US Supreme Court rules South Carolina can defund Planned Parenthood, paving the way for other states
The US Supreme Court has paved the way for states to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood, one of the country's largest abortion providers, by ruling South Carolina can effectively defund the service.
Planned Parenthood, which provides a wide range of reproductive health services across the US, is already barred from receiving federal money for abortion care.
This latest ruling, supported by six of the Supreme Court's nine judges, allows South Carolina, and potentially other states who may wish to follow suit, to cut off reimbursements to the healthcare provider for low-income Americans who access care through a US government healthcare scheme known as Medicaid.
The case stems from an executive order issued by South Carolina's Republican governor Henry McMaster in 2018 cutting off Medicaid funding to the two Planned Parenthood clinics in the state.
The Medicaid reimbursements were not abortion-related, but Mr McMaster said providing any funding to Planned Parenthood amounts to a taxpayer "subsidy of abortion", which is banned in South Carolina for women who are more than six weeks pregnant.
Both Planned Parenthood and a South Carolina woman suffering from diabetes later launched a legal challenge, arguing that Medicaid patients have the right to receive care from any qualified provider.
An appeals court later overturned the executive order, before the state escalated the legal fight to the Supreme Court.
Thursday's verdict was split down ideological lines, with conservatives holding a 6-3 majority in the US's most powerful court.
The court ruled that a Medicaid patient cannot sue the state to receive medical care from a provider of their choosing.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent joined by the two other liberal justices, disagreed.
"Congress enacted the Medicaid Act's free-choice-of-provider provision to ensure that Medicaid recipients have the right to choose their own doctors," Ms Jackson said.
"Today's decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people."
The Supreme Court ruling was welcomed by the anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, which called it a "major win for babies and their mothers."
It clears the way for South Carolina and other states "to stop funding big abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood in their Medicaid programs," it said on X.
Paige Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, called the ruling a "grave injustice" and said it "promises to send South Carolina deeper into a healthcare crisis."
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark 1973 case that established federal protections for abortion access, in June 2022.
Since then, more than 20 of the 50 US states have imposed strict limits on abortion, or even outright bans.
AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
37 minutes ago
- ABC News
Hegseth accuses US media of cheering against Trump
The US Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has accused the media of cheering against the Donald Trump over reporting on the damage done by US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Iran claims victory over Israel, downplays US strikes
Iran claims it has "won" over Israel, criticised United States China accuses NATO of smearing its reputation in "reckless" expansion Holly McNamara helps Matildas secure win over Lithuania Iran's Supreme leader is claiming his country won its war with Israel. In his first public comment since the ceasefire was announced earlier this week, Ali Khamenei has posted a message of congratulations to his countrymen, saying Iran has slapped the United States in the face. He's also warning Iran would attack the United States again if provoked. He says US President Donald Trump is exaggerating the damage done by U-S attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. "The President of the United States made an unusual exaggeration in describing what had happened; it became clear that he needed this exaggeration. If aggression occurs, the cost for both the enemy and the protester will certainly be high.' Khamenei hasn't been seen in public since going underground when Israeli bombing started on the 13th of June. The White House is reporting US President Donald Trump has ended "the immediate threat" of Iranian nuclear program. The White House and Pentagon are still trying to discredit a leaked intelligence report that said the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities had been mostly superficial. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a press briefing that the U-S mission to bomb Iran's nuclear infrastructure would "go down in the history books" as an "overwhelming success." 'President Trump finally ended the immediate threat of a nuclear Iranian regime. Following President Trump's command, the most powerful military in the history of the world executed massive precision strikes on three of the Iranian regime's key nuclear facilities.' She also said Trump "wants peace" and US officials are in communication with Iranian leaders. China's Foreign Minister has accused NATO Secretary Generalof hyping up regional tensions to justify a sharp increase in the alliance's military spending. The pledge by all but one of the NATO member states to raise defence spending by 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 was reached at the NATO summit in The Hague, alongside a renewed commitment to defend one another from attacks. Guo Jiakun described the move as recklessly expanding NATO's powers and strategically pushing into the Asia Pacific. 'China urges NATO to deeply reflect on itself, heed the just calls of the international community, abandon outdated Cold War thinking, bloc confrontation, and zero-sum games, correct its wrongful perceptions about China, and stop manipulating China-related issues. China will firmly safeguard its sovereignty, security, and development interests and will continue to contribute to global peace and stability through concrete actions.' The Opposition continues to push for Australia's defence spending to be lifted, claiming current spending is not adequate to meet the threats of a volatile global environment. On the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Defence Minister Richard Marles resisted pressure from President Donald Trump to lift military spending, saying Australia would decide its own spending levels to meet its own military needs. His comments were made after NATO member countries - Australia is not a member - agreed to increase defence spending targets to 5 per cent of G-D-P. Opposition Defence Minister Angus Taylor says the government must follow suit and increase defence spending to at least 3 per cent of G-D-P to ensure its military is prepared for an increasingly unstable global security environment. "We need to have the serious capability on the ground to be able to play our role in this more uncertain world. That means getting spending to 3% of GDP, and that was a position we took to the last election, and it's a position we maintain, and we will continue to hold the government to account on its failure to fund its own plan." Traditional custodians will travel to Paris next week to raise concerns with the United