Calls to scrap two-child benefit cap over child poverty link
'Bold action' is needed, the campaign said ahead of Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review this month, as they called for the cap to be scrapped as soon as possible.
The policy means parents only receive support for up to two children through the universal credit system.
Analysis of the child poverty rate and the proportion of children affected by the two-child limit found that the two are 'extremely highly correlated', adding to evidence that the cap is a 'major driver of child poverty across the UK'.
In the North East, West Midlands and Wales, around nine out of 10 constituencies were found to have a child poverty rate higher than one in four.
Birmingham Ladywood, Dewsbury and Batley and Bradford West were among those with the highest rates.
Sir Keir Starmer and the Chancellor are under pressure to respond to mounting calls for the two-child benefit cap to be axed at a cost of around £3.5 billion.
Ministers have reportedly been considering scrapping it as part of their child poverty strategy, which was due to be published in the spring but is now set to come out in the autumn so it can be aligned with the Chancellor's budget.
Dan Paskins, vice-chairman of the End Child Poverty Coalition, said the data presents a 'bleak picture of life' for the UK's children.
'A record number are now in poverty and this is under the noses of our MPs, particularly Cabinet members. 80% of Keir Starmer's Cabinet represent constituencies with higher-than-average child poverty rates.
'The time for action is now, and the Comprehensive Spending Review and forthcoming child poverty strategy should involve bold action.
'Due to the analysis's finding (of) a strong correlation between child poverty rates in local areas and the number of children impacted by the two-child limit to universal credit, it is essential this policy is scrapped as soon as possible.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'This Government is determined to bring down child poverty.
'We've already expanded free breakfast clubs, introduced a cap on the cost of school uniforms, increased the national minimum wage for those on the lowest incomes, uprated benefits in April and supported 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions.
'We will publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully-funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Proof that Starmer's 'smash the gangs' campaign is a joke: Small boat migrant tally hits 25,000 in record time
Keir Starmer 's pledge to 'smash the gangs' was in tatters on Thursday night after a new record was set for Channel crossings. More than 25,000 migrants have now arrived in the UK in small boats this year, the earliest the milestone has been hit. Nearly 900 migrants arrived in Dover from northern France on Wednesday, bringing the total for 2025 so far to 25,436, Home Office figures show. The record figure, represents a rise of more than 50 per cent on 2024, prompted demands for Labour to declare a 'national emergency'. One of the Prime Minister's first acts after winning power was to scrap the Conservatives ' Rwanda scheme, which was designed to deter migrants from risking the dangerous journey. A pilot for his 'one in, one out' migrant returns deal with France's President Macron - signed last month - has not yet begun. The scheme is expected to initially see just 50 Channel migrants a week swapped with asylum seekers already in France. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told the Mail: 'Starmer promised to smash the gangs, but all he's smashing is illegal immigration records instead. It will only get worse.' Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary, added: '2025 is the worst year on record so far and the Labour Government are doing nothing to stop the crossings. This is now a national emergency. 'Their 17 in one out deal with France will not even make a dent - it would take ten years for Yvette Cooper to deport the illegal immigrants that have arrived since the start of this year alone under her so-called deal which still hasn't started. 'The Conservative Party's Deportation Bill would bring this circus to an end. We would detain illegal arrivals on the spot, deport them without delay. If the ECHR stands in our way, we will leave it.' In 2024, the 25,000 mark was passed on September 22 and in 2023 it was even later, on October 2. The previous earliest it had been breached was in 2022 The first year in which at least 25,000 arrivals were recorded was 2022, when the milestone was passed on August 27, and the total went on to hit a record 45,774 by the end of December. Predictions suggest this year's total could hit 50,000. The jump in arrivals this year has coincided with a rise in the number of migrants making the perilous journey in a single craft. The average for 2025 is currently running at 59 people per boat, the highest on record, up from 53 in 2024 and 49 in 2023. On some days this year the average has been as high as 75. The Home Office has vowed to increase co-operation with France and the EU to tackle the criminal networks behind the crossings. French officials have been handed £771million of British taxpayers' money to step up patrols on beaches but continue to be criticised for their lax response. Fresh proof came on Tuesday, when pictures emerged showing a group of gendarmes standing idly by as a group of migrants headed to a smuggler's boat. One officer even appeared to be taking a selfie moments after the flimsy craft set sail towards the English coast. On Thursday, the National Crime Agency (NCA) announced it had worked with Bulgarian authorities to seize 25 small boats that were due to be used in the Channel. But the Conservatives have long insisted the crossings will continue without an effective deterrent. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'By scrapping the Rwanda deterrent, Starmer might as well have put up a big neon welcome sign on the cliffs of Dover. 