Worrying number of pubs and restaurants that have put prices up revealed
Nearly eight out of 10 pubs, restaurants and others have upped prices as a direct result of government triggered cost increases, research has revealed.
More than half of hospitality firms questioned said they had also cut staff numbers since April's increase in employers' national insurance and the minimum wage. Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves insisted tax increases were needed to try to plug a hole in the public finances left by the Tories.
The results come as trade bodies joined forces to urge Labour to ease the pressure on the sector, amid fears of worse to come. Industry chiefs say April's increases have added £3.4billion a year to costs, and resulted in 84,000 jobs being lost since last year's autumn Budget.
The British Institute of Innkeeping, the British Beer & Pub Association, UKHospitality and Hospitality Ulster came together to make a fresh plea.
In a joint statement, they said: 'This shocking data reinforces the urgent need for government to recognise the incredible pressure hospitality businesses have been put under, particularly since April, and illustrates why it should come forward with measures to support this vital sector at the Budget.
'Unsustainable tax increases are squeezing businesses, stifling growth and investment, and threatening local employment, especially for young people. It is forcing businesses across the sector to make impossible decisions to cut jobs, put up prices, reduce opening hours and sadly limit the support they desperately want to give their communities.
'Hospitality is united in which measures will reverse this trend and drive growth: a reduction in VAT for hospitality, changes to employer NICs and permanently lower business rates for the sector. Now is the time to act and back a vital British sector that supports the economy, jobs, and local communities. We urge the Government to do so at the Budget this autumn.'
It follows recent figures showing nearly five pubs were lost for good across Britain every week in the first half of this year, with more than 600 standing empty long term. It takes the number of pubs that have closed since 2016 to almost 5,000, according to data from the Campaign for Real Ale (Camra).
There have also been warning about the impact of tax rises on the high street too. The number of high street firms going bust is on track to surge by more than a quarter this year, experts have warned.
The latest casualty is Claire's Accessories, which has gone into administration, threatening more than 2,000 job losses. Bargain chain Poundland has also announced a number of store closures.
Industry experts Kroll said: 'Our data suggests that at current levels, there will be a 25% increase in retail failures year-on-year.'
Latest data also suggests a rise in private schools going under after the government added VAT to fees.
However, figures from the Insolvency Service showed only a small rise in business failures despite tax rises and the weak state of the economy.
Official data showed there were 2,081 company insolvencies in England and Wales in July, edging up by 1% compared with June. Experts said firms are being challenged by 'relentless uncertainty' in the global economic environment.
Simon Edel, UK turnaround and restructuring strategy partner at EY-Parthenon, said: 'Many businesses are also contending with higher costs including recent increases to employer national insurance contributions and the national living wage.
"With interest rates still relatively high - alongside significant working capital demands and a constrained credit environment - liquidity pressures are intensifying for more UK companies. This is causing more businesses to call time.'
A government spokesperson said: 'Our Plan for Change recognises the vital importance of pubs, cafes and restaurants to local communities.
'That's why we're cutting the cost of licensing, helping more pubs, cafes and restaurants offer pavement drinks and al fresco dining and extending business relief for these businesses - on top of cutting alcohol duty on draught pints and capping corporation tax.'
The government has said small businesses will not see a rise in National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and that any rise in NICs will help pay for the NHS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
25 minutes ago
- ITV News
Morecambe FC match against Altrincham will go ahead under new manager Ashir Singh Johal
Morecambe FC will play Altricham as planned on Saturday, 23 August, under new manager Ashvir Singh Johal. The Shrimp's previous two league matches were postponed following the club's suspension for failing to comply with National League rules. The club took to X to confirm that tickets are now on sale for their match at home to the Robins, despite doubts over whether the new manager could rebuild an 11-man squad in time. Morecambe FC, who were relegated from League Two at the end of the 2024/25 Season, were suspended from the National League in July amid ongoing financial issues. The suspension has now been lifted, with Owners Bond Group and investment firm Panjab Warriors agreeing a deal for the sale of the club, after more than a year of protracted talks and the Shrimps at risk of "immediate closure". The new owners first action was to part ways with manager Derek Adams, announcing Ashvir Singh Johal as the club's new manager just hours later. The 30-year-old is now the youngest head coach in the top five tiers of English football, and the first Sikh to take on the role at a British football club. Despite the uncertainty of the immediate future, the new boss is looking to the long term. 'The immediate priority right now is going to be to identify the players that we need in this building to ensure Morecambe Football Club can perform well in the National League,' he said in an interview with the club's official website. 'I think the short-term plan this year is to make sure that we retain our place in the National League by playing exciting, energetic football and working hard. I think that is a short-term aim. 'The long-term aim is to build the processes, the infrastructure. There's a clear commitment from the owners about the direction they want the club to go in. 'OK, now it's about building, and it's about growing and making sure that in three, four, five years' time, this is a completely energised and galvanised more football club that thrives in the EFL.' The club has confirmed the National League has lifted the embargo, and they are now free to sign players ahead of their first match.
Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves' 'mansion tax' plan: What is capital gains tax, who pays and what could change?