Nations, about a draft decision to deny a World Heritage listing for WA's ancient Murujuga rock art collection. There are more than 1 million petroglyphs at the Pilbara site, which is adjacent to a Woodside gas plant. Last month, UNESCO indicated it would not be approving a World Heritage listing for the petroglyphs, because of damage from nearby industry. UNESCO's decision came as the state and federal government's gave Woodside permission to extend its Northwest Shelf gas plant for another 40 years. In football, Holly McNamara has scored her first international goal, but new Matildas coach Joe Montemurro was left with plenty to ponder, after his side scratched out an unconvincing 3-0 win over Slovenia in Perth. Emily Gielnik's third-minute strike in Thursday night's match at H-B-F Park got the 15th-ranked Matildas off to a flyer, but it wasn't until McNamara scored in the 86th minute that the win was safe. Although the 3-0 scoreline looked good on paper, the performance was far from slick in front of a crowd of just over 8 and a half thousand people. The under-strength Matildas were error-prone throughout the night, especially in defence where they attempted to play their way out of trouble at every chance.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Young woman reveals why she got a surgery on the rise in Australia
A video of a young woman bursting into tears over her appearance has broken social media users' hearts after she revealed the reason behind her tears. Amy Hills, 24, had a lot of physical and mental pain and strain due to the size of her G to H cup breasts. It also led to the calcification of her spine and her neck being curved the wrong way — to the point she was developing a hump on the back of her neck. 'I did need my partner to help with some of my daily living activities at one point, which was really difficult — things like showering and dressing when the pain was so bad I couldn't live my life,' she told Ms Hills even had to wear a back brace. She felt like she couldn't present to the world in the way that she wanted. Breast reduction surgery had always been in the back of her mind — from as young as 13 — but five years ago after seeing details about the procedure on social media she buried herself in her own research. This helped Ms Hills realise that it was actually an option, so she went to her GP. It took three to four tries to submit a referral to the local hospital to get on the surgical waitlist. Once she was approved, she had to wait for an initial appointment with a surgeon and then spent another year with her name on the public waitlist for a surgery date. The Brisbane woman said the waiting game was a 'struggle' but she did understand bureaucratic processes do take their time, and that for plastics there are people who are going through other things that need priority. When she got the call, she burst into tears and felt on top of the world. Ms Hills said getting her surgery date locked it felt like she was 'finally being listened to'. She said she looked into the private system but the extreme cost difference — $20,000 compared to $250 for two post-operation bras — made her hesitate. She also wanted to highlight that her care in the public system was 'exceptional'. On the day of her surgery, she was anxious that it would be cancelled, but thankfully it wasn't. She said when she woke up, she had swelled up and had a bad reaction to the medication, but overall the recovery 'wasn't bad at all'. Ms Hills is now a 10D or 12C and says the difference is 'astronomical'. 'When I woke up, I was like 'oh my god, I don't have any boobs anymore' but I am used to them now,' she said. It's been just over two months since her surgery, and her back pain and neck hump has essentially gone. She said she can now breathe easier, adding that everything in her life feels more comfortable – including buying the clothes she wants to wear. Ms Hills added her partner has been an incredible support not only through the initial pain, but also during recovery. All he wanted was for Ms Hills to be free of pain and feel like herself after more than a decade of feeling uncomfortable. During Ms Hills' recovery, she shared a clip of herself crying due to the amount of pain she was in following the surgery. 'I felt like all I could see was my breasts — and that's all anyone else could see too … I thought in that moment, no pain can last forever so I decided to record that moment and see how far I've come,' she said. 'It's indescribable to be able to do that now.' She said she also wanted others to realise they weren't alone, and is sharing her story so that others realise it's a possibility to be free of the pain and mental load of having a larger chest. Ms Hills said before having the procedure, everything felt so 'degrading' and is stunned by the difference the surgery has made to her life. Dr David Morgan, the president of the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons, told that in his experience breast reductions are becoming popular — but that may be reflective of his practice. 'It's easy to understand why women would be more inclined to consider the procedure, as virtually all women who undergo breast reduction are extremely happy with the outcome and are not afraid to talk about the benefits with friends and acquaintances,' Dr Morgan said. 'This encourages those who might have never been aware of the procedure, or who have been considering it for some time but haven't quite made the decision to proceed, to seek out a consultation. 'Almost universally, those that have had the procedure call it the 'best thing I've ever done', and that they 'should have done it years ago'. When new patients hear during their consultation the feedback that they have heard is validated, they are much more inclined to proceed to surgery. 'They are also reassured by the fact that the post-operative discomfort is relatively mild and short-lived, and that the scarring is well hidden and generally quite acceptable. Down time is only a few weeks, with most women returning to some exercise at four weeks, and full activity by six weeks.' He said the benefits are 'literally life-changing' and helps relieve symptoms of back and shoulder pain and difficulty finding clothing. He said he typically sees women in early adulthood, after having a family or during peri-menopause. But he highlighted that, as with all surgeries there are risks, particularly as it as under general anaesthetic and there are risks such as bleeding and infection. 'Other concerns, particularly for younger women, relate to the ability to breastfeed in the future. As many techniques leave the nipple attached to underlying breast tissue, then the ability to feed is maintained,' he said. 'Of course, not every woman who wishes to feed a baby (regardless having had any surgery) can successfully do so, and this is discussed, as well. Finally, especially in the older women, we always recommend a mammogram prior to surgery to ensure that there are no areas of concern beforehand. Even once cleared, all tissue removed during a reduction is sent off for evaluation to ensure that there are no signs of cancer. 'Nonetheless, in more than 20 years of practice, I have had five breast cancers detected in the tissue. Most did not require any further treatment other than closer surveillance.'
