US weighs refugee cap of 40,000 with most spots for Afrikaners
Angie Salazar, the top refugee programme official at the US health and human services department (HHS), told state-level refugee workers she expected the cap to be 40,000, according to an email summary of an August 1 meeting reviewed by Reuters.
The two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said about 30,000 of the 40,000 spaces would be reserved for Afrikaners.
The 40,000-person cap would be a sharp drop from the 100,000 refugees brought in by former president Joe Biden in 2024 fiscal year, but higher than the record-low 15,000 person ceiling Trump set for fiscal 2021 before ending his first term.
A separate person familiar with the matter said that in addition to the 40,000 figure a cap as low as 12,000 had also been discussed.
There are 37-million refugees worldwide, according to a UN estimate. Trump immediately froze refugee admissions after taking office in January, but weeks later launched a programme for Afrikaners, saying the white minority group suffered racial discrimination and violence in majority-black South Africa, claims rejected by South Africa's government.
The Trump administration also expects to bring in some Afghans who aided the US government during the conflict in Afghanistan and is weighing whether to resettle Ukrainians, the email said.
Some spaces would remain unallocated to potentially be filled by other nationalities, the email and officials said.
White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly stressed that no decisions were final until Trump issued his determination for the 2026 fiscal year, which begins on October 1.
'President Trump has a humanitarian heart, which is why he has welcomed these courageous individuals to the US,' Kelly said. 'Refugee admission caps will be determined next month and any numbers discussed now are pure speculation.'
A senior state department official pointed to the department's recent human rights report, which raised concerns about 'inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities' in South Africa.
The HHS referred questions related to the refugee cap to the White House. Salazar did not respond to requests for comment.
The first group of 59 South Africans arrived in May, but only 34 more had arrived by early August, a White House official said.
The state department laid off many refugee programme staffers in major workforce reductions in July. To compensate for the fired staff, workers from the HHS who normally deal with domestic refugee assistance have been reassigned to the South Africa programme, one of the officials said.
Thirteen HHS staffers were dispatched to Pretoria on Monday though most had no direct experience screening refugees, the official said.
An HHS spokesperson said trained staff had been detailed to support refugee resettlement but that they were not conducting interviews to determine whether a refugee had experienced persecution.
Some South Africans now in the US with refugee status have reached out to the HHS to raise concerns about a lack of benefits to support them, one of the US officials said.
Trump slashed refugee benefits after taking office, including reducing cash assistance and healthcare benefits that normally last a year to four months.
One of the initial group of 59 South Africans brought into the US in mid-May sent an email to the HHS' refugee office two weeks later pleading for help getting a social security number (SSN) and access to a work permit.
The person, who went to Missoula, Montana, said their family had spent thousands of dollars to cover expenses.
'We have applied for jobs like crazy but to no avail because we found people here are not keen on hiring refugees without an SSN,' one of the family members wrote in a May 27 email to the HHS refugee programme reviewed by Reuters. 'We have spent about $4,000 [R70,307] on Uber, food, cellphone SIM cards which don't work.'
The person was concerned the family would not be able to find housing after a government-funded hotel stay ended in early June.
Reuters could not reach the family. The HHS spokesperson said the agency takes complaints seriously and refugees placed in temporary housing receive support for essential needs, including food.
A person familiar with the matter said some South Africans arrived in the US expecting standard refugee benefits that had been paused or reduced by Trump.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
We are here to start the dialogue, says Ramaphosa
President Cyril Ramaphosa has emphasised his standing amid the wrangling over the national dialogue. Taking to the podium to address the national convention meant to kick off the dialogue, the president maintained he is well within his rights to oversee the process as its convener. 'I have called this first national convention in my capacity as your president, as the head of state. I have done so in line with section 83 of our constitution, which requires the president, as the head of state and head of the national executive, to promote the unity of the nation and that which will advance the republic. 'This is what brings me here. This is why I invited all of you here, to be here and be part of this dialogue,' said Ramaphosa. Despite the dramatic 11th-hour withdrawal from the dialogue by legacy foundations, Ramaphosa insisted there was a need to forge ahead as planned. Thanking them for their work preparing for the dialogue, Ramaphosa said any hesitation or postponement could erode trust in the process by civil society organisations and NGOs invited to share their views. 'For more than a year, various formations of civil society have been working to conceptualise and champion the national dialogue. Central to this effort have been a number of legacy foundations established by and named for stalwarts of our liberation struggle. We express our gratitude and appreciation for the work of these foundations in giving life to the national dialogue.' He said this would open up a space where South Africans confront their realities openly, respectfully and constructively. ' This is not a partisan platform. This is a national platform. Here, no voice is too small and no perspective is too inconvenient to be heard. We are gathered to listen to each other, to understand one another and to chart a common path forward for our country. 'We meet at a time of profound challenges: economic hardship, unemployment, inequality, growing poverty and a crisis of confidence in our institutions. We also meet at a time when the world is rapidly changing and our ability to adapt and renew ourselves will define the next generation. But history teaches us that nations are not defined solely by their difficulties; they are defined by how they respond to challenges they face.' Ramaphosa said the South African struggle was one for freedom from the nightmare of apartheid, one that proved there was unity in diversity. 'It is a powerful force for transformation. Gathered in this hall are people from all across our land, people from all walks of life, people of all races, all classes, all languages and cultures.' Despite the diversity of those participating in forums like the dialogue, one thing that held South Africans together was that they were all 'sons and daughters of the same soil'. 'We share a common past. We share the same inheritance of division, of inequality and of injustice. We share the same pride at ending the crime of apartheid and establishing a constitutional democracy. We also share a common future. And that is why we have chosen to gather here today. Because each one of us, regardless of our differences, is committed to work together to build the future of which we all dream. 'We have chosen to be here because we believe in the power of dialogue and united action. We believe that if we share our concerns and fears, we can conquer them. If we understand the challenges we face, we can overcome them. 'If we know what hurts us, we can heal. If we know what divides us, we can unite.' He said across the length and breadth of South Africa, people would, and should, meet to talk about what worried them, what gave them hope and how they thought their lives and the country could be better.