In the latest furore over Labour's plans for property taxes, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reported to be considering charging some homeowners a levy if they sell their home and make a profit. It follows reports in the last few days that the Government is mulling over sweeping changes to stamp duty and council tax, in a bid to fill the £51billion fiscal black hole. At the moment, people don't have to pay tax if they sell the home they live in and the price has increased since they bought it - known in tax parlance as a 'capital gain'. But according to The Times, Reeves is considering changing this rules so they would have to pay this, if they made more than a certain amount of money. We explain what taxes people currently pay when selling property, how much they pay and what could potentially change. What is capital gains tax? Capital gains tax is levied on profits from assets including second homes, buy-to-let properties, stocks and shares and personal possessions. It is not currently charged when people sell their main home, which they live in full-time, but this is what Reeves is reported to be considering changing. It's important to note that it is only charged on increase in value or 'gain' made on the property or shares, not on the whole value. Everyone also gets an annual capital gains tax-free allowance of £3,000, so any gains below this aren't taxed. How much is capital gains tax? It depends on which tax band the person is in. If you are a basic rate taxpayer, with an annual income of up to £50,271, you pay 18 per cent. If you are a higher or additional-rate taxpayer, earning £50,271 or more, you pay 24 per cent. Take, for example, a landlord who purchased a buy-to-let property for £200,000 and sold it a decade later for £230,000 - requiring them to pay capital gains tax under the current rules. They would only pay tax on the £30,000 increase in value. If they were a basic-rate taxpayer, this would be charged at 18 per cent. This would set their bill at £5,400. However, if they hadn't made any other capital gains that tax year, they could use their £3,000 annual allowance to cut the bill to £2,400. Selling costs such as an estate agent and solicitors can sometimes be deducted. What is private residence relief? Private residence relief is the name for the tax exemption which means those selling their main home don't pay capital gains tax, no matter how much it increases in value. This is what Rachel Reeves is said to be considering taking away, or making changes to. What is being proposed? According to The Times, people selling their home would now need to pay capital gains tax at the rates described above - but only if their home was above a certain price threshold. It is not yet known how much a property would need to be worth, or how much the 'gain' would need to be, for the home seller to be drawn into the tax net. The Times said a threshold of £1.5million would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973. At current rates, a home bought for £800,000 and sold for £1millon by a higher-rate taxpayer would attract a capital gains tax bill of £47,280, before any deductions. Who will it affect? Older homeowners looking to downsize could be hit especially hard, as well as anyone who has lived in their property for a long time or experienced big house price gains. Those who have stayed in the same home for decades and enjoyed large property price rises could find themselves hit with a bill worth tens or even hundreds of thousands. This could prevent them from downsizing at all. The average house price in London in 1980 was £25,732, according to the Land Registry. Today, that has jumped to about £561,000 - though many family-sized homes in areas of the capital that have experienced gentrification could be worth double that. If capital gains tax was charged at current rates, a basic rate-taxpayer couple selling a £561,000 home could face a tax bill of £114,180, after deducting £5,000 for selling costs. However, it may be that a home worth that much could fall under the threshold. Stephen Perkins, managing director at Norwich-based Yellow Brick Mortgages, said: 'I can see a lot of families in London being caught with this higher tax bill. 'It may push more wealthy tax contributors to exodus the UK, which is already a problem following the Chancellor's last budget.' Why is it controversial? Some are terming the increase a 'mansion tax' which punishes people who have worked hard to buy a nice home. Harps Garcha, director at Slough-based financial adviser Brooklyns Financial, told the news agency Newspage: 'The Government's plan will have a massive impact on London and the South East, where many middle-class families have sacrificed themselves for years to build wealth through their homes. 'These homeowners expected to rely on that equity in retirement by downsizing, yet they now face being taxed twice, first through stamp duty and then capital gains. 'Rather than rewarding prudence, this policy punishes those who have worked hard and planned responsibly for their future.' Property experts also say taxing homeowners could would gum up the property market, as people at the top end of the ladder would be less inclined to move. This could increase the number of older people in homes that are too big, and young families could struggle to upsize. If people were less likely to move because of the policy, this might even limit the amount of money the Treasury might raise from the tax. Tom Bill, head of UK residential research at estate agent Knight Frank, said: 'Anyone with a taxable gain would think twice before selling, which would reduce transaction numbers. 'The Government seems to want a predictable flow of revenue that is skewed towards the wealthiest homeowners. 'That would be best achieved by re-banding council tax rather than introducing transaction taxes that change behaviour in the most discretionary part of the property market to the point they fail to raise what is intended.' When could this change happen? This change is reported to be an announcement being tabled for the Autumn Budget, in October or November. It is unclear when the new rule, if it was announced, would come into effect. One potential problem is that any announcement could create a rush of people trying to sell their homes before the new tax was put in place, to avoid paying it. When Rachel Reeves announced an additional stamp duty levy on landlords last year, this came into effect immediately to stop people from doing this. What has changed already? In recent years, both Conservative and Labour governments have made the capital gains tax allowances less generous. The annual capital gains tax-free allowance was £12,300 until April 2023, which meant it was typically only levied on wealthier taxpayers. However, radical cuts to the CGT allowance - to £6,000 in spring 2023 and £3,000 from April 2024 - make it inevitable that many more people will now have to pay capital gains tax. Rachel Reeves also increased capital gains tax for stocks and shares investors in last year's Autumn Budget. The rate charged increased from 10 per cent to 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers and 20 per cent to 24 per cent for those paying higher rates of tax. This brought them into line with the already higher levies on property. The Treasury's response The Treasury declined to comment to the Daily Mail on 'speculation' about future changes to tax policy. A spokesman said: 'As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. 'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8billion and cut borrowing by £3.4billion 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT.'
