Parents are raving about massive Amazon paddling pool that inflates in 2 minutes & it's been slashed from £35 to £9
LOOKING for a cheap way to beat the heat this summer?
Look no further than Amazon for the perfect pool that will keep you cool as temperatures continue to soar.
2
2
The budget-friendly pool has just been slashed in price and is now just £8.99.
Reduced from £34.99, that's an incredible 74% off.
Families are racing to get their hands on the Bestway 6ft inflatable pool, which is great for smaller gardens.
Better yet, the pool is easy to set up and can be ready for water in just 10 minutes.
Simply select a level surface, inflate the top ring and fill.
And when it comes time to take the pool down the simple flow control drain valve makes for easy draining and disassembly.
If you are on the hunt for something slightly bigger, the paddling pool also comes in 8ft and 10ft options.
With an average rating of 4.2 stars out of five on Amazon, it's clear families have been loving the pool too.
One said: "I love how easy this is to set up and deflate. It does take a while to fill but that's due to the capacity of the pool
"It's easy to get in and out of. I will say is when you lean on the side you will loose water."
Swimming pool named best in the UK has new £2.5million splash park and soft play
"Great, cheap pool. Massive and only need to blow up 1 ring," another wrote.
And another happy shopper said: "As 40 year old kid, I wanted to something to enjoy and cool down with a cocktail at the weekend in 32C daytime."
They added: "I am also 6 foot. Nice to lay out/slightly float and rest my head on the side. Of course designed for kids! But this could fit 2/3 adults sitting. Or one taller person sprawled out, with a beer gut, perfectly."
Not only that, but the shopper noted they had no problems with inflating the pool, and noted it was up for four days "with no issue."
More bargain pools for summer
The Range is offering an Avenli Prompt Set Pool Set for an impressive reduced price.
The budget retailer has slashed the price of its pool offering from £49.99 to just £34.99 .
Click and collect is available at no extra cost, which might be a better option if you want to collect for the weekend.
The inflatable measures 3m x 3m x 76cm.
Asda are offering up a shark themed pool, perfect for animal loving kids and it only costs £15.
Shoppers ordering via home delivery and click and collect will be charged £4.
Asda's offering measures in at 1.93m x 2.21m x 68cm making it suitable for kids aged two and older.
How to bag a bargain
SUN Savers Editor Lana Clements explains how to find a cut-price item and bag a bargain…
Sign up to loyalty schemes of the brands that you regularly shop with.
Big names regularly offer discounts or special lower prices for members, among other perks.
Sales are when you can pick up a real steal.
Retailers usually have periodic promotions that tie into payday at the end of the month or Bank Holiday weekends, so keep a lookout and shop when these deals are on.
Sign up to mailing lists and you'll also be first to know of special offers. It can be worth following retailers on social media too.
When buying online, always do a search for money off codes or vouchers that you can use vouchercodes.co.uk and myvouchercodes.co.uk are just two sites that round up promotions by retailer.
Scanner apps are useful to have on your phone. Trolley.co.uk app has a scanner that you can use to compare prices on branded items when out shopping.
Bargain hunters can also use B&M's scanner in the app to find discounts in-store before staff have marked them out.
