The NSW families who have just had a $65 hit to their electricity bills
The energy rebate for low-income families with concession cards has been slashed from $350 per year to $285 this financial year. The medical energy rebate, which helps those with certain medical conditions that require extra energy use for treatment, was cut from $350 to $200.
The family energy rebate, which applies to Family Tax Benefit recipients, was cut from $250 per year to $180. The seniors energy rebate has also been reduced from $250 to $180.
The gas rebate remains unchanged at $110 per household.
The rebates were increased last year following a $100 million budget injection, which the state government has chosen not to continue. This year's budget papers show cutting the benefit to low-income families will save $55 million alone.
Loading
The NSW opposition has seized on the cuts as evidence the state government isn't doing enough to combat the cost of living.
'When the cost of everything is going up, cutting cost-of-living relief isn't just out of touch, it's the wrong priority. Chris Minns should be making life easier, not harder,' opposition leader Mark Speakman said.
A spokesperson for Energy Minister Penny Sharpe said the rebates were returning to previous levels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
10 hours ago
- ABC News
NSW government kills debate on protesters paying for police presence after exceeding cap
A renewed push to limit activists to staging three protests a year with taxpayer-funded crowd control has been shut down by the NSW government. After the weekend's pro-Palestinian march over Sydney Harbour Bridge, Shadow Attorney-General Alister Henskens attempted to bring on debate for a bill — first introduced in February — that proposed a 'user pays' system for protest organisers after reaching a cap. "This bill is not taking any side on the issues that were subject of the protest on Sunday," Mr Henskens told parliament. "The current legislation does not give any guidance to courts as to how they are to determine the public interest. "What we've seen is millions of dollars being spent on policing instead of on health, education and public transport. There's been a huge drain on our policing resources." But the government voted against debating the proposal on Tuesday, effectively killing the bill. The proposal could have forced protest organisers to pay or contribute to the cost of policing after three annual protests. Premier Chris Minns said the "strong view" of senior government counsel was that it could be "unconstitutional". However, he has not ruled out legislation to prevent regular protests that disrupt "critical infrastructure" like the harbour bridge, following the Supreme Court decision on Saturday for the march to go ahead. "We can't have open season on the bridge. We need to have some kind of orderly process where we balance people's rights to have a protest in Sydney — it's a big international city — without closing down critical infrastructure," Mr Minns told radio station 2GB. "I want to make sure my ducks are in a row ... I'm not ruling out legislation. "I realise that will be controversial, but I think even a lot of people that were at the protest on Sunday would appreciate that you can't knock the bridge out every weekend." NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said it was a fair demand that, after three free demonstrations, the right to protest was balanced against cost to taxpayers and diversion of police resources. "We offered the government a way to strike a fair balance when it comes to protest law," Mr Speakman said. "The right to protest is fundamental in a liberal democracy, but it's not an absolute right. "It has to be balanced against public safety, against the diversion of police resources, against the cost to the taxpayer and against the right of other citizens to use their public infrastructure and go about their daily business." In the lead-up to the protest, Mr Minns faced internal criticism from Labor MPs who suggested political overreach after he stated the bridge march should not go ahead. Two of his ministers, Penny Sharpe and Jihad Dib, joined the protest on Sunday, as did several MPs including Julia Finn, Lynda Voltz, Stephen Lawrence and Anthony D'Adam. While the government is reviewing the Supreme Court's judgement, legal expert Simon Rice from Sydney Law School described the decision as "unremarkable". Professor Rice said Justice Belinda Rigg ultimately decided freedom of expression in this case outweighed NSW Police's public safety concerns. "It's another in a string of decisions the Supreme Court makes from time-to-time when police are concerned about safety and it weighs up competing considerations," he said. "It's not a special decision except that it was on the harbour bridge. "A future protest could be on the harbour bridge, but that depends on the factors the court weighs up next time."