'We will deport anyone who arrives here illegally.' Migrants who cross the Channel and claim asylum are usually moved into taxpayer-funded hotels, which have been the centre of repeated protests. These began at The Bell Hotel in Epping on July 13, after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl in the Essex town. Local political leaders have urged the Home Office to make the site a 'priority for urgent closure', citing community tensions that have put a strain on policing. Currently, 32,000 asylum seekers are housed in hotels at a cost of £3 billion per year. Pressure to reduce the use of hotels has prompted Sir Keir to announce 445 new places for asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex - despite previously pledging not to do so. Wethersfield is one of just two Home Office mass accommodation sites - along with Napier barracks in Folkestone which was already the largest. It is understood more adult migrants will be moved into the former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, on a short-term basis. The new milestone for small boat crossing comes as separate figures showed the population of England and Wales is estimated to have grown by more than 700,000 people in the year to June - driven almost entirely by international migration. There were an estimated 61.8million people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up 706,881 from 61.1million in mid-2023, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). It is the second-largest annual numerical rise in more than 75 years, with net international migration - the difference between people moving to the country and leaving - accounting for 98 per cent of the total, the ONS said. Commenting on the issue of small boat crossings, a Home Office spokesman said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Exposed: Labour's plot to silence migrant hotel critics
A secretive Whitehall 'spy' unit has been used by the Government to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two-tier policing'. The Telegraph can reveal that officials working for Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, have flagged videos with 'concerning narratives' to social media giants including TikTok, warning that they were 'exacerbating tensions' on the streets. Emails recovered by a US congressional committee show that civil servants have complained to tech firms about content mentioning asylum seekers, immigration and two-tier policing. The dossier has emerged as ministers battle claims that the UK is censoring social media with the Online Safety Act, including from allies of Donald Trump, the US president. The disclosure reveals that members of the Government's National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT) complained about a series of posts that were critical of mass migration and asylum hotels in August last year during the Southport riots. The team, based in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, was previously known as the Counter Disinformation Unit and was used during the Covid pandemic to monitor anti-lockdown campaigners. The exchanges are likely to fuel claims that Labour is seeking to silence criticism over its continued use of asylum hotels. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to end their use by 2029 amid concerns that they are costing taxpayers £4m a day and causing tensions in communities. The row over the hotels exploded again earlier this month when demonstrations broke out at a hotel in Epping after a migrant tried to kiss a teenager, with further protests on Thursday night. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has told the Cabinet the Government must take concerns about immigration seriously and do more to alleviate them. However, one post flagged by the government unit with 'urgency' included a photograph of a rejected Freedom of Information request about the location of asylum hotels, and a reference to asylum seekers as 'undocumented fighting-age males'. An unnamed civil servant warned there were 'significant risks' of protests at asylum hotels becoming violent because of the posts and there was a 'definite sense of urgency' about them in Whitehall. The emails were sent over Aug 3 and 4, 2024, the worst weekend of the riots, when protesters attacked asylum hotels across the UK. The violence spiralled after false claims circulated that the perpetrator of the Southport attack, where three little girls were killed, was a Muslim asylum seeker. The Government's private exchange with TikTok came days before Elon Musk, the tech billionaire owner of X and a former ally of Mr Trump, joined the criticism of 'two-tier Keir'. The same phrase was echoed by Nigel Farage, who warned police had created a 'sense of injustice'. In another email the same weekend, officials warned TikTok that users were posting about 'two-tier' policing at Southport rallies, amid accusations white protesters had been treated more harshly by the police than ethnic minorities. It said: 'I am sure you will not be surprised at the significant volumes of anti-immigrant content directed at Muslim and Jewish communities as well as concerning narratives about the police and a 'two-tier' system we are seeing across the online environment.' Officials requested that TikTok explain 'any measures you have taken in response…as soon as you are able to'. A third example of 'concerning content' flagged by the team was a video of Pakistani men celebrating on a street, posted on Aug 5 and captioned: 'Looks like Islamabad but it's Manchester'. The team claimed it had been shared 'in order to incite fear of the Muslim community'. The emails did not ask for the content to be removed, but requested that TikTok explain how it was dealing with it. However, critics say the emails amount to Government censorship of free speech online. The emails were revealed by Jim Jordan, chairman of the US House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee, which issued a subpoena to TikTok to hand over messages 'regarding the company's compliance with foreign censorship laws'. Mr Jordan said Labour ministers had censored posts that were critical of the Government's policy on asylum, warning critics of Sir Keir to 'watch out'. He said: 'In recent years, UK citizens have become increasingly fed up with the double standard in the UK. Mean tweets get you a longer prison sentence than many violent offences.' Government sources denied that officials had censored the posts, insisting that the unit's role is to monitor online 'trends' and point out where platforms' own rules had been broken. 