And always check if you can get cashback before paying which in effect means you'll get some of your money back or a discount on the item.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
World Bank urges 'radical' debt transparency for developing countries
LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - The World Bank is urging "radical" debt transparency for developing countries and their lenders to stave off future crises, it said in a report released on Friday. The Bank wants to broaden the depth and detail of what sovereign countries disclose regarding new loans, as more of them enter complex, off-budget borrowing deals due to global market turmoil. "When hidden debt surfaces, financing dries up and terms worsen," World Bank senior managing director Axel van Trotsenburg said in a statement, adding: "Radical debt transparency, which makes timely and reliable information accessible, is fundamental to break the cycle." The Bank wants countries to make legal and regulatory reforms that mandate transparency when signing new loan contracts and to share more granular debt data. It also wants more regular audits, the public release of debt restructuring terms, and for creditors to open their loan and guarantee books. It is calling for better tools for international financial institutions to detect misreporting. The World Bank and other multilateral banks have been pressing for years to improve lending transparency. The proportion of low-income countries reporting some debt data is now above 75%, up from below 60% in 2020. But only 25% of them disclose loan-level information. As financing costs spike due to trade wars and geopolitical risk, more countries are using arrangements such as central bank swaps and collateralized transactions that complicate reporting. Senegal has used private debt placements as it negotiates with the International Monetary Fund over misreporting of its previous debts, and Cameroon and Gabon have also used what are known as "off-screen" deals. Angola recently had to pay a $200-million margin call after a rout in its bond prices. In Nigeria, the central bank disclosed in early 2023 that billions of U.S. dollars of its foreign exchange reserves were tied up in complex financial contracts negotiated by the previous leadership. The Bank said broader loan coverage and deeper loan-by-loan disclosures would enable the international community to fully assess public debt exposure.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Uncle Sam's stablecoin passion has shaky rationale
LONDON, June 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Uncle Sam is going all-in on stablecoins. President Donald Trump backed, opens new tab the privately issued cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to the U.S. dollar within days of his inauguration in January. Now Congress is poised to legislate, after the Senate this week approved the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins – or GENIUS - Act. The newly supportive regulatory environment has drawn a flood of interest from potential issuers, from major banks, opens new tab to retailers, opens new tab such as Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab and (AMZN.O), opens new tab, according to media reports. Meanwhile stablecoin specialist Circle Internet, opens new tab(CRCL.N), opens new tab, which listed on the New York Stock Exchange this month, has a digital dollar surrogate, USDC, which already has coins worth over $60 billion in circulation, opens new tab. Commercial interest is nothing new. Tech-savvy American corporates have long recognised stablecoins as the one species of digital money with a compelling mainstream use. The first generation of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin offered not just a way of digitally storing and transferring value, but the ability to denominate it in their own standard units. That model caught on with speculative traders but never made much headway in the world of digital payments. Stablecoins, by contrast, combine the novelty of global, real-time availability and programmability with the familiarity of national currency units. That makes them uninteresting as speculative bets – but well suited as methods for payment. A simple comparison shows how the two models serve different purposes. Bitcoin – the original and by far the largest own-standard cryptocurrency – has tokens in circulation worth $2.1 trillion. That's nearly 10 times the value of the two biggest stablecoins, USDT and USDC, combined. Yet when it comes to transactions, the leaderboard is reversed. Less than 3% of those bitcoins change hands in a 24-hour period, compared to nearly 40% of the two stablecoins. The payments business is a big target for disruption. Visa (V.N), opens new tab and Mastercard (MA.N), opens new tab – the two largest processors of fiat currency payments – reported combined revenue of $74 billion last year and enjoy net profit margins of around 50%. That's quite a market at which to take aim. Moreover, stablecoin issuers collect interest on the collateral backing their digital coins as well as harvesting transaction processing fees. That's how Circle made a cool $1.7 billion in revenue last year. It's not hard to see why potential stablecoin issuers have been lining up for years. Nevertheless early projects flopped, notably Facebook owner Meta Platforms' (META.O), opens new tab ill-fated 2017 Libra stablecoin, opens new tab. That's because regulators and central bankers have not been nearly so keen. Three potential gremlins have been uppermost in their minds. The first is what would happen if stablecoins are not backed by sufficient high-quality, liquid collateral to make them redeemable at par on demand. A plague of pseudo-U.S. dollars would then circulate at varying discounts to the real greenback. That would undermine the so-called 'singleness of money, opens new tab' and destroy the co-ordinating role of the U.S. dollar as a unit of account. The regulators' second bugbear is the black economy. They fret that because stablecoins are effectively 'bearer securities', like physical banknotes, they are subject to know-your-customer and anti-money laundering rules only when their users seek to convert them into traditional bank deposits. In the meantime, they can be used to make payments anonymously just like physical cash. Finally, there is the risk that stablecoins erode the effectiveness of monetary policy. Physical greenbacks may be hard to track, but they are still issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve. A stablecoin issued by Amazon or Walmart might settle a macroeconomically significant volume of transactions between its customers and suppliers without ever formally touching the dollar. That could scramble the Fed's attempts to manage inflation by constraining liquidity. Yet none of these objections are new. Prudential risks are already a concern for money market funds and traditional banks. The anonymity of transactions is a feature of physical banknotes. The dilution of monetary policy is a familiar gripe of central bankers in emerging markets, where foreign currencies such as the dollar or euro often circulate alongside the national unit. What spooks regulators in the developed world is less the novelty of the risks than the frightening scale, scope, and speed which digitisation allows. That implies work-arounds can probably be found, especially if a unified clearing and settlement protocol connecting stablecoins to the traditional financial system, such as the ubyx, opens new tab concept announced this week, are adopted. Until this year, the caution of the regulators trumped the commercial interests of potential stablecoin issuers. What has helped to unblock the GENIUS Act is that the U.S. government believes it has spotted a fiscal benefit. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent set out, opens new tab his reasoning immediately after the Senate approved the act. 'A thriving stablecoin ecosystem will drive demand from the private sector for U.S. Treasuries, which back stablecoins,' he wrote: 'This newfound demand could lower government borrowing costs and help rein in the national debt.' What's more, he argued, stablecoins could 'onramp millions of new users – across the globe – to the dollar-based digital asset economy', effectively opening up a new frontier of overseas funding for the U.S. budget deficit. Bessent cited projections that the stablecoin market could top $3.7 trillion by 2030. That's certainly not small change. It would be more than sufficient to soak up the $3 trillion that nonpartisan experts reckon, opens new tab Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add to the national debt over the next 10 years. Unfortunately, things are not so simple. The Treasury already effectively enjoys free foreign financing via overseas demand for U.S. dollar banknotes. The Fed estimates, opens new tab that over $1 trillion of them currently circulate abroad. If dollar-backed stablecoins simply replace demand for physical notes, there will be no net fiscal benefit. Another niggle is that while purchases of stablecoins may help finance the national debt, the tokens could facilitate more payments that fly under the radar of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In 2022, the IRS estimated, opens new tab that nearly 12% of U.S. taxes go missing due to underreporting, implying a shortfall of around $600 billion in the most recent fiscal year. A surge in stablecoin usage could easily make that worse. Given the compelling commercial case and the likelihood that regulatory risks can be managed, it is ironic that the potential fiscal dividend that has finally convinced the U.S. government to bank on stablecoins is the shakiest rationale for embracing them. Follow @felixmwmartin, opens new tab on X
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
CMA to review wrong turns on road and rail building projects
The UK's competition regulator has opened an investigation into Whitehall's delivery of rail and road infrastructure. The inquiry by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) comes just a day after a damning report into the failed delivery of the HS2 high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham which is hugely over-budget, hopelessly late and which ministers have admitted has made Britain the laughing stock of infrastructure investment. It also follows the government's renationalisation of the railways, which it is planning to complete incrementally over the next couple of years. • What happened to HS2? The project that made Britain a laughing stock The CMA said its inquiry would focus 'on persistent issues around costs and delivery of road and railway infrastructure across the country', especially in the light of Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves's new ten-year infrastructure strategy to help grow the economy. 'There's no question that reliable, high-quality infrastructure is critical in accelerating economic growth,' said Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA. 'To achieve this, public authorities and the civil engineering sector must be able to work together to deliver projects on time, within budget and to high standards. 'This review is a crucial step in identifying barriers holding back the sector — supporting the drive to get Britain building and ensuring every penny spent is delivering value for taxpayers.' Identifying the long-standing friction and dysfunctional procurement engagement between Whitehall and its agencies, and private sector contractors, the CMA inquiry states: 'The market study will examine whether there are opportunities to improve how the public sector and industry work together, for example through improvements to public procurement, so more cost-effective infrastructure can be built in support of the government's growth mission.' • Pumping money into infrastructure may not keep Labour in power The CMA said it would make recommendations to government but does not have the power to intervene in the market directly. Civil engineering is reckoned to be worth £23 billion annually to the UK economy. The National Infrastructure Commission has estimated that public and private sector investment will need to increase by up to 50 per cent over the next decade to deliver more complex infrastructure. Road and railway projects account for up to 75 per cent of government spending on economic infrastructure such as transportation and energy. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors indicated the sector has previously suffered from a lack of what its chief executive Justin Young called a 'clear, joined-up infrastructure strategy that incorporates long-term thinking and vision'. Young said he believes 'the country is on a considerably clearer path and represents a significant shift in how the government approaches infrastructure and industrial capacity', but warned of 'skills and labour shortages [that] stifle construction projects and investment in skills for new professionals'.
