability to adapt to regional nuances and price ladders. Their exposure to emerging markets and beverages (a relatively defensive consumption category) makes them more attractive in the current environment and have helped the fund to deliver strong overall performance during a challenging period. DM About the Fund The Laurium Global Active Equity Fund is an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of global equities that aims to outperform the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI). The Fund is managed by Rob Oellermann, who brings extensive experience in global markets, and is supported by Laurium's broader Investment, Trading, and Quants teams. The team follows a disciplined, quality-oriented investment approach, focused on long-term value creation while remaining highly attuned to macroeconomic shifts, sector dynamics, and structural changes shaping the global landscape. The Laurium Global Active Equity Fund was launched in August 2021 and has delivered excellent performance since inception. It is up 20.3% in USD for the 12 months ended 31 July 2025, versus the MSCI All Country World Index return of 15.9%. It is available for USD and ZAR investments either directly or via select platforms. For more information, visit Disclaimer: Laurium Capital (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider (FSP 34142). Collective Investment Schemes in Securities (CIS) should be considered as medium to long-term investments. The value may go up as well as down and past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. CISs are traded at the ruling price and can engage in scrip lending and borrowing. A schedule of fees, charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the Manager. A CIS may be closed to new investors in order for it to be managed more efficiently in accordance with its mandate. There is no guarantee in respect of capital or returns in a portfolio. Performance has been calculated using net NAV to NAV numbers with income reinvested. The performance for each period shown reflects the return for investors who have been fully invested for that period. Individual investor performance may differ as a result of initial fees, the actual investment date, the date of reinvestments and dividend withholding tax. Full performance calculations are available from the manager on request. Annualised performance shows longer term performance rescaled to a 1-year period. Annualised performance is the average return per year over the period. Actual annual figures are available to the investor on request. Highest and lowest is returns for any 1 year over the period since inception have been shown. NAV is the net asset value represents the assets of a Fund less its liabilities. Prescient Management Company (RF) (Pty) Ltd is registered and approved under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act (No.45 of 2002). For any additional information such as fund prices, fees, brochures, minimum disclosure documents and application forms please go to
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit
In their first meeting since 2019, Trump and Putin hold high-risk talks in Alaska with Ukraine's fate hanging in the balance. US President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin meet Friday in Alaska in a high-stakes, high-risk summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine. Putin will step onto Western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and on which Russia has not relented, making rapid gains just before the summit. Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since been defensive and warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Putin does not compromise. Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has publicly refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Trump has called the summit a 'feel-out meeting' to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future,' Trump said Thursday. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa speaks to Putin on Ukraine crisis, bilateral issues He gave the summit a one-in-four chance of failure. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov responded to a question from Russian state TV by saying that Moscow would not make guesses on the outcome of the meeting. 'We never make any predictions ahead of time,' Lavrov said after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with 'USSR' written across it in Cyrillic script. '… our position is clear and unambiguous. We will present it,' he said. Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to 'divvy up' territory. Trump's latest shift Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war and vowed before his return to the White House in January to bring peace within 24 hours. ALSO READ: Ukraine is becoming the wedge driving US and Europe apart But despite repeated calls to Putin, and a stunning February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise. Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned of 'very severe consequences' if he does not accept a ceasefire — but also agreed to see him in Alaska. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1900 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War base for surveillance of the former Soviet Union. Adding to the historical significance, the United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia — a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps. The Kremlin said it expected Putin and Trump to meet alone with interpreters before a working lunch with aides. Neither leader is expected to step off the base into Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where protesters have put up signs of solidarity with Ukraine. ALSO READ: Ukraine war 'existential,' Kremlin says, launching revenge strikes Exiled Russian opposition figure Yulia Navalnaya — whose husband Alexei Navalny died in prison last year — urged the two leaders to strike a deal to 'release Russian political activists and journalists, Ukrainian civilians, (and) those who were imprisoned for anti-war statements and posts on social media.' A 'personal victory' for Putin? The summit marks a sharp shift from the approach of Western European leaders and Biden, who vowed no discussion with Russia on Ukraine's future unless Ukraine was also at the table. Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, leading him to curtail travel sharply since the war began. However, the United States is not party to the Hague tribunal and Trump's Treasury Department temporarily eased sanctions on top Russian officials to allow them to travel and use bank cards in Alaska. Zelensky said on Tuesday that the Alaska summit was a 'personal victory' for Putin. With the trip, Putin 'is coming out of isolation' and he has 'somehow postponed sanctions,' which Trump had vowed to impose on Russia without progress. ALSO READ: Russia signals severe retaliation after Ukraine's strikes Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called for security guarantees for Ukraine — an idea downplayed by Trump at the start of his latest term. Daniel Fried, a former US diplomat now at the Atlantic Council, said Trump had the means to pressure Putin but that the Russian could distract him by seeming to offer something new. Putin, Fried said, 'is a master of the new shiny object which turns out to be meaningless.' – By: © Agence France-Presse
The Herald
6 hours ago
- The Herald
US weighs refugee cap of 40,000 with most spots for Afrikaners
US President Donald Trump's administration is discussing a refugee admissions cap of about 40,000 for the coming year with most allocated to white South Africans, according to two US officials briefed on the matter and an internal refugee programme email, reflecting a major shift in the US approach to refugees. Angie Salazar, the top refugee programme official at the US health and human services department (HHS), told state-level refugee workers she expected the cap to be 40,000, according to an email summary of an August 1 meeting reviewed by Reuters. The two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said about 30,000 of the 40,000 spaces would be reserved for Afrikaners. The 40,000-person cap would be a sharp drop from the 100,000 refugees brought in by former president Joe Biden in 2024 fiscal year, but higher than the record-low 15,000 person ceiling Trump set for fiscal 2021 before ending his first term. A separate person familiar with the matter said that in addition to the 40,000 figure a cap as low as 12,000 had also been discussed. There are 37-million refugees worldwide, according to a UN estimate. Trump immediately froze refugee admissions after taking office in January, but weeks later launched a programme for Afrikaners, saying the white minority group suffered racial discrimination and violence in majority-black South Africa, claims rejected by South Africa's government. The Trump administration also expects to bring in some Afghans who aided the US government during the conflict in Afghanistan and is weighing whether to resettle Ukrainians, the email said. Some spaces would remain unallocated to potentially be filled by other nationalities, the email and officials said. White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly stressed that no decisions were final until Trump issued his determination for the 2026 fiscal year, which begins on October 1. 'President Trump has a humanitarian heart, which is why he has welcomed these courageous individuals to the US,' Kelly said. 'Refugee admission caps will be determined next month and any numbers discussed now are pure speculation.' A senior state department official pointed to the department's recent human rights report, which raised concerns about 'inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities' in South Africa. The HHS referred questions related to the refugee cap to the White House. Salazar did not respond to requests for comment. The first group of 59 South Africans arrived in May, but only 34 more had arrived by early August, a White House official said. The state department laid off many refugee programme staffers in major workforce reductions in July. To compensate for the fired staff, workers from the HHS who normally deal with domestic refugee assistance have been reassigned to the South Africa programme, one of the officials said. Thirteen HHS staffers were dispatched to Pretoria on Monday though most had no direct experience screening refugees, the official said. An HHS spokesperson said trained staff had been detailed to support refugee resettlement but that they were not conducting interviews to determine whether a refugee had experienced persecution. Some South Africans now in the US with refugee status have reached out to the HHS to raise concerns about a lack of benefits to support them, one of the US officials said. Trump slashed refugee benefits after taking office, including reducing cash assistance and healthcare benefits that normally last a year to four months. One of the initial group of 59 South Africans brought into the US in mid-May sent an email to the HHS' refugee office two weeks later pleading for help getting a social security number (SSN) and access to a work permit. The person, who went to Missoula, Montana, said their family had spent thousands of dollars to cover expenses. 'We have applied for jobs like crazy but to no avail because we found people here are not keen on hiring refugees without an SSN,' one of the family members wrote in a May 27 email to the HHS refugee programme reviewed by Reuters. 'We have spent about $4,000 [R70,307] on Uber, food, cellphone SIM cards which don't work.' The person was concerned the family would not be able to find housing after a government-funded hotel stay ended in early June. Reuters could not reach the family. The HHS spokesperson said the agency takes complaints seriously and refugees placed in temporary housing receive support for essential needs, including food. A person familiar with the matter said some South Africans arrived in the US expecting standard refugee benefits that had been paused or reduced by Trump. Reuters