News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Short sighted': Unions concerned about flood resilience after latest NSW job cuts
Communities in NSW could be left without workers to support them after flood events, a union leader has warned, after another 300 state government jobs were slashed. WaterNSW, the state-owned dam manager and bulk-water supplier to Sydney Water, said it would slash the number of executives and senior managers by 30 per cent. Commencing with voluntary reductions, the cuts are the latest to hit the state workforce in recent weeks and come after renewed flooding in central NSW last week. Australian Service Union secretary Angus McFarland said the cuts 'beggar belief' with 'economists, scientists' warning the number of floods will double in 10 years. 'I'm worried this is very shortsighted,' Mr McFarland said. 'Are we going to have a situation in just a month or two where there's another flooding event, and suddenly there aren't the workers there to support the community? 'WaterNSW has a lot to answer (for), but also the government does, because at the end of the day WaterNSW is operated by the government. 'They own and operate on behalf of the people of NSW, so we are worried about impacts on the state's water security and the state's climate preparedness.' More than 20,000 homes are without power in the Hunter Valley as a result of the flooding, the latest to smash central and northern NSW in recent months. 'Terrible week' for NSW public servants NSW Premier Chris Minns campaigned prior to the 2024 state election on a 15 per cent cut to upper echelons of the public service. The cuts also come after almost 1000 senior service manager positions would be slashed at Transport for NSW, which manages the state's public transport and roads. Only days later, the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development – the state's only dedicated regional department – said it would cut 165 jobs. Public Service Association General Secretary Stewart Little described it as a 'terrible week for the public sector'. 'It's disgraceful that you've had these cuts being implemented to regional locations, frontline jobs,' she said. 'These aren't background jobs that deal with pay and things … they're helping communities. 'Then, willy nilly, we've had 300 jobs cut and announced in this water restructure, but we've lost jobs in DPI, elsewhere, and the government haven't explained it. 'Quite frankly, the government have lost control of the fatcat bureaucrats. 'They're the ones overseeing all of this, and they're doing it to save their own speeds.' Asked during question time on Tuesday about cuts to the DPIRD, Monaro MP Steve Whan said 'no final decision had been made about the changes'. 'The department is focusing on its core business of protecting, supporting, and developing primary industries in regional economies,' he said. 'The department is proposing to implement changes that will enable it to work in a financially sustainable and responsible way, while maintaining service levels. 'All impacted staff will be appropriately supported and consultation is being undertaken.' Mr Whan acknowledged the changes would affect regionally based staff, but noted increases to staff levels in response to the Covid pandemic. 'That means that there is, over time, a need to bring them back to focus on the areas which are the core areas,' he said. Financial strife at WaterNSW Unions NSW Secretary called on the WaterNSW board to resign as a result of the planned cuts. 'They have been ineffective and been unable to manage the circumstances in which they employ people,' he said. In a statement, WaterNSW said it would be 'unable to continue delivering all its current functions in the same way' with significantly reduced funding. The reduction, they said, was a result of determinations by the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal, which set the maximum price that WaterNSW can charge its customers for bulk, unfiltered water in Sydney. 'To put the size of the challenge in numbers, we now need to find a further $80m each year in cost savings,' WaterNSW said. 'We are performing a fundamental reset of WaterNSW, becoming a leaner, smaller and more focused business, with formal consultation on planned changes. 'Unfortunately, some staff will be impacted as part of this process. 'We are reducing the number of executives and senior managers by greater than 30 per cent, and we will reduce our total workforce by approximately 300 employees. 'Despite this, WaterNSW will continue to have hundreds of expert employees based across regional NSW and Greater Sydney, where we are committed to retaining a strong local presence.'
News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
NSW Premier Chris Minns praises Port Arthur response amid pressure over Shooters' reform bill
NSW Premier Chris Minns has praised John Howard's response to the Port Arthur massacre as 'one of the best decisions a government has ever made', as the state government faces pushback to proposed reforms to hunting rights. The bill, introduced by Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers' MLC Robert Borsak, seeks to enshrine a 'right to hunt' into law and create a new hunting authority, as well as paving the way for the introduction of a bounty system for the killing of feral animals. Former Prime Minister John Howard, who oversaw sweeping gun reforms after the killing of 35 people in 1996, on Monday said he did not support establishing a hunting authority he described as a 'government-funded lobby group'. Asked about the comments on Tuesday morning, Mr Minns described Mr Howard's urgent reforms as 'one of the best decisions any government has made' and hit back at claims the bill would allow access to military-style equipment. 'We won't be watering down gun laws in NSW,' Mr Minns told 2GB. 'Any suggestion we're going to introduce silencers, or night vision goggles, or body armour … Police oppose any changes to those provisions in the legislation, and I won't support them either. 'I'm also taking heed of his (Mr Howard's) warning not to have a government-funded gun lobby. That's not what we need in NSW or Australia.' Mr Minns hit back at claims of a deal with the NSW Shooters. The Premier said he was 'open at looking at' a potential bounty scheme, which is not an explicit provision of the bill, but would open up recreational hunters to killing feral animals and then collecting a bounty. 'There's recreational shooters in forests across Australia, across NSW, every weekend, that are getting rid of feral pests,' he said. 'Is there a way of allowing them to shoot a lot of these pests that cause significant damage to private land and public land?' The bill is due back before a parliamentary committee on Friday. It has faced stiff opposition from the NSW Animal Justice Party and the Greens, but is general supported by the major parties who both proposed amendments when the bill was still before the NSW upper house earlier this year. In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, John Howard said he was 'totally opposed' to any weakening of gun laws. He said: 'They have worked well, they have saved lives and they are the envy of the rest of the world. 'There are no politics in this as far as I'm concerned.'