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Bail delay for four accused of hit on DA councillor Nhlalayenza Ndlovu
Bail proceedings for four men charged with the murder of DA councillor Nhlalayenza Ndlovu suffered another setback on Friday when the magistrate was booked off sick. The matter was set down for the official bail application in the Howick magistrate's court. Traditional leader of the Nxamalala tribal authority in Impendle Inkosi Simphiwe Eric Zuma, 55, Masobho Hlongwa, 31, Khayelihle Shabalala, 31, and Thabo Mathonsi, 26, are charged with murder. A fifth accused, Zwelithini Buthelezi, 43, turned state witness. Deputy director of public prosecutions advocate Lawrence Gcaba said they had learnt about the magistrate's absence when they arrived in court. Gcaba asked that the matter be postponed to August 22. This will coincide with the sitting of another pending matter which Zuma is facing, where he is alleged to have killed iNduna Qalokunye Zuma on January 23, 2023. He was released on bail of R25,000 for that matter. DA leader Francois Rodgers who attended the hearing was disappointed it was postponed. Stand-in magistrate Helene Wilkins said she had received several applications from the media to be allowed to film and photograph court proceedings. She said she would not make the determination and instead hand the matter over to the magistrate who would preside at the next court sitting. 'This will be canvassed at the next court date,' she said. The defence, including advocate Sthembiso Mdladla representing Zuma, has objected to the media requests while the state has no objections. Ndlovu was shot dead outside his home, in front of his wife, two children and a nanny. His family have since abandoned the home outside eMpophomeni. The accused were emotionless during the short proceedings, a sharp contrast to a previous appearance during which Zuma, who is related to Ndlovu, cried in the dock. When the matter was adjourned Zuma greeted several people seated in the public gallery. Outside court the prime minister of the Nxamalala tribal authority, Tallman Zuma, could not hide his disappointment about the delay over bail. He is among Zuma's fierce backers and deputy convener of the MK Party in the region. 'We have been left in limbo. Some of the affairs of the rural community have stalled because of inkhosi's absence. Though we have his subjects in the lower rung of the community structures where things are smooth, a problem comes when issues sometimes have to be escalated to inkhosi,' said Zuma. TimesLIVE
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Lungu family approaches ConCourt in bid for private burial in SA
'Our wishes for a private burial emanate from both our own wishes, as well as those of President Lungu. Before his passing on June 5, President Lungu expressed his wishes and made it clear that if he were to pass on he did not want those who did not care for him while he was still alive to be 'anywhere near his body'.' She said it was her husband's wish that incumbent Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema, among other people, should not attend nor speak at his funeral. This was informed by the estranged relationship between Lungu and the regime in Zambia. Consistent with the wishes of Lungu, the family had decided that it would have a private burial to avoid any interactions and involvement with the Zambian government, she said. However, the Lungu family was approached by a number of parties for the family to open up the possibility of engaging with the Zambian government regarding Lungu being afforded a state funeral. This was despite that at the time of his death and due to his estranged relations with the current regime, Lungu had been stripped of his benefits as a former president, she said. Though the Lungu family was reluctant to engage with the Zambian government , it nonetheless understood that there were many Zambians who would wish to pay their last respects in a state funeral. 'At all material times, however, the family was clear that any agreement to a state funeral would have to be on circumscribed terms that catered for the wishes of the family.' She said i nitially, the negotiations had progressed to a point where Zambian officials had agreed that the wishes of Lungu would be honoured. A tentative programme was prepared by the Lungu family in line with the wishes of the family and Lungu. The programme proposed the transportation of the remains of Lungu to be private, with his family and by private charter. However, two days after the family had produced its programme, a handwritten programme was circulated by the Zambian government, which was a complete departure from what the officials and the family had agreed on. 'The government now wanted to repatriate the mortal remains of President Lungu and President Hichilema was among the speakers at the funeral.' She said after the Zambian government's attempt to superimpose its own programme on the family, the negotiations between the parties had broken down and no agreement was reached for a state funeral. The family decided to proceed with its choice of a private burial, which would be held in South Africa. This led to the Zambian government approaching the high court for an order declaring it was entitled to repatriate the mortal remains of Lungu. Lungu said the reason for the extreme urgency in its application was that it had already been more than two months since her husband's death and his body was still lying in a mortuary. 'The matter cannot await ordinary appellate processes because there is a real risk of President Lungu's body decomposing while awaiting the matter to go through ordinary appellate processes,' she said. TimesLIVE