'Unaccountable and secretive' However, the emails have prompted fresh scrutiny of the Government's secretive disinformation team, which was criticised during the pandemic for using the Government's 'trusted flagger' status to report critics of lockdown and child vaccinations. A spokesman for the campaign group Big Brother Watch called for an immediate investigation into the team, warning that an 'unaccountable and secretive government unit is spying on speech that is critical of the police and government policies'. 'Legitimate concerns about racism and violence must not become a blank cheque for the monitoring and censorship of controversial speech, absent of any oversight or scrutiny,' they added. Labour was recently criticised over the 'cover-up' of a secret resettlement programme for Afghans affected by a data leak in 2022. Officials worried that the announcement would create a 'risk of disorder'. Meanwhile, free speech campaigners have already raised concerns about the imprisonment of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months for a post about asylum hotels on the day of the Southport attacks. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'When I called out 'two-tier Keir', little did I realise Starmer's officials were pressurising tech companies to suppress debate about a 'two-tier' justice system. 'This Government's cynical attack on free speech will only further erode public confidence in the criminal justice system. 'The solution is to apply the law evenly to all groups, not to attempt to stifle criticism.' It is understood that Mr Jordan, a Trump ally, raised the TikTok emails directly with Mr Kyle on Wednesday. It is understood TikTok is one of several companies contacted by officials during the riots. Their meeting came a day after Mr Kyle said Nigel Farage was 'on the side' of Jimmy Savile for opposing the new online safety rules. Government sources said Mr Jordan's committee had misunderstood the role of NSOIT, which they said was to find out whether tech companies were taking action on harmful content, not to order them to remove it. A spokesman said: 'Free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy. The Online Safety Act protects it. Platforms have a duty to uphold freedom of expression, and the Act places no curbs whatsoever on what adults can say and see on the internet - unless it is something that would already be illegal, offline. 'The Government has no role in deciding what actions platforms take on legal content for adults – that is a matter for them according to their own rules – however we make no apologies for flagging to platforms content which is contrary to their own terms of service and which can result in violent disorder on our streets, as we saw in the wake of the horrific Southport attack.'
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's former shadow chancellor backs wealth tax
Sir Keir Starmer should consider introducing a wealth tax at the Budget this autumn, his former shadow chancellor has said. Anneliese Dodds urged the Prime Minister and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to look at 'how it would be possible' to impose a levy on the assets of the richest Britons. She has become the most senior Labour figure to call for a wealth tax, despite Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, rejecting demands for the 'daft' policy last week. Ms Dodds, who preceded Ms Reeves as shadow chancellor from April 2020 to May 2021, suggested new taxes on the wealthy could help the Government in the long term. She told Sky's Electoral Dysfunction podcast: 'What has changed the debate [...] is the work that was undertaken by the Commission on Wealth Tax. They looked at the operation of lots of different wealth taxes. 'They looked at all of that evidence and set out how it would be possible to deliver something like that in a UK context. I would hope that the Treasury is considering that kind of evidence, as well as other changes that have been put forward. 'We've seen the deputy leader of the Labour Party, for example, put forward suggestions. I think it's important for all of those to be considered now.' In May, The Telegraph revealed that Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and deputy Labour leader, had sent a secret memo to Ms Reeves pushing for eight new taxes. These included raids on the million people who pay the additional rate of income tax and a higher level of corporation tax for the banks. Ms Dodds said ministers faced a world of 'difficult trade-offs' before calling on Sir Keir to make 'some big and significant changes early' to avoid bigger problems in the future. Downing Street took more than a fortnight to rule out a wealth tax after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, suggested a 2 per cent tax on assets worth more than £10 million. Last week, Mr Reynolds told backbenchers to 'get serious' about proposals for such a levy, which experts have warned would hurt Britain's middle class. His comments came after 14 Labour MPs signed an early day motion in support of a wealth tax. The group claimed the move would 'represent a fairer alternative' to Sir Keir's cuts to disability benefits, which have been heavily watered down following a backbench revolt. Ms Dodds, the MP for Oxford East, served in Sir Keir's Cabinet as the development minister until her resignation in February over his cuts to the overseas aid budget. She warned on her departure that cutting foreign aid – a decision taken to boost defence spending – would bolster Russia and encourage China to rewrite the global rulebook. Reflecting on her resignation, Ms Dodds said: 'I obviously was informed about the decision to boost our defence spending in its entirety from the international development budget. 'I had anticipated that we were going to need to be boosting defence and I support that. I think we do need to make sure that we are more secure, and we need to be working very closely with a number of allies to deliver that. So I thought there would be that change.' Ms Dodds went on to say she had worried that the budget cut would not be a 'sustainable' one, adding: 'I was concerned [about] the immense soft power that we get from developments, and of course, people can mean a lot of different things from that term. 'That was, in some people's minds – certainly not the Prime Minister's, and he never has described it like this – but in some people's minds it was being opposed to hard power, to military power, when I'd seen directly the opposite.'